The issue of donation makes sense in a world where the capitalist logic is growing. The challenges of giving to people in need during the day dedicated to the sick was an opportunity for us to make an anthropological reading of caring for the sick through giving. Indeed, the sick person is vulnerable and requires a particular look. Their needs are biological, psychological, social and spiritual. Caring for them through gifts in kind and the gift of oneself (accompaniment, touching, listening, education and care) are dimensions of caring. However, this approach to the gift is not always shared by all, as it does not necessarily follow the logic of Marcel Mauss' theoretical model. The concept of donation, distorted by the individualist paradigm, is part of a system of giving-receiving-giving back or the theory of reciprocity oriented towards the understanding of social obligations, which has allowed us to understand the practices of donation in our modern societies and particularly in the outbursts of solidarity of donations to the sick organised by the School of Health Sciences each year. This article is an echo for health professionals to understand that making a donation to a sick person is taking care of the other (giving), in a situation of fragility, it is giving oneself to the other.
Published in | American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13 |
Page(s) | 12-18 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Caring, Gift, Sick Person, Socioanthropological
[1] | Nadot, M. (2012). Recherche fondamentale en science infirmière: La recherche historique sur les fondements d'une discipline. Recherche en soins infirmiers, 109, 57-68. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.109.0057 Hoch, V. (2008). Le bien chez thomas d’Aquin. Mémoire en ligne. Institut Catholique de Paris.) |
[2] | Buisson (2010) [2] F. Buisson, La Foi laïque : extraits de discours et d’écrits, 1878-1911, Paris, Hachette, 1911, p. 16. |
[3] | Caillé, A. (2009). Utilitarian theory of action. Paris: la Decouverte/ Mauss. |
[4] | Azoulay, V. (2012). From the gift paradigm to a pragmatic anthropology of value. 17-42. https://doi.org/10.148.j.ASH.1.02901 |
[5] | Mayada-Claustre, J. (2002). Le Don. Que faire de l’anthropologie ? http://www.cairn.info/revue-hypothèses-2002-1page-229.htm |
[6] | Testart, A. (2005). Critique du don…, p. cit., qui est suivi, par exemple, par Ph. Descola, Par-delà nature et culture, Paris, p. 423-458. |
[7] | Durkheim, E. (1922). «L’Éducation : sa nature, son rôle», in Éducation et sociologie [1911], Paris, Alcan, 1922, p. 48. |
[8] | Weber, F. (2007). "Marcel Mauss, essay on the gift. |
[9] | Caillé, A. 2005. “Esquisse d’une analytique du don.” In Dé-penser l’économique. Paris : La Découverte/MAUSS. |
[10] | Mauss, M. (1968). Sociologie et Anthropologie, Paris, PUF, 4e édition. |
[11] | Weber, F. (2007), Des concepts universels, ethnographie économique, coll. Repères, la Découverte, Paris. Pp 26-38. |
[12] | Godbout, J. T. ( 2013). Ce qui circule entre nous. Paris: Le seuil. |
[13] | Godelier, M. (1996). L'énigme du don. Fayard. p. 209. |
[14] | Mauss, M. (1923). Essay on the gift. Sociology and anthropology. |
[15] | Leveratto, J-M (2014). Georges Bataille and the anthropology of the gift. Le Portique 29. |
[16] | Alter, N. (2002). Gift theory and sociology of the world of work. La découverte. Revue du Mauss, 20, 263-285. Retrieved from http://www.cairn.info/revue-du-mauss-2002-2page-263.htm |
[17] | Brugère, F. (2011). L’éthique du care, P. U. F., Que sais-je ?, Paris. |
[18] | Albert, J-P (2011). Don, échange, argent, quelques réflexions à partir de l'Essai du don de Marcel Mauss. N°82, 14-19. |
[19] | Godbout, J. T. (2007). Le don, la dette et l'identité. Homo Donato vs Homo oeconomicus. Paris. |
[20] | Chanial, Ph (2014). La société vue du don. Manuel de sociologie antiutilitariste appliquée. Paris : la Découverte/ Mauss. |
[21] | Tronto, J. (2009b). «Care démocratique et démocraties du care», in Molinier P., Paperman P., Laugier S., Qu’est-ce que le care ? Paris : Payot. |
[22] | Doussot, P. (1990) «Au cœur de la méthode : la personne» in Du soin à la personne. Ouvrage collectif. Editions INFIIP. Lyon. |
[23] | Chanial, Ph (2008). La société vue du don. Manuel de sociologie antiutilitariste appliquée. Paris: la Découverte/ Mauss. |
[24] | Caillé, A. (2009). Théorie anti-utilitariste de l’action. Paris : La Découverte/MAUSS. |
[25] | Bourgeon, D. (2007). Le don et la relation de soin: historique et perspective. Recherche en soins infirmiers. n°89, vol 2 p: 4-14. |
APA Style
Sylvie Myriam Ambomo. (2023). Caring for the Sick Person Through a Gift: A Socio-Anthropological Analysis. American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 4(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13
ACS Style
Sylvie Myriam Ambomo. Caring for the Sick Person Through a Gift: A Socio-Anthropological Analysis. Am. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2023, 4(1), 12-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13
AMA Style
Sylvie Myriam Ambomo. Caring for the Sick Person Through a Gift: A Socio-Anthropological Analysis. Am J Nurs Health Sci. 2023;4(1):12-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13, author = {Sylvie Myriam Ambomo}, title = {Caring for the Sick Person Through a Gift: A Socio-Anthropological Analysis}, journal = {American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, pages = {12-18}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajnhs.20230401.13}, abstract = {The issue of donation makes sense in a world where the capitalist logic is growing. The challenges of giving to people in need during the day dedicated to the sick was an opportunity for us to make an anthropological reading of caring for the sick through giving. Indeed, the sick person is vulnerable and requires a particular look. Their needs are biological, psychological, social and spiritual. Caring for them through gifts in kind and the gift of oneself (accompaniment, touching, listening, education and care) are dimensions of caring. However, this approach to the gift is not always shared by all, as it does not necessarily follow the logic of Marcel Mauss' theoretical model. The concept of donation, distorted by the individualist paradigm, is part of a system of giving-receiving-giving back or the theory of reciprocity oriented towards the understanding of social obligations, which has allowed us to understand the practices of donation in our modern societies and particularly in the outbursts of solidarity of donations to the sick organised by the School of Health Sciences each year. This article is an echo for health professionals to understand that making a donation to a sick person is taking care of the other (giving), in a situation of fragility, it is giving oneself to the other.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Caring for the Sick Person Through a Gift: A Socio-Anthropological Analysis AU - Sylvie Myriam Ambomo Y1 - 2023/03/09 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13 T2 - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences JF - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences JO - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences SP - 12 EP - 18 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7227 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20230401.13 AB - The issue of donation makes sense in a world where the capitalist logic is growing. The challenges of giving to people in need during the day dedicated to the sick was an opportunity for us to make an anthropological reading of caring for the sick through giving. Indeed, the sick person is vulnerable and requires a particular look. Their needs are biological, psychological, social and spiritual. Caring for them through gifts in kind and the gift of oneself (accompaniment, touching, listening, education and care) are dimensions of caring. However, this approach to the gift is not always shared by all, as it does not necessarily follow the logic of Marcel Mauss' theoretical model. The concept of donation, distorted by the individualist paradigm, is part of a system of giving-receiving-giving back or the theory of reciprocity oriented towards the understanding of social obligations, which has allowed us to understand the practices of donation in our modern societies and particularly in the outbursts of solidarity of donations to the sick organised by the School of Health Sciences each year. This article is an echo for health professionals to understand that making a donation to a sick person is taking care of the other (giving), in a situation of fragility, it is giving oneself to the other. VL - 4 IS - 1 ER -