Objective: To assess effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on emergency treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients. Methods: 80 patients were invested to join our study who were diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction. They went to the hospital for treatment from March 2017 to July 2019. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups, that included a control group (n = 40) and an intervention group (n = 40). The control group participants received conventional nursing in treatment process. The intervention group participants receive comprehensive nursing intervention. All participants provided the data after their condition stabilized, the data contains first aid time, average hospital stay, the situation of cardiovascular adverse events and patient satisfaction. Result: Base on recording result, first aid time and average hospital stay of intervention group are shorter than that of control group, and those are statistical significance. In cardiovascular adverse events research, intervention group has better performance in cardiovascular adverse, it contains post-infarction angina pectoris [5 (12.5%) vs 10 (25.0%)], heart failure [1 (2.5%) vs 5 (12.5%)], Myocardial infarction recur [1 (2.5%) vs 6 (15.0%)] and cardiac death [0 (0%) vs 1 (2.5%)]. In satisfaction research, intervention group has more very good assessments in the patient report (21 vs 12). Conclusion: the comprehensive nursing intervention has strongly improvement to acute myocardial infarction patients in emergency treatment. Its influence contains not only reducing first aid time and average hospital stay but also reducing the cases of cardiovascular adverse events. Additionally, it also can improve patient satisfaction in the treatment process.
| Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27 |
| Page(s) | 172-174 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Comprehensive Nursing Intervention, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Emergency Treatment
| [1] | Jennings RB, Murry CE, Steenbergen Jr C, Reimer KA. Development of cell injury in sustained acute ischemia. Circulation. 2015; 82: 2-12. |
| [2] | Pfeffer M, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation. 2016; 81: 1161–1172. |
| [3] | Frangogiannis N. The immune system and cardiac repair. Pharmacol. Res. 2018; 58: 88–111. |
| [4] | Garg RK, Jolly N. Acute myocardial infarction secondary to thromboembolism in a patient with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 123: 18–20. |
| [5] | de Waha S, Jobs A, Eitel I, Poss J, Stiermaier T, Meyer-Saraei R, et al. Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018; 7: 28–37 |
| [6] | Park DW, Clare RM, Schulte PJ, Pieper KS, Shaw LK, Califf RM, et al. Extent, location, and clinical significance of non-infarct-related coronary artery disease among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2014; 312: 2019–27. |
| [7] | Rathod KS, Koganti S, Jain AK, Astroulakis Z, Lim P, Rakhit R, et al. Complete versus culprit-only lesion intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 1989–1999. |
| [8] | Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Cox DA, McLaughlin MG, Zimetbaum P, Costantini C, et al. Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2017; 28: 1709–1716. |
| [9] | Bates ER, Tamis-Holland JE, Bittl JA, O'Gara PT, Levine GN. PCI strategies in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 1066–1081. |
| [10] | Stroebe M, Schut H, Stroebe W. Health outcomes of bereavement. Lancet. 2017; 370 (9603): 1960–73. |
| [11] | Wright AA, Keating NL, Balboni TA, Matulonis UA, Block SD, Prigerson HG. Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers' mental health. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 28 (29): 4457–64. |
| [12] | Pimes JM, Griffey RT. What we have learned from a decade of ED crowding research. Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22 (8): 985-998. |
| [13] | Johnson KD, Winkelman C. The effect of emergency department crowding on patient outcomes: a literature review. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2016; 33 (1): 39–54. |
| [14] | Shaw PM, Chandra V, Escobar GA, Robbins N, Rowe V, Macsata R. Controversies and evidence for cardiovascular disease in the diverse Hispanic population. J. Vasc. Surg. 2018; 67: 960–969. |
| [15] | Sinha SK, Krishna V, Thakur R, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in very youngadults: a clinical presentation, risk factors, hospital outcome index, and theirangiographic characteristics in North India- AMIYA study. ARYA Atheroscler. 2017; 13 (2): 79-87. |
| [16] | Iragavarapu T, Radhakrishna T, Babu KJ, et al. Acute coronary syndrome in young - a tertiary care centre experience with reference to coronary angio-gram. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci. 2019; 5: 18-25. |
| [17] | Yoon NS, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, Kim JH, Chae SC, Kim YJ, Hur SH, Seong IW, Hong TJ, Choi D. Impact of high-normal blood pressure measured in emergency room on adverse cardiac events in acute myocardial infarction, Kor. Circ. J. 2016; 42 (5): 304–310. |
APA Style
Qingyun Zheng, Qiyao Liu. (2020). Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Emergency Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients. American Journal of Nursing Science, 9(3), 172-174. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27
ACS Style
Qingyun Zheng; Qiyao Liu. Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Emergency Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2020, 9(3), 172-174. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27
AMA Style
Qingyun Zheng, Qiyao Liu. Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Emergency Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients. Am J Nurs Sci. 2020;9(3):172-174. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27,
author = {Qingyun Zheng and Qiyao Liu},
title = {Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Emergency Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients},
journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
volume = {9},
number = {3},
pages = {172-174},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20200903.27},
abstract = {Objective: To assess effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on emergency treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients. Methods: 80 patients were invested to join our study who were diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction. They went to the hospital for treatment from March 2017 to July 2019. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups, that included a control group (n = 40) and an intervention group (n = 40). The control group participants received conventional nursing in treatment process. The intervention group participants receive comprehensive nursing intervention. All participants provided the data after their condition stabilized, the data contains first aid time, average hospital stay, the situation of cardiovascular adverse events and patient satisfaction. Result: Base on recording result, first aid time and average hospital stay of intervention group are shorter than that of control group, and those are statistical significance. In cardiovascular adverse events research, intervention group has better performance in cardiovascular adverse, it contains post-infarction angina pectoris [5 (12.5%) vs 10 (25.0%)], heart failure [1 (2.5%) vs 5 (12.5%)], Myocardial infarction recur [1 (2.5%) vs 6 (15.0%)] and cardiac death [0 (0%) vs 1 (2.5%)]. In satisfaction research, intervention group has more very good assessments in the patient report (21 vs 12). Conclusion: the comprehensive nursing intervention has strongly improvement to acute myocardial infarction patients in emergency treatment. Its influence contains not only reducing first aid time and average hospital stay but also reducing the cases of cardiovascular adverse events. Additionally, it also can improve patient satisfaction in the treatment process.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Emergency Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients AU - Qingyun Zheng AU - Qiyao Liu Y1 - 2020/05/29 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 172 EP - 174 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.27 AB - Objective: To assess effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on emergency treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients. Methods: 80 patients were invested to join our study who were diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction. They went to the hospital for treatment from March 2017 to July 2019. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups, that included a control group (n = 40) and an intervention group (n = 40). The control group participants received conventional nursing in treatment process. The intervention group participants receive comprehensive nursing intervention. All participants provided the data after their condition stabilized, the data contains first aid time, average hospital stay, the situation of cardiovascular adverse events and patient satisfaction. Result: Base on recording result, first aid time and average hospital stay of intervention group are shorter than that of control group, and those are statistical significance. In cardiovascular adverse events research, intervention group has better performance in cardiovascular adverse, it contains post-infarction angina pectoris [5 (12.5%) vs 10 (25.0%)], heart failure [1 (2.5%) vs 5 (12.5%)], Myocardial infarction recur [1 (2.5%) vs 6 (15.0%)] and cardiac death [0 (0%) vs 1 (2.5%)]. In satisfaction research, intervention group has more very good assessments in the patient report (21 vs 12). Conclusion: the comprehensive nursing intervention has strongly improvement to acute myocardial infarction patients in emergency treatment. Its influence contains not only reducing first aid time and average hospital stay but also reducing the cases of cardiovascular adverse events. Additionally, it also can improve patient satisfaction in the treatment process. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: