Objective: To assess effect of group continuous nursing intervention model on serum biochemical parameters, general self-efficacy scale (GSES) assessment, Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Scale (DSQL) assessment and satisfaction of diabetic patients. Methods: A total of 150 patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted from June 2017 to October 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University were randomly selected as the research subjects. They were divided into intervention group and control group (75 cases each group) according to the mode of health nursing intervention. Control group patients received common nursing intervention, and intervention group patients received group continuous nursing intervention. We collected the valid data from the changes of serum biochemical level, self-efficacy, diabetes specific quality of life and clinical nursing satisfaction were observed before and after the intervention. Result: In serum indicators, the results were not significantly different before nursing intervention (P> 0.05), and these indicators of the intervention group were significantly lower compare with the control group (P < 0.05). before nursing intervention, the GSES assessment of the two groups of patients were not statistically significant (P> 0.05), and the GSES assessment of the two groups of patients were significantly increased after nursing intervention, but the GSES assessments of the patients in the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). In diabetes specific quality of life assessment, The DSQL evaluation of the patients in the intervention group after nursing intervention was significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). After nursing intervention, the clinical nursing satisfaction of patients in the intervention group reached 98.67%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.33%), and the comparison between groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: group continuous nursing intervention can significantly improve serum indicators, diabetes specific quality of life, self-efficacy, and clinical nursing satisfaction.
| Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 10, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24 |
| Page(s) | 75-81 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Group Continuous Nursing Intervention, Serum Biochemical Indicators, Clinical Nursing Satisfaction, General Self-efficacy Scale Assessment, Diabetes Specific Quality of Life
| [1] | Sánchez Lechuga B, Carral San Laureano F. Apoyo tele-fónico, control glucémico y visitas a la unidad dediabetes en pacientes insulinizados. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (English ed.). 2017; 64: 328-9. |
| [2] | Chimen M, Kennedy A, Nirantharakumar K, Pang TT, Andrews R, Narendran P. What are the health benefits of physical activity in type 1 diabetes mellitus? Aliterature review. Diabetologia. 2017; 55: 542e51. |
| [3] | Quirk H, Blake H, Tennyson R, Randell TL, Glazebrook C. Physical activity interventions in children and young people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: Asystematic review with meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2018; 31: 1163e73. |
| [4] | International Diabetes Federation (IDF). The latest global diabetes map [OL]. 2019. (http: // www.diabetesatlas.org/). |
| [5] | National Health Commission. Healthy China Action (2019-2030). The State Council. 2019.07. |
| [6] | Yan Fang. Analysis of the effect of whole-process health education on blood glucose control, prognosis and complications in diabetes mellitus health management [J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2017; 4 (70): 13738-13739. |
| [7] | Ding D, Li D, Qin Y. The effect of group continuous care intervention on the self-care ability and mental toughness of patients with T2DM. Du Food & Medicine. 2019; (12): 154-155. |
| [8] | Diabetes Society of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine. 2018; 38 (04): 34-86. |
| [9] | Li DB, Wang F, Xia Y. The effect of continuous nursing intervention on disease outcome of elderly patients with diabetes. Journal of Zhejiang Clin. 2019; 21 (9): 1281-1282. |
| [10] | Wu XJ, Geng G, Hou GY, Li Z. Effects of group continuous care on self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with diabetes. Hebei Medical Journal. 2018; 40 (21): 3338-3341. |
| [11] | Li ZY, Liu Y, Zhai XQ, Cao ZG. Effects of group continuous care on self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus. Nursing Research. 2018; 32 (5): 795-798. |
| [12] | Borries TM, Dunbar A. The impact of telemedicine on patient self-management processes and clinical outcomes for patients with types I or II diabetes mellitus in the United States: A scoping review. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019; 13: 1353-7. |
| [13] | ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: The Task Force for diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the Euro-pean Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J. 2019; 41: 255-323. |
| [14] | Chen XS, Wang Y, Sheng YQ, Fang SH, Mao ZW. Improving the self-management rate of patients with type 2 diabetes. Chinese Journal of Health Quality Management. 2017; 24 (F01): 6-11. |
| [15] | Stopford R, Winkley K, Ismail K. Social support and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of observational studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2013, 93 (3): 549-558. |
| [16] | Liu JP. Effects of continuous nursing intervention on blood glucose control in community patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovascular Diseases of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine. 2019; 7 (1): 190-191. |
| [17] | Ru HY. Effects of continuous care on self-care ability and self-management ability of patients with diabetic nephropathy on hemodialysis. Journal of Applied Diabetes. 2019; 0 (3): 31-32. |
| [18] | Steinsbekk A, Rygg LQ, Lisulo M, et al. Group based diabetes self- management education eompared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic: review with meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12 (12): 213-232. |
| [19] | Lu WJ, Yang H, Huang Y, Luo SY, et al. Evaluation of self-management program for diabetic patients in community. Chinese Journal of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control. 2018; 26 (3): 189-192. |
| [20] | Alberti KG, Zimmet P. Epidemiology: Global burden of disease - where does diabetes mellltus fit in?. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013; 9 (5): 258-260. |
| [21] | Zhu WF. Significance of continuous nursing intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes. Heilongjiang Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2019; 48 (4): 293-294. |
| [22] | Zhang HX, Song Q, Chen CX. Journal of Health and Health. 2017; 33 (6): 810-813. |
| [23] | Feng LH, Pan J. The effect of continuous care intervention on the quality of life of patients with diabetes. New World Diabetes. 2019; 22 (4): 172-173. |
| [24] | Thorpe CT, Fabey LE, Johnson H, et al. Facilitating healthy coping in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ. 2013; 39 (1): 33-52. |
| [25] | Teng Y, Liu ML, Zhang XM. The effect of hospital-family integrated continuous care on elderly patients with diabetes. Nursing Research. 2018; 32 (21): 3461-3462. |
APA Style
Xiaohua Fang, Jinyi Li. (2021). Effect of Group Continuous Nursing Intervention Model on Serum Biochemical Parameters, GSES Assessment, DSQL Assessment and Satisfaction of Diabetic Patients. American Journal of Nursing Science, 10(1), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24
ACS Style
Xiaohua Fang; Jinyi Li. Effect of Group Continuous Nursing Intervention Model on Serum Biochemical Parameters, GSES Assessment, DSQL Assessment and Satisfaction of Diabetic Patients. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 10(1), 75-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24
AMA Style
Xiaohua Fang, Jinyi Li. Effect of Group Continuous Nursing Intervention Model on Serum Biochemical Parameters, GSES Assessment, DSQL Assessment and Satisfaction of Diabetic Patients. Am J Nurs Sci. 2021;10(1):75-81. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24,
author = {Xiaohua Fang and Jinyi Li},
title = {Effect of Group Continuous Nursing Intervention Model on Serum Biochemical Parameters, GSES Assessment, DSQL Assessment and Satisfaction of Diabetic Patients},
journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {75-81},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20211001.24},
abstract = {Objective: To assess effect of group continuous nursing intervention model on serum biochemical parameters, general self-efficacy scale (GSES) assessment, Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Scale (DSQL) assessment and satisfaction of diabetic patients. Methods: A total of 150 patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted from June 2017 to October 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University were randomly selected as the research subjects. They were divided into intervention group and control group (75 cases each group) according to the mode of health nursing intervention. Control group patients received common nursing intervention, and intervention group patients received group continuous nursing intervention. We collected the valid data from the changes of serum biochemical level, self-efficacy, diabetes specific quality of life and clinical nursing satisfaction were observed before and after the intervention. Result: In serum indicators, the results were not significantly different before nursing intervention (P> 0.05), and these indicators of the intervention group were significantly lower compare with the control group (P 0.05), and the GSES assessment of the two groups of patients were significantly increased after nursing intervention, but the GSES assessments of the patients in the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). In diabetes specific quality of life assessment, The DSQL evaluation of the patients in the intervention group after nursing intervention was significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). After nursing intervention, the clinical nursing satisfaction of patients in the intervention group reached 98.67%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.33%), and the comparison between groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: group continuous nursing intervention can significantly improve serum indicators, diabetes specific quality of life, self-efficacy, and clinical nursing satisfaction.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Group Continuous Nursing Intervention Model on Serum Biochemical Parameters, GSES Assessment, DSQL Assessment and Satisfaction of Diabetic Patients AU - Xiaohua Fang AU - Jinyi Li Y1 - 2021/02/23 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 75 EP - 81 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.24 AB - Objective: To assess effect of group continuous nursing intervention model on serum biochemical parameters, general self-efficacy scale (GSES) assessment, Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Scale (DSQL) assessment and satisfaction of diabetic patients. Methods: A total of 150 patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted from June 2017 to October 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University were randomly selected as the research subjects. They were divided into intervention group and control group (75 cases each group) according to the mode of health nursing intervention. Control group patients received common nursing intervention, and intervention group patients received group continuous nursing intervention. We collected the valid data from the changes of serum biochemical level, self-efficacy, diabetes specific quality of life and clinical nursing satisfaction were observed before and after the intervention. Result: In serum indicators, the results were not significantly different before nursing intervention (P> 0.05), and these indicators of the intervention group were significantly lower compare with the control group (P 0.05), and the GSES assessment of the two groups of patients were significantly increased after nursing intervention, but the GSES assessments of the patients in the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). In diabetes specific quality of life assessment, The DSQL evaluation of the patients in the intervention group after nursing intervention was significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). After nursing intervention, the clinical nursing satisfaction of patients in the intervention group reached 98.67%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.33%), and the comparison between groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: group continuous nursing intervention can significantly improve serum indicators, diabetes specific quality of life, self-efficacy, and clinical nursing satisfaction. VL - 10 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: