This paper examined the monthly volatility of Naira/Dollar exchange rates in Nigeria between the periods of January, 1995 to January, 2016. Forecasting volatility remains to be an important step to be taken in several decision makings involving financial market. Traditional GARH models were usually applied in forecasting volatility of a financial market. This study was aim at enhancing the performance of these models in volatility forecasting in which both the traditional GARCH and Dynamic Neural Networks were hybridized to develop the proposed models offorecasting the volatility of Inflation rate in Nigeria. The values of the volatility estimated by the best fitted GARH model are used as input to the Neural Network. The inputs of the first hybrid model also included past values of other related endogenous variables. The second hybrid model takes as inputs both series of the simulated data and the inputs of the first hybrid model. The forecasts obtained by each of those hybrid models have been compared with those of GARCH model in terms of the actual volatility. The computational results demonstrate that the second hybrid model provides better volatility forecasts.
Published in | American Journal of Management Science and Engineering (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12 |
Page(s) | 8-14 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Volatility, ARCH Models, Dynamic Neural Networks, Monthly Standard Deviation
[1] | Olowe, R. A., (2009), Modeling Naira/Dollar Exchange Rate Volatility: Application Of GARCH And Asymmetric Models, International Review of Business Research Papers, 5, 377-398. |
[2] | Engle, R. F., (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica, 50, 987-1007. |
[3] | Friedman, M., (1977). Nobel lecture: inflation and unemployment, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 451–472. |
[4] | Engle, R. F., (1983). Estimates of the variance of U.S. inflation based on the ARCH model, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 15, 286–301. |
[5] | Cosimano, T. F. and D. W. Jansen (1988) Estimates of the variance of U.S. inflation based upon the ARCH model: comment, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 20, 409–421. |
[6] | Grier, K. B. and Perry M. J., (2000). The effects of real and nominal uncertainty on inflation and output growth: Some GARCH-M evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 45–58. |
[7] | Hajizadeh E., Seifi A., Fazel Zarandi M. H., Turksen I. B., (2012). A hybrid modeling approach for forecasting the volatility of S&P 500 index return, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 431-436. |
[8] | Hamid, S. A., and Iqbal, Z., (2004). Using neural networks for forecasting volatility of S&P 500. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1116–1125. |
[9] | Kim, K. j. (2006). Artificial neural networks with evolutionary instance selection for financial forecasting. Expert System with Application, 30, 519–526. |
[10] | Wang, Y. H., (2009). Nonlinear neural network forecasting model for stock index option price: Hybrid GJR-GARCH approach. Expert System with Application, 36, 564–570GARCH models. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention, 2 (6), 52-65. |
[11] | Yu, L., Wang, S., & Keung, L. (2009). A neural-network-based nonlinear meta modeling approach to financial time series forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 9, 536–57. |
[12] | Bildirici, M., & Ersin, O. O. (2009). Improving forecasts of GARCH family models with the artificial neural networks: An application to the daily returns in Istanbul Stock Exchange. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7355–7362. |
[13] | Roh, Tae Hyup (2007). Forecasting the volatility of stock price index. Expert Systemwith Application, 33, 916–922. |
[14] | Daly, K. (2008). Financial volatility: Issues and measuring techniques. Physica A, 387, 2377–2393. |
[15] | Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327. |
[16] | Nelson, D. B., & Cao, C. Q. (1992). Inequality constraints in the univariate GARCH model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10 (2), 229–235. |
[17] | Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., and Runkle. D. (1993). Relationship between the expected valueand the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance 48, 1779-1801. |
[18] | Zakoian, J. M. (1994). Threshold Heteroskedastic models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 931–955. |
[19] | Engle R (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation. A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business statistics, 20 (3) 339-350. |
[20] | Ding, Z. K. F. Engle and C. W. J Granger (1993). “Long Memory Properties of Stock Market Returns and a New Model”. Journal of Empirical Finance. 1. 83-106. |
[21] | Roman, J., and A. Jameel, “Back propagation and recurrent neural networks in financial analysis of multiple stock market returns,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 2, 1996, pp. 454–460. |
[22] | Feng, J., C. K. Tse, and F. C. M. Lau, “A neural-network-based channel equalization strategy for chaos-based communication systems,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, Vol. 50, No. 7, 2003, pp. 954–957. |
[23] | Kamwa, I., R. Grondin, V. K. Sood, C. Gagnon, Van Thich Nguyen, and J. Mereb,“Recurrent neural networks for phasor detection and adaptive identification in power system control and protection,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 45, No. 2, 1996, pp. 657–664. |
[24] | Medsker, L. R., and L. C. Jain, Recurrent neural networks: design and applications, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000. |
[25] | De Jesus, O. and M. T. Hagan, (2001a). Back propagation through time for a general class of recurrent network. Proceedings of the international Joint Conference on Neural Networks, July 15-19, Washington, DC, USA., PP: 2638-2642. |
[26] | De Jesus, O. and M. T. Hagan, (2001b). Forward perturbation algorithm for a general class of recurrent network. Proceedings of the international Joint Conference on Neural Networks, July 15-19, Washington, DC, USA., PP: 2638-2642. |
APA Style
S. Suleiman, S. U. Gulumbe, B. K. Asare, M. Abubakar. (2016). Training Dynamic Neural Networks for Forecasting Naira/Dollar Exchange Returns Volatility in Nigeria. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 1(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12
ACS Style
S. Suleiman; S. U. Gulumbe; B. K. Asare; M. Abubakar. Training Dynamic Neural Networks for Forecasting Naira/Dollar Exchange Returns Volatility in Nigeria. Am. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2016, 1(1), 8-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12, author = {S. Suleiman and S. U. Gulumbe and B. K. Asare and M. Abubakar}, title = {Training Dynamic Neural Networks for Forecasting Naira/Dollar Exchange Returns Volatility in Nigeria}, journal = {American Journal of Management Science and Engineering}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {8-14}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmse.20160101.12}, abstract = {This paper examined the monthly volatility of Naira/Dollar exchange rates in Nigeria between the periods of January, 1995 to January, 2016. Forecasting volatility remains to be an important step to be taken in several decision makings involving financial market. Traditional GARH models were usually applied in forecasting volatility of a financial market. This study was aim at enhancing the performance of these models in volatility forecasting in which both the traditional GARCH and Dynamic Neural Networks were hybridized to develop the proposed models offorecasting the volatility of Inflation rate in Nigeria. The values of the volatility estimated by the best fitted GARH model are used as input to the Neural Network. The inputs of the first hybrid model also included past values of other related endogenous variables. The second hybrid model takes as inputs both series of the simulated data and the inputs of the first hybrid model. The forecasts obtained by each of those hybrid models have been compared with those of GARCH model in terms of the actual volatility. The computational results demonstrate that the second hybrid model provides better volatility forecasts.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Training Dynamic Neural Networks for Forecasting Naira/Dollar Exchange Returns Volatility in Nigeria AU - S. Suleiman AU - S. U. Gulumbe AU - B. K. Asare AU - M. Abubakar Y1 - 2016/09/09 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12 T2 - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering JF - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering JO - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering SP - 8 EP - 14 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1379 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20160101.12 AB - This paper examined the monthly volatility of Naira/Dollar exchange rates in Nigeria between the periods of January, 1995 to January, 2016. Forecasting volatility remains to be an important step to be taken in several decision makings involving financial market. Traditional GARH models were usually applied in forecasting volatility of a financial market. This study was aim at enhancing the performance of these models in volatility forecasting in which both the traditional GARCH and Dynamic Neural Networks were hybridized to develop the proposed models offorecasting the volatility of Inflation rate in Nigeria. The values of the volatility estimated by the best fitted GARH model are used as input to the Neural Network. The inputs of the first hybrid model also included past values of other related endogenous variables. The second hybrid model takes as inputs both series of the simulated data and the inputs of the first hybrid model. The forecasts obtained by each of those hybrid models have been compared with those of GARCH model in terms of the actual volatility. The computational results demonstrate that the second hybrid model provides better volatility forecasts. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -