Worldwide, bovine tuberculosis is most common in agricultural regions of Central and South America, Sub-Saharan Africa and South-Western Asia. Bovine tuberculosis was reported to be endemic in the Zambian traditional cattle sector with a high herd prevalence of 49.8% recorded from areas within, and adjacent to the Kafue Basin as far back as 1995. An analytical cross sectional study design was applied to a sample size of 384 selected cattle owners in the Kafue Basin. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to the cattle owners who were randomly selected. The data was analyzed using STATA Version 15 Software. The results from the study showed that 54% of the cattle owners experienced bovine tuberculosis among their cattle while 46% did not experience bovine tuberculosis. The prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle was higher among the male cattle owners (76%) compared to female cattle owners (24%). There was a significant relationship of p value < 0.029 between level of knowledge of cattle owners and the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis. Unemployed cattle owners had higher odds of experiencing bovine tuberculosis among their cattle (OR 3.488; 95% CI 1.341-9.067) and the relationship was statistically significant at p value < 0.010. There was equally a significant relationship of p value < 0.042 between vaccination status of animals and the occurrence of bovine tuberculosis. The study showed that the majority of cattle owners lacked awareness and had a lower level of understanding of the disease and its public health significance. Therefore, the implications of the study suggest the creation of disease control programs that will ensure regular herd testing for bovine tuberculosis, routine vaccinations of animals, deliberate quarantine of infected animals as well as community health education about transmission, control and prevention of the disease.
Published in | American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11 |
Page(s) | 46-53 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bovine Tuberculosis, Cattle Owners, Awareness, Vaccination, Transmission, Level of Knowledge, Kafue Basin
3.1. Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis
Experienced BTB | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Yes | 207 | 53.91 |
No | 177 | 46.09 |
Total | 384 | 100 |
3.2. Demographic and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Cattle Owners
Variab1e | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Age | ||
20-24 | 64 | 17.45 |
25-29 | 146 | 38.02 |
30-34 | 76 | 19.79 |
35-39 | 38 | 9.9 |
40+ | 57 | 14.84 |
Total | 385 | 100 |
Sex | ||
Male | 291 | 75.78 |
Female | 93 | 24.22 |
Total | 384 | 100 |
Education Status | ||
No education | 150 | 39.06 |
Primary | 160 | 41.67 |
Secondary | 69 | 17.97 |
College/University | 5 | 1.3 |
Total | 384 | 100 |
Employment Status | ||
Unemployed | 268 | 67.79 |
Employed | 116 | 32.41 |
Total | 384 | 100 |
Variable | Namwala (%) | Kafue (%) | Chikankata (%) | Nega-Nega (%) | Total (%) | P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge of BTB | ||||||
Heard of BTB | 149 (55) | 67 (25) | 42 (15) | 14 (5) | 272 (71) | |
Not heard of BTB | 51 (45) | 30 (27) | 22 (20) | 9 (8) | 112 (29) | 0.043* |
Total | 200 (52) | 97 (25) | 64 (17) | 23 (6) | 384 (100) | |
Source of information | ||||||
Veterinary Doctor | 92 (71) | 16 (12) | 15 (12) | 7 (5) | 130 (130) | |
Fellow cattle owner | 61 (47) | 44 (34) | 21 (16) | 4 (3) | 130 (34) | |
TV | 18 (36) | 15 (30) | 11 (22) | 6 (12) | 50 (13) | |
Radio | 17 (42) | 12 (29) | 9 (22) | 3 (7) | 41 (11) | 0.033* |
Newspaper | 12 (36) | 10 (30) | 8 (24) | 3 (10) | 33 (8) | |
Total | 200 (52) | 97 (25) | 64 (17) | 23 (6) | 384 (100) | |
Cattle infected by BTB | ||||||
Yes | 112 (51) | 52 (23) | 39 (18) | 15 (8) | 218 (57) | |
No | 88 (53) | 45 (27) | 25 (15) | 8 (5) | 166 (43) | 0.123 |
Total | 200 (52) | 97 (25) | 64 (17) | 23 (6) | 384 (100) | |
Action taken | ||||||
Kill the cattle | 105 (54) | 48 (24) | 32 (16) | 11 (6) | 196 (51) | |
Call the vet | 48 (46) | 29 (28) | 19 (18) | 8 (8) | 104 (27) | |
Separate from others | 47 (56) | 20 (24) | 13 (15) | 4 (5) | 84 (22) | 0.045* |
Total | 200 (52) | 97 (25) | 64 (17) | 23 (6) | 384 (100) |
3.3. Level of Knowledge and the Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis
3.4. Environmental Features and Behavioral Practices
Variable | Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P Value | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Veterinary clinic available | ||||
Yes | 1 | |||
No | 0.735 (0.303-1.782) | 0.047 | 0.237 (1.124-2.523) | 0.023* |
Distance to the clinic | ||||
Less than 1km | 1 | 1 | ||
Between 1km – 5km | 1.042 (0.365-2.977) | 0.271 | 0.775 (0.334-1.803) | 0.141 |
Beyond 5km | 1.052 (0.426-2.602) | 0.012 | 0.934 (0.436-1.999) | 0.020* |
Other | 7.957 (0.864-73.216) | 0.067 | 3.565 (0.609-20.869) | 0.019* |
Vaccination of animals | ||||
Yes | 1 | 1 | ||
No | 3.891 (1.580-9.581) | 0.042 | 2.513 (1.231-5.130) | 0.011* |
Frequency of vaccinations | ||||
Once a year | 1 | 1 | ||
Twice a year | 1.830 (0.673-4.975) | 0.236 | 0.149 (0.553-0.390) | 0.409 |
Beyond 2 years | 2.683 (0.883-8.154) | 0.022 | 2.093 (0.877-4.994) | 0.016* |
Enough shelter for animals | ||||
Yes | 1 | 1 | ||
No | 0.274 (0.110-0.687) | 0.033 | 1.402 (0.201-2.805) | 0.010* |
Enough grazing land | ||||
Yes | 1 | |||
No | 0.965 (0.396-2.348) | 0.031 | 1.381 (0.302-2.912) | 0.023* |
Contact with wild animals | ||||
Yes | 1 | |||
No | 0.766 (0.268-2.195) | 0.157 |
[1] | Alvarez L. G., Webb R. and Holmes M. A.: A novel field-based approach to validate the use of network models for disease spread between dairy herds. Epidemiology and Infection. 2011. 139-163. |
[2] | CDC: Mycobacterium bovis (Bovine Tuberculosis) in domestic animals. U. S. Department of Agriculture-Bovine Tuberculosis fact sheet. 2019. |
[3] | Lehman F. D.: Critical Control Points in Beef Heifer Development - College of Veterinary Medicine, Box 9825, Mississippi State. 2017. MS 3976. |
[4] | WHO: Bovine tuberculosis world organization for animal health. 2018. |
[5] | Cosivi O., Grange J. M. and Daborn C. J.: The zoonotic importance of mycobacterium bovis - Tubercle and Lung Disease. 2000. Vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 103–108. |
[6] | Munyeme M., Muma J. B., Skjerve: Risk factors associated with bovine tuberculosis in traditional cattle of the livestock/wildlife interface areas in the Kafue basin of Zambia - Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2005. |
[7] | O’Reilly F. and Daborn D.: Wildlife tuberculosis in South African conservation areas: implications and challenges, Veterinary Microbiology. 2004. Vol. 112, no. 2–4, pp. 91–100. |
[8] | Williamson D. and Payne G.: The role of wild animal populations in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in domestic animals: how to assess the risk - Veterinary Microbiology. 2003. Vol. 112, no. 2–4, pp. 303–312. |
[9] | Bengis L. and Cooper R. J.: Zoonotic tuberculosis due to mycobacterium bovis in developing countries-Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2006. Vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 59–70. |
[10] | Ameni G. and Kiros S.: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA from an extinct bison - Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2001. Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 305–311, 2001. |
[11] | Ministry of Health. Ministry of Health Annual Report of 2019 – an analytical report on disease surveillance in Zambia. 2019. |
[12] | Zambia National Public Health Institute. ZNPHI Annual Report of 2019 – a case study on the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in Zambia. 2019. |
[13] | Olea-Popelka G., Rothschild B. M. and Martin L. D.: Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis and animal level risk factors for indigenous cattle under different grazing strategies in the livestock/wildlife interface areas of Africa. 2004. |
[14] | Ameni G. and Tibbo M.: Prevalence and risk factor assessment in cattle and cattle owners in Wuchale-Jida District. Central Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine. 2003. 1-17. |
[15] | Roswurm H. and Ranney T. S.: Risk factors for herd-level bovine-tuberculosis seropositivity in transhumant cattle in Uganda - Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2000. Vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 318–329. |
[16] | Kazwala K. J.: A review of diseases of parasites of the Kafue lechwe (Kobus leche kafuensis). J. Wildl. Dis. 2001. 661– 667. |
[17] | Faye N.: Bovine Tuberculosis - an update. Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics Research Unit, The University of Reading and UK. 2005. 132. |
[18] | Kaneene S.: Detection and identification of multiple mycobacterial pathogens by DNA amplification in a single tube. 2002. Genome Research 1, 269-273. |
[19] | Muma J. B., Samui K. L., Siamudaala V. M., Oloya J., Matop G., Omer M. K., Munyeme M., Mubita C. and Skjerve E.,: Prevalence of antibodies to Brucella spp. and individual risk factors of infection in traditional cattle, goats and sheep reared in livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zambia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2006. 38, 195–206. |
[20] | Ayele D. G. Winkler B. and Mathews F.: Environmental risk factors associated with bovine tuberculosis among cattle in high-risk areas. 2004. |
[21] | Macallan R. Martens G. and Hudson, C. P.: Diagnosing bovine tuberculosis: reducing the costs and diagnostic delays. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2000. 240–245. |
[22] | Kasradze G.: Tuberculosis is a reemerging disease in animals and humans. 2015. Vet Ital.; 45: 35-181. |
[23] | Munyua B.: Epidemiology of selected mycobacteria that infect humans and animals. Rev Sci Tech off Inter des Epiz. 2016. 20 (1): 105-112. |
[24] | WHO: Global animal tuberculosis report. 2003. 1-14. |
[25] | Fujikura T.: Zoonotic tuberculosis due to mycobacterium bovis in developing countries. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2007. 4: 1–17. |
[26] | Oloya J.: Risk factors for herd-level bovine-tuberculosis seropositivity in transhumant cattle in Uganda PMID: 17482694 |
[27] | Enticotta G., Mayeb D., Christl D. and Donnelly A.: An assessment of risk compensation and spill over behavioral adaptions associated with the use of vaccines in animal disease management. 2020. |
[28] | Zellweger J. P.: How can bovine tuberculosis among immigrant cattle be managed in Europe? Editorial. The International Journal of Bovine Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 1999. 551-552. |
[29] | Grange J. M. and Yates M. D.: Zoonotic Aspects of Mycobacterium Bovis Infection PMID. 2002. 8073621 |
[30] | Sitima A. C.: Variability of Mycobacterium Bovis in Traditionally Processed Sour Milk and the Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Namwala District of Zambia- University of Zambia, Lusaka. 2002. |
APA Style
Mwelaisha, K., Likwa, R. N., Simukoko, H. (2024). Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in the Kafue Basin of Zambia. American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 5(2), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11
ACS Style
Mwelaisha, K.; Likwa, R. N.; Simukoko, H. Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in the Kafue Basin of Zambia. Am. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2024, 5(2), 46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11
AMA Style
Mwelaisha K, Likwa RN, Simukoko H. Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in the Kafue Basin of Zambia. Am J Nurs Health Sci. 2024;5(2):46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11, author = {Kalenga Mwelaisha and Rosemary Ndonyo Likwa and Humphrey Simukoko}, title = {Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in the Kafue Basin of Zambia }, journal = {American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {46-53}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajnhs.20240502.11}, abstract = {Worldwide, bovine tuberculosis is most common in agricultural regions of Central and South America, Sub-Saharan Africa and South-Western Asia. Bovine tuberculosis was reported to be endemic in the Zambian traditional cattle sector with a high herd prevalence of 49.8% recorded from areas within, and adjacent to the Kafue Basin as far back as 1995. An analytical cross sectional study design was applied to a sample size of 384 selected cattle owners in the Kafue Basin. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to the cattle owners who were randomly selected. The data was analyzed using STATA Version 15 Software. The results from the study showed that 54% of the cattle owners experienced bovine tuberculosis among their cattle while 46% did not experience bovine tuberculosis. The prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle was higher among the male cattle owners (76%) compared to female cattle owners (24%). There was a significant relationship of p value < 0.029 between level of knowledge of cattle owners and the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis. Unemployed cattle owners had higher odds of experiencing bovine tuberculosis among their cattle (OR 3.488; 95% CI 1.341-9.067) and the relationship was statistically significant at p value < 0.010. There was equally a significant relationship of p value < 0.042 between vaccination status of animals and the occurrence of bovine tuberculosis. The study showed that the majority of cattle owners lacked awareness and had a lower level of understanding of the disease and its public health significance. Therefore, the implications of the study suggest the creation of disease control programs that will ensure regular herd testing for bovine tuberculosis, routine vaccinations of animals, deliberate quarantine of infected animals as well as community health education about transmission, control and prevention of the disease. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in the Kafue Basin of Zambia AU - Kalenga Mwelaisha AU - Rosemary Ndonyo Likwa AU - Humphrey Simukoko Y1 - 2024/04/17 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11 T2 - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences JF - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences JO - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences SP - 46 EP - 53 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7227 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20240502.11 AB - Worldwide, bovine tuberculosis is most common in agricultural regions of Central and South America, Sub-Saharan Africa and South-Western Asia. Bovine tuberculosis was reported to be endemic in the Zambian traditional cattle sector with a high herd prevalence of 49.8% recorded from areas within, and adjacent to the Kafue Basin as far back as 1995. An analytical cross sectional study design was applied to a sample size of 384 selected cattle owners in the Kafue Basin. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to the cattle owners who were randomly selected. The data was analyzed using STATA Version 15 Software. The results from the study showed that 54% of the cattle owners experienced bovine tuberculosis among their cattle while 46% did not experience bovine tuberculosis. The prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle was higher among the male cattle owners (76%) compared to female cattle owners (24%). There was a significant relationship of p value < 0.029 between level of knowledge of cattle owners and the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis. Unemployed cattle owners had higher odds of experiencing bovine tuberculosis among their cattle (OR 3.488; 95% CI 1.341-9.067) and the relationship was statistically significant at p value < 0.010. There was equally a significant relationship of p value < 0.042 between vaccination status of animals and the occurrence of bovine tuberculosis. The study showed that the majority of cattle owners lacked awareness and had a lower level of understanding of the disease and its public health significance. Therefore, the implications of the study suggest the creation of disease control programs that will ensure regular herd testing for bovine tuberculosis, routine vaccinations of animals, deliberate quarantine of infected animals as well as community health education about transmission, control and prevention of the disease. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -