Objective: To assess the effect of personalized nursing on thrombolytic hemodialysis patients after arteriovenous fistula occlusion. Methods: 92 patients who undergoing arteriovenous fistula in the hospital were invited to join our study. The time of they receive the treatment is from May 2015 to July 2020. In study beginning, the patients were randomly assigned to the control group (n = 46) and an intervention group (n = 46). The two groups receive different nursing intervention. The control group receive common nursing intervention. On the other hand, the intervention group patients receive personalized nursing intervention in treatment process. Result: In basic patient information, the patient basic status are similar [20 (47.6%) vs 23 (54.8%), 38.14±9.12 vs 37.88±10.07, 1.41±0.75 vs 1.37±0.69], that the gender, age and number of thrombolysis are not statistical significance (p > 0.05). In thrombolysis success rate research, the intervention group has higher thrombolysis success rate than that of control group [38 (90.5%) vs 32 (76.2%), p = 0.016]. In patient satisfaction research result, more intervention group patients make very well assessment than that of control group patients [19 (45.2%) vs 10 (23.8%), p < 0.005]. Conclusion: the personalized nursing intervention not only increase thrombolysis success rate but also improve the patient satisfaction in arteriovenous fistula occlusion.
| Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 9, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13 |
| Page(s) | 320-323 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Arteriovenous Fistula, Hemodialysis, Nursing
| [1] | Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, et al. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med. 1966; 275 (20): 1089-92. |
| [2] | Vora AN, Stanislawski M, Grunwald GK, et al. Association between chronic kidney disease and rates of transfusion and progression to end-stage renal disease in patients undergoing transradial versus transfemoral cardiac catheterization-an analysis from the veteran’s affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6 (4): e004819. |
| [3] | Remuzzi A, Bozzetto M, Brambilla P, et al. Is shear stress the key factor for AVF maturation? J Vasc Access. 2017; 18: 10-14. |
| [4] | Parmar J, Aslam M, Standfield N, et al. Pre-operative radial arterial diameter predicts early failure of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for haemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017; 33 (1): 113-15. |
| [5] | AI-Jaishi AA, Liu AR, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Moist LM, Al-Jaishi AA, et al. Compli-cations of the arteriovenous fistula: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 28 (6): 1839-1850. |
| [6] | Ozen N, Tosun N, Cinar FI, Bagcivan G, Yilmaz MI, Askin D, et al. Investigation of the knowledge and attitudes of patients who are undergoing hemodialysis treatment regarding their arteriovenous fistula. J Vasc Access 2017; 18 (1): 64-68. |
| [7] | Pessoa NRC, Linhares FMP. Hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula: knowledge, attitude and practice. Escola Anna Nery 2015; 19 (1): 73e9. |
| [8] | Clementino DC, Souza AMQ, Barros DCC, Carvalho DMA, Santos CR, Fraga SN. Hemodialysis patients: the importance of self-Care with the arteriovenous fistula. Journal of Nursing UFPE on line 2018; 12 (7): 1841-1852. |
| [9] | Clark S, Farrington K, Chilcot J. Nonadherence in dialysis patients: Prevalence, measurement, outcome, and psychological determinants, Semin. Dial. 2015; 27: 42-49. |
| [10] | Başer E, Mollaoglu M. The effect of a hemodialysis patient educationprogram on fluid control and dietary compliance, Hemodial. Int. 2019; 23: 392-401. |
| [11] | Barzegar M, Valizadeh S, Gojazadeh M, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Zamanzadeh V, Shahbazi S. The effects of two educational strategies on knowledge, attitude, concerns, and practices of mothers with febrile convulsive children, Thrita 2016; 5: 33411. |
| [12] | Dehghanmehr S, Mansouri A, Faghihi H, Piri F. The effect of acupressure on theanxiety of patients undergoing hemodialysis-a review. J Pharm Sci Res. 2017; 9 (12): 2580e4. |
| [13] | Kılıç Akça N, Tas ̧çıS, Karatas ̧ N. Effect of acupressure on patients in Turkeyreceiving hemodialysis treatment for uremic pruritus. Altern Therap HealthMed. 2013; 19 (5): 8e12. |
| [14] | Muz G, Tas ̧cıS. Effect of aromatherapy via inhalation on the sleep quality and fatigue level in people undergoing hemodialysis. Appl Nurs Res. 2017; 37: 28-35. |
| [15] | Movahedi M, Ghafari S, Nazari F, Valiani M. The effects of acupressure on pain severity in female nurses with chronic low back pain. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2017; 22 (5): 339. |
| [16] | Scholz SS, Vukadinovic D, Lauder L, Ewen S, Ukena C, Townsend RR, et al. Effect of arteriovenous fistula on blood pressure in patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8: e011183. |
| [17] | Yang G, Lin S, Wu Y, Zhang S, Wu X, Liu X, et al. Auricular acupressure helpsalleviate xerostomia in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a pilot study. J AltCompl Med. 2017; 23 (4): 278-284. |
APA Style
Huixia Yu, Xiutin Li, Jian Li, Yi Yang, Guanmin Wu, et al. (2020). Assessing the Effect of Personalized Nursing on Thrombolytic Hemodialysis Patients After Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion. American Journal of Nursing Science, 9(5), 320-323. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13
ACS Style
Huixia Yu; Xiutin Li; Jian Li; Yi Yang; Guanmin Wu, et al. Assessing the Effect of Personalized Nursing on Thrombolytic Hemodialysis Patients After Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2020, 9(5), 320-323. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13
AMA Style
Huixia Yu, Xiutin Li, Jian Li, Yi Yang, Guanmin Wu, et al. Assessing the Effect of Personalized Nursing on Thrombolytic Hemodialysis Patients After Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion. Am J Nurs Sci. 2020;9(5):320-323. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13,
author = {Huixia Yu and Xiutin Li and Jian Li and Yi Yang and Guanmin Wu and Guiyan Wen},
title = {Assessing the Effect of Personalized Nursing on Thrombolytic Hemodialysis Patients After Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion},
journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
volume = {9},
number = {5},
pages = {320-323},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20200905.13},
abstract = {Objective: To assess the effect of personalized nursing on thrombolytic hemodialysis patients after arteriovenous fistula occlusion. Methods: 92 patients who undergoing arteriovenous fistula in the hospital were invited to join our study. The time of they receive the treatment is from May 2015 to July 2020. In study beginning, the patients were randomly assigned to the control group (n = 46) and an intervention group (n = 46). The two groups receive different nursing intervention. The control group receive common nursing intervention. On the other hand, the intervention group patients receive personalized nursing intervention in treatment process. Result: In basic patient information, the patient basic status are similar [20 (47.6%) vs 23 (54.8%), 38.14±9.12 vs 37.88±10.07, 1.41±0.75 vs 1.37±0.69], that the gender, age and number of thrombolysis are not statistical significance (p > 0.05). In thrombolysis success rate research, the intervention group has higher thrombolysis success rate than that of control group [38 (90.5%) vs 32 (76.2%), p = 0.016]. In patient satisfaction research result, more intervention group patients make very well assessment than that of control group patients [19 (45.2%) vs 10 (23.8%), p < 0.005]. Conclusion: the personalized nursing intervention not only increase thrombolysis success rate but also improve the patient satisfaction in arteriovenous fistula occlusion.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing the Effect of Personalized Nursing on Thrombolytic Hemodialysis Patients After Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion AU - Huixia Yu AU - Xiutin Li AU - Jian Li AU - Yi Yang AU - Guanmin Wu AU - Guiyan Wen Y1 - 2020/08/31 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 320 EP - 323 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.13 AB - Objective: To assess the effect of personalized nursing on thrombolytic hemodialysis patients after arteriovenous fistula occlusion. Methods: 92 patients who undergoing arteriovenous fistula in the hospital were invited to join our study. The time of they receive the treatment is from May 2015 to July 2020. In study beginning, the patients were randomly assigned to the control group (n = 46) and an intervention group (n = 46). The two groups receive different nursing intervention. The control group receive common nursing intervention. On the other hand, the intervention group patients receive personalized nursing intervention in treatment process. Result: In basic patient information, the patient basic status are similar [20 (47.6%) vs 23 (54.8%), 38.14±9.12 vs 37.88±10.07, 1.41±0.75 vs 1.37±0.69], that the gender, age and number of thrombolysis are not statistical significance (p > 0.05). In thrombolysis success rate research, the intervention group has higher thrombolysis success rate than that of control group [38 (90.5%) vs 32 (76.2%), p = 0.016]. In patient satisfaction research result, more intervention group patients make very well assessment than that of control group patients [19 (45.2%) vs 10 (23.8%), p < 0.005]. Conclusion: the personalized nursing intervention not only increase thrombolysis success rate but also improve the patient satisfaction in arteriovenous fistula occlusion. VL - 9 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: