Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence

Krismiaji; Surifah

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence

Krismiaji, Surifah

Published in International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management (Volume 4, Issue 1)

Received: 21 February 2019 Accepted: 4 April 2019 Published: 6 May 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper describes empirical research which investigateshow corporate governance (CG) affects the compliance level of disclosure for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2013 and 2014, the two yearsafter full IFRS adoption. The CGis proxy by the board’s structure, characteristics of an audit committee, and shares ownership structure, whereas IFRS disclosure’s level of compliance is measured by disclosure index. This research uses ordinary least square to investigate the effect of corporate governance on the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance along with profitability, industry, and leverage as control variables. This research finds that five elements of CG characteristics which are board’s independence, board’s size, audit committee’sindependence, audit committee’s size, and management’s ownershippositively affect the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance. Yet, the block holder’s ownership negatively affects the compliance level of IFRS disclosure, whereas government ownershipdoes not affect the compliance level of IFRS disclosure. This study provides additional evidence about the association of CG and the level of IFRS disclosure compliance by using Indonesian data. Furthermore, involvingfive elements of corporate governance mechanisms, this study provide additional finding about corporate governance comprehensively. Finally, this research provides values for all users of information including standard setters and other regulators to enhance reporting quality standards in Indonesia.

Published in	International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management (Volume 4, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13
Page(s)	24-33
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

CG Characteristics, IFRS Disclosure, Level of Compliance

References

[1]	Abbott, L. J., Parker, S. and Peters, G. F. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23(1): 69-87.
[2]	Abdullah, S. N. 1999. The role of corporate governance and ownership structure on accountingearnings quality, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok.
[3]	Abdullah, S. N. and Mohd Nasir, N. 2004. Accrual management and the roles of boards of directorsand audit committees among Malaysian listed companies: evidence during the Asian financialcrisis. IIUM Journal of Management & Economics, 12 (1): 33-45.
[4]	Abdullah, S. N. 2004. Board structure and ownership in Malaysia: the case of listed distressedcompanies, working paper, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok.
[5]	Ahmaed, K. and Nicholls, D. 1994. The impact of non-financial company characteristics on mandatory disclosure in developing countries: the case of Bangladesh, International Journal of Accounting Education and Research, 29(1): 62-77.
[6]	Al-Akra, M., Eddie, I. A. and Ali, M. J. 2010. The influence of the introduction of accounting disclosure regulation on mandatory disclosure compliance: evidence from Jordan. The British Accounting Review, 42 (3): 170-186.
[7]	Alanezi, F. S. and Albuloushi, S. S. 2011. Does the existence of voluntary audit committees really affect IFRS-required disclosure? The Kuwaiti evidence, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 8(2): 148-173.
[8]	Alfraih, M. M. 2016. The effectiveness of board of directors’ characteristics in mandatory disclosure compliance, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 24(2):154-176
[9]	Anderson, R., Mansi, S. and Reeb, D. 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3): 315-342.
[10]	Ball, R., Robin, A. and Wu, J. 2003. Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries and implications for acceptance of IAS. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1-3): 235-270.
[11]	Barth, M. W. Landsman, and M. Lang. 2008. International Accounting Standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46 (3): 467-498.
[12]	Beuselinck, C., P. Joos, and S. V. D. Meulen. 2007. International earnings comparability. Working paper, Tilburg University.
[13]	Bova, F. and Pereira, R. 2012. The determinants and consequences of heterogeneous IFRS compliance levels following mandatory IFRS adoption: evidence from a developing country. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1): 83-111.
[14]	Brown, P. 2011. International financial reporting standards: what are the benefits? Accounting and Business Research, 41(3): 269-285.
[15]	Byrne, J. 2002. How to fix corporate governance. Business Week, May 6, available at: www. businessweek.com:/print/magazine/content/02_18/b3781701.htm.
[16]	Chalevas, C. G. 2011. The effect of the mandatory adoption of corporate governance mechanisms on executive compensation. The International Journal of Accounting, 46(2): 138-174.
[17]	Chen, C. J. and Jaggi, B. 2000. Association between independent nonexecutive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(4-5): 285-310.
[18]	Cooke, T. E. 1992. The impact of size, stock market listing and industry type on disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese listed corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 22(87): 229-237.
[19]	Covrig, V. M., M. L. DeFond, and M. Hung. 2007. Home bias, foreign mutual fund holdings, and the voluntary adoption of International Accounting Standards. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (1): 1-70
[20]	Cuijpers, R., and W. Buijink. 2005. Voluntary adoption of non-local GAAP in the European Union: a study of determinants and consequences. European Accounting Review 14 (3): 487-524.
[21]	Daske, H., L. Hail, C. Leuz, and R. Verdi. 2008. IFRS reporting around the world: early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (5): 1085-1142.
[22]	Deakin, S. and Konzelmann, S. 2004. Learning from Enron. Corporate Governance, 12(2): 134-142.
[23]	Dumontier, P., and B. Raffournier. 1998. Why firms comply voluntarily with IAS: an empirical analysis with Swiss data. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 9 (3): 216-245.
[24]	Felo, A., Krishnamurthy, S. and Solieri, S. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and the perceived quality of financial reporting: an empirical analysis. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, Malvern, PA.
[25]	Forker, J. 1992. Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research, 22(86): 111-124.
[26]	Ghazali, N. A. M., and Weetman, P. 2006. Perpetuating traditional influences: voluntary disclosure in Malaysia following the economic crisis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 15(2): 226-248.
[27]	Haniffa, R. M. and Cooke, T. E. 2002. Culture, corporate governance, and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3): 317-349.
[28]	Ho, S. and Wong, K. 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 10(2): 139-156.
[29]	Hodgdon, C., Tondkar, R. H., Adhikari, A. and Harless, D. W. 2008. Compliance with IFRS disclosure requirements and individual analysts forecast errors, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 17(1):1-13.
[30]	Hodgdon, C., Tondkar, R. H., Adhikari, A. and Harless, D. W. 2009, Compliance with international financial reporting standards and auditor choice: new evidence on the importance of the statutory audit, The International Journal of Accounting, 44(1): 33-55.
[31]	Hung, M., and K. R. Subramanyam. 2007. Financial statement effects of adopting International Accounting Standards: the case of Germany. Review of Accounting Studies 12 (4): 623-657.
[32]	Inchausti, B. 1997. The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. European Accounting Review. 6(1): 45-68.
[33]	Jarva, H., and A. M. Lantto. 2012. The value-relevance of IFRS versus domestic accounting standards: evidence from Finland. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 2: 141-177.
[34]	Jeanjean, T., and H. Stolowy. 2008. Do accounting standards matter? an exploratory analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 27: 480-494.
[35]	Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
[36]	Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems, Journal of Finance, 48(3): 831-880.
[37]	John, K. and Senbet, L. 1998. Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(4): 371-403.
[38]	Juhmani, O. 2017. Corporate governance and the level of Bahraini corporate compliance with IFRS disclosure, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(1): 22 – 41.
[39]	Kim, J., and H. Shi. 2014. International Financial Reporting Standards, institutional infrastructures and costs of equity capital around the world. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 42(3): 469–507
[40]	Klein, A. 2002. Economic determinants of audit committee independence. The Accounting Review, 77(2): 435-452.
[41]	Krismiaji, Y A. Aryani, and D. Suhardjanto. 2016. International Financial Reporting Standards, board governance, and accounting quality - A preliminary Indonesian evidence. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(4): 474 – 497.
[42]	Landsman, W. R., E. L. Maydew, and J. R. Thornock. 2012. The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 53(1-2): 34-54.
[43]	Makhija, A. K. and Patton, J. M. 2004. The impact of firm ownership structure on voluntary disclosure: empirical evidence from Czech annual reports. The Journal of Business, 77(3): 457-491.
[44]	Marston, C. and Polei, A. 2004. Corporate reporting on the internet by German companies. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5(3): 285-311.
[45]	Mazni, A. 2011. Compliance with international financial reporting standards (IFRS) in a developing country: the case of Malaysia. Theses, University of Stirling.
[46]	Meek, G., Roberts, C. B., and Gray, S. J. 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK, and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 555-572.
[47]	Nelson, J., Gallery, G., and Percy, M. 2010. Role of corporate governance in mitigating the selective disclosure of executive stock option information, Accounting & Finance, 50(3): 685-717.
[48]	Noe, T. 2002. Investor activism and financial market structure. Review of Financial Studies, 15(1):289-318.
[49]	Omar, B. 2015. The Changes of Disclosure in Compliance with the New Regulations in Jordan, International Business Research, 8 (2): 155-172
[50]	Owusu-Ansah, S. 1998. The impact of corporate attributes on the extent of mandatory disclosure and reporting by listed companies in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Accounting, 33(5): 605-631.
[51]	Paananen, M. 2008. The IFRS adoption’s effect on accounting quality in Sweden. Working paper, University of Hertfordshire.
[52]	Paananen, M and C. Lin. 2009. The Development of accounting quality of IAS and IFRS over time: The case of Germany. Journal of International Accounting Research, 8(1): 31-55
[53]	Pope, P. F. and McLeay, S. J. 2011. The European IFRS experiment: objectives, research challenges, and some early evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 41(3): 233-266.
[54]	Ramsay, I. 2001. Independence of Australian company auditors: a review of current Australian requirements and proposals for reform, Commonwealth of Australia, ACT, Canberra.
[55]	Sabia, M. and Goodfellow, J. 2003. Integrity in the Spotlight: Opportunities for Audit Committees. The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, Toronto, December.
[56]	Samaha, K., Dahawy, K., Hussainey, K. and Stapleton, P. 2012. The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market: the case of Egypt. Advances in Accounting, 28(1): 168-178.
[57]	Sellami, Y. M. and H. B. Fendri. 2017. The effect of audit committee characteristics on compliance with IFRS for related party disclosures: Evidence from South Africa, Managerial Auditing Journal, 32 (6):603-626, https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2016-1395
[58]	Smith, R. 2003. Audit committees: combined code guidance report, Financial Reporting Council, London.
[59]	Song, J. and Windram, B. 2004. Benchmarking audit committee effectiveness in financial reporting. International Journal of Auditing, 8(3): 195-205.
[60]	Street, D., S. Gray, and S. Bryant. 1999. Acceptance and observance of International Accounting Standards: an empirical study of companies claiming to comply with IASs. International Journal of Accounting 34 (1): 11-48.
[61]	Tarca, A., 2004. International convergence of accounting practices: choosing between IAS and US GAAP. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 15(1): 60-91.
[62]	United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2006. Guidance on Good Practices in Corporate Governance Disclosure, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York, NY.
[63]	Verriest, A., Gaeremynck, A. and Thornton, D. B. 2013. The impact of corporate governance on IFRS adoption choices. European Accounting Review, 22(1): 39-77.
[64]	Vicknair, D., K. Hickman, and K. C. Carnes. 1993. A note on audit committee independence: Evidence from the NYSE on" grey" area directors. Accounting Horizons, 7(1): 53-57.
[65]	Wallace, R. S. O., Naser, K. and Mora, A. 1994. The relationship between the comprehensiveness of corporate annual reports and firm characteristics in Spain. Accounting and Business Research, 25(97): 41-53.
[66]	Williamson, O. E. 1984. Corporate governance. Yale Law Journal, 93(7): 1197-1230.
[67]	Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2): 185-211.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Krismiaji, Surifah. (2019). Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 4(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Krismiaji; Surifah. Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence. Int. J. Account. Finance Risk Manag. 2019, 4(1), 24-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Krismiaji, Surifah. Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence. Int J Account Finance Risk Manag. 2019;4(1):24-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13,
  author = {Krismiaji and Surifah},
  title = {Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence},
  journal = {International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management},
  volume = {4},
  number = {1},
  pages = {24-33},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijafrm.20190401.13},
  abstract = {This paper describes empirical research which investigateshow corporate governance (CG) affects the compliance level of disclosure for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2013 and 2014, the two yearsafter full IFRS adoption. The CGis proxy by the board’s structure, characteristics of an audit committee, and shares ownership structure, whereas IFRS disclosure’s level of compliance is measured by disclosure index. This research uses ordinary least square to investigate the effect of corporate governance on the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance along with profitability, industry, and leverage as control variables. This research finds that five elements of CG characteristics which are board’s independence, board’s size, audit committee’sindependence, audit committee’s size, and management’s ownershippositively affect the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance. Yet, the block holder’s ownership negatively affects the compliance level of IFRS disclosure, whereas government ownershipdoes not affect the compliance level of IFRS disclosure. This study provides additional evidence about the association of CG and the level of IFRS disclosure compliance by using Indonesian data. Furthermore, involvingfive elements of corporate governance mechanisms, this study provide additional finding about corporate governance comprehensively. Finally, this research provides values for all users of information including standard setters and other regulators to enhance reporting quality standards in Indonesia.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence
AU  - Krismiaji
AU  - Surifah
Y1  - 2019/05/06
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13
T2  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
JF  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
JO  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
SP  - 24
EP  - 33
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-9376
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13
AB  - This paper describes empirical research which investigateshow corporate governance (CG) affects the compliance level of disclosure for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2013 and 2014, the two yearsafter full IFRS adoption. The CGis proxy by the board’s structure, characteristics of an audit committee, and shares ownership structure, whereas IFRS disclosure’s level of compliance is measured by disclosure index. This research uses ordinary least square to investigate the effect of corporate governance on the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance along with profitability, industry, and leverage as control variables. This research finds that five elements of CG characteristics which are board’s independence, board’s size, audit committee’sindependence, audit committee’s size, and management’s ownershippositively affect the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance. Yet, the block holder’s ownership negatively affects the compliance level of IFRS disclosure, whereas government ownershipdoes not affect the compliance level of IFRS disclosure. This study provides additional evidence about the association of CG and the level of IFRS disclosure compliance by using Indonesian data. Furthermore, involvingfive elements of corporate governance mechanisms, this study provide additional finding about corporate governance comprehensively. Finally, this research provides values for all users of information including standard setters and other regulators to enhance reporting quality standards in Indonesia.
VL  - 4
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Krismiaji

Department of Accounting, Accounting Academy of YKPN, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Surifah

Department of Economic and Business, Yogyakarta Technology University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Krismiaji, Surifah. (2019). Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 4(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Krismiaji; Surifah. Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence. Int. J. Account. Finance Risk Manag. 2019, 4(1), 24-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Krismiaji, Surifah. Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence. Int J Account Finance Risk Manag. 2019;4(1):24-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13,
  author = {Krismiaji and Surifah},
  title = {Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence},
  journal = {International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management},
  volume = {4},
  number = {1},
  pages = {24-33},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijafrm.20190401.13},
  abstract = {This paper describes empirical research which investigateshow corporate governance (CG) affects the compliance level of disclosure for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2013 and 2014, the two yearsafter full IFRS adoption. The CGis proxy by the board’s structure, characteristics of an audit committee, and shares ownership structure, whereas IFRS disclosure’s level of compliance is measured by disclosure index. This research uses ordinary least square to investigate the effect of corporate governance on the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance along with profitability, industry, and leverage as control variables. This research finds that five elements of CG characteristics which are board’s independence, board’s size, audit committee’sindependence, audit committee’s size, and management’s ownershippositively affect the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance. Yet, the block holder’s ownership negatively affects the compliance level of IFRS disclosure, whereas government ownershipdoes not affect the compliance level of IFRS disclosure. This study provides additional evidence about the association of CG and the level of IFRS disclosure compliance by using Indonesian data. Furthermore, involvingfive elements of corporate governance mechanisms, this study provide additional finding about corporate governance comprehensively. Finally, this research provides values for all users of information including standard setters and other regulators to enhance reporting quality standards in Indonesia.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Corporate Governance and Firm’s Compliance on Disclosure of International Financial Reporting Standards–Indonesian Evidence
AU  - Krismiaji
AU  - Surifah
Y1  - 2019/05/06
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13
T2  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
JF  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
JO  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
SP  - 24
EP  - 33
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-9376
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20190401.13
AB  - This paper describes empirical research which investigateshow corporate governance (CG) affects the compliance level of disclosure for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in 2013 and 2014, the two yearsafter full IFRS adoption. The CGis proxy by the board’s structure, characteristics of an audit committee, and shares ownership structure, whereas IFRS disclosure’s level of compliance is measured by disclosure index. This research uses ordinary least square to investigate the effect of corporate governance on the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance along with profitability, industry, and leverage as control variables. This research finds that five elements of CG characteristics which are board’s independence, board’s size, audit committee’sindependence, audit committee’s size, and management’s ownershippositively affect the level of IFRS disclosurecompliance. Yet, the block holder’s ownership negatively affects the compliance level of IFRS disclosure, whereas government ownershipdoes not affect the compliance level of IFRS disclosure. This study provides additional evidence about the association of CG and the level of IFRS disclosure compliance by using Indonesian data. Furthermore, involvingfive elements of corporate governance mechanisms, this study provide additional finding about corporate governance comprehensively. Finally, this research provides values for all users of information including standard setters and other regulators to enhance reporting quality standards in Indonesia.
VL  - 4
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download