| Peer-Reviewed

Risk of Thromboembolic Disease and Hemorrhage in Patients with Multiform Glioblastoma

Received: 8 May 2021    Accepted: 31 May 2021    Published: 9 June 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor, with an aggressive course and a short life expectancy despite standard treatment. The possibility of the development of thrombotic events (VTE) with this type of cancer is frequent. Objective: To determine the risk of presenting VTE and haemorrhagic events in patients affected by GBM. Methods: Observational retrospective study of patients with GBM diagnosis at the General University Hospital of Ciudad Real between 2012 and 2015. The demographic characteristics of patients were studied, predictive models were compared, and a survival analysis was performed. Results: 13 (16.9%) out of 77 patients developed symptomatic VTE. The quality of life according to the performance status ECOG scale at the moment of diagnosis was 1 in 42 (15.38%) patients, and at the time of VTE, 5 (41.7%) had a value of 2, and 4 (33.3.3%) registered 3. In the group that developed VTE according to the predictive model of risk for thrombosis in Khorana 5 (38.5%) had low risk and 8 (61.5%) intermediate; on the ASCO 2013 modified scale 5 (38.5%) had an Intermediate risk and 8 (61.5%) high. With a median, 1 year follow-up, 64 (84.2%) patients died, with an average time after diagnosis of 279.09 days (216.6-341.6) (SE 31,8). 2 (2.6%) of the patients presented a greater haemorrhagic event and 7 (7.9%) cerebral haemorrhage, of which 4 (44.4%) had prophylactic Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). In the survival analysis, patients who received prophylactic treatment with LMWHs had a higher survival rate with an average of 298.5 days compared to 239.3 of those who did not (p>0.05). There were no significant variables in the multivariate analysis for thrombotic or haemorrhagic events. Conclusion: The demographic and clinical characteristics of our patients were similar to those reported in other publications. The predictive scale of Khorana was not validated in our study, in contrast, the modified ASCO 2013 scale was closer to our results. The creation of a precise predictive model would help to delineate the benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation in high-risk patients. Long-term prophylaxis with LMWHs has demonstrated a reduction of thrombotic events without significantly increasing fatal haemorrhagic episodes, also demonstrating greater long-term survival, independent of thrombotic events. Randomized prospective studies are needed to demonstrate its benefits.

Published in American Journal of Internal Medicine (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18
Page(s) 153-159
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Glioblastoma Multiforme, Thrombosis, Haemorrhagic, Low Molecular Weight Heparins

References
[1] Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, XI J, Kromer C, Wolinsky Y, Krinchko C, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2009-2013. Neuro Oncology. 2016; 18 (suppl 5): p. v1-v75.
[2] Gussoni G, Frasson S, La Regina M, Di Micco P, Monreal M, Investigators. R. Three-month mortality rate and clinical predictors in patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer. Findings from the RIETE registry. Thrombosis research. 2013 January; 131 (1): p. 24-30.
[3] Lyman G, Khorana A, Falanga A, Clarke-Pearson D, Flowers C, Jahanzeb M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline: recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007 De ember; 25 (34): p. 5490-505.
[4] Versteeg H, Schaffner F, Kerver M, Petersen H, Ahamed J, Felding-Habermann B, et al. Inhibition of tissue factor signaling suppresses tumor growth. Blood. 2008 January; 111 (1): p. 190-9.
[5] Ludwig R, Alban S, Boehncke W. Structural requirements of heparin and related molecules to exert a multitude of anti-inflammatory activities. Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2006 September; 6 (9): p. 1009-23.
[6] Martínez-González A, Calvo G, Pérez Romasanta L, Pérez-García V. Hypoxic cell waves around necrotic cores in glioblastoma: a biomathematical model and its therapeutic implications. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 2012 December; 74 (12): p. 2875-96.
[7] Khorana A, Kuderer N, Culakova E, Lyman G, Francis C. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2008 May; 111 (10): p. 4902-7.
[8] Lyman G, Khorana A, Kuderer N, Lee A, Arcelus J, Balaban E, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2013 June; 31 (17): p. 2189-204.
[9] Sideras K, Schaefer P, Okuno S, Sloan J, Kutteh L, Fitch T, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with advanced cancer: a phase 3 clinical trial. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2006 June; 81 (6): p. 758-67.
[10] Semrad T, O'Donnell R, Wun T, Chew HHD, Zhou H, White R. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in 9489 patients with malignant glioma. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2007 April; 106 (4): p. 601-8.
[11] Streiff M, Ye X, Kickler T, Desideri S, Jani J, Fisher J, et al. A prospective multicenter study of venous thromboembolism in patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma: hazard rate and risk factors. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2015 June; 142 (2): p. 299-305.
[12] Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney D, Gokaslan Z, Shi W, DeMonte F, et al. A Multivariate Analysis of 416 Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme: Prognosis, Extent of Resection, and Survival. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2001 August; 95 (2): p. 190-198.
[13] Shea-Budgell M, Wu C, Easaw J. Evidence-based guidance on venous thromboembolism in patients with solid tumours. Current Oncology. 2014 June; 21 (3): p. e504-e514.
[14] Lim G, Ho C, Roldan-Urgoti G, Leugner D, Easaw J. Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Glioblastoma Patients. Cureus. 2018 May; 10 (5): p. e2678.
[15] Yust-Katz S, Mandel J, Wu J, Yuan Y, Webre C, Pawar T, et al. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and glioblastoma. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2015 August; 124 (1): p. 87-94.
[16] Portillo J, de la Rocha I, Font L, Braester A, Madridano O, Díaz Peromingo J, et al. Venous thromboembolism in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Thrombosis Research. 2015 December; 136 (6): p. 1199-203.
[17] Kaewborisutsakul A, Tunthanathip T, Yuwakosol P, Inkate S, Pattharachayakul S. Incidence and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism Following Craniotomy for Intracranial Tumors: A Cohort Study. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2020 January-March; 15 (1): p. 31-38.
[18] Dolovich L, Ginsberg J, Douketis J, Holbrook A, Cheah G. A meta-analysis comparing low-molecular-weight heparins with unfractionated heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolism: examining some unanswered questions regarding location of treatment, product type, and dosing frequency. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2000 January; 160 (2): p. 181-8.
[19] Thaler J, Ay C, Pabinger I. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients –Risk scores and recent randomised controlled trials. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2012 December; 108 (6): p. 1042-8.
[20] Lyman G, Bohlke K, Khorana A, Kuderer N, Lee A, Arcelus J, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update 2014. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015 february; 33 (6): p. 654-6.
[21] Streiff M, Holmstrom B, Ashrani A, Bockenstedt P, Chesney C, Eby C, et al. Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolic Disease, Version 1.2015. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2015 September; 13 (9): p. 1079-95.
[22] den Exter P, Hooijer J, can der Hulle T, Van Oosten J, Dekkers O, Klok F, et al. Vitamin K Antagonists Compared to Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins for Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: An Observational Study in Routine Clinical Practice. An Observational Study in Routine Clinical Practice. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2017 November; 117 (11): p. 2163-2167.
[23] Gerber D, Grossman S, Zeltzman M, Parisi M, Kleinberg L. The impact of thrombocytopenia from temozolomide and radiation in newly diagnosed adults with high-grade gliomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2007 January; 9 (1): p. 47-52.
[24] Lee A, Levine M, Baker R, Bowden C, Kakkar A, Prins M, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2003 July; 349 (2): p. 146-53.
[25] Bitoh S, Hasegawa H, Ohtsuki H, Obashi J, Fujiwara M, Sakurai M. Cerebral neoplasms initially presenting with massive intracerebral hemorrhage. Surgical Neurology. 1984 July; 22 (1): p. 57-62.
[26] Lieu A, Hwang S, Howng S, Chai C. Brain tumors with hemorrhage. Journal of the Formosoan Medical Association. 1999 May; 98 (5): p. 365-7.
[27] Cote L, Greenberg S, Caprini J, Stone J, Arcelus J, López-Jiménez L, et al. Outcomes in neurosurgical patients who develop venous thromboembolism: a review of the RIETE registry. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2014 November; 20 (8): p. 772-778.
[28] Delgado-López P, Corrales-García E. Survival in Glioblastoma: A Review on the Impact of Treatment Modalities. Clinical & translational oncology. 2016 November 1062-1071; 18 (11).
[29] Zincircioglu S, Kaplan M, Isikdogan A, Cil T, Karadayi B, Dirier A, et al. Contribution of low-molecular weight heparin addition to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Jpurnal of the Balkan Union Oncology. 2012 January-March; 17 (1): p. 124-7.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Iris Violeta de la Rocha Vedia, Jose Portillo Sanchez. (2021). Risk of Thromboembolic Disease and Hemorrhage in Patients with Multiform Glioblastoma. American Journal of Internal Medicine, 9(3), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Iris Violeta de la Rocha Vedia; Jose Portillo Sanchez. Risk of Thromboembolic Disease and Hemorrhage in Patients with Multiform Glioblastoma. Am. J. Intern. Med. 2021, 9(3), 153-159. doi: 10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Iris Violeta de la Rocha Vedia, Jose Portillo Sanchez. Risk of Thromboembolic Disease and Hemorrhage in Patients with Multiform Glioblastoma. Am J Intern Med. 2021;9(3):153-159. doi: 10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18,
      author = {Iris Violeta de la Rocha Vedia and Jose Portillo Sanchez},
      title = {Risk of Thromboembolic Disease and Hemorrhage in Patients with Multiform Glioblastoma},
      journal = {American Journal of Internal Medicine},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {153-159},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajim.20210903.18},
      abstract = {Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor, with an aggressive course and a short life expectancy despite standard treatment. The possibility of the development of thrombotic events (VTE) with this type of cancer is frequent. Objective: To determine the risk of presenting VTE and haemorrhagic events in patients affected by GBM. Methods: Observational retrospective study of patients with GBM diagnosis at the General University Hospital of Ciudad Real between 2012 and 2015. The demographic characteristics of patients were studied, predictive models were compared, and a survival analysis was performed. Results: 13 (16.9%) out of 77 patients developed symptomatic VTE. The quality of life according to the performance status ECOG scale at the moment of diagnosis was 1 in 42 (15.38%) patients, and at the time of VTE, 5 (41.7%) had a value of 2, and 4 (33.3.3%) registered 3. In the group that developed VTE according to the predictive model of risk for thrombosis in Khorana 5 (38.5%) had low risk and 8 (61.5%) intermediate; on the ASCO 2013 modified scale 5 (38.5%) had an Intermediate risk and 8 (61.5%) high. With a median, 1 year follow-up, 64 (84.2%) patients died, with an average time after diagnosis of 279.09 days (216.6-341.6) (SE 31,8). 2 (2.6%) of the patients presented a greater haemorrhagic event and 7 (7.9%) cerebral haemorrhage, of which 4 (44.4%) had prophylactic Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). In the survival analysis, patients who received prophylactic treatment with LMWHs had a higher survival rate with an average of 298.5 days compared to 239.3 of those who did not (p>0.05). There were no significant variables in the multivariate analysis for thrombotic or haemorrhagic events. Conclusion: The demographic and clinical characteristics of our patients were similar to those reported in other publications. The predictive scale of Khorana was not validated in our study, in contrast, the modified ASCO 2013 scale was closer to our results. The creation of a precise predictive model would help to delineate the benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation in high-risk patients. Long-term prophylaxis with LMWHs has demonstrated a reduction of thrombotic events without significantly increasing fatal haemorrhagic episodes, also demonstrating greater long-term survival, independent of thrombotic events. Randomized prospective studies are needed to demonstrate its benefits.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Risk of Thromboembolic Disease and Hemorrhage in Patients with Multiform Glioblastoma
    AU  - Iris Violeta de la Rocha Vedia
    AU  - Jose Portillo Sanchez
    Y1  - 2021/06/09
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18
    T2  - American Journal of Internal Medicine
    JF  - American Journal of Internal Medicine
    JO  - American Journal of Internal Medicine
    SP  - 153
    EP  - 159
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-4324
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajim.20210903.18
    AB  - Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor, with an aggressive course and a short life expectancy despite standard treatment. The possibility of the development of thrombotic events (VTE) with this type of cancer is frequent. Objective: To determine the risk of presenting VTE and haemorrhagic events in patients affected by GBM. Methods: Observational retrospective study of patients with GBM diagnosis at the General University Hospital of Ciudad Real between 2012 and 2015. The demographic characteristics of patients were studied, predictive models were compared, and a survival analysis was performed. Results: 13 (16.9%) out of 77 patients developed symptomatic VTE. The quality of life according to the performance status ECOG scale at the moment of diagnosis was 1 in 42 (15.38%) patients, and at the time of VTE, 5 (41.7%) had a value of 2, and 4 (33.3.3%) registered 3. In the group that developed VTE according to the predictive model of risk for thrombosis in Khorana 5 (38.5%) had low risk and 8 (61.5%) intermediate; on the ASCO 2013 modified scale 5 (38.5%) had an Intermediate risk and 8 (61.5%) high. With a median, 1 year follow-up, 64 (84.2%) patients died, with an average time after diagnosis of 279.09 days (216.6-341.6) (SE 31,8). 2 (2.6%) of the patients presented a greater haemorrhagic event and 7 (7.9%) cerebral haemorrhage, of which 4 (44.4%) had prophylactic Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). In the survival analysis, patients who received prophylactic treatment with LMWHs had a higher survival rate with an average of 298.5 days compared to 239.3 of those who did not (p>0.05). There were no significant variables in the multivariate analysis for thrombotic or haemorrhagic events. Conclusion: The demographic and clinical characteristics of our patients were similar to those reported in other publications. The predictive scale of Khorana was not validated in our study, in contrast, the modified ASCO 2013 scale was closer to our results. The creation of a precise predictive model would help to delineate the benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation in high-risk patients. Long-term prophylaxis with LMWHs has demonstrated a reduction of thrombotic events without significantly increasing fatal haemorrhagic episodes, also demonstrating greater long-term survival, independent of thrombotic events. Randomized prospective studies are needed to demonstrate its benefits.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Internal Medicine, General University Hospital of Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain

  • Internal Medicine, General University Hospital of Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain

  • Sections