Objective: To assess the application of seamless nursing to patients with nephrotic syndrome. Methods: 88 nephrotic syndrome patients agree to join our study, they were diagnosed as nephrotic syndrome in the hospital from May 2018 to October 2019. The participants were randomly assigned the participants to two groups, that include control group (n = 44) and intervention group (n = 44). We provide conventional nursing service to the control group participants in the treatment process. Also, intervention group participants receive seamless nursing services. Our researchers collected anxiety information and depression information by questionnaires which include Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS). In addition, we collect the information was associated with participants characteristics from hospital database and participant satisfaction of satisfaction questionnaire. Result: In depression- and anxiety- research result, the two groups have similar assessment result in SAS and SDS of before the nursing, they are not statistical significance. However, the result of after the nursing is different in SDS and SAS. The intervention group participants have better performance in SAS and SDS result (34.21±1.26 vs 44.21±3.83, 32.37±2.81 vs 46.51±5.7). In patient satisfaction research, all participants have good satisfaction assessment for nursing service (95.5% & 77.3%). But intervention group has obviously improvement in our research result. In intervention group assessment, most assessment are very well (n = 24). Conclusion: The seamless nursing has strongly improvement to depression and anxiety of patient, and patient satisfaction.
| Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 9, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13 |
| Page(s) | 193-195 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nephrotic Syndrome, Seamless Nursing, Nursing
| [1] | Jahan I, Hanif M, Ali MA, et al. Prediction of risk factors of frequent relapse idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Mymensingh Med J. 2015; 24: 735–742. |
| [2] | Andolino TP, Reid-Adam J: Nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Rev. 2015; 36: 117. |
| [3] | Nephrotic syndrome in children: prediction of histopathology from clinical and laboratory characteristics at time of diagnosis. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children. Kidney Int. 1978; 13: 159–165. |
| [4] | Morris AW. Nephrotic syndrome: PCSK9: a target for hypercholesterolaemia in nephrotic syndrome. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016; 12: 510. |
| [5] | Agrawal S, Zaritsky JJ, Fornoni A, Smoyer WE. Dyslipidaemiain nephrotic syndrome: mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018; 14: 57-70. |
| [6] | Mikolasevic I, Zutelija M, Mavrinac V, Orlic L. Dyslipidemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: etiology and management. Int J Nephrol Renovascular Dis. 2017; 10: 35-45. |
| [7] | Eckardt KU, Coresh J, Devuyst O, Johnson RJ, Köttgen A, Levey AS, Levin A. Evolving importance of kidney disease: from subspecialty to global health burden. Lancet. 2013; 382: 158–169. |
| [8] | Lu R, Zhou J, Liu B, Liang N, He Y, Bai L, Zhang P, Zhong Y, Zhou Y, Zhou J. Paeoniflorin ameliorates Adriamycin-induced nephrotic syndrome through the PPAR gamma/ANGPTL4 pathway in vivo and vitro. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017; 96: 137–147. |
| [9] | Cattran D, Brenchley P. Membranous nephropathy: thinking through the therapeutic options. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2017; 32: i22–i29. |
| [10] | Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, et al. Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: A retrospective observational study. Lancet. 2015; 383 (9931): 1824–1830. |
| [11] | Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Clinical governance for nurses and midwives. Sydney: ACSQH. 2017. |
| [12] | Melnyk B, Gallagher-Ford L, Long L, Fineout-Overholt E. The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in real-world clinical settings: Proficiencies to improve healthcare quality, reliability, patient outcomes, and costs. Worldviews on Evidence-based Nursing. 2014; 11 (1): 5–15. |
| [13] | White D, Leach C, Sims R, Atkinson M, Cottrell D. Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 175: 452–454. |
| [14] | El-Rufaie O, Absood G. Validity study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale among a group of Saudi patients. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 687–688. |
| [15] | McPherson R., Frohlich J., Fodor G., Genest J., Canadian cardiovascular society position statement e recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease, Can. J. Cardiol. 2006; (22): 913–927. |
| [16] | Niaudet P. Steroid-resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. In: Avner ED, Harmon WE, Niaudet P, eds. Pediatric Nephrology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2016: 557-573. |
| [17] | Chernin G, Heeringa SF, Gbadegesin RA, et al. Low prevalence of NPHS2 mutations in African American children with steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018; 23 (9): 1455-1460. |
| [18] | Eddy AA, Symons JM. Nephrotic syndrome in childhood. Lancet. 2015; 362 (9384): 629-639. |
| [19] | Banh TH, Hussain-Shamsy N, Patel V, et al. Ethnic differences in incidence and outcomes of childhood nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 11 (10): 1760-1768. |
| [20] | Bonilla-Felix M, Parra C, Dajani T, et al. Changing patterns in the histopathology of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. Kidney Int. 1999; 55 (5): 1885-1890. |
APA Style
Yingxue Zhong, Qingqing Zhai. (2020). The Application of Seamless Nursing to Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome. American Journal of Nursing Science, 9(4), 193-195. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13
ACS Style
Yingxue Zhong; Qingqing Zhai. The Application of Seamless Nursing to Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2020, 9(4), 193-195. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13
AMA Style
Yingxue Zhong, Qingqing Zhai. The Application of Seamless Nursing to Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome. Am J Nurs Sci. 2020;9(4):193-195. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13,
author = {Yingxue Zhong and Qingqing Zhai},
title = {The Application of Seamless Nursing to Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome},
journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
volume = {9},
number = {4},
pages = {193-195},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20200904.13},
abstract = {Objective: To assess the application of seamless nursing to patients with nephrotic syndrome. Methods: 88 nephrotic syndrome patients agree to join our study, they were diagnosed as nephrotic syndrome in the hospital from May 2018 to October 2019. The participants were randomly assigned the participants to two groups, that include control group (n = 44) and intervention group (n = 44). We provide conventional nursing service to the control group participants in the treatment process. Also, intervention group participants receive seamless nursing services. Our researchers collected anxiety information and depression information by questionnaires which include Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS). In addition, we collect the information was associated with participants characteristics from hospital database and participant satisfaction of satisfaction questionnaire. Result: In depression- and anxiety- research result, the two groups have similar assessment result in SAS and SDS of before the nursing, they are not statistical significance. However, the result of after the nursing is different in SDS and SAS. The intervention group participants have better performance in SAS and SDS result (34.21±1.26 vs 44.21±3.83, 32.37±2.81 vs 46.51±5.7). In patient satisfaction research, all participants have good satisfaction assessment for nursing service (95.5% & 77.3%). But intervention group has obviously improvement in our research result. In intervention group assessment, most assessment are very well (n = 24). Conclusion: The seamless nursing has strongly improvement to depression and anxiety of patient, and patient satisfaction.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Application of Seamless Nursing to Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome AU - Yingxue Zhong AU - Qingqing Zhai Y1 - 2020/06/03 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 193 EP - 195 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200904.13 AB - Objective: To assess the application of seamless nursing to patients with nephrotic syndrome. Methods: 88 nephrotic syndrome patients agree to join our study, they were diagnosed as nephrotic syndrome in the hospital from May 2018 to October 2019. The participants were randomly assigned the participants to two groups, that include control group (n = 44) and intervention group (n = 44). We provide conventional nursing service to the control group participants in the treatment process. Also, intervention group participants receive seamless nursing services. Our researchers collected anxiety information and depression information by questionnaires which include Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS). In addition, we collect the information was associated with participants characteristics from hospital database and participant satisfaction of satisfaction questionnaire. Result: In depression- and anxiety- research result, the two groups have similar assessment result in SAS and SDS of before the nursing, they are not statistical significance. However, the result of after the nursing is different in SDS and SAS. The intervention group participants have better performance in SAS and SDS result (34.21±1.26 vs 44.21±3.83, 32.37±2.81 vs 46.51±5.7). In patient satisfaction research, all participants have good satisfaction assessment for nursing service (95.5% & 77.3%). But intervention group has obviously improvement in our research result. In intervention group assessment, most assessment are very well (n = 24). Conclusion: The seamless nursing has strongly improvement to depression and anxiety of patient, and patient satisfaction. VL - 9 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: