| Peer-Reviewed

A Review of Bio-Role Fumigation's in Plant Parasitic Nematode (PPNs) Control

Received: 11 February 2022    Accepted: 7 March 2022    Published: 15 March 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Worldwide there are greater than 4,100 species of PPNs. The most common opponent of agricultural production is PPNs. Plant parasitic nematodes (PPN) cause substantial economic destruction to an extensive range of crops. Nematicide Chemicals are considered the furthermost operative method in reducing nematodes population. Increasing concern over chemical nematicides has increased interest in safe alternative methods to minimize these losses. This review focuses on the role of bio-fumigation against PPNs in sustainable agroecosystems. Bio-fumigation is a long-term approach for controlling diseases, nematodes, insects, and weeds in the soil. It was originally defined as the pest-controlling effect of decomposing Brassica tissues, but it was later broadened to include animal and plant leftovers. Glucosinolates are the principal active molecule responsible for the bio-fumigation process in various plants. Plant age and tissue type influence glucosinolate accumulation and myrosinase activity, which are influenced by environmental factors such as planting density and herbivory. Glucosinolates are sulphur-containing chemicals produced by the secondary metabolism of plants in the order Capparales, which includes the Brassicacea family among others. Natural antimicrobials and anti-carcinogenic agents, glucosinolates are well-known. Therefore, researchers should have to focus on environmentally save methods of plant parasitic nematode management like bio-fumigation. This biofumigation may be replace the fumigant nematicides for future.

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13
Page(s) 59-63
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Anti-carcinogenic, Antimicrobials, Bio-fumigation, Glucosonolate, Myrosinase

References
[1] Agbemafle, R. Obodai, E. A. Adukpo, G. E. Amprako. N (2012). Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 3 (5): 2815.
[2] Ahmad F (2009). Studies on the management of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) with organic soil amendments. Ph.D. Thesis, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. p. 262.
[3] Bello, A., Lopez Perez, J. A., Garcia Alvarez, A., Sanz, R., and Lacasa, A (2004). Biofumigation and nematode control in the Mediterranean region. p. 133-149. Bellostas, N. Sorensen, J. C. Sorensen, H (2004). Agroindustria: 3-5.
[4] Chitwood, D. J (2002). Phytochemical based strategies for nematode control. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 221-249.
[5] Collange B, Navarrete M, Peyre G, Mateille T, Tchamitchian M (2011). Root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne) management in vegetable crop production: The challenge of an agronomic system analysis. Crop Protection, 30, 1251–1262.
[6] Cox, C (2006). Fumigant factsheet: metam sodium. Journal of Pesticide Reform 26: 12-16.
[7] Daneel M, Engelbrecht E, Fourie H, Ahuja P (2018). The host status of Brassicaceae to Meloidogyne and their effects as cover and biofumigant crops on root-knot nematode populations associated with potato and tomato under South African field conditions. Crop Protection, 110, 198–206.
[8] De Pascale, S., Maggio, A., Pernice, R., Fogliano, V. and Barbieri, G (2007). Sulphur fertilization may improve the nutritional value of Brassica rapa L. subsp. sylvestris. European Journal of Agronomy 26: 418-424.
[9] Dutta, T. K., Khan, M. R., & Phani, V (2019). Plant-parasitic nematode management via biofumigation using brassica and non-brassica plants: Current status and future prospects. Current Plant Biology, 17, 17–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2019.02.001.
[10] Edwards, S. and A. Ploeg (2014). Evaluation of 31 Potential biofumigant Brassicaceous plants as hosts for three Meloiodogyne species. Journal of Nematology 46: 287-295.
[11] El-Sherbiny, A. A., and S. F. A. Awd Allah (2014). Management of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants by pre-planting soil biofumigation with harvesting residues of some winter crops and waste residues of oyster mushroom cultivation under field condition. Egyptian Journal of Agronematology, 13 (1): 189–202.
[12] Elling A. A (2013). Major emerging problems with minor Meloidoygne species. Phytopathol., 103: 1092-1102.
[13] Fahey, J. W., Zalcmann, A. T. and Talalay, P (2001). The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 56: 5-51.
[14] Font, R. Celestino, M. D. R. Rosa, E. Aires, A. Bailon, A. D. H (2005). J. Agri. Sci., 143, 65.
[15] Griffiths, H. M., Gies, D., Zitter, T. A (2011). Brassicas as biofumigants for controlling soilborne organisms in potato production for upstate New York and northern Pennsylvania. Fact sheet (Online). (http://vegetablemdonline.ppath.cornell.edu/NewsArticles/Brassicas%20Factsheet%20Final%20August%20, 2011.pdf).
[16] Gunjan Bhushan, V. K. Mishra, Mir Asif Iquebal and Singh Y. P (2013). Effect of genotypes, reproductive developmental stages, and environments on glucosinolates content in rapeseed mustard. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res., 3 (1): 75-82.
[17] Halkier, B. A. Gershenzon, J (2006). Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 57: 303.
[18] Hussain, M. A.; Mukhtar, T.; Kayani, M. Z.; Aslam, M. N.; Ulhaque, M. I (2012). A survey of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in the Punjab province of Pakistan for the determination of prevalence, incidence and severity of root-knot disease caused by Meloidogyne spp. Pakistan Journal of Botany, v. 44, n. 6, p. 2071- 2075.
[19] Kago, E. K., Kinyua, Z. M., Okemo, P. O., and Maingi, J. M (2013). Efficacy of Brassica Tissue and Chalim TM on Control of Plant Parasitic Nematodes. Journal of Biology 1: 32-38.
[20] Kruger D H M, Fourie J, Malan A (2013). Cover crops with biofumigation properties for the suppression of plant-parasitic nematodes: A review. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 34, 287–295.
[21] Kusnierczyk, AMidelfart, P. W. H. Armbruster, W. S. Rossiter, J. T. Bones, A. M (2007). J. Exp. Bot., 58: 2537.
[22] Kwerepe, B. C., and Labuschagne, N (2003). Biofumigation and soil solarization as integrated pest management (IPM) components for the control of root-knotnematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood on Bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc]. University of Swaziland. Journal of Agriculture 11: 56-63.
[23] Lopez Perez, J., Roubtsova, T. and Ploeg, A (2005). Effect of three plant residues and chicken manure used as biofumigants at three temperatures on Meloidogyne incognita infestation of tomato in greenhouse experiments. Journal of Nematology 37 (4): 489-494.
[24] Lopez Perez, J. A., Roubtsova, T., Garcia, M. D., and Ploeg, A (2010). The Potential of five winter grown crops to reduce root-knot nematode damage and increase yield of tomato. Journal of Nematology 42: 120-127.
[25] Moens, M., Perry, R. N., Starr, J. L (2009). Meloidogyne species – A diverse group of novel and important plant parasites. In: Perry, R. N., Moens, M., Starr, J. L. (Eds.), Root-knot nematodes. CABI International, Cambrige, MA (USA), pp. 1-17.
[26] Mota, F. C.; Alves, G. C. S.; Giband, M.; Gomes, A. C. M. M.; Sousa, F. R.; Mattos, V. S.; Barbosa, V. H. S.; Barroso, P. A. V.; Nicole, M.; Peixoto, J. R.; Rocha, M. R.; Carneiro, R. M. D. G (2013). New sources of resistance to Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in wild cotton accessions and histological characterization of the defense mechanisms. Plant Pathology, v. 62, n. 5, p. 1173-1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12022.
[27] Natarajan N, Cork A, Boomathi N, Pandi R, Velavan S, Dhaskshanamoorthy G (2006). Cold aqueous extracts of African marigold, Tagetes erecta for control tomato root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Crop Prot. 25: 1210–1213.
[28] Oka Y, Tkachi N, Shuker S, Rosenberg R, Suriano S, Fine P (2006). Laboratory studies on the enhancement of nematicidal activity of ammonia releasing fertilizers by alkaline amendments. Nematology 8: 335-346.
[29] Padilla, G., Cartea, M. E., Velasco, P., De Haro, A. and Ordas, A (2007). Variation of glucosinolates in vegetable crops of Brassica rapa. Phytochemistry 68: 536-545.
[30] Park W, Kim KS, Jang YS, Lee KB, Kim SJ, Ahn SJ, Hong SW, Lee YH (2017). Variation in glucosinolate contents of cruciferous plants. Rec Nat Prod. 11: 185-192.
[31] Piedra Buena, A., Garcia Alvarez, A., Dies Rojo, M. A., Ros, C., Fernadez, P., Lacasa, A. and Bello, A (2007). Use of pepper crop residues for the control of rootknot nematodes. Bioresource Technology 98: 2846- 2851.
[32] Rothe, R., H. Hartung, G. Marks, H. Bergmann, R. Gotz and Scohne F (2004). Glucosinolate contents in vegetative tissues of winter rape cultivars. J. Appl. Bot. 78: 41-47.
[33] Roubtsova, T., Lopez Perez, J., Edwards, S. and Ploeg, A (2007). Effect of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea) tissue, incorporated at different depths in a soil column, on Meloidogyne incognita. Journal of Nematology 39: 111-117.
[34] Satoko Yasumoto, Morio Matsuzaki, Hisako Hirokane and Kensuke Okada (2010). Glucosinolate Content in Rapeseed in Relation to Suppression of Subsequent Crop. Plant Prod. Sci. 13 (2): 150-155.
[35] Sarikamiş, G. Yanmaz, R (2011). J. Med. Plants Res., 5: 4388.
[36] Saucet, S. B.; Ghelder, C. V.; Abad, P.; Ducal, H.; Esmenjaud, D (2016). Resistance to root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. in woody plants. New Phytologist, v. 211, p. 41-56, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13933.
[37] Schreiner, R. P., Ivors, K. L. and Pinkerton, J. N (2001). Soil solarization reduces arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a consequence of weed suppression. Mycorrhiza 11: 273-277.
[38] Singh KP, Suman A, Singh PN, Srivastava TK (2007). Improving quality of sugarcane growing soils by organic amendments under subtropical climatic conditions of India. Biol Fert Soils. 44: 367–376.
[39] Thanki, N. Joshi, P. Joshi, Eur. H (2012). J. Exp. Biol., 2 (5): 1639.
[40] Thoden TC, Hallmann J, Boppré M (2009). Effects of plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids on the northern root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 123: 27-36.
[41] Tsay TT, Wu TS, Lin YY (2004). Evaluation of Asteraceae plant for control of Meloidogyne incognita. J Nematol. 36: 36–41.
[42] Tripathi, M. K. Mishra., A. S (2007). Animal Feed Sci. Techn., pp: 1321.
[43] Van Dam, N., Tytgat, T. G., and Kirkegaard, J (2009). Root and shoot glucosinolates: a comparison of their diversity, function and interactions in natural and managed ecosystems. Phytochemistry Reviews 8: 171-86.
[44] Wang K H, McSorley R, Kokalis-Burelle N (2006). Effects of cover cropping, solarization, and soil fumigation on nematode communities. Plant and Soil, 286, 229–243.
[45] Wentzell, A. M. Kliebenstein, D. J (2008). Plant Physiol.: 147-415.
[46] Youssef, M. M. A., and Lashein, A. M. S (2013). Effect of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) leaf residue as a biofumigant on root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato. Journal of Plant Protection Research 53: 271-274.
[47] Zasada, I. A., and H. Ferris (2004). Nematode suppression with brassicaceous amendments: application based upon glucosinolate profiles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36: 1017 1024.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Belay Feyisa. (2022). A Review of Bio-Role Fumigation's in Plant Parasitic Nematode (PPNs) Control. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 10(2), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Belay Feyisa. A Review of Bio-Role Fumigation's in Plant Parasitic Nematode (PPNs) Control. Am. J. Agric. For. 2022, 10(2), 59-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Belay Feyisa. A Review of Bio-Role Fumigation's in Plant Parasitic Nematode (PPNs) Control. Am J Agric For. 2022;10(2):59-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13,
      author = {Belay Feyisa},
      title = {A Review of Bio-Role Fumigation's in Plant Parasitic Nematode (PPNs) Control},
      journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {59-63},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20221002.13},
      abstract = {Worldwide there are greater than 4,100 species of PPNs. The most common opponent of agricultural production is PPNs. Plant parasitic nematodes (PPN) cause substantial economic destruction to an extensive range of crops. Nematicide Chemicals are considered the furthermost operative method in reducing nematodes population. Increasing concern over chemical nematicides has increased interest in safe alternative methods to minimize these losses. This review focuses on the role of bio-fumigation against PPNs in sustainable agroecosystems. Bio-fumigation is a long-term approach for controlling diseases, nematodes, insects, and weeds in the soil. It was originally defined as the pest-controlling effect of decomposing Brassica tissues, but it was later broadened to include animal and plant leftovers. Glucosinolates are the principal active molecule responsible for the bio-fumigation process in various plants. Plant age and tissue type influence glucosinolate accumulation and myrosinase activity, which are influenced by environmental factors such as planting density and herbivory. Glucosinolates are sulphur-containing chemicals produced by the secondary metabolism of plants in the order Capparales, which includes the Brassicacea family among others. Natural antimicrobials and anti-carcinogenic agents, glucosinolates are well-known. Therefore, researchers should have to focus on environmentally save methods of plant parasitic nematode management like bio-fumigation. This biofumigation may be replace the fumigant nematicides for future.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Review of Bio-Role Fumigation's in Plant Parasitic Nematode (PPNs) Control
    AU  - Belay Feyisa
    Y1  - 2022/03/15
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13
    T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
    SP  - 59
    EP  - 63
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8591
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20221002.13
    AB  - Worldwide there are greater than 4,100 species of PPNs. The most common opponent of agricultural production is PPNs. Plant parasitic nematodes (PPN) cause substantial economic destruction to an extensive range of crops. Nematicide Chemicals are considered the furthermost operative method in reducing nematodes population. Increasing concern over chemical nematicides has increased interest in safe alternative methods to minimize these losses. This review focuses on the role of bio-fumigation against PPNs in sustainable agroecosystems. Bio-fumigation is a long-term approach for controlling diseases, nematodes, insects, and weeds in the soil. It was originally defined as the pest-controlling effect of decomposing Brassica tissues, but it was later broadened to include animal and plant leftovers. Glucosinolates are the principal active molecule responsible for the bio-fumigation process in various plants. Plant age and tissue type influence glucosinolate accumulation and myrosinase activity, which are influenced by environmental factors such as planting density and herbivory. Glucosinolates are sulphur-containing chemicals produced by the secondary metabolism of plants in the order Capparales, which includes the Brassicacea family among others. Natural antimicrobials and anti-carcinogenic agents, glucosinolates are well-known. Therefore, researchers should have to focus on environmentally save methods of plant parasitic nematode management like bio-fumigation. This biofumigation may be replace the fumigant nematicides for future.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Ambo Agricultural Research Centre, Ambo, Ethiopia

  • Sections