There are two types of bed baths: the traditional basin used with soap and water, and the disposable bath, which is pre-packed in single-use units and heated before use. From earlier studies it was recommended with further studies witch would strengthen the evidence. To compare the traditional basin bed bath to a disposable bed bath, there are three factors that need to bed considered: (1) duration and quality of the bath, (2) patient satisfaction and (3) nurse satisfaction.31 patients received bed baths on two consecutive days. The patients were bathed by the same nurse on both days. The bed baths were observed in relation to duration and quality. Nurses and patients were interviewed about their preferences. The study was performed in both surgical and medical floors. Both types of bed baths scored very highly in the area of quality. Significantly less time was used with the disposable bed baths (p< 0.001). The registered nurses prefer the disposable bath (78%). The patients were satisfied with both types of bed baths. There was no significant difference in the results. Even when we adapt the results in relation to the patients’ gender and age, there is still no significant difference. Patients rated the bed baths equally in most cases. By this study we applied further research in the area of personal hygiene. When all aspects of bed baths are considered (time, cost, quality, and patient and nurse preferences), both types of bed baths are secure and well received. Due to the times savings achieved and the importance of this for patients (who are weak and need nursing assistance to perform personal hygiene), we recommend the use of disposable bed baths.
Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15 |
Page(s) | 109-114 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bed Bath, Bag Bath, Disposable Baths, Bathing, Hygiene, Washing with Out Water, Patient Involvement, Satisfaction
[1] | Skewes SM. No more bed baths!... bag bath... a technique that lessens the risk of skin impairment. RN 1994; 57 (1):34-35. |
[2] | Carruth AK, Ricks D, Pullen P. Bag baths: an alternative to the bed bath. Nursing Management 1995 09; 26 (9):75. |
[3] | Collins F, Hampton S. Product focus. The cost-effective use of BagBath: a new concept in patient hygiene. Br J Nurs 2003 09/11; 12 (16):984. |
[4] | Greaves A. We'll just freshen you up, dear... a bed bath can often leave the patient dirtier. Nursing Times 1985 03/06; 81 (10):3. |
[5] | Larson EL, Ciliberti T, Chantler C, Abraham J, Lazaro EM, Venturanza M, et al. Comparison of traditional and disposable bed baths in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care 2004 05; 13 (3): 235-241. |
[6] | Lentz J. Daily baths: torment or comfort at end of life? J HOSP PALLIAT NURS 2003 Januar; 5 (1):34-39. |
[7] | Sheppard CM, Brenner PS. The effects of bathing and skin care practices on skin quality and satisfaction with an innovative product. J Gerontol Nurs 2000 10; 26 (10):36. |
[8] | Nøddeskou, Lis Horstmann; Hemmingsen, Lars E.; Hørdam, Britta; An Assessment of Traditional Bed Baths and Pre-packed Single Unit Baths – a Randomized Controlled Trial Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, Jun2015; 29 (2): 347-352. |
[9] | van Achterberg T, van Gaal BGI, Geense WW, Verbeke G, van der Vleuten C, Schoonhoven L. Completeness of assisted bathing in nursing homes related to dementia and bathing method: results from a secondary analysis of cluster-randomised trial data. Int J Older People Nurs. 2015. |
[10] | Groven et al. How does washing without water perform compared to the traditional bed bath: a Systematic review. BMC Geriatrics (2017) 17:31 |
[11] | Lawler J. Bak skjermbrettene: sykepleie, somologi og kroppslige problemer. Oslo: Gyldendal; 2002. |
[12] | Johnson D, Lineweaver L, Maze LM. Patient's bath basins as potential sources of infection: a multicenter sampling study. Am J Crit Care 2009; 18 (1):31-38. |
[13] | Simmons SF. Resident Characteristics Related to the Lack of Morning Care Provision in Long-term Care. Gerontologist, The 2013; 53 (1):151. |
[14] | Nøddeskou LH, Hemmingsen LE, Hørdam B. Evidensbaseret sygepleje- et ledelsesansvar. Tidsskrift for kvalitet i Sundhedsvæsenet. Årgang 90 no 4. 2014 |
[15] | Hørdam B, Brandsen RV, Frandsen TK, Bind A, Stuhaug HN, Petersen K. Nurse-assisted personal hygiene to older adults 65+ in home care setting. J of Nursing Education and Practice. Oct 2017 |
[16] | Schoonhoven L, Gall BGI, Teerenstra S, Adang E, Vleuten C, Achterberg T. Cost-consequence analysis og “washing without water” for nursing home residents: A cluster randomized trial. International J of Nursing Studies. 2014 |
[17] | Gillis K, Tency I, Roelant E, Laureys S, Devriendt H, Lips D. Skin hydration in nursing home residents using disposable bed baths. Geriatr Nurs 2016 May-Jun; 37 (3):175-179. |
[18] | Nielsen T, Kreiner S. SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). 3rd ed. Copenhagen: Jurist og Økonomforbundet; 2008. |
[19] | Lund H, Røgind H. Statistik i ord. 1. ed. Kbh: Munksgaard Denmark; 2004. |
[20] | Alban A. Sundhedsøkonomi - principper og perspektiver. 3. ed. Kbh: DSI - Institut for Sundhedsvæsen; 2006. |
APA Style
Lis Horstmann Nøddeskou, Naina Túgvustein, Asta Marjunardóttir, Ingun Gaardbo, Lars Hemmingsen, et al. (2018). Assessment of Bed Bathing Methods in the Faroe Islands. American Journal of Nursing Science, 7(3), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15
ACS Style
Lis Horstmann Nøddeskou; Naina Túgvustein; Asta Marjunardóttir; Ingun Gaardbo; Lars Hemmingsen, et al. Assessment of Bed Bathing Methods in the Faroe Islands. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2018, 7(3), 109-114. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15
AMA Style
Lis Horstmann Nøddeskou, Naina Túgvustein, Asta Marjunardóttir, Ingun Gaardbo, Lars Hemmingsen, et al. Assessment of Bed Bathing Methods in the Faroe Islands. Am J Nurs Sci. 2018;7(3):109-114. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15, author = {Lis Horstmann Nøddeskou and Naina Túgvustein and Asta Marjunardóttir and Ingun Gaardbo and Lars Hemmingsen and Britta Hørdam}, title = {Assessment of Bed Bathing Methods in the Faroe Islands}, journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science}, volume = {7}, number = {3}, pages = {109-114}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20180703.15}, abstract = {There are two types of bed baths: the traditional basin used with soap and water, and the disposable bath, which is pre-packed in single-use units and heated before use. From earlier studies it was recommended with further studies witch would strengthen the evidence. To compare the traditional basin bed bath to a disposable bed bath, there are three factors that need to bed considered: (1) duration and quality of the bath, (2) patient satisfaction and (3) nurse satisfaction.31 patients received bed baths on two consecutive days. The patients were bathed by the same nurse on both days. The bed baths were observed in relation to duration and quality. Nurses and patients were interviewed about their preferences. The study was performed in both surgical and medical floors. Both types of bed baths scored very highly in the area of quality. Significantly less time was used with the disposable bed baths (p< 0.001). The registered nurses prefer the disposable bath (78%). The patients were satisfied with both types of bed baths. There was no significant difference in the results. Even when we adapt the results in relation to the patients’ gender and age, there is still no significant difference. Patients rated the bed baths equally in most cases. By this study we applied further research in the area of personal hygiene. When all aspects of bed baths are considered (time, cost, quality, and patient and nurse preferences), both types of bed baths are secure and well received. Due to the times savings achieved and the importance of this for patients (who are weak and need nursing assistance to perform personal hygiene), we recommend the use of disposable bed baths.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Bed Bathing Methods in the Faroe Islands AU - Lis Horstmann Nøddeskou AU - Naina Túgvustein AU - Asta Marjunardóttir AU - Ingun Gaardbo AU - Lars Hemmingsen AU - Britta Hørdam Y1 - 2018/06/01 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 109 EP - 114 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20180703.15 AB - There are two types of bed baths: the traditional basin used with soap and water, and the disposable bath, which is pre-packed in single-use units and heated before use. From earlier studies it was recommended with further studies witch would strengthen the evidence. To compare the traditional basin bed bath to a disposable bed bath, there are three factors that need to bed considered: (1) duration and quality of the bath, (2) patient satisfaction and (3) nurse satisfaction.31 patients received bed baths on two consecutive days. The patients were bathed by the same nurse on both days. The bed baths were observed in relation to duration and quality. Nurses and patients were interviewed about their preferences. The study was performed in both surgical and medical floors. Both types of bed baths scored very highly in the area of quality. Significantly less time was used with the disposable bed baths (p< 0.001). The registered nurses prefer the disposable bath (78%). The patients were satisfied with both types of bed baths. There was no significant difference in the results. Even when we adapt the results in relation to the patients’ gender and age, there is still no significant difference. Patients rated the bed baths equally in most cases. By this study we applied further research in the area of personal hygiene. When all aspects of bed baths are considered (time, cost, quality, and patient and nurse preferences), both types of bed baths are secure and well received. Due to the times savings achieved and the importance of this for patients (who are weak and need nursing assistance to perform personal hygiene), we recommend the use of disposable bed baths. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -