Objective: To assess effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument on patients who received procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH). Methods: rom January 2020 to December 2020, we collected valid data from 172 patients. According to the random number table method, the participants were divided into intervention group and control group, 86 cases in each group. We provided traditional nursing intervention to control group participants during non-surgery period. In addition, we provided ERAS combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument to intervention group participants. Result: intervention group had better outcome in time of first exhaust, time of activity out of bed, and time of hospital stay compare with control group, that the results were significantly different (p < 0.05). In degree of wound pain of patient, NRS scores in preoperative, six hours after surgery, and 24 hours after surgery were lower in intervention compare with control group, that the results were significantly different. Conclusion: RAS combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument can reduce wound pain of patient, and it speeds patient recovery, promotes early urination after surgery, reduces the risk of urinary retention, and shortens the length of hospital stay.
Published in | American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 10, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33 |
Page(s) | 114-117 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids, Recovery After Surgery, Pulsed Electronic Bladder Therapy Instrument
[1] | Shi RR, Liu Z, Wang L. Clinical Research in Medicine, 2019, 36 (6): 1235-1237. |
[2] | Ganio E, Altomare F, Milito G, Gabrielli F, Canuti F. Long-term outcome of amulticentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy, Br. J. 2017; 94: 1033-1037. |
[3] | Mott T, Latimer K, Edwards C. Hemorrhoids: diagnosis and treatment options, Am. Fam. Physician. 2018; 97 (3): 172–179. |
[4] | Shen HM. Observation on the treatment of pain and edema after anorectal disease by sitting bath with self-made hemorrhoid basket lotion. Clinical Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2018; 10 (5): 110-111. |
[5] | Xie FM, Jiang YH, Gu HT, Wang YW. Comparison of tissue-selecting therapy stapler and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids: systematic review, World Latest Med. Inf. 2019; 19 (35): 44–50. |
[6] | Du TC, Quan SJ, Dong T, Meng Q. Comparison of surgical procedures implemented in recent years for patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids: a network meta-analysis, Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2019; 34 (6): 1001–1012. |
[7] | Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152: 292–8. |
[8] | Brown JK, Singh K, Dumitru R, Chan E, Kim MP. The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery programs and their application in cardiothoracic surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018; 14: 77–88. |
[9] | Ore AS, Shear MA, Liu FW, et al. Adoption of enhanced recovery after laparotomy in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020; 30: 122–7. |
[10] | de Groot JJ, Ament SM, Maessen JM, Dejong CH, Kleijnen JM, Slangen BF. Enhanced recovery pathways in abdominal gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95: 382–95. |
[11] | Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, et al. Guidelines for pre- and intraoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERASÒ) Society recommendations—part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 140: 313–22. |
[12] | Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019; 29: 651–68. |
[13] | Deng YH, Ma DH, Yao QQ, et al. Effect of laser sit-bath on wound healing in patients with mixed hemorrhoids after Milligan-Morgan operation. Journal of Nursing Science. 2014; 21 (12): 35-36. |
[14] | Cai XY. Causes and effective nursing methods of urinary retention after hemorrhoid super mucosa circumcision (PPH). Capital Food and Medicine. 2018; 25 (4): 82-83. |
[15] | Duo M. Clinical effect analysis of comprehensive nursing intervention combined with intermittent urethral catheterization on relieving urinary retention after removal of urinary catheter in patients with lumbar surgery. Extremely healthy. 2019; 4 (23): 132. |
APA Style
Zhenxin Zhang, Junyi Yu, Tianying Pang. (2021). Effect of ERAS Combined with Low-frequency Pulsed Electronic Bladder Therapy Instrument on Patients Who Received PPH. American Journal of Nursing Science, 10(1), 114-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33
ACS Style
Zhenxin Zhang; Junyi Yu; Tianying Pang. Effect of ERAS Combined with Low-frequency Pulsed Electronic Bladder Therapy Instrument on Patients Who Received PPH. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 10(1), 114-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33
AMA Style
Zhenxin Zhang, Junyi Yu, Tianying Pang. Effect of ERAS Combined with Low-frequency Pulsed Electronic Bladder Therapy Instrument on Patients Who Received PPH. Am J Nurs Sci. 2021;10(1):114-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33
@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33, author = {Zhenxin Zhang and Junyi Yu and Tianying Pang}, title = {Effect of ERAS Combined with Low-frequency Pulsed Electronic Bladder Therapy Instrument on Patients Who Received PPH}, journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science}, volume = {10}, number = {1}, pages = {114-117}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20211001.33}, abstract = {Objective: To assess effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument on patients who received procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH). Methods: rom January 2020 to December 2020, we collected valid data from 172 patients. According to the random number table method, the participants were divided into intervention group and control group, 86 cases in each group. We provided traditional nursing intervention to control group participants during non-surgery period. In addition, we provided ERAS combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument to intervention group participants. Result: intervention group had better outcome in time of first exhaust, time of activity out of bed, and time of hospital stay compare with control group, that the results were significantly different (p < 0.05). In degree of wound pain of patient, NRS scores in preoperative, six hours after surgery, and 24 hours after surgery were lower in intervention compare with control group, that the results were significantly different. Conclusion: RAS combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument can reduce wound pain of patient, and it speeds patient recovery, promotes early urination after surgery, reduces the risk of urinary retention, and shortens the length of hospital stay.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of ERAS Combined with Low-frequency Pulsed Electronic Bladder Therapy Instrument on Patients Who Received PPH AU - Zhenxin Zhang AU - Junyi Yu AU - Tianying Pang Y1 - 2021/02/28 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33 DO - 10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33 T2 - American Journal of Nursing Science JF - American Journal of Nursing Science JO - American Journal of Nursing Science SP - 114 EP - 117 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5753 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211001.33 AB - Objective: To assess effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument on patients who received procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH). Methods: rom January 2020 to December 2020, we collected valid data from 172 patients. According to the random number table method, the participants were divided into intervention group and control group, 86 cases in each group. We provided traditional nursing intervention to control group participants during non-surgery period. In addition, we provided ERAS combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument to intervention group participants. Result: intervention group had better outcome in time of first exhaust, time of activity out of bed, and time of hospital stay compare with control group, that the results were significantly different (p < 0.05). In degree of wound pain of patient, NRS scores in preoperative, six hours after surgery, and 24 hours after surgery were lower in intervention compare with control group, that the results were significantly different. Conclusion: RAS combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument can reduce wound pain of patient, and it speeds patient recovery, promotes early urination after surgery, reduces the risk of urinary retention, and shortens the length of hospital stay. VL - 10 IS - 1 ER -