Background: Self-Directed in Learning has been emphasized nursing education settings based on many factors such as changing in learning teaching methods, nursing professions development, etc. Awareness and identification of the students learning and their academic achievement are important factors in nursing Course. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between self-directed in learning and undergraduate nursing students’ academic achievement in Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran. Method: The cross sectional study with 232 sample size was conducted. The subjects of this study were 232 undergraduate nursing students from school grades of years attending to school of nursing and midwifery of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Data was collected from students through an anonymous self-administrated questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into three sections including (a) demographic profile(b)Fisher’s Self-Directed in Learning Readiness questionnaire, (d) academic achievement. Data analysis was carried out by using the latest version of the statistical software package SPSS (Version-21). Descriptive and analytical statistical test were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 232 participated in study of relationship between learning styles, Self-directed in learning and undergraduate nursing students’ academic achievement. One hundred –Forty three participants were female (61.6%), and 89 respondents were male (38.4%); 60.8% were between 20 and 25 years, 33.6% were <20 years, and 5.6% were >25 years old. The most frequency learning style of students was AC (37.5%).The majority of subjects (90.52%) SDLR were in the level of Self-Control (Score >150).The majority of subjects (52.8%) their academic achievements were at level of Good (the Median score were between (13-16). There was no significant relationship between Learning styles and Academic Achievement (P> 0.05).Conclusion: Not all students are self-directed, and this study suggests that mature students are more self-directed than that entering nurse education direct from high school. Nurses’ educators need to assess the Learning style and preferences of their students in order to determine the appropriateness of Self-Directed in learning. It is important to acknowledge that Self-Directed in Learning is only one teaching method that can be used to meet the learning needs of all students.
Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 4, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24 |
Page(s) | 138-150 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
LS, Academic Achievement, Self-Directed Learning, Nursing Students’, Iran, Undergraduate Degree
[1] | Cleveland State University School of Nursing (2012). Philosophy and conceptual frame work. |
[2] | Arthurs, J. B(2007). A juggling act in the classroom: managing different learning styles. . teaching and learning in nursing, 2, 2-7. |
[3] | Dmirbas, O.O., Demirkan, H(2007).Learning styles of design students and the relationship between academic performance and gender in design education. . Learning and Instruction 17, 345-359. |
[4] | Whitton, N(2010). Learning with digital games: a practical guide to engaging students in higher education. . new york: routledge. |
[5] | Sawchuk, R(2012). Learning nurses resources network, 2012.: Learning and Learning style. learning nurse newsletter. |
[6] | Nasrabadi, H. B., Mousavi, S., Farsan, Z. K(2012). The contribution of critical thinking attitude and cognitive learning style in predicating academic achievement of medical university students. iranian journal of medical education., 12, 285-296. |
[7] | Malloy, H. D(2007). The relationship of learning style, academic achievement, and psychological type of baccalaureate nursing students, proquest. |
[8] | Noguera, J. S., Wageman,J(2011). Spanish efl undergraduate students’ perceptions of learning styles. nordic journal of english studies, 10, 77-101. |
[9] | Brown, t., Cosgriff, T.,French, G(2008). Learning style preferences of occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech pathology students: a comparative study. internet journal of allied health sciences & practice, 6, 12. |
[10] | Provident , I., M.L,L., Dolhi, C.,Jeffcoat, J(2009). Becoming a fieldwork “educator”: enhancing your teaching skills. ot practice., 14, suppl: 2p, ce1-8. |
[11] | Rogers, K. M. A(2009). A preliminary investigation and analysis of student learning style preferences in further and higher education. . Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33, 13-21. |
[12] | Cassidy, S(2004). learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. educational psychology 24, 419-444. |
[13] | Kolb and kolbs (2005). Experential learning experience as the source of learning and development. |
[14] | Kolb, D. A(1984).Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. |
[15] | Felder , R. M., Silverman, L. K(1988)"Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. " engr. education,, 78, 674-681. |
[16] | Felder, R M(1993). "Reaching the second tier: learning and teaching styles in college science education," j. college science teaching, 23, 286-290 . an updated presentation of the felder-silverman model. |
[17] | Dunn, R., Honigsfeeld, A.,Doolan, L.S(2009). Impact of learning style instructional strategies or students achievement & attitudes;perceptions of educations of educators institutions. education journal, 82, 135-140. |
[18] | Honigsfeld, a. & dunn, r. 2009. learning-style responsive approaches for teaching typically performing and at-risk adolescents. clearing"house:. "a"journal"of"educational"strategies," issues"and"ideas, 82, 220-224. |
[19] | Cherry, K.(2013). A closer look at kolb’s four stytle of learning .about .com guide. |
[20] | Mcleod, S.A (2010). Kolb's learning styles and experiential learning cycle simply psychology. |
[21] | Mcleod, S.A (2010). Kolb's learning styles and experiential learning cycle - simply psychology. . |
[22] | Ainoda, N., Onishi, H., Yasuda, Y(2005). Definitions and goals of “self-directed learning”in contemporary medical education literature. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 34, 515-9. |
[23] | Mcmaster University (2008). Educational frame work. school of nursing and rehabilitation science. |
[24] | Merriam, S. ,Caffarella, R.(eds.)(2007). Learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). . |
[25] | Merriam, S., Caffarella, R., Baumgartner, l. (eds.) 2007. learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide (4th ed.). |
[26] | Safavi, M., Scooshtari, Z., S.H, Mahamoodi, M., Yarmohammadian, M (2010). Self-directed learning readiness and learning styles among nursing students of isfahan university of medical sciences. iranina journal of medical education, 10, 27-35. |
[27] | Safavi, M., Z.S.H, S., Mahmoodi, M., Yarmohammadian, M( 2010). Self-directed learning styles among nursing students of isfahan university of medical scieneces. iranian journal of medical education., 10, 27-35. |
[28] | Laeeq, K., Weatherly, R. A., Carrott, A., Pandian, V., Cummings, C. W.,Bahatti, N. I. (2009). learning styles in two otolarngology residency programs the laryngoscope, 119, 2360-2365. |
[29] | D'amore, A., James, S.,Maitchell, E. K.L(2012).Learning styles of first -year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: a cross-sectional survey utilizing the kolb learning style inventory. nurse education today, 32, 506-515. |
[30] | Smith, A(2010). Learning styles of registreted nurses enrolled in an online nursing program journal of professional nursing, 26, 49-53. |
[31] | Salehi, S( 2007). Nursing students' preferred learning style. journal of medical education., 11, 1-5. |
[32] | Fleming , S., Mckee ,G.,Huntley-Moore ,S( 2011). Undergraduate nursing students' learning styles: a longitudinal study. nurse educ today. , 31, 444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.08.005. |
[33] | Rassool, G. H., Rawaf, S(2007). Learning style preferences of undergraduate nursing students. nurs stand, 21, 35-41. |
[34] | Rassool , G. H., Rawaf , S(2008). The influence of learning styles preference of undergraduate nursing students on educational outcomes in substance use education. nurse educ pract., 8, 306-14. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2008.02.001. epub 2008 mar 25. |
[35] | Erol Gurpinar, E., Alimoglu, M. K., Mamakli, S., Aktekin, M( 2010). Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education? Adv Physiol Educ 35, 307–311, 2011;doi:10.1152/advan.00047.2011. |
[36] | Tahernezhad, E., Behjat, F., Kargar, AA(2014).The Relationship between Language Learning Anxiety and Language Learning Motivation among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Innovations in Foreign Language Teaching. Vol. 2 ( 6-1): 35-48. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020601.16 |
[37] | Aziz, Z., Tey, X. Y., Alwi, S., Jet, C. N( 2013). Learning style prefrences of pharmacy students. the european journal of social and behavioural sciences, eiss:2301-2218, 820-837. |
[38] | Fleming , S., Mckee , G.,Huntley-Moore , S(2011). undergraduate nursing students' learning styles: a longitudinal study. nurse educ today, 31, 444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.08.005. epub 2010 sep 21. |
[39] | Walker, J. T., Martin, T M., Haynie, L., Norwood, A., White, J.,Grant, L(2007). Preferences for teaching methods in a baccalaureate nursing program: how second degree and traditional students differ. . nursing education perspectives,, 28, 246-250. |
[40] | Aghaei, H., Behjat, F., Rostampour, M (2014). Investigating the Relationship between Iranian High School Female Students’ Spiritual Intelligence, Language Proficiency and Self-Esteem. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Innovations in Foreign Language Teaching 2 (6-1): 19-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020601.14 |
[41] | Kocaman , G., Dicle , A., Ugur, A(2009). A longitudinal analysis of the self-directed learning readiness level of nursing students enrolled in a problem-based curriculum. j nurs educ, 48, 286-90. |
[42] | Azer, S. A(2008). Navigating problem-based learning. london: . elsevier. |
[43] | Williams, B., Boyle, M., Winship,C., Brightwell, R., Devenish, S., munro, g. 2013b. examination of self-directed learning readiness ofparamedic undergraduates: a multi-institutional study. journal of nursing education and practice, 3, 102-111. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v3n2p102. |
[44] | Williams, B., Boyl, M., Winship, C., Brightwen, R., Devenish, S., Graham, M(2013). Examination of self-directed learning readiness of paramedic undergraduates a multi-institutional study. . journal of nursing education and practice.3 (2):102-111., 3, 102-111. |
[45] | Miller, M. P(2010). Are first year undergraduate students nurses prepared for self-directed learning? nursing times.net. |
[46] | Gemeay, E., Behilak, S., Kanona, E.,Mansour, E. A(2013). Self -concept and academic achievements among nursing students. life sci j, 10, 1466-1470. |
[47] | Baker, C. M., Pesult, D. J., Mcdaniel, A. M.,Fisher, M. L(2007). Evaluating the impact of problem-based learning on learning styles of master's students in nursing administration. journal of professional nursing 23, 214-219. |
[48] | Kazu, I. Y(2009).The effect of learning styles on education and the teaching process. . journal of social sciences, 5 (1), 1-17. , 5, 1-17. |
[49] | Marchese, T.J(2012). " The new conversations about learning. insights from neuroscience and anthropology, . . cognitive science and workplace studies, 1-15. |
[50] | Panahi, R., Kazemi, S.,Rezaie, A(2012). The relationship of learning styles to academic achievement: the role of gender and academic discipline. . developmental psychology: iranian psychologists., 8, 189-196. |
[51] | Ahanchian, M., Mohamadzadeghasr , A., Garavand , H. ,Hosseini, A(2012). Prevalent learning styles among nursing and midwifery students and its association with functionality of thinking styles and academic achievement; a study in mashhad school of nursing and midwifery. iranian journal of medical education. , 12 577-588. |
[52] | Yang , S., Ha , E., Lee , O., Sim, I., Park, Y., Nam, H., Kim , J(2012). Academic achievement, self-directed learning, and critical thinking disposition according to learning styles of nursing students. journal of korean academy of fundamentals of nursing, 19, 334. |
[53] | Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P.,Fernandes,C(2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. intelligence,. 35, 13-21. |
[54] | Erdogan, Y., Bayram, S., Deniz, L(2008). Factors that influence academic achievement and attitudes in web based education,. international journal of instruction, 1, 31-48. |
[55] | Ferla, J., Valcke, M., Cai, Y(2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: reconsidering structural relationships. . learning and individual differences, 19, 499-505. |
[56] | Holliday, A(2009). Understanding the implications self - concept and academic self - concept has on african. |
[57] | O’sullivan, E. M(2009). The demographic and academic profile of irish dental school faculty members. Journal of the Irish Dental Association, 55, 296-301. |
APA Style
Addis Adera Gebru, Shahrazad Ghiyasvandian, Nooroodin Mohammadi. (2015). The Relationship Between Learning Style, Self-Directed in Learning and Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Academic Achievement in Tehran University of Medical Science (TUMS). American Journal of Nursing Science, 4(3), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24
ACS Style
Addis Adera Gebru; Shahrazad Ghiyasvandian; Nooroodin Mohammadi. The Relationship Between Learning Style, Self-Directed in Learning and Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Academic Achievement in Tehran University of Medical Science (TUMS). Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2015, 4(3), 138-150. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24
AMA Style
Addis Adera Gebru, Shahrazad Ghiyasvandian, Nooroodin Mohammadi. The Relationship Between Learning Style, Self-Directed in Learning and Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Academic Achievement in Tehran University of Medical Science (TUMS). Am J Nurs Sci. 2015;4(3):138-150. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24
@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24, author = {Addis Adera Gebru and Shahrazad Ghiyasvandian and Nooroodin Mohammadi}, title = {The Relationship Between Learning Style, Self-Directed in Learning and Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Academic Achievement in Tehran University of Medical Science (TUMS)}, journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science}, volume = {4}, number = {3}, pages = {138-150}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20150403.24}, abstract = {Background: Self-Directed in Learning has been emphasized nursing education settings based on many factors such as changing in learning teaching methods, nursing professions development, etc. Awareness and identification of the students learning and their academic achievement are important factors in nursing Course. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between self-directed in learning and undergraduate nursing students’ academic achievement in Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran. Method: The cross sectional study with 232 sample size was conducted. The subjects of this study were 232 undergraduate nursing students from school grades of years attending to school of nursing and midwifery of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Data was collected from students through an anonymous self-administrated questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into three sections including (a) demographic profile(b)Fisher’s Self-Directed in Learning Readiness questionnaire, (d) academic achievement. Data analysis was carried out by using the latest version of the statistical software package SPSS (Version-21). Descriptive and analytical statistical test were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 232 participated in study of relationship between learning styles, Self-directed in learning and undergraduate nursing students’ academic achievement. One hundred –Forty three participants were female (61.6%), and 89 respondents were male (38.4%); 60.8% were between 20 and 25 years, 33.6% were 25 years old. The most frequency learning style of students was AC (37.5%).The majority of subjects (90.52%) SDLR were in the level of Self-Control (Score >150).The majority of subjects (52.8%) their academic achievements were at level of Good (the Median score were between (13-16). There was no significant relationship between Learning styles and Academic Achievement (P> 0.05).Conclusion: Not all students are self-directed, and this study suggests that mature students are more self-directed than that entering nurse education direct from high school. Nurses’ educators need to assess the Learning style and preferences of their students in order to determine the appropriateness of Self-Directed in learning. It is important to acknowledge that Self-Directed in Learning is only one teaching method that can be used to meet the learning needs of all students.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Relationship Between Learning Style, Self-Directed in Learning and Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Academic Achievement in Tehran University of Medical Science (TUMS) AU - Addis Adera Gebru AU - Shahrazad Ghiyasvandian AU - Nooroodin Mohammadi Y1 - 2015/06/13 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 138 EP - 150 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20150403.24 AB - Background: Self-Directed in Learning has been emphasized nursing education settings based on many factors such as changing in learning teaching methods, nursing professions development, etc. Awareness and identification of the students learning and their academic achievement are important factors in nursing Course. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between self-directed in learning and undergraduate nursing students’ academic achievement in Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran. Method: The cross sectional study with 232 sample size was conducted. The subjects of this study were 232 undergraduate nursing students from school grades of years attending to school of nursing and midwifery of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Data was collected from students through an anonymous self-administrated questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into three sections including (a) demographic profile(b)Fisher’s Self-Directed in Learning Readiness questionnaire, (d) academic achievement. Data analysis was carried out by using the latest version of the statistical software package SPSS (Version-21). Descriptive and analytical statistical test were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 232 participated in study of relationship between learning styles, Self-directed in learning and undergraduate nursing students’ academic achievement. One hundred –Forty three participants were female (61.6%), and 89 respondents were male (38.4%); 60.8% were between 20 and 25 years, 33.6% were 25 years old. The most frequency learning style of students was AC (37.5%).The majority of subjects (90.52%) SDLR were in the level of Self-Control (Score >150).The majority of subjects (52.8%) their academic achievements were at level of Good (the Median score were between (13-16). There was no significant relationship between Learning styles and Academic Achievement (P> 0.05).Conclusion: Not all students are self-directed, and this study suggests that mature students are more self-directed than that entering nurse education direct from high school. Nurses’ educators need to assess the Learning style and preferences of their students in order to determine the appropriateness of Self-Directed in learning. It is important to acknowledge that Self-Directed in Learning is only one teaching method that can be used to meet the learning needs of all students. VL - 4 IS - 3 ER -