This study was piloted in Jimma Horro District of Kellem Wollega Zone, through the objective of evaluating smallholders’ chicken managing system of the area. An organized questionnaire and Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) approaches significant to Small holder chicken management were used to collect data. A study stayed piloted on the designated Households relating Small Holder Chicken Controlling Structure. The most leading chicken running classification in the survey part was a survival extensive method which is constructed on native and better chickens with hunting besides periodic additional breast-feeding of home-based particles then home nutrition rejections. As the views of respondent’s home chicken is basis of revenue that profits females subsequently around 99.4% poultry coverage of the District are described to be kept through females who remain supposed to be accountable for creation nearly entirely the main directions regarding chicken. About 86.7% of the respondents have no separate chicken household. Serious limitations of the smallholder chicken manufacture in the revision area were moderately due to the dominant lowly supervision observes, in specific disease, predator, absence of appropriate vigor attention, and lowly accommodation. It was decided that exertions have to be finished to move the manufacture standard to semi intensive aiming on business concerned with invention founded on searching with a universal care of facilities such as well-being, covering, delay, credit and selling to make it fruitful and supportable.
Published in | American Journal of Management Science and Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11 |
Page(s) | 77-86 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Searching, Chicken Management System, Households
[1] | Bush, Jennifer. (2006). The Threat of Avian Flu Predicted Impacts on Rural Livelihoods in CACC (Central Agricultural Census Commission), (2003): Statistical report on farm management Practices, livestock and farm managements Central Statistical Authority report of 2004- 2005, Vol. II, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[2] | CSA (central statistical Agency). (2015). Agricultural sample survey volume II report on livestock and Livestock characteristics Addis Ababa August 2015 573 statical bulletin 573. |
[3] | Danda, M. K, Mwamachi., D. M, Lewal,. K and Jefa,. F. (2008), Characterization of the indigenous chicken sub-sector in the Coastal lowlands of Kenya. In: Proceedings of the 12th Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Biennial Scientific Conference, obi, Kenya, pp. 898-905. |
[4] | FAO (2010). Poultry meat and Eggs Agribusiness hand book. Director of Investment Centre Division. |
[5] | Kelem Wollega Zone Western Oromia, Ethiopia Jimma Horo Livestock office 2018). |
[6] | Mekonnen G., (2007). Characterization of smallholder poultry production and marketing system of Dale, wonsho and loka abaya weredas of southern Ethiopia. Msc. Thesis presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Hawassa University. |
[7] | Mengesha, M., Tamir, B. and Dessie, T. 2011. Village Chicken Constraints and Traditional Management Practices in Jamma District, South Wollo, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 23 (37). |
[8] | Moges F, Tegegne A, Dessie T (2010). Local chicken production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: Characteristics and opportunities for market-oriented development. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 24 Nairobi, Kenya, ILRI. 55. |
[9] | Nzioka M. (2000), Indigenous poultry production in the Katumani mandate area. In: Margo Kooijiman and E. Mukisira (Eds). Netherlands support to the National Agricultural Research Project Phase II. Proceedings of the end of project conference. 29th Nov.-1st Dec. 2002. KARI Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya. |
[10] | SAS (Statistical Analysis System), (2008). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. V. 9.25. Eskinder Aklilu, 2013. On-farm phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken and chicken. school of graduate studies, Haramaya University, pp: 107. |
[11] | Solomon D. (2008a): Suitability of hay-box brooding technology to rural household poultry production system. Livestock, Research, Rural Development, 19 (1): Retrieved May 8, 2012, Solomon D., 2007b. Comparative nutritive value of Atella and industrial brewer’s grains in chicken retrieved May 26, 2015. |
[12] | Solomon, D. (2007): Suitability of hay-box brooding technology to rural household poultry production System. Lives. Res. Rural Dev., 19: 71-74. |
[13] | SPSS (2011). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Vision 20.0. IBM Corporation, SPSS Inc., Chicago IL. |
[14] | Tadelle Dessie, Million Tadesse, Alemu Yami and Peters, K. J. 2003 b. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: Use patterns and performance valuation and chicken products and socio-economic functions of chicken. Livestock Research for Rural Development, Vol. 15. |
[15] | Tadelle Dessie, Nigusie, D., Alemu Yami and Peters, K. J. 2003 a. The feed resource base and its potentials for increased poultry production in Ethiopia. World's Poultry Science Journal, 58, 77-87, Cambridge University Press. |
[16] | Tekelewold Hailemariam, Dadi, L., Yami, A. and Dana, N. 2006. Determinants of Adoption of Poultry Technology: A Double-Hurdle Approach. Livestock Research for Rural Development, Vol. 18 (3). |
[17] | Tselemti and Tahtay Koraro Office of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2016). |
[18] | Yamane T., (1967). Stastics: An introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., And And New York: Harper and Row. |
APA Style
Soresa Shuma. (2021). Smallholders’ Chicken Management System: The Case of Jimma Horro District of Kelem Wollega Zone Western Oromia, Ethiopia. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6(4), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11
ACS Style
Soresa Shuma. Smallholders’ Chicken Management System: The Case of Jimma Horro District of Kelem Wollega Zone Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Am. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2021, 6(4), 77-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11
AMA Style
Soresa Shuma. Smallholders’ Chicken Management System: The Case of Jimma Horro District of Kelem Wollega Zone Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Manag Sci Eng. 2021;6(4):77-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11, author = {Soresa Shuma}, title = {Smallholders’ Chicken Management System: The Case of Jimma Horro District of Kelem Wollega Zone Western Oromia, Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Management Science and Engineering}, volume = {6}, number = {4}, pages = {77-86}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmse.20210604.11}, abstract = {This study was piloted in Jimma Horro District of Kellem Wollega Zone, through the objective of evaluating smallholders’ chicken managing system of the area. An organized questionnaire and Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) approaches significant to Small holder chicken management were used to collect data. A study stayed piloted on the designated Households relating Small Holder Chicken Controlling Structure. The most leading chicken running classification in the survey part was a survival extensive method which is constructed on native and better chickens with hunting besides periodic additional breast-feeding of home-based particles then home nutrition rejections. As the views of respondent’s home chicken is basis of revenue that profits females subsequently around 99.4% poultry coverage of the District are described to be kept through females who remain supposed to be accountable for creation nearly entirely the main directions regarding chicken. About 86.7% of the respondents have no separate chicken household. Serious limitations of the smallholder chicken manufacture in the revision area were moderately due to the dominant lowly supervision observes, in specific disease, predator, absence of appropriate vigor attention, and lowly accommodation. It was decided that exertions have to be finished to move the manufacture standard to semi intensive aiming on business concerned with invention founded on searching with a universal care of facilities such as well-being, covering, delay, credit and selling to make it fruitful and supportable.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Smallholders’ Chicken Management System: The Case of Jimma Horro District of Kelem Wollega Zone Western Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Soresa Shuma Y1 - 2021/07/16 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11 T2 - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering JF - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering JO - American Journal of Management Science and Engineering SP - 77 EP - 86 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1379 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmse.20210604.11 AB - This study was piloted in Jimma Horro District of Kellem Wollega Zone, through the objective of evaluating smallholders’ chicken managing system of the area. An organized questionnaire and Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) approaches significant to Small holder chicken management were used to collect data. A study stayed piloted on the designated Households relating Small Holder Chicken Controlling Structure. The most leading chicken running classification in the survey part was a survival extensive method which is constructed on native and better chickens with hunting besides periodic additional breast-feeding of home-based particles then home nutrition rejections. As the views of respondent’s home chicken is basis of revenue that profits females subsequently around 99.4% poultry coverage of the District are described to be kept through females who remain supposed to be accountable for creation nearly entirely the main directions regarding chicken. About 86.7% of the respondents have no separate chicken household. Serious limitations of the smallholder chicken manufacture in the revision area were moderately due to the dominant lowly supervision observes, in specific disease, predator, absence of appropriate vigor attention, and lowly accommodation. It was decided that exertions have to be finished to move the manufacture standard to semi intensive aiming on business concerned with invention founded on searching with a universal care of facilities such as well-being, covering, delay, credit and selling to make it fruitful and supportable. VL - 6 IS - 4 ER -