Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19

Litaba Efraim Kolobe

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19

Litaba Efraim Kolobe

Published in American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences (Volume 1, Issue 1)

Received: 14 December 2020 Accepted: 21 December 2020 Published: 31 December 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Coronavirus pandemic globally overwhelmed the hospitals to deliver care as used to be employed by nurses. The two University hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia despite exhausted were still sustaining the pain management nursing care standards during the pandemic settings. The implementation of the pain management quality project enhanced sustaining the pain management nursing care standards related to pain assessment and reassessment after interventions. The aim of this quality improvement of pain management was to improve nurses’ compliance regarding pain assessment during arrival to the clinics, emergency department or in the wards and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain. Retrospective pain audits were performed monthly from electronic patients’ medical records by the pain team nurses. Analysis of the audits data findings of the two University hospitals were compared for the first six months of 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate the trend for compliance rate that was sustained. The average rate for initial pain screening for outpatients’ clinics in 2019 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 99% for hospital A and 97% for hospital B. Secondly the average rate for initial pain assessment for inpatients/emergency units in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 100% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 100% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Thirdly, for pain reassessment in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 93% for hospital B, though in 2020 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Pain reassessment for University hospital B in 2019 indicated that there was a need for improvement in February and April, while in 2020 compliance rate significantly improved by 7% despite the pandemic settings. On this basis, for sustainability it is recommended to continue monitoring the compliance of nurses to conduct pain assessment and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain as part to enhance quality improvement of pain management and patient safety.

Published in	American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14
Page(s)	22-28
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Pain Assessment, Compliance Rate, Nursing Care Standards, Pain Reassessment

References

[1]	H. Shanthanna, N. Strand, D. Provenzano, C. Lobo, S. Eldabe, A. Bhatia, J. Wegener, K. Curtis, S. Cohen, and S. Narouze, (2020). Caring for patients with pain during the COVID-19 pandemic: consensus recommendations from an international expert panel. Anaesthesia.
[2]	J. J. Chan, Y. Sim, S. G. W. Ow, J. S. J. Lim, G. Kusumawidjaja, Q. Zhuang, R. X. Wong, F. Y. Wong, V. K. M. Tan, and T. J. Y. Tan (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on and recommendations for breast cancer care: the Singapore experience. Endocrine-Related Cancer, 27, R307-R327.
[3]	C. Sohrabi, Z. Alsafi, N. O’Neill, M. Khan, A. Kerwan, A. Al-Jabir, C. Iosifidis, and R. C. Agha, (2020). World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). International Journal of Surgery.
[4]	W. Lealfilho, L. L. Brandli, A. Langesalvia, L. Rayman-Bacchus, and J. Platje, (2020). COVID-19 and the UN sustainable development goals: threat to solidarity or an opportunity? Sustainability, 12, 5343.
[5]	A. Mehrotra, M. Chernew, D. Linetsky, H. Hatch, and D. Cutler, (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient visits: a rebound emerges. The Commonwealth Fund. May 19, 2020.
[6]	Q. Yang, H. Chen, M. Wang, and Y. Lu, (2017). Comparison and Enlightenment of the Contents of Pharmaceutical Administration in Hospital Accreditation Standards between China and JCI. China Pharmacy, 28, 5060-5063
[7]	A. M. Elsheikh, M. A. Alshareef, B. S. Saleh, and M. A. El-Tawansi, (2017). Assessment of patient safety culture: a comparative case study between physicians and nurses. Business Process Management Journal.
[8]	A. Ahmadi, S. Bazargan-Hejazi, Z. H. Zadie, P. Euasobhon, P. Ketumarn, A. Karbasfrushan, J. Amini-Saman, and R. A. Mohammadi, (2016). Pain management in trauma: a review study. Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 8, 89.
[9]	G. V. M. C Fernando, and F. Rawlison, (2019). A reflection on the experience with conducting a clinical audit aimed at optimizing pain assessment in cancer patients in Sri Lanka. Indian journal of palliative care, 25, 127.
[10]	N. Kamnerd, and L. Daengthern, (2018). Joint Commission International (JCI) The Relationship between Tranformational Leadership of Head Nurses and Joint Commission International (JCI) Accreditation. Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 12, 172-180.
[11]	A. Al Otaibi, W. Kattan, and A. Nabil, (2020). The Impact of Saudi (CBAHI) Accreditation on Enhancing Patient Safety and Improving the Quality-of-Care Indicators. Prensa Med Argent, 106, 3.
[12]	Z. Shaikh, S. Al-Towyan, and G. Khan, (2017). Critical Analysis of Patient and Family Rights in JCI Accreditation and CBAHI Standards for Hospitals. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management &Technology (IJERMT), 6, 324-330.
[13]	D. D. Ignatavicius, and, M. L. Workman, (2015). Medical-Surgical Nursing-E-Book: Patient-Centered Collaborative Care, Elsevier Health Sciences.
[14]	A. J. Flagg, (2015). The role of patient-centered care in nursing. Nursing Clinics, 50, 75-86.
[15]	D. Glowacki, (2015). Effective pain management and improvements in patients’ outcomes and satisfaction. Critical Care Nurse, 35, 33-41.
[16]	T. J. Toney-Butler, and W. J. Unison-Pace, (2019). Nursing Admission Assessment and Examination.
[17]	M. A. Brown, (2013). The role of nurses in pain and palliative care. Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy, 27, 300-302.
[18]	A. Abbott, 2020. Comprehending Cardiology Concepts. Canadian Journal of Critical Care Nursing, 31.
[19]	A. B. Prempeh, R, Duys, A. De Vaal, and R. Parker, (2020). Pain assessment and management: An audit of practice at a tertiary hospital. Health SA Gesondheid, 25.
[20]	N. Akbar, S. P. Teo, N. A. HJ-Abdul-Rahman, A. HJ-Husain, and M. R. Venkatasalu, (2019). Barriers and solutions for improving pain management practices in acute hospital settings: perspectives of healthcare practitioners for a pain-free hospital initiative. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 23, 190-196.
[21]	C. L. Morgan, P. Conway, and C. J. Currie, (2011). The relationship between self-reported severe pain and measures of socio-economic disadvantage. European Journal of Pain, 15, 1107-1111.
[22]	A. C. Watson, and P. V. Sminkey, (2014). Pain management: screening and assessment of pain as part of a comprehensive case management process. Professional Case Management, 19, 126-134.
[23]	J. L Abrahm, (2018). Pain Control, An Issue of Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, E-Book, Elsevier Health Sciences.
[24]	N. Witt, S. Coynor, C. Edwards, and H. Bradshaw, H. (2016). A guide to pain assessment and management in the neonate. Current emergency and hospital medicine reports, 4, 1-10.
[25]	V. Do, T. Pham, H. Dinh, X. Do, and H. Le, (2017). Assessment of Pain in Children Hospitalized in the Emergency Department, Vietnam National Children’s Hospital. Pediatr Ther, 7, 2161-0665.1000328.
[26]	A. Kimball, A. Naegeli, E. Edson-Heredia, C. Y. Lin, C. Gaich, E. Nikai, K. Wyrwich, and G. Yosipovitch, (2016). Psychometric properties of the Itch Numeric Rating Scale in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. British Journal of Dermatology, 175, 157-162.
[27]	L. Selman, and R. Harding, (2010). How can we improve outcomes for patients and families under palliative care? Implementing clinical audit for quality improvement in resource limited settings. Indian journal of palliative care, 16, 8.
[28]	P. J. Scott, M. Rigby, E. Ammenwerth, J. B. Mcnair, A. Georgiou, H. Hyppӧnen, N. De Keizer, F. Magrabi, P. Nykanen, and W. T. Gude, (2017). Evaluation considerations for secondary uses of clinical data: principles for an evidence-based approach to policy and implementation of secondary analysis: A position paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group. Yearbook of medical informatics, 26, 59.
[29]	C. Hatherley, N. Jennings, and R. Cross, (2016). Time to analgesia and pain score documentation best practice standards for the Emergency Department–A literature review. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, 19, 26-36.
[30]	K. Hayes, and D. Gordon, (2015). Delivering quality pain management: the challenge for nurses. Aorn Journal, 101, 327-337.
[31]	K. Grady, (2015). Core standards for pain management services in the UK. London. Retrieved from http://www. rcoa. ac. uk/system/files/FPM-CSPMS ….
[32]	W. Song, L. H. Eaton, D. B. Hoyle, and A. Z. Doornbos, (2015). Evaluation of evidence-based nursing pain management practice. Pain Management Nursing, 16, 456-463.
[33]	G. V. M. Fernando, and F. Rawlison, (2019). A reflection on the experience with conducting a clinical audit aimed at optimizing pain assessment in cancer patients in Sri Lanka. Indian journal of palliative care, 25, 127.
[34]	D. B. Gordon, S. M. Rees, M. P. McCausland, T. A. Pellino, S. Sandford-Ring, J. Smith-Helmenstine, and D. M. Danis, (2008). Improving reassessment and documentation of pain management. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 34, 509-517.
[35]	H. Kemp, C. Bantel, F. Gordon, S. Brett, H. Plan, Search, H. Laycock, S. Bampoe, C. Bantel, and M. Gooneratne, (2017). Pain Assessment in INTensive care (PAINT): an observational study of physician-documented pain assessment in 45 intensive care units in the United Kingdom. Anaesthesia, 72, 737-748.
[36]	L. Akhu-Zaheya, R. Al-Maaitah, and S. Banyhani, (2018). Quality of nursing documentation: Paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records. Journal of clinical nursing, 27, e578-e589.
[37]	N. Coleman, G. Halas, W. Peeler, N. Casaclang, T. Williamson, and A. Katz, (2015). From patient care to research: a validation study examining the factors contributing to data quality in a primary care electronic medical record database. BMC family practice, 16, 11.
[38]	M. R. Kim, J. S. Shin, J. Lee, Y. J. Lee, Y. J. Ahn, K. B. Park, H. D. Lee, Y. Lee, S. G. Kim, and I. H. Ha, (2016). Safety of acupuncture and pharmacopuncture in 80,523 musculoskeletal disorder patients: a retrospective review of internal safety inspection and electronic medical records. Medicine, 95.
[39]	R. Batto, (2016). Improving Pain Reassessment and Documentation Through Nurse Education.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Litaba Efraim Kolobe. (2020). Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19. American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Litaba Efraim Kolobe. Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19. Am. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2020, 1(1), 22-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Litaba Efraim Kolobe. Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19. Am J Nurs Health Sci. 2020;1(1):22-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14,
  author = {Litaba Efraim Kolobe},
  title = {Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19},
  journal = {American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {22-28},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajnhs.20200101.14},
  abstract = {Coronavirus pandemic globally overwhelmed the hospitals to deliver care as used to be employed by nurses. The two University hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia despite exhausted were still sustaining the pain management nursing care standards during the pandemic settings. The implementation of the pain management quality project enhanced sustaining the pain management nursing care standards related to pain assessment and reassessment after interventions. The aim of this quality improvement of pain management was to improve nurses’ compliance regarding pain assessment during arrival to the clinics, emergency department or in the wards and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain. Retrospective pain audits were performed monthly from electronic patients’ medical records by the pain team nurses. Analysis of the audits data findings of the two University hospitals were compared for the first six months of 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate the trend for compliance rate that was sustained. The average rate for initial pain screening for outpatients’ clinics in 2019 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 99% for hospital A and 97% for hospital B. Secondly the average rate for initial pain assessment for inpatients/emergency units in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 100% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 100% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Thirdly, for pain reassessment in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 93% for hospital B, though in 2020 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Pain reassessment for University hospital B in 2019 indicated that there was a need for improvement in February and April, while in 2020 compliance rate significantly improved by 7% despite the pandemic settings. On this basis, for sustainability it is recommended to continue monitoring the compliance of nurses to conduct pain assessment and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain as part to enhance quality improvement of pain management and patient safety.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19
AU  - Litaba Efraim Kolobe
Y1  - 2020/12/31
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14
T2  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
JF  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
JO  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
SP  - 22
EP  - 28
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7227
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14
AB  - Coronavirus pandemic globally overwhelmed the hospitals to deliver care as used to be employed by nurses. The two University hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia despite exhausted were still sustaining the pain management nursing care standards during the pandemic settings. The implementation of the pain management quality project enhanced sustaining the pain management nursing care standards related to pain assessment and reassessment after interventions. The aim of this quality improvement of pain management was to improve nurses’ compliance regarding pain assessment during arrival to the clinics, emergency department or in the wards and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain. Retrospective pain audits were performed monthly from electronic patients’ medical records by the pain team nurses. Analysis of the audits data findings of the two University hospitals were compared for the first six months of 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate the trend for compliance rate that was sustained. The average rate for initial pain screening for outpatients’ clinics in 2019 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 99% for hospital A and 97% for hospital B. Secondly the average rate for initial pain assessment for inpatients/emergency units in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 100% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 100% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Thirdly, for pain reassessment in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 93% for hospital B, though in 2020 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Pain reassessment for University hospital B in 2019 indicated that there was a need for improvement in February and April, while in 2020 compliance rate significantly improved by 7% despite the pandemic settings. On this basis, for sustainability it is recommended to continue monitoring the compliance of nurses to conduct pain assessment and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain as part to enhance quality improvement of pain management and patient safety.
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Litaba Efraim Kolobe

Department of Nursing Pain Management, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Litaba Efraim Kolobe. (2020). Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19. American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Litaba Efraim Kolobe. Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19. Am. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2020, 1(1), 22-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Litaba Efraim Kolobe. Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19. Am J Nurs Health Sci. 2020;1(1):22-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14,
  author = {Litaba Efraim Kolobe},
  title = {Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19},
  journal = {American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences},
  volume = {1},
  number = {1},
  pages = {22-28},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajnhs.20200101.14},
  abstract = {Coronavirus pandemic globally overwhelmed the hospitals to deliver care as used to be employed by nurses. The two University hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia despite exhausted were still sustaining the pain management nursing care standards during the pandemic settings. The implementation of the pain management quality project enhanced sustaining the pain management nursing care standards related to pain assessment and reassessment after interventions. The aim of this quality improvement of pain management was to improve nurses’ compliance regarding pain assessment during arrival to the clinics, emergency department or in the wards and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain. Retrospective pain audits were performed monthly from electronic patients’ medical records by the pain team nurses. Analysis of the audits data findings of the two University hospitals were compared for the first six months of 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate the trend for compliance rate that was sustained. The average rate for initial pain screening for outpatients’ clinics in 2019 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 99% for hospital A and 97% for hospital B. Secondly the average rate for initial pain assessment for inpatients/emergency units in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 100% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 100% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Thirdly, for pain reassessment in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 93% for hospital B, though in 2020 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Pain reassessment for University hospital B in 2019 indicated that there was a need for improvement in February and April, while in 2020 compliance rate significantly improved by 7% despite the pandemic settings. On this basis, for sustainability it is recommended to continue monitoring the compliance of nurses to conduct pain assessment and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain as part to enhance quality improvement of pain management and patient safety.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Sustaining Pain Assessment and Reassessment Nursing Care Standards During COVID-19
AU  - Litaba Efraim Kolobe
Y1  - 2020/12/31
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14
T2  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
JF  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
JO  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
SP  - 22
EP  - 28
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7227
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20200101.14
AB  - Coronavirus pandemic globally overwhelmed the hospitals to deliver care as used to be employed by nurses. The two University hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia despite exhausted were still sustaining the pain management nursing care standards during the pandemic settings. The implementation of the pain management quality project enhanced sustaining the pain management nursing care standards related to pain assessment and reassessment after interventions. The aim of this quality improvement of pain management was to improve nurses’ compliance regarding pain assessment during arrival to the clinics, emergency department or in the wards and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain. Retrospective pain audits were performed monthly from electronic patients’ medical records by the pain team nurses. Analysis of the audits data findings of the two University hospitals were compared for the first six months of 2019 and 2020 to demonstrate the trend for compliance rate that was sustained. The average rate for initial pain screening for outpatients’ clinics in 2019 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 99% for hospital A and 97% for hospital B. Secondly the average rate for initial pain assessment for inpatients/emergency units in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 100% for hospital B, while in 2020 was 100% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Thirdly, for pain reassessment in 2019 was 99% for hospital A and 93% for hospital B, though in 2020 was 98% for hospital A and 99% for hospital B. Pain reassessment for University hospital B in 2019 indicated that there was a need for improvement in February and April, while in 2020 compliance rate significantly improved by 7% despite the pandemic settings. On this basis, for sustainability it is recommended to continue monitoring the compliance of nurses to conduct pain assessment and reassessment after interventions for patients who experienced pain as part to enhance quality improvement of pain management and patient safety.
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download