Objective: To assess application of individualized nursing intervention in the nursing of patients who were treated in department of rheumatism and immunology. Method: From May 2018 to December 2020, we collected valid data from 78 patients with rheumatic immune disease. According to nursing intervention type, we assigned participants to intervention groups and control group, that control group participants received common nursing intervention, and intervention group participants received individualized nursing intervention. In this study, we collect the data from patients’ medical records and questionnaires, the questionnaires include medical treatment compliance research and satisfaction research. Result: In patient characteristics research, gander factors were significant different among control group and intervention group, but other factors are similar as their results were not statistically significant. As for medical treatment compliance assessment, intervention group had better assessment compare with control group in the treatment. Although most assessments of two group participants were great satisfaction, participants in the intervention group were more satisfied with the individualized nursing intervention. Conclusion: individualized nursing intervention had better effect that was significantly higher than common nursing intervention. Base on the result of this study, individualized nursing intervention not only improve medical treatment compliance of patients with rheumatic immune disease but also increase satisfaction rate in treatment.
| Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 10, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25 |
| Page(s) | 82-85 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nursing, Rheumatic Immune Disease, Medical Treatment Compliance, Satisfaction
| [1] | Fu Q, Lu LJ. Response strategy of rheumatic immune diseases combined with respiratory tract infection under epidemic situation. Shanghai Medical Journal. 2020; 43 (2): 99-100. |
| [2] | Mankia K, Emery P. Palindromic rheumatism as part of the rheumatoid arthritis continuum. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019; 15: 687–95. |
| [3] | Sanmarti R, Canete JD, Salvador G. Palindromic rheumatism and other relapsing arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014; 18: 647–61. |
| [4] | Doran MF, Crowson CS, Pond GR, O’Fallon WM, Gabriel SE. Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2020; 46: 2287–2293. |
| [5] | Lean-Tooke A, Aldridge C, Waugh S, Spickett GP, Kay L. Methotrexate, rheumatoid arthritis and infection risk: what is the evidence? Rheumatology. 2019; 48: 867–71. |
| [6] | Gonzalez A, Kremers HM, Crowson CS, Nicola PJ, Davis JM, Therneau TM, et al. The widening mortality gap between rheumatoid arthritis patients and the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2017; 56: 3583–3587. |
| [7] | Wotton CJ, Goldacre MJ. Risk of invasive pneumococcal disease in people admitted to hospital with selected immune-mediated diseases: record linkage cohort analyses. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016; 66: 1177–1181. |
| [8] | Dirven L, Huizinga TWJ, Allaart CF. Risk factors for reported influenza and influenza-like symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2015; 41: 359–365. |
| [9] | Kim L, Kim JA, Kim S. A guide for the utilization of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service National Patient Samples. Epidemiol Health. 2014; 36: e2014008. |
| [10] | Consolaro A, Giancane G, Alongi A, van Dijkhuizen E, Aggarwal A, Al-Mayouf SM, et al. Phenotypic variability and disparities in treatment and outcomes of childhood arthritis throughout the world: an observational cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019; 3 (4): 255e63. |
| [11] | Ramelet AS, Fonjallaz B, Rio L, Zoni S, Ballabeni P, Rapin J, et al. Impact of a nurse led telephone intervention on satisfaction and health outcomes of children with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and their families: a crossover randomized clinical trial. BMC Pediatr. 2017; 17 (1): 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0926-5. |
| [12] | Song MM, Lian L. Analysis of factors and nursing measures of sleep disorders in hospitalized patients with rheumatic immunology. World Journal of Sleep Medicine. 2020; 7 (04): 687-688. |
| [13] | Shang QY, Zhang Q, Zhang HY. Application of Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Rheumatism and Immune Diseases. Qilu Journal of Nursing. 2020; 26 (23): 152-154. |
| [14] | Wang XF, Song WY. The application of case teaching method and clinical pathway combined with mind mapping in the regulated education of rheumatic immunology department. Nursing Practice and Research. 2020; 17 (23): 139-141. |
| [15] | Leuvenink R, Aeschlimann F, Baer W, Berthet G, Cannizzaro E, Hofer M, et al. Clinical course and therapeutic approach to varicella zoster virus infection in children with rheumatic autoimmune diseases under immunosuppression. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016; 14 (1): 34. |
| [16] | Zhang GL. Analysis of the influence of personalized nursing on negative emotions and comfort of patients under non-general anesthesia in operating room. Journal of Practical Clinical Nursing. 2019; 4 (29): 143+150. |
| [17] | He P. Influence of personalized nursing on nursing satisfaction of patients with rheumatic bone disease [J]. World Journal of Sleep Medicine. 2019; 6 (09): 1182-1184. |
APA Style
Fang Ji, Guiyan Wen. (2021). Application of Individualized Nursing Intervention in the Nursing of Patients Who Were Treated in Department of Rheumatism and Immunology. American Journal of Nursing Science, 10(1), 82-85. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25
ACS Style
Fang Ji; Guiyan Wen. Application of Individualized Nursing Intervention in the Nursing of Patients Who Were Treated in Department of Rheumatism and Immunology. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 10(1), 82-85. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25
AMA Style
Fang Ji, Guiyan Wen. Application of Individualized Nursing Intervention in the Nursing of Patients Who Were Treated in Department of Rheumatism and Immunology. Am J Nurs Sci. 2021;10(1):82-85. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25,
author = {Fang Ji and Guiyan Wen},
title = {Application of Individualized Nursing Intervention in the Nursing of Patients Who Were Treated in Department of Rheumatism and Immunology},
journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {82-85},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20211001.25},
abstract = {Objective: To assess application of individualized nursing intervention in the nursing of patients who were treated in department of rheumatism and immunology. Method: From May 2018 to December 2020, we collected valid data from 78 patients with rheumatic immune disease. According to nursing intervention type, we assigned participants to intervention groups and control group, that control group participants received common nursing intervention, and intervention group participants received individualized nursing intervention. In this study, we collect the data from patients’ medical records and questionnaires, the questionnaires include medical treatment compliance research and satisfaction research. Result: In patient characteristics research, gander factors were significant different among control group and intervention group, but other factors are similar as their results were not statistically significant. As for medical treatment compliance assessment, intervention group had better assessment compare with control group in the treatment. Although most assessments of two group participants were great satisfaction, participants in the intervention group were more satisfied with the individualized nursing intervention. Conclusion: individualized nursing intervention had better effect that was significantly higher than common nursing intervention. Base on the result of this study, individualized nursing intervention not only improve medical treatment compliance of patients with rheumatic immune disease but also increase satisfaction rate in treatment.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Application of Individualized Nursing Intervention in the Nursing of Patients Who Were Treated in Department of Rheumatism and Immunology AU - Fang Ji AU - Guiyan Wen Y1 - 2021/02/25 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 82 EP - 85 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.25 AB - Objective: To assess application of individualized nursing intervention in the nursing of patients who were treated in department of rheumatism and immunology. Method: From May 2018 to December 2020, we collected valid data from 78 patients with rheumatic immune disease. According to nursing intervention type, we assigned participants to intervention groups and control group, that control group participants received common nursing intervention, and intervention group participants received individualized nursing intervention. In this study, we collect the data from patients’ medical records and questionnaires, the questionnaires include medical treatment compliance research and satisfaction research. Result: In patient characteristics research, gander factors were significant different among control group and intervention group, but other factors are similar as their results were not statistically significant. As for medical treatment compliance assessment, intervention group had better assessment compare with control group in the treatment. Although most assessments of two group participants were great satisfaction, participants in the intervention group were more satisfied with the individualized nursing intervention. Conclusion: individualized nursing intervention had better effect that was significantly higher than common nursing intervention. Base on the result of this study, individualized nursing intervention not only improve medical treatment compliance of patients with rheumatic immune disease but also increase satisfaction rate in treatment. VL - 10 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: