Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs

Baoxiang Wang; Elizabeth Roe; Weiju Chen; Judith Ruland

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs

Baoxiang Wang, Elizabeth Roe, Weiju Chen, Judith Ruland

Published in American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 10, Issue 2)

Received: 15 February 2021 Accepted: 23 February 2021 Published: 3 March 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Lack of research still exists about how Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) prepared nurses meet the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. The goal of this study was to examine the perception of DNP prepared nurses and employers on how they met the AACN Essentials. Self-reported data was collected from a convenience sample of DNP prepared nurses and employers across the U.S. (n=202) through an electronic survey assessment. Overall, the participants perceived that the DNP prepared nurses were meeting the competencies with all Essentials receiving a mean score above 4 (agree). The lowest mean score (4.289) was rated for Essential Ⅶ (Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health). Two other low mean scores were 4.310 for Essential V (health care policy for advocacy in health care) and 4.360 for Essential IV (information systems/technology and patient-care technology for the improvement and transformation of health care). The perception that DNP prepared nurses rated for Essential III (4.49 ±.68, p =.026), VI (4.48 ±.84, p =.017), and the total Essentials (4.43 ±.67, p =.023), and other employers rated for Essential VI (4.02 ± 1.17, p =.042) were statistically significantly lower compared to those working as a DNP prepared nurse and an employer at the same time. The findings of this study have a number of important insights into the value of DNP prepared nurses for the future development of DNP programs in the U.S and the future initiation in other countries.

Published in	American Journal of Nursing Science (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11
Page(s)	118-123
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Enlightenment, Nursing Education, Perception, Essentials, Competency, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)

References

[1]	American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2004). AACN Position Statement on the Practice Doctorate in Nursing.
[2]	American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). The essentials of doctoral nursing education for advanced practice.
[3]	American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2019). Fact Sheet: The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP).
[4]	Auerbach DI, Martsolf G, Pearson ML, Taylor EA, Zaydman M, Muchow A, Spetz J and Dower C. (2015). The DNP by 2015 A Study of the Institutional, Political, and Professional Issues that Facilitate or Impede Establishing a Post-Baccalaureate Doctor of Nursing Practice Program. RAND Health.
[5]	Pritham UA and White P. Assessing DNP impact. (2016). The Nurse Practitioner, 41 (4): 44-53.
[6]	Beeber AS, Palmer C, Waldrop J, Lynn MR and Jones CB. (2019). The role of Doctor of Nursing Practice-prepared nurses in practice settings. Nursing Outlook, 67 (4), 354-364.
[7]	Fu M and Zhang Y. (2015). Enlightenment of doctor of nursing practice program in America on development of advanced nursing practice in China. Chinese Nursing Research, 29 (3A), 773–775.
[8]	Christiansen B and Champion JD. (2018). Examining Doctor of Nursing Practice Clinical Competency. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 14 (5), e93-e100.
[9]	Issel LM, Baldwin KA, Lyons RL and Madamala K. (2006). Self- reported competency of public health nurses and faculty in Illinois. Public Health Nursing, 23 (2), 168–177.
[10]	Zahner SJ and Henriques JB. (2014). Public health practice competency improvement among nurses. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 47 (5 Suppl. 3), S352–S359.
[11]	Hermer J, Hirsch A, Bekemeier B, Nyirati C, Wojnar D, Wild L, Dotson JAW, Smith S, Griffin-Sobel JP and Oneal G. (2020). Integrating population health into nursing education: The process of gaining commitment from Washington’s nursing deans and directors. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36 (2), 6–12.
[12]	National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. In S. H. Woolf, L. Aron, & Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Institute of Medicine (Eds.). (2013). U.S. health in international perspective: Shorter lives, poorer health. Panel on understanding cross-national health differences among high-income countries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[13]	Storfjell J, Winslow B and Saunders JSD. (2017). Catalysts for change: Harnessing the power of nurses to build population health in the 21st century.
[14]	Deans and Directors of Schools and Programs of Nursing in Washington State. (2017). The future of nursing education: Ensuring a population health focus in nursing education in Washington state.
[15]	Harvard Global Health Institute. (2018). Global Monitoring of Disease Outbreak Preparedness: Preventing the Next Pandemic. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
[16]	Garritano N and Stec M. (2019). Leveraging Technology to Enhance Doctor of Nursing Practice Student Health Policy Engagement. Nurse Educator, 44 (4), 192–196.
[17]	American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2017). Faculty Policy Think Tank: Report and Recommendations.
[18]	De Cordova PB, Steck MBW and Vermeesch A. (2018). Health policy engagement among graduate nursing students in the United States. Nursing Forum, 1-6.
[19]	Luo S and Kalman M. (2018). A technology training protocol for meeting QSEN goals: Focusing on meaningful learning. Nursing Forum, 53 (1), 20–26.
[20]	Cashin, A. (2017). A scoping review of the progress of the evolution of the Doctor of Nursing Practice in the USA to inform consideration of future transformation of Nurse Practitioner education in Australia. Collegian.
[21]	Naomi E, Karen F and Michelle B. (2016). Utilizing team debate to increase student abilities for mentoring and critical appraisal of global health care in doctor of nursing practice programs. Journal of Professional Nursing, Vol 32, No. 3 (May/June), 2016: pp 224–234.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Baoxiang Wang, Elizabeth Roe, Weiju Chen, Judith Ruland. (2021). Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs. American Journal of Nursing Science, 10(2), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Baoxiang Wang; Elizabeth Roe; Weiju Chen; Judith Ruland. Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 10(2), 118-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Baoxiang Wang, Elizabeth Roe, Weiju Chen, Judith Ruland. Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs. Am J Nurs Sci. 2021;10(2):118-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11,
  author = {Baoxiang Wang and Elizabeth Roe and Weiju Chen and Judith Ruland},
  title = {Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs},
  journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  pages = {118-123},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20211002.11},
  abstract = {Lack of research still exists about how Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) prepared nurses meet the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. The goal of this study was to examine the perception of DNP prepared nurses and employers on how they met the AACN Essentials. Self-reported data was collected from a convenience sample of DNP prepared nurses and employers across the U.S. (n=202) through an electronic survey assessment. Overall, the participants perceived that the DNP prepared nurses were meeting the competencies with all Essentials receiving a mean score above 4 (agree). The lowest mean score (4.289) was rated for Essential Ⅶ (Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health). Two other low mean scores were 4.310 for Essential V (health care policy for advocacy in health care) and 4.360 for Essential IV (information systems/technology and patient-care technology for the improvement and transformation of health care). The perception that DNP prepared nurses rated for Essential III (4.49 ±.68, p =.026), VI (4.48 ±.84, p =.017), and the total Essentials (4.43 ±.67, p =.023), and other employers rated for Essential VI (4.02 ± 1.17, p =.042) were statistically significantly lower compared to those working as a DNP prepared nurse and an employer at the same time. The findings of this study have a number of important insights into the value of DNP prepared nurses for the future development of DNP programs in the U.S and the future initiation in other countries.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs
AU  - Baoxiang Wang
AU  - Elizabeth Roe
AU  - Weiju Chen
AU  - Judith Ruland
Y1  - 2021/03/03
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11
T2  - American Journal of Nursing Science
JF  - American Journal of Nursing Science
JO  - American Journal of Nursing Science
SP  - 118
EP  - 123
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5753
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11
AB  - Lack of research still exists about how Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) prepared nurses meet the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. The goal of this study was to examine the perception of DNP prepared nurses and employers on how they met the AACN Essentials. Self-reported data was collected from a convenience sample of DNP prepared nurses and employers across the U.S. (n=202) through an electronic survey assessment. Overall, the participants perceived that the DNP prepared nurses were meeting the competencies with all Essentials receiving a mean score above 4 (agree). The lowest mean score (4.289) was rated for Essential Ⅶ (Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health). Two other low mean scores were 4.310 for Essential V (health care policy for advocacy in health care) and 4.360 for Essential IV (information systems/technology and patient-care technology for the improvement and transformation of health care). The perception that DNP prepared nurses rated for Essential III (4.49 ±.68, p =.026), VI (4.48 ±.84, p =.017), and the total Essentials (4.43 ±.67, p =.023), and other employers rated for Essential VI (4.02 ± 1.17, p =.042) were statistically significantly lower compared to those working as a DNP prepared nurse and an employer at the same time. The findings of this study have a number of important insights into the value of DNP prepared nurses for the future development of DNP programs in the U.S and the future initiation in other countries.
VL  - 10
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Baoxiang Wang

College of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Elizabeth Roe

College of Health and Human Service, Saginaw Valley State University, Michigan, United State
Weiju Chen

College of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Judith Ruland

College of Health and Human Service, Saginaw Valley State University, Michigan, United State

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Baoxiang Wang, Elizabeth Roe, Weiju Chen, Judith Ruland. (2021). Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs. American Journal of Nursing Science, 10(2), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Baoxiang Wang; Elizabeth Roe; Weiju Chen; Judith Ruland. Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 10(2), 118-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Baoxiang Wang, Elizabeth Roe, Weiju Chen, Judith Ruland. Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs. Am J Nurs Sci. 2021;10(2):118-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11,
  author = {Baoxiang Wang and Elizabeth Roe and Weiju Chen and Judith Ruland},
  title = {Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs},
  journal = {American Journal of Nursing Science},
  volume = {10},
  number = {2},
  pages = {118-123},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajns.20211002.11},
  abstract = {Lack of research still exists about how Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) prepared nurses meet the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. The goal of this study was to examine the perception of DNP prepared nurses and employers on how they met the AACN Essentials. Self-reported data was collected from a convenience sample of DNP prepared nurses and employers across the U.S. (n=202) through an electronic survey assessment. Overall, the participants perceived that the DNP prepared nurses were meeting the competencies with all Essentials receiving a mean score above 4 (agree). The lowest mean score (4.289) was rated for Essential Ⅶ (Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health). Two other low mean scores were 4.310 for Essential V (health care policy for advocacy in health care) and 4.360 for Essential IV (information systems/technology and patient-care technology for the improvement and transformation of health care). The perception that DNP prepared nurses rated for Essential III (4.49 ±.68, p =.026), VI (4.48 ±.84, p =.017), and the total Essentials (4.43 ±.67, p =.023), and other employers rated for Essential VI (4.02 ± 1.17, p =.042) were statistically significantly lower compared to those working as a DNP prepared nurse and an employer at the same time. The findings of this study have a number of important insights into the value of DNP prepared nurses for the future development of DNP programs in the U.S and the future initiation in other countries.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs
AU  - Baoxiang Wang
AU  - Elizabeth Roe
AU  - Weiju Chen
AU  - Judith Ruland
Y1  - 2021/03/03
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11
T2  - American Journal of Nursing Science
JF  - American Journal of Nursing Science
JO  - American Journal of Nursing Science
SP  - 118
EP  - 123
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5753
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20211002.11
AB  - Lack of research still exists about how Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) prepared nurses meet the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. The goal of this study was to examine the perception of DNP prepared nurses and employers on how they met the AACN Essentials. Self-reported data was collected from a convenience sample of DNP prepared nurses and employers across the U.S. (n=202) through an electronic survey assessment. Overall, the participants perceived that the DNP prepared nurses were meeting the competencies with all Essentials receiving a mean score above 4 (agree). The lowest mean score (4.289) was rated for Essential Ⅶ (Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health). Two other low mean scores were 4.310 for Essential V (health care policy for advocacy in health care) and 4.360 for Essential IV (information systems/technology and patient-care technology for the improvement and transformation of health care). The perception that DNP prepared nurses rated for Essential III (4.49 ±.68, p =.026), VI (4.48 ±.84, p =.017), and the total Essentials (4.43 ±.67, p =.023), and other employers rated for Essential VI (4.02 ± 1.17, p =.042) were statistically significantly lower compared to those working as a DNP prepared nurse and an employer at the same time. The findings of this study have a number of important insights into the value of DNP prepared nurses for the future development of DNP programs in the U.S and the future initiation in other countries.
VL  - 10
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download