| Peer-Reviewed

An Analysis of Inlet Inclination on the Performance of a Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclonic Separator

Received: 5 August 2019    Accepted: 24 August 2019    Published: 10 September 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Gas-Liquid cylindrical cyclonic separator plays a significant role with regards to gas-liquid separation in the oil fields. Its major operational challenges include liquid carryover and excessive pressure losses. The Inlet geometry of a gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone is one of its critical parts that affect the performance of the separator. The inlet geometry drives the performance of the separator in terms of liquid carryover and pressure drop. Traditionally, the 27° downward inclined inlet is usually used because of its advantage in terms of liquid carryover operating envelope. However, detail comparison in terms of pressure drop in the gas leg of the separator is yet to be reported. In this paper, the author presents experimental results on the effect of inlet inclination on the performance of a gas-liquid cyclonic separator in terms of separation efficiency (liquid carryover) and pressure drop. The results showed that under the same inlet conditions, the liquid carryover operating envelope of the 27° downward inclined inlet pipe cyclonic gas-liquid separator is slightly wider than the horizontal inlet of the same separator. However, the pressure drop across the gas leg of the 27° downward inclined inlet pipe cyclonic gas-liquid separator is far greater than the horizontal inlet of the same separator. The paper concludes that, where there is a strict requirement on pressure drop, the horizontal inlet cyclonic separator should be favoured against the 27° inclined inlet.

Published in International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12
Page(s) 82-88
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Multiphase Separation, Cyclonic Separator, Tangential Inlet, Inlet Inclination, Liquid Carryover, Inlet Nozzle, Pressure Transducer

References
[1] Msi, “A State-of-the-art, Highly Efficient and Reliable Compact Separator Providing Optimum Gas-Liquid Separation Performance at Minimum cost,” 2006. [Online]. Available: http://msieng.com/pages/sub/other/glcc.htm.
[2] G. E. Kouba, O. Shoham, and S. Shirazi, “Design and performance of gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone separators,” in Proceedings of the BHR Group 7th International Meeting on Multiphase Flow., Cannes, France, 1995, pp. 307-327.
[3] S. S. Kolla, R. S. Mohan, and O. Shoham, “A Study on the Effect of Fluid Properties and Watercut on Liquid Carry-Over in Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Compact Separators,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 141, no. 9, pp. 91303-91310, Apr. 2019.
[4] S. S. Kolla, R. S. Mohan, and O. Shoham, “Effect of Liquid Level on Gas Carry-Under in GLCC Compact Separators,” no. 51555. p. V001T07A005, 2018.
[5] S. S. Kolla, R. S. Mohan, and O. Shoham, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Study on the Effect of Inlet Modifications of Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone (GLCC©) Compact Separators,” no. 58066. p. V01CT14A007, 2017.
[6] V. van A. N. Nanninga, J. W. F. Janssen, “Gasunie/CDS Improvement of the Gasunie Cyclone Gas-Liquid Separator,” 2001.
[7] Z. Atakan, Y. D. Chin, P. P. Lang, and S. Iyer, “Design and Operability Considerations of the Gas Flowline at Parque das Conchas (BC-10) Ostra Field,” in Offshore Technology Conference, 3-6 May, Houston, Texas, USA, 2010.
[8] T. Yue et al., “Experimental and numerical study of Upper Swirling Liquid Film (USLF) among Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclones (GLCC),” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 358, pp. 806-820, 2019.
[9] W. A. Chirinos, L. E. Gomez, S. Wang, R. S. Mohan, O. Shoham, and G. E. Kouba, “Liquid Carry-Over in Gas/Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Compact Separators,” SPE J., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 259-267, Jan. 2000.
[10] O. Shoham and G. E. Kouba, “State of the Art of Gas/Liquid Cylindrical-Cyclone Compact-Separator Technology,” J. Pet. Technol., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 58-65, Jan. 1998.
[11] G. E. Kouba, S. Wang, L. E. Gomez, R. S. Mohan, and O. Shoham, “Review of the State-of-the-Art Gas/Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone (GLCC) Technology—Field Applications,” International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition in China. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Beijing, China, 2006.
[12] I. Arpandi, A. R. Joshi, O. Shoham, S. Shirazi, and G. E. Kouba, “Hydrodynamics of Two-Phase Flow in Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators,” in SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition held in Dallas, U.S.A., 22-25 October 1995., 1996.
[13] S. Movafaghian, J. a Jaua-marturet, R. S. Mohan, and O. Shoham, “The effects of geometry, fluid properties and pressure on the hydrodynamics of gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone separators,” vol. 26, pp. 999-1018, 2000.
[14] R. Hreiz, C. Gentric, N. Midoux, R. Lainé, and D. Fünfschilling, “Hydrodynamics and velocity measurements in gas-liquid swirling flows in cylindrical cyclones,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 2231-2246, 2014.
[15] R. Hreiz, R. Lainé, J. Wu, C. Lemaitre, C. Gentric, and D. Fünfschilling, “On the effect of the nozzle design on the performances of gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone separators,” Int. J. Multiph. Flow, vol. 58, pp. 15-26, Jan. 2014.
[16] N. Barbuceanu, S. Scott, A. Texas, and S. Scott, “SPE 71555 Novel Inlet Design Expense Range of Operability for Compact Separator,” Spe 71555, 2001.
[17] I. Uvwo, “Expanding the Operational Envelope of Compact Cylindrical Cyclone Gas / Liquid Separators Using a Variable Inlet-Slot Configuration Expanding the Operational Envelope of Compact Cylindrical Cyclone Gas / Liquid Separators Using a Variable Inlet-Slot Confi,” no. December 2004.
[18] E. S. Rosa, F. A. França, and G. S. Ribeiro, “The cyclone gas-liquid separator: operation and mechanistic modeling,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 87-101, 2001.
[19] R. Hreiz, R. Lainé, J. Wu, C. Lemaitre, C. Gentric, and D. Fünfschilling, “On the effect of the nozzle design on the performances of gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone separators,” Int. J. Multiph. Flow, vol. 58, pp. 15-26, Jan. 2014.
[20] O. Kristiansen, Ø. Sørensen, and O. R. Nilssen, “CompactSep TM - Compact Subsea Gas-Liquid Separator for High-Pressure,” 2016.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sunday Kanshio. (2019). An Analysis of Inlet Inclination on the Performance of a Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclonic Separator. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 7(3), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sunday Kanshio. An Analysis of Inlet Inclination on the Performance of a Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclonic Separator. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2019, 7(3), 82-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sunday Kanshio. An Analysis of Inlet Inclination on the Performance of a Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclonic Separator. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2019;7(3):82-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12,
      author = {Sunday Kanshio},
      title = {An Analysis of Inlet Inclination on the Performance of a Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclonic Separator},
      journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
      volume = {7},
      number = {3},
      pages = {82-88},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20190703.12},
      abstract = {Gas-Liquid cylindrical cyclonic separator plays a significant role with regards to gas-liquid separation in the oil fields. Its major operational challenges include liquid carryover and excessive pressure losses. The Inlet geometry of a gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone is one of its critical parts that affect the performance of the separator. The inlet geometry drives the performance of the separator in terms of liquid carryover and pressure drop. Traditionally, the 27° downward inclined inlet is usually used because of its advantage in terms of liquid carryover operating envelope. However, detail comparison in terms of pressure drop in the gas leg of the separator is yet to be reported. In this paper, the author presents experimental results on the effect of inlet inclination on the performance of a gas-liquid cyclonic separator in terms of separation efficiency (liquid carryover) and pressure drop. The results showed that under the same inlet conditions, the liquid carryover operating envelope of the 27° downward inclined inlet pipe cyclonic gas-liquid separator is slightly wider than the horizontal inlet of the same separator. However, the pressure drop across the gas leg of the 27° downward inclined inlet pipe cyclonic gas-liquid separator is far greater than the horizontal inlet of the same separator. The paper concludes that, where there is a strict requirement on pressure drop, the horizontal inlet cyclonic separator should be favoured against the 27° inclined inlet.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - An Analysis of Inlet Inclination on the Performance of a Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclonic Separator
    AU  - Sunday Kanshio
    Y1  - 2019/09/10
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12
    T2  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    JF  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    JO  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    SP  - 82
    EP  - 88
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7677
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20190703.12
    AB  - Gas-Liquid cylindrical cyclonic separator plays a significant role with regards to gas-liquid separation in the oil fields. Its major operational challenges include liquid carryover and excessive pressure losses. The Inlet geometry of a gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone is one of its critical parts that affect the performance of the separator. The inlet geometry drives the performance of the separator in terms of liquid carryover and pressure drop. Traditionally, the 27° downward inclined inlet is usually used because of its advantage in terms of liquid carryover operating envelope. However, detail comparison in terms of pressure drop in the gas leg of the separator is yet to be reported. In this paper, the author presents experimental results on the effect of inlet inclination on the performance of a gas-liquid cyclonic separator in terms of separation efficiency (liquid carryover) and pressure drop. The results showed that under the same inlet conditions, the liquid carryover operating envelope of the 27° downward inclined inlet pipe cyclonic gas-liquid separator is slightly wider than the horizontal inlet of the same separator. However, the pressure drop across the gas leg of the 27° downward inclined inlet pipe cyclonic gas-liquid separator is far greater than the horizontal inlet of the same separator. The paper concludes that, where there is a strict requirement on pressure drop, the horizontal inlet cyclonic separator should be favoured against the 27° inclined inlet.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Baze University, Abuja, Nigeria

  • Sections