Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Influence of Inter and Intra Row Spacing for Growth and Yield of Maize

Received: 13 January 2025     Accepted: 27 April 2025     Published: 3 June 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Effect of inter row and intra row spacing on growth, growth parameters, yield and yield related parameters of maize was studied at Melkasa Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia during the rainy season in 2019 and 2020. The objective of this study was to evaluate impact of inter row and intra row spacing on growth and yields of maize variety Melkassa-II. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with a split-plot treatment structure of 4 inter spacing levels as the main plot and 3 intra row spacing levels as sub plot factors. There was significant (P<0.05) main effect of inter row spacing, and interaction of inter row and intra row spacing on leaf leaf area index, cob weight, grain yield, 1000 seed weight and harvest index. There was also significance difference due to the main effects of inter row spacing on leaf leaf area index, cob weight, plant height, kernels per row, above ground biomass, grain yield, 1000 seed weight and harvest index. Higher grain yield and above ground dry biomass yield were due to intermediate and closer spacing. By considering other crop management factors it can be concluded that spacing combination of 65 cm * 20 cm can be recommended in attaining higher grain yield of Melkassa-II maize variety in similar environment.

Published in American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 11, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13
Page(s) 127-134
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Plant Spacing, Maize Variety, Plant Population

References
[1] Ahmad, R., A. Tanveer, M. M. Maqbool and Z. Ata, 2006. Growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by row spacing and weed competition durations. Journal of Plant Science, 38(4): 27-36.
[2] Ahmadi, M., Wiebold, W. J., Beverlein, J. E., Eckert, D. J. and Schoper, J, 1993. Agronomic Practices that Affect Corn Kernel Characteristics. Agronomy Journal, 85: 615-619.
[3] Allessi, J. and Power, J. F. (2004). Effect of plant population, row spacing and relative maturity on dry land corn in the Northern plans. Agronomy Journal 66(2): 316-319
[4] ATA (Agricultural Transformation Agency) (2014). Annual Report. ATA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[5] Chandrasekaran, B., Annadurai, K. and Somasundaram, E. (2010). A Text of Agronomy. Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi.
[6] CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2018). Agricultural Sample Survey Reports on Area and Production of Major Crops. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[7] Eskandarnejada, S., S. Khorasani, S. Bakhtiaric, A. R. Heidarian, 2013. Effect of row spacing and plant density on yield and yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Crop Science, l3(1): 81-88.
[8] FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2016). Food and Agriculture Data.
[9] Farnham, D. E., 2001. Effects of row spacing, plant density and variety on maize grain yield. Journal of Agronomy, 93: 1049-1053.
[10] Goldsworthy, P. R. and Taylor, R. S. (1990). The effect of plant spacing on grain yield of tall and short sorghum in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, 50(8):566-568.
[11] Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
[12] Gonzalo, M., Vyn, T. J., Holland, J. B. and Mcintre, L. M. 2006. Mapping Density Response in Maize: A Direct Approach for Testing Genotype and Treatment Interactions. Genetics, 173, 331-348.
[13] Jettner, R., Loss S. P., Siddique, K. H. and Martin, L. D. 1998. Responses of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) to Sowing Rate in South-Western Australia. I. Seed Yield and Economic Optimum Plant Density. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 49, 989-998.
[14] Liu, T., Gu, L., Dong, S., Zhang, J., Liu, P., Zhao, B., 2015. Optimum leaf removal increases canopy apparent photosynthesis, 13C-photosynthate distribution and grain yield of maize crops grown at high density. Field Crops Res.170, 32–39.
[15] Mahmood, M. T., M. Maqsood, T. H. Awan and R. Sarwa, 2001. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and intrarow plant spacing on yield and yield components of maize. Journal of agricultural science, 38(2):35-38.
[16] Malaviarachchi, M. A., K. M. Karunarathne and S. N. Jayawardane, 2007. Influence of plant density on yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) under supplementary irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3(2): 5866.
[17] Maqsood, M., M. S. Ibin Zamir, M. A. Safi and M. Yousat, 2002. Effect of plant spacing on yield and yield components of maize. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, (3)25: 15.
[18] Miko, S. and A. A. Manga, 2008. Effect of intra–spacing and nitrogen rates on growth and yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Var. ICSV 400. Journal of Agronomy, 4(2): 66-73.
[19] Mukhtar, T., M. Arif, S. Hussain, M. Atif and K. Hussain, 2012. Yield and yield components of maize hybrids as influenced by plant spacing. Journal of Agricultural research, 50(1):63-67
[20] Randhawa, M., A. Mahmood and A. J. khan, 2007. Effect of plant spacing on quality and yield of maize crop. Journal of Agriculture and biology, 29(2):370-371.
[21] Rosegrant, M. W., S. Msangi, C. Ringler, T. B. Sulser, T. Zhu, S. A. Cline, 2010. International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): Model Description. International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, D. C.
[22] Sangoi, L., Graceietti, M. A., Rampazzo, C. and Bianchetti, P. 2002. The Response of Brazilian Maize Hybrids from Different Eras to Changes in Plant Density. Field Crops Research, 79, 39-51.
[23] Sangoi, L., M. Ender, A. Guidolin, M. L. de Almeida and P. C. Heberle, 2001. Influence of row spacing reduction on maize grain yield and yield components. Agronomy Journal, 36(6) 861-869.
[24] Shiferaw, B., Prasanna, B., Hellin, J. and Banziger, M., 2011. Feeding a Hungry World: Past Successes and Future Challenges to Global Food Security in Maize. Food Security, 3, 307-327.
[25] Tollenaar M, Aguilera A., 1992. Radiations used efficiency of old and new maize hybrids. Agron. J, 84:536-541.
[26] Ulger, A. C., 2001. The effect of different rows and intra-row spacing on grain yield and some agronomic characteristics of maize. Journal of Agriculture, 13:95-104.
[27] Yousaf, N., A. Raouf, M. S., S. Kamel S. Amer. 2007. Investigating the influence of varying row spacing and planting density on growth characteristics, agronomic and yield traits, quality of grain and nutrient uptake patterns of diverse maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 8: 120-123.
[28] Zhang, J, Dong S, Wang K, Hu C, Lin P. Effect of shading on the growth development and grain yield of summer maize. Ying Yong Sheing Tai Xue Bao, 2006; 17(4): 657-662.
[29] Ali M, Khalil SK, Ayaz S, Marwat MI, Phonological stages, flag leaf area, plant height, and leaves per plant of corn influenced by phosphorus levels and plant spacing. Sarhad J. Agric. 1998, 14: 515.
[30] Majid A, Shafiq M Iqbal M. Deep tillage and sowing techniques in maize production under high rainfed conditions. Pak. J. Agric. Res, 1986; 7: 181-185.
[31] Singh D, Choudhary J. Effect of plant population and fertilizer levels on yield and economics of popcorn. Indian J. Plant Sci. 2008; 78(4): 370-371.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tesfa, Y., Tilahun, B. (2025). Influence of Inter and Intra Row Spacing for Growth and Yield of Maize. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 11(2), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tesfa, Y.; Tilahun, B. Influence of Inter and Intra Row Spacing for Growth and Yield of Maize. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2025, 11(2), 127-134. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tesfa Y, Tilahun B. Influence of Inter and Intra Row Spacing for Growth and Yield of Maize. Am J Appl Sci Res. 2025;11(2):127-134. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13,
      author = {Yaya Tesfa and Bahiru Tilahun},
      title = {Influence of Inter and Intra Row Spacing for Growth and Yield of Maize
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research},
      volume = {11},
      number = {2},
      pages = {127-134},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20251102.13},
      abstract = {Effect of inter row and intra row spacing on growth, growth parameters, yield and yield related parameters of maize was studied at Melkasa Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia during the rainy season in 2019 and 2020. The objective of this study was to evaluate impact of inter row and intra row spacing on growth and yields of maize variety Melkassa-II. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with a split-plot treatment structure of 4 inter spacing levels as the main plot and 3 intra row spacing levels as sub plot factors. There was significant (P<0.05) main effect of inter row spacing, and interaction of inter row and intra row spacing on leaf leaf area index, cob weight, grain yield, 1000 seed weight and harvest index. There was also significance difference due to the main effects of inter row spacing on leaf leaf area index, cob weight, plant height, kernels per row, above ground biomass, grain yield, 1000 seed weight and harvest index. Higher grain yield and above ground dry biomass yield were due to intermediate and closer spacing. By considering other crop management factors it can be concluded that spacing combination of 65 cm * 20 cm can be recommended in attaining higher grain yield of Melkassa-II maize variety in similar environment.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Influence of Inter and Intra Row Spacing for Growth and Yield of Maize
    
    AU  - Yaya Tesfa
    AU  - Bahiru Tilahun
    Y1  - 2025/06/03
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13
    T2  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    JF  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    JO  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    SP  - 127
    EP  - 134
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2471-9730
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20251102.13
    AB  - Effect of inter row and intra row spacing on growth, growth parameters, yield and yield related parameters of maize was studied at Melkasa Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia during the rainy season in 2019 and 2020. The objective of this study was to evaluate impact of inter row and intra row spacing on growth and yields of maize variety Melkassa-II. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with a split-plot treatment structure of 4 inter spacing levels as the main plot and 3 intra row spacing levels as sub plot factors. There was significant (P<0.05) main effect of inter row spacing, and interaction of inter row and intra row spacing on leaf leaf area index, cob weight, grain yield, 1000 seed weight and harvest index. There was also significance difference due to the main effects of inter row spacing on leaf leaf area index, cob weight, plant height, kernels per row, above ground biomass, grain yield, 1000 seed weight and harvest index. Higher grain yield and above ground dry biomass yield were due to intermediate and closer spacing. By considering other crop management factors it can be concluded that spacing combination of 65 cm * 20 cm can be recommended in attaining higher grain yield of Melkassa-II maize variety in similar environment.
    
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Melkassa Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Adama, Ethiopia

  • Melkassa Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Adama, Ethiopia

  • Sections