| Peer-Reviewed

Synerging of Root Traits and Agronomic Practices in Common Bean Production Improvement under Acidic Soil

Received: 24 July 2021    Accepted: 16 August 2021    Published: 23 August 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The most challenging in twenty first century is the cause and consequences of Climate change and variability. It is hastening frequently by over population more in developing countries. Thus, it is affected several sectors, while Agriculture is the most vulnerable for climate change. As a result both biotic and abiotic factors are bottle neck for food security and sustainability. From abiotic factor, soil acidity is the frequently observed at area where received intensive rainfall due to top soil and metallic elements washed out. Soil acidity is arsenic, and causes abortion of expected production, especially susceptible crops such as Common bean. To overcome this problem, agronomic practices such as lime application, soil conservation techniques and appropriate root traits were reported. Root system architectures traits such as higher basal root number between 12 to 16, basal root whorl number of around 4, and shallow root angle of less than 15° were reported suitable to withstand soil acidity. Agronomic practices alone reported as it is tedious and also difficult to get complete genotypes with full of desired acidity resistance root traits. Hence several reported explained that using the desired root traits for acidity resistance genotypes and important agronomic practices obtained more valuable results as form of integration. Therefore, using the appropriate root traits and agronomic practices support with each other to reduces the syndrome of soil acidity impacts.

Published in American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11
Page(s) 77-85
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Acid Soil, Climate Change, Common Bean and Root Trait

References
[1] Abdanna Deressa, Negassa Chewaka W. and Tilahun Geleto. (2007). Inventory of soil acidity status in croplands of Central and Western Ethiopia. Utilization of diversity in land use systems: Sustainable and organic approaches to meet human needs. Tropentag, 9-11.
[2] Alemu, F. and Alemu, T., (2015). Pseudomonas fluorescens Isolates used as a plant growth promoter of Faba Bean (Viciafaba) in vitro as well as in vivo study in Ethiopia. American Journal of Life Sciences, 3 (2), 100-108.
[3] Amy, B. Y. and Jonathan, M. B. (1996) ‘Effect of phosphorus deficiency on growth angle of basal roots in Phaseolus vulgaris’, 281–288.
[4] Araujo, A. P., Teixeira, M. G. and Almeida, D. L. D., 2000. Growth and yield of common bean cultivars at two soil phosphorus levels under biological nitrogen fixation. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 35 (4), pp. 809-817.
[5] Atemkeng, M. F., Remans, R., Michiels, J., Tagne, A. and Ngonkeu, E. L. M. (2011). Inoculation with Rhizobium etli enhances organic acid exudation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) subjected to phosphorus deficiency. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (10), 2235-2242.
[6] Bareke, T., Asfaw, Z. and Woldu, Z. (2018). Diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., fabaceae) landraces in South Eastern Ethiopia. Advanced Plants Agricultural Resources, 8 (6), 449-457.
[7] Beebe, S., Rao, I., Blair, M. and Acosta, J. (2013). Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Frontiers in physiology, 4, 35-48.
[8] Beebe, Ramirez, J., Jarvis, A., Rao, M. I., Mosquera, G., Bueno, M. J., and Blair, W. M. (2011). Genetic Improvement of Common Beans and the Challenges of Climate Change. In S. S. Yadav, J. R. Redden, L. J. Hatfield, H. Lotze-Campenand E. A. Hall (Edition.), Crop Adaptation to Climate Change 1, 356-369.
[9] Blair, M. W., Torres, M. M., Giraldo, M. C. and Pedraza, F., (2009). Development and diversity of Andean-derived, gene-based microsatellites for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). BMC Plant Biology, 49 (1), 59-68.
[10] Boutraa, T. (2009). Growth and carbon partitioning of two genotypes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) grown with low phosphorus availability. Eurasian Journal of BioScience, 3 (3), 17-24.
[11] Buni, A., (2014). Effects of liming acidic soils on improving soil properties and yield of haricot bean. J. Environ. Anal. Toxicol, 5 (1), 1-4.
[12] Buri, M. M., Issaka, R. N. and Wakatsuki, T. (2005). Extent and management of low pH soils in Ghana. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 51 (5), 755-759.
[13] Burridge, J., Jochua, C. N., Bucksch, A., and Lynch, J. P. (2016). Legume shovelomics: high—throughput phenotyping of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculatasubsp, unguiculata) root architecture in the field. Field Crops Research, 192, 21-32.
[14] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2021). Agricultural sample survey 2020/21 report on area and production for major crops (private peasant holdings). Statistical bulletin Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[15] Champman D., (1965). Cation exchange capacity by ammonium saturation. In: black, C. A., L. E., Ensminger and F. E., Clark (Editions.). Method of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy. Madison Wisconsin, USA. 891-901.
[16] Chen, Y. L., Djalovic, I. and Rengel, Z. (2015). Phenotyping for root traits. In Phenomics in Crop Plants: Trends, Options, and Limitations. 101-128.
[17] Cochrane, L. and Bekele, Y. W., 2018. Average crop yield (2001–2017) in Ethiopia: Trends at national, regional and zonal levels. Data in brief, 16, 1025.
[18] Demelash. (2018) ‘Advances in Crop Science and Technology Common Bean Improvement Status ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Ethiopia’, Journal of Biotechnology, 6 (2). 1-18.
[19] Eberbach, P. and Black, A., (2003). Managing the Soil. In Principles of Field Crop Production. 233-272. Oxford University Press.
[20] Ephrem Terefe Lemu, (2016). Review of Haricot bean Value Chain in Ethiopia. International Journal of African and Asian Studies, 24, 2409 - 6938.
[21] Ethiosis., (Ethiopia soil information system (Ethiopia) (2014). Soil fertility mapping and fertilizer blending. Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA) Report,. Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa.
[22] Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C. and Li, Y. C. (2008). The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty-first century. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31 (6), 1121-1157.
[23] Fageria, V. C. Baligarand R. W. Zobel (2007) Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Soil Chemical Properties as Influenced by Liming and Boron Application in Common Bean in a No-Tillage System, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 38: 11-12.
[24] Fageria, N. K., and Baligar, V. C. (2005). Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in agronomy, 88, 97-185.
[25] Gahoonia, T. S. and Nielsen, N. E. (2004) ‘Root traits as tools for creating phosphorus efficient crop varieties’, 47–57.
[26] Garcıa MJ, Romera F, Lucena C, Alc_antara E, Pe´rez-Vicente R. (2015). Ethylene and the regulation of physiological and morphological responsesto nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiology 169: 51–60.
[27] Gepts, P., 1998. Origin and evolution of common bean: past events and recent trends. Hort Science, 33 (7), 1124-1130.
[28] Gregory P. (2006). Plant roots. Growth, activity, and interaction with soils. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[29] Hardarson, G. (1993) ‘Methods for enhancing symbiotic nitrogen fixation.’, Plant and Soil, 152 (1), 1–17.
[30] HirphaLeggesse., Nigussie-Dechassa, R., Gebeyehu, S., Bultosa, G. and Mekbib, F. (2013). Response to soil acidity of common bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under field conditions at Nedjo, western Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 2 (3), 3-15.
[31] Ho, M. D., Rosas, J. C., Brown. K. M., Lynch. J. P., (2005). Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition. Function Plant Biology. 32. 737-748.
[32] Hodge, A., Berta, G., Doussan, C., Merchan, F. and Crespi, M. (2009). Plant root growth, architecture, and function. Plant and Soil, 321 (1-2), 153-187.
[33] Holford, I. C. R. (1997). Soil phosphorus: its measurement, and its uptake by plants. Soil Research, 35 (2), 227-240.
[34] Jawad, I. T., Taha, M. R., Majeed, Z. H. and Khan, T. A., (2014). Soil stabilization using lime: Advantages, disadvantages and proposing a potential alternative. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering, and Technology, 8 (4), 510-520.
[35] Judd, L. A., Jackson, B. E. and Fonteno, W. C. (2015) ‘Advancements in Root Growth Measurement Technologies and Observation Capabilities for Container-Grown Plants’,. African Journal of Plant Science, 369–392.
[36] Jung, J. K. H. M. and McCouch, S. R. M. (2013). Getting to the roots of it: genetic and hormonal control of root architecture. Frontiers in plant science, 4, 186.
[37] Kay, D. E. (1979). Food Legumes. Tropical Product Institutes. 56/62 Gray’s lnn Road London. 25.
[38] Kenrick, P. and Strullu-Derrien, C., (2014). The origin and early evolution of roots. Plant physiology, 166 (2), 570-580.
[39] Kimani, P., Buruchara, R. and Lubanga, L. (2006), Enhancing the Resilience of Agroecosystems in Central Africa through Improved, Nutrient Dense and Marketable Bean Germplasm Tolerant to Low Fertility Acid Soils. In the CIALCA Second Planning Workshop, Kigali 28, 1-34.
[40] Kochian LV, Pin˜eros MA, Hoekenga OA, (2005). The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminum resistance and toxicity. Plant Soil, 274: 175–195.
[41] Kudoyarova, G. R., Dodd, I. C., Veselov, D. S., Rothwell, S. A. and Yu. Veselov, S. (2015). Common and specific responses to the availability of mineral nutrients and water. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66 (8), 2133-2144.
[42] Lamb, J. F. S., Johnson, L. D. and Barnes, D. K. (2000) ‘A method to characterize root morphology traits in alfalfa’.
[43] Lambers, H., Cawthray, G. R., Giavalisco, P., Kuo, J., Laliberté, E., Pearse, S. J., Scheible, W. R., Stitt, M., Teste, F. and Turner, B. L. (2012). Proteaceae from severely phosphorus-impoverished soils extensively replace phospholipids with galactolipids and sulfolipids during leaf development to achieve a high photosynthetic phosphorus-use-efficiency. New Phytologist, 196 (4), 1098-1108.
[44] Landon JR. 1991. Booker tropical soil manual: a handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and sub-tropics. Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group, New York, USA,. 1-474.
[45] Liao, H., Rubio, G., Yan, X., Cao, A., Brown, K. M. and Lynch, J. P., (2001). Effect of phosphorus availability on basal root shallowness in common bean. Plant and Soil, 232 (1-2), 69-79.
[46] Lunze, L., Kimani, P. M., Ngatoluwa, R., Rabary, B., Rachier, G. O., Ugen, M. M. and Ruganza, V., (2007). Bean improvement for low soil fertility adaptation in Eastern and Central Africa. In Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities, 325-332.
[47] Lynch JP. (2011). Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiology 156: 1041–1049.
[48] Lynch, J. P. and Brown, K. M., (2012). New roots for agriculture: exploiting the root phenome. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367 (1595), pp. 1598-1604.
[49] Lynch, J. P., and Brown, k.m., (2001). Top soil foraging- an architectural adaptation of plant to low phosphorus availability. Plant soil. 225-237.
[50] Margaret, N., Tenywa, J. S., Otabbong, E., Mubiru, D. N. and Ali, T., (2014). Development of Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Production Under Low Soil Phosphorus and Drought in Sub-Saharan Africa: A. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7 (5).
[51] Marschner, P., Crowley, D. and Rengel, Z. (2011). Rhizosphere interactions between microorganisms and plants govern iron and phosphorus acquisition along the root axis–model and research methods. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43 (5), 883-894.
[52] Mekonnen, F. (2007) ‘Adaptation and agronomic performance of chickpea varieties in northeastern Amhara’, 85–92.
[53] MeseretTuruko, and Amin Mohammed., (2014). Effect of different phosphorus fertilizer rates on growth, dry matter yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). World Journal of Agricultural Research, 2 (3), 88-92.
[54] Miguel, M. A., Postma, J. A. and Lynch, J. P., (2015). Phene synergism between root hair length and basal root growth angle for phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiology, 167 (4), 1430-1439.
[55] Miguel, M. A., Postma, J. A. and Lynch, J., (2013). Phene synergism between root hair length and basal root growth angle for phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiology. 167, 1430–1439.
[56] Miller, c., Ochoa, I., Nielson, K., Beck, D., Lynch, J., (2003). Genetic variation for adventitious rooting in response to low phosphorus availability: potential utility for phosphorus acquisition from stratified soils. Functional plant Biology. 30, 973-985.
[57] Mulugeta A (2011) Factors affecting the adoption of improved haricot bean varieties and associated agronomic practices in Dale woreda. SNNPRS, M.Sc. Thesis in Plant Sciences (Agronomy), Hawassa University, Ethiopia, Africa.
[58] Munuve, H. K., (2016). Effects of phosphorus and soil moisture on grain yield, leaf and grain tissue concentration of iron and zinc in three bean (phaseolusvulgarisl. L) genotypes (Doctoral dissertation).
[59] Mwanauta, R. W., Mtei, K. M. and Ndakidemi, P. A., (2015). Potential of Controlling Common Bean Insect Pests (Bean Stem Maggot (Ophiomyia phaseoli), Ootheca (Ootheca bennigseni) and Aphids (Aphis fabae)) Using Agronomic, Biological and Botanical Practices in Field. Agricultural Sciences, 6 (05), 489.
[60] Mweetwa, A. M., Chilombo, G. and Gondwe, B. M., (2016). Nodulation, nutrient uptake and yield of common bean inoculated with Rhizobia and Trichoderma in an Acid Soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, 8 (12), 61.
[61] Namugwanya Margaret, John Stephen Tenywa1, Erasmus Otabbong, D. N. M. and T. A. B. (2014) ‘Development of Common Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Production Under Low Soil Phosphorus and Drought in Sub-Saharan Africa : A Review’, 7 (5), 128–139.
[62] Negash, R, (2007). Determinants of adoption of improved haricot beans production package in Alaba Special Woreda, Southern Ethiopia, M.Sc. thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia
[63] Niu, Y. F., Chai, R. S., Jin, G. L., Wang, H., Tang, C. X. and Zhang, Y. S., (2012). Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: AReview. Annals of Botany, 112 (2), 391-408.
[64] Okii, D., Tukamuhabwa, P., Odong, T., Namayanja, A., Mukabaranga, J., Paparu, P. and Gepts, P., (2014). Morphological diversity of tropical common bean germplasm. African Crop Science Journal, 22 (1), 59-68.
[65] Rao, I. M., Miles, J. W., Beebe, S. E. and Horst, W. J., (2016). Root adaptations to soils with low fertility and aluminum toxicity. Annals of Botany, 118 (4), 593-605.
[66] Salinas, J. G. (1978). Differential response of some cereal and bean cultivars to Al and P stress in an oxisol of central Brasil. PhD Diss., Raleigh, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.
[67] Sanchez-Calderón, L., Ibarra-Cortés, M. E. and Zepeda-Jazo, I., (2013). Root development and abiotic stress adaptation. In Abiotic Stress-Plant Responses and Applications in Agriculture. 23 (5-7), 101-113.
[68] Sanchez, P. A. and Salinas, J. G., (1981). Low-input technology for managing Oxisols and Ultisols in tropical America. In Advances in agronomy 34, 279-406.
[69] Shenoy, V. V. and Kalagudi, G. M., (2005). Enhancing plant phosphorus use efficiency for sustainable cropping. Biotechnology Advances, 23 (7-8), 501-513.
[70] Shumi D, Alemayehu D, Afeta T, and Debelo B. (2018). Response of Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended NPS Fertilizer in Adola District, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Biological Soil Health. 5 (1): 1-12
[71] Simane, B., (1998) ‘No Title: Haricot bean Agroecology in Ethiopia’, 6 (1), 9–18.
[72] Slattery J., M. Ridley and M. Windsor, (1999). Ash alkalinity of animal and plant products. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31: 321-324.
[73] Tesfaye, A., Githiri, M., Derera, J. and Debele, T., (2017). Genetic variability in soybean (Glycine max L.) for low soil phosphorus tolerance. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27 (2), 1-15.
[74] Tapia, B. H. (1987). Variedadesmejoradas de frijol Phaseolus vulgaris L. con granorojo para Nicaragua. Instituto Superior de CienciasAgropecuarias. Dirección de Investigación y Postgrado, Managua, Nicaragua.
[75] Thung, M. (1990). Phosphorus: A limiting nutrient in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Latin America and field screening for efficiency and response, In: N. El Bassam, M. Dambroth, and B. C. Loughman (eds). Genetic aspects of plant mineral nutrition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 501–521.
[76] White, W. B., Cannon, C. P., Heller, S. R., Nissen, S. E., Bergenstal, R. M., Bakris, G. L., Perez, A. T., Fleck, P. R., Mehta, C. R., Kupfer, S. and Wilson, C., (2013). Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine, 369 (14), 1327-1335.
[77] Wolff, A. B., Sidirelli, M., Paradellis, C. and Kotzabasis, K., (1995). Influence of acid soil on nodule numbers in relation to polyamine and tannin concentrations in roots of Phaseolus vulgaris. Biology and fertility of soils, 20 (4), 249-252.
[78] Wolff, A. B., Singleton, P. W., Sidirelli, M. and Bohlool, B. B., (1993). Influence of acid soil on nodulation and interstrain competitiveness in relation to tannin concentrations in seeds and roots of Phaseolus vulgaris. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 25 (6), 715-721.
[79] Yan, X., Lynch, J. P. and Beebe, S. E., (1995). Genetic variation for phosphorus efficiency of common bean in contrasting soil types: I. Vegetative response. Crop Science, 35 (4), 1086-1093.
[80] York LM, Nord EA, Lynch JP. (2013). Integration of root phenes for soil resource acquisition. Frontiers in Plant Science 4 (Article 435): 1–15.
[81] Zahran, H. H. (1999) ‘Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate.’, Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 63 (4), 968–89.
[82] Zhang XB, Peng L, Yang YS, Gen-Di Xu (2007). Effect of Al in soil on photosynthesis and related morphological and physiological characteristics of two soybean genotypes, Botanical Studies, 48: 435-444.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Daba Etana, Tolossa Ameyu. (2021). Synerging of Root Traits and Agronomic Practices in Common Bean Production Improvement under Acidic Soil. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 6(3), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Daba Etana; Tolossa Ameyu. Synerging of Root Traits and Agronomic Practices in Common Bean Production Improvement under Acidic Soil. Am. J. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2021, 6(3), 77-85. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Daba Etana, Tolossa Ameyu. Synerging of Root Traits and Agronomic Practices in Common Bean Production Improvement under Acidic Soil. Am J Environ Resour Econ. 2021;6(3):77-85. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11,
      author = {Daba Etana and Tolossa Ameyu},
      title = {Synerging of Root Traits and Agronomic Practices in Common Bean Production Improvement under Acidic Soil},
      journal = {American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {77-85},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajere.20210603.11},
      abstract = {The most challenging in twenty first century is the cause and consequences of Climate change and variability. It is hastening frequently by over population more in developing countries. Thus, it is affected several sectors, while Agriculture is the most vulnerable for climate change. As a result both biotic and abiotic factors are bottle neck for food security and sustainability. From abiotic factor, soil acidity is the frequently observed at area where received intensive rainfall due to top soil and metallic elements washed out. Soil acidity is arsenic, and causes abortion of expected production, especially susceptible crops such as Common bean. To overcome this problem, agronomic practices such as lime application, soil conservation techniques and appropriate root traits were reported. Root system architectures traits such as higher basal root number between 12 to 16, basal root whorl number of around 4, and shallow root angle of less than 15° were reported suitable to withstand soil acidity. Agronomic practices alone reported as it is tedious and also difficult to get complete genotypes with full of desired acidity resistance root traits. Hence several reported explained that using the desired root traits for acidity resistance genotypes and important agronomic practices obtained more valuable results as form of integration. Therefore, using the appropriate root traits and agronomic practices support with each other to reduces the syndrome of soil acidity impacts.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Synerging of Root Traits and Agronomic Practices in Common Bean Production Improvement under Acidic Soil
    AU  - Daba Etana
    AU  - Tolossa Ameyu
    Y1  - 2021/08/23
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11
    T2  - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics
    JF  - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics
    JO  - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics
    SP  - 77
    EP  - 85
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-787X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210603.11
    AB  - The most challenging in twenty first century is the cause and consequences of Climate change and variability. It is hastening frequently by over population more in developing countries. Thus, it is affected several sectors, while Agriculture is the most vulnerable for climate change. As a result both biotic and abiotic factors are bottle neck for food security and sustainability. From abiotic factor, soil acidity is the frequently observed at area where received intensive rainfall due to top soil and metallic elements washed out. Soil acidity is arsenic, and causes abortion of expected production, especially susceptible crops such as Common bean. To overcome this problem, agronomic practices such as lime application, soil conservation techniques and appropriate root traits were reported. Root system architectures traits such as higher basal root number between 12 to 16, basal root whorl number of around 4, and shallow root angle of less than 15° were reported suitable to withstand soil acidity. Agronomic practices alone reported as it is tedious and also difficult to get complete genotypes with full of desired acidity resistance root traits. Hence several reported explained that using the desired root traits for acidity resistance genotypes and important agronomic practices obtained more valuable results as form of integration. Therefore, using the appropriate root traits and agronomic practices support with each other to reduces the syndrome of soil acidity impacts.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Sections