Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery

Huixuan Chen; Cuiqing Liu; Wei Li; Shiyong Wang; Weiju Chen

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26

| Peer-Reviewed

Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery

Huixuan Chen, Cuiqing Liu, Wei Li, Shiyong Wang, Weiju Chen

Published in American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 9, Issue 3)

Received: 29 April 2020 Accepted: 18 May 2020 Published: 27 May 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect and advantages of no indwelling catheter during perioperative period of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia under the concept of rapid recovery. Methods: 30 patients underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia at our hospital during February 2017 and December 2019 were collected and divided into experimental group and control group by whether patients adopted urinary catheter or not at the concept of rapid recovery. The data of gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, urine tract infection, incidence of urinary retention, urinary comfort and average postoperative hospital stay were collected and compared. Results: No significant difference in gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05) between those two groups. The intraoperative fluid infusion and urine output in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group. There was no significant difference in urine tract infection and urinary retention in these two groups (P > 0.05), comfort level (P < 0.05), and no significant difference in the average postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without urinary catheter during perioperative period under the concept of rapid recovery is feasible and safe, will not increase risk of urinary retention, improve postoperative comfort and shorten average postoperative hospital stay.

Published in	American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26
Page(s)	166-171
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Rapid Recovery, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Microvascular Decompression, Urinary Catheter, Nursing Stratege

References

[1]	Chai Y, Chen M, Zhang W, et al. Predicting the outcome of microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia by the use of magnetic resonance tomographic angiography [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2013, 24 (5): 1699-1702.
[2]	Revuelta-Gutierrez R, Martinez-Anda J J, Coll J B, et al. Efficacy and safety of root compression of trigeminal nerve for trigeminal neuralgia without evidence of vascular compression [J]. World Neurosurg, 2013, 80 (3-4): 385-389.
[3]	Wu Q, Sha Y S. Application Status and Progress of Rapid Rehabilitation Concept in Surgical Nursing [J]. Journal of Nurse Training, 2018, 33 (20): 1850-1853.
[4]	Yang M, Chen J, Che G W, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of perioperative urethral indwelling in patients with lung cancer lobectomy [J]. Chinese Clinical Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016, 23 (05): 421-424.
[5]	Cao Z Q, Shi J, Jin H T, et al. Urethra affects the rehabilitation of pediatric appendicitis after laparoscopic surgery [J]. Domestic and Overseas Medical Research, 2019, 17 (05): 18-19.
[6]	Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice [J]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2016, 60 (3): 289-334.
[7]	Zheng X L, Luo Z Z, Cai J Y, et al, Effect of rapid rehabilitation surgery concept on perioperative insulin resistance and inflammatory response in patients with partial hepatectomy [J]. Guangdong Medical, 2017, 38 (05): 709-712.
[8]	Stallard S, Prescott S. Postoperative urinary retention in general surgical patients [J]. Br J Surg, 1988, 75 (11): 1141-1143.
[9]	Nicolle L E. Urinary catheter-associated infections [J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2012, 26 (1): 13-27.
[10]	Wang G D, Wang M F. Comparison on comfort of urinary catheter in gynecological surgery patients before and after anesthesia [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2005 (09): 705-706.
[11]	Chen L, Chen Y J, Dong H L, et al. Chinese consensus and clinical guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2018 editon) [J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2018, 38 (01): 1-20.
[12]	Kehlet H, Wilmore D W. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome [J]. Am J Surg, 2002, 183 (6): 630-641.
[13]	Wilmore D W, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery [J]. BMJ, 2001, 322 (7284): 473-476.
[14]	Kosar S, Seelen H A, Hemmen B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of an integrated 'fast track' rehabilitation service for multi-trauma patients involving dedicated early rehabilitation intervention programs: design of a prospective, multi-centre, non-randomised clinical trial [J]. J Trauma Manag Outcomes, 2009, 3: 1.
[15]	Mazza F, Venturino M, Turello D, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: adherence and outcomes in elderly patients undergoing VATS lobectomy [J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020.
[16]	Alimena S, Falzone M, Feltmate C M, et al. Perioperative glycemic measures among non-fasting gynecologic oncology patients receiving carbohydrate loading in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol [J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020.
[17]	Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D, et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019 [J]. World J Surg, 2020.
[18]	Ghodoussipour S, Naser-Tavakolian A, Cameron B, et al. Internal audit of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for radical cystectomy [J]. World J Urol, 2020.
[19]	Che G. [Current Situation and Strategy of Day Surgery in Patients with Lung Cancer by Enhanced Recovery after Surgery] [J]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi, 2020, 23 (1): 1-4.
[20]	Ni C Y, Wang Z H, Huang Z P, et al. Early enforced mobilization after liver resection: A prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 54 (Pt A): 254-258.
[21]	Hu G W, Wang H M. Application of Accelerated Rehabilitation Surgery in Perioperative Nursing of Sun's End-Flexible Ureter Nephroscope Holmium Laser Lithotripsy [J]. Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature, 2018, 5 (44): 129-131.
[22]	Liu Q. Effect of fast recovery surgical nursing on postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing urological surgery [J]. Nursing Practice and Research, 2017, 14 (15): 58-59.
[23]	Zhang J J, Zhang Y, Ma Q. Analysis of the influence of eating time on gastrointestinal peristalsis function, adverse reactions and blood sugar after gynecological malignant tumors after laparotomy [J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2019, 34 (16): 1512-1515.
[24]	Zhao C M, Jin C M, Shao Y. Clinical study on the time of first meal after orthopedic spinal surgery of patients undergoing general anesthesia [J]. Chongqing Medical, 2019, 48 (18): 3224-3227.
[25]	Yin M, Yan Y, Fan Z, et al. The efficacy of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures who received surgery: study protocol for a randomized, blinded, controlled trial [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020, 15 (1): 91.
[26]	Jiang H H, Jian X F, Shangguan Y F, et al. Effects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients Older Than 65 Years [J]. Orthop Surg, 2019, 11 (2): 229-235.
[27]	Wu M H, Chen M J, Liu W J. Study on the effect of no indwelling of urinary catheter in patients with Chiari malformation during perioperative under accelerated rehabilitation surgery mode [J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Science Edition), 2018, 49 (4): 670-672.
[28]	Zhao J, Xie X H. Application of clinical nursing path combined with rapid rehabilitation surgery concept in perioperative period of patients with trigeminal neuralgia [J]. Tofay Nurse (later issue), 2017 (12): 49-51.
[29]	Mai H Z. Analysis of the effect of Dacronine hydrochloride on the discomfort of male patients with indwelling urinary catheter under general anesthesia [J]. China Practical Medical, 2018 (35): 125-126.
[30]	Lei Y, Liu J Q, Song S S. Effect study of nursing project on reducing the incidence of urinary retention after extubation in gynecological patients with indwelling catheter [J]. Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature, 2018 (51): 139-140.
[31]	Li B, Wang F. Discussion on standard construction of urinary catheter removal in patients with lower limb fracture after spinal anesthesia under accelerated rehabilitation surgery mode [J]. Chinese Medicine and Clinic, 2018 (05): 860-862.
[32]	Alyami M, Lundberg P, Passot G, et al. Laparoscopic Colonic Resection Without Urinary Drainage: Is It "Feasible"?[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2016, 20 (7): 1388-1392.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Huixuan Chen, Cuiqing Liu, Wei Li, Shiyong Wang, Weiju Chen. (2020). Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery. American Journal of Nursing Science, 9(3), 166-171. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Huixuan Chen; Cuiqing Liu; Wei Li; Shiyong Wang; Weiju Chen. Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2020, 9(3), 166-171. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Huixuan Chen, Cuiqing Liu, Wei Li, Shiyong Wang, Weiju Chen. Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery. Am J Nurs Sci. 2020;9(3):166-171. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26,
  author = {Huixuan Chen and Cuiqing Liu and Wei Li and Shiyong Wang and Weiju Chen},
  title = {Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery},
  journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {166-171},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20200903.26},
  abstract = {Objective: To determine the effect and advantages of no indwelling catheter during perioperative period of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia under the concept of rapid recovery. Methods: 30 patients underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia at our hospital during February 2017 and December 2019 were collected and divided into experimental group and control group by whether patients adopted urinary catheter or not at the concept of rapid recovery. The data of gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, urine tract infection, incidence of urinary retention, urinary comfort and average postoperative hospital stay were collected and compared. Results: No significant difference in gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05) between those two groups. The intraoperative fluid infusion and urine output in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group. There was no significant difference in urine tract infection and urinary retention in these two groups (P > 0.05), comfort level (P P > 0.05). Conclusions: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without urinary catheter during perioperative period under the concept of rapid recovery is feasible and safe, will not increase risk of urinary retention, improve postoperative comfort and shorten average postoperative hospital stay.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery
AU  - Huixuan Chen
AU  - Cuiqing Liu
AU  - Wei Li
AU  - Shiyong Wang
AU  - Weiju Chen
Y1  - 2020/05/27
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26
T2  - American Journal of Nursing Science
JF  - American Journal of Nursing Science
JO  - American Journal of Nursing Science
SP  - 166
EP  - 171
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5753
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26
AB  - Objective: To determine the effect and advantages of no indwelling catheter during perioperative period of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia under the concept of rapid recovery. Methods: 30 patients underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia at our hospital during February 2017 and December 2019 were collected and divided into experimental group and control group by whether patients adopted urinary catheter or not at the concept of rapid recovery. The data of gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, urine tract infection, incidence of urinary retention, urinary comfort and average postoperative hospital stay were collected and compared. Results: No significant difference in gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05) between those two groups. The intraoperative fluid infusion and urine output in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group. There was no significant difference in urine tract infection and urinary retention in these two groups (P > 0.05), comfort level (P P > 0.05). Conclusions: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without urinary catheter during perioperative period under the concept of rapid recovery is feasible and safe, will not increase risk of urinary retention, improve postoperative comfort and shorten average postoperative hospital stay.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Huixuan Chen

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Cuiqing Liu

Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Wei Li

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Shiyong Wang

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Weiju Chen

School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Huixuan Chen, Cuiqing Liu, Wei Li, Shiyong Wang, Weiju Chen. (2020). Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery. American Journal of Nursing Science, 9(3), 166-171. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Huixuan Chen; Cuiqing Liu; Wei Li; Shiyong Wang; Weiju Chen. Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2020, 9(3), 166-171. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Huixuan Chen, Cuiqing Liu, Wei Li, Shiyong Wang, Weiju Chen. Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery. Am J Nurs Sci. 2020;9(3):166-171. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26,
  author = {Huixuan Chen and Cuiqing Liu and Wei Li and Shiyong Wang and Weiju Chen},
  title = {Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery},
  journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {166-171},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20200903.26},
  abstract = {Objective: To determine the effect and advantages of no indwelling catheter during perioperative period of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia under the concept of rapid recovery. Methods: 30 patients underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia at our hospital during February 2017 and December 2019 were collected and divided into experimental group and control group by whether patients adopted urinary catheter or not at the concept of rapid recovery. The data of gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, urine tract infection, incidence of urinary retention, urinary comfort and average postoperative hospital stay were collected and compared. Results: No significant difference in gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05) between those two groups. The intraoperative fluid infusion and urine output in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group. There was no significant difference in urine tract infection and urinary retention in these two groups (P > 0.05), comfort level (P P > 0.05). Conclusions: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without urinary catheter during perioperative period under the concept of rapid recovery is feasible and safe, will not increase risk of urinary retention, improve postoperative comfort and shorten average postoperative hospital stay.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Without Urinary Catheter During Perioperative Period of Microvascular Decompression of Trigeminal Neuralgia: The Inspiration Under the Concept of Rapid Recovery
AU  - Huixuan Chen
AU  - Cuiqing Liu
AU  - Wei Li
AU  - Shiyong Wang
AU  - Weiju Chen
Y1  - 2020/05/27
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26
T2  - American Journal of Nursing Science
JF  - American Journal of Nursing Science
JO  - American Journal of Nursing Science
SP  - 166
EP  - 171
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5753
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.26
AB  - Objective: To determine the effect and advantages of no indwelling catheter during perioperative period of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia under the concept of rapid recovery. Methods: 30 patients underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia at our hospital during February 2017 and December 2019 were collected and divided into experimental group and control group by whether patients adopted urinary catheter or not at the concept of rapid recovery. The data of gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, urine tract infection, incidence of urinary retention, urinary comfort and average postoperative hospital stay were collected and compared. Results: No significant difference in gender, age, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05) between those two groups. The intraoperative fluid infusion and urine output in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group. There was no significant difference in urine tract infection and urinary retention in these two groups (P > 0.05), comfort level (P P > 0.05). Conclusions: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without urinary catheter during perioperative period under the concept of rapid recovery is feasible and safe, will not increase risk of urinary retention, improve postoperative comfort and shorten average postoperative hospital stay.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download