Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Technology Practices in Ghana: Application of Multinomial Logistic Regression

Received: 19 November 2023    Accepted: 9 December 2023    Published: 22 December 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The study primarily examined the determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture technology practices on maize production. Data on socio-demographic and farming characteristics were obtained from the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Partnership for Up Scaling the project’s targeted communities (Bompari, Dazuuri and Toto) in the Lawra municipality of the Upper West Region of Ghana. A total of 300 peasant farmers completed the questionnaire. Results from the model building confirmed models 1 and 2 to have strong explanatory power. Notwithstanding that, further evaluation with the adoption of Likelihood Ratio and log-likelihood favoured model 1 Furthermore, the post estimation results (Average Marginal Effects) from model 1 revealed that farming experience and household head status have no significant impact on predicting Climate Smart Agriculture technology practices. The results also confirmed that farmers who have practiced Climate Smart Agriculture technology for 6 to 10 years were found to be accompanied by a low probability (15.47%) of using improved variety/treated seeds as compared to those farmers who have practiced the technology for a period of 1–5 years. Also, tied ridges as Climate Smart Agriculture technology practiced by farmers resulted in a high probability of 11.44% for high yields relative to low yields. We recommend the need for further study to investigate the underlying reasons, if any, based on the non-significant relationship established at the 5% level between the determinants of mineral chemical fertiliser and monoculture respectively.

Published in American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics (Volume 12, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15
Page(s) 187-194
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Climate Change, Climate Smart Agriculture, Multinomial Logistic Regression, Predictions

References
[1] World Bank (2008). World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
[2] Manda, J., Alene, A. D., Mukuma, C. & Chikoye, D. (2017). Ex-ante welfare impacts of adopting maize-soybean rotation in eastern Zambia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 249, 22–30.
[3] Gebremariam, G. & Tesfaye, W. (2018). The heterogeneous effect of shocks on agricultural innovations adoption: microeconometric evidence from rural Ethiopia. Food Policy, 74, 154-161.
[4] Van de Steeg, J., Herrero, M., Kinyangi, J. & Thornton, P. (2009). The Influence of Climate Variability and Climate Change on the Agricultural Sector in East and Central Africa-Sensitizing the ASARECA Strategic Plan to Climate Change. Report 22. ASARECA (Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa), Entebbe, Uganda, and ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya.
[5] Schlenker, W. & Lobell, D. (2010). Robust Negative Impacts of Climate Change on African Agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 5(1), 1-8.
[6] Osbahr, H. & Viner, D. (2006). Linking Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management for Sustainable Poverty Reduction. Kenya Country Study. A study carried out for the Vulnerability and Adaptation Resource Group (VARG) with support from the European Commission.
[7] Mendelsohn, R., Dinar, A. & Dalfelt, A. (2000b). Climate Change Impacts on African Agriculture. Preliminary Analysis prepared for the World Bank. Washington, District of Columbia.
[8] Aggarwal, P. K., Jarvis, A., Campbell, B. M., Zougmoré, R. B., Khatri-Chhetri, A., Vermeulen, S. J., Loboguerrero, A. M., Sebastian, L. S., Kinyangi, J., Bonilla-Findji, O., Radeny, M., Recha, J., Martinez-Baron, D., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Huyer, S., Thornton, P., Wollenberg, E., Hansen, J., Alvarez-Toro, P., Aguilar-Ariza, A., Arango-Londoño, D., Patiño-Bravo, V., Rivera, O., Ouedraogo, M. & Yen, B. T. (2018). The climate-smart village approach: framework of an integrative strategy for scaling up adaptation options in agriculture. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 14.
[9] Ubilava, D. (2018). The role of El Niño Southern Oscillation in commodity price movement and predictability. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100, 239-263.
[10] Asfaw, S., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., Arslan, A. & Cattaneo, A. (2016). What determines farmers’ adaptive capacity? Empirical evidence from Malawi. Food Security, 8, 643–664.
[11] Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P. & Savastano, S. (2017). Agricultural intensification: the status in six African countries. Food Policy, 67, 26–40.
[12] World Food Programme (2017). Southern Africa Growing Season 2016–2017: Recovery After Two Years of Drought?
[13] Rao, K. P., Ndegwa, W. G., Kizito, K. & Oyoo, A. (2011). Climate Variability and Change: Farmer Perceptions and Understanding of Intra-Seasonal Variability in Rainfall and Associated Risk in Semi-Arid Kenya. Experimental Agriculture, 47(2), 267–291.
[14] FAO (2013). Climate Smart Agriculture Source Book. United Nations. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation.
[15] Fanen, T. & Adekola, O. (2014). Assessing the Role of Climate Smart Agriculture in Combating Climate Change, Desertification and Improving Rural Livelihood in Northern Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(15), 1180-1191.
[16] Dzanku, F. & Sarpong, D. (2011). Agricultural Diversification, Food Self Sufficiency and Food Security in Ghana-Role of Infrastructure and Institutions. (G. E. Djurfeldt, Ed.) African small holders; Food crops, Markets and Policy. CABI, Wallingford, UK, 189-213.
[17] Mburu, K. (2013). Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Dry land Agriculture and the Adaptation strategies by Small Scale Farmers in Yata District. PhD Thesis. Kenyatta University.
[18] Ghana Statistical Service (2014). Ghana Living Standards Survey Round 6 (GLSS 6): Labor Force Report. Ghana. Research Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Management, 2(12), 1-244.
[19] Zizinga, A., Kangalawe, R. Y. M., Ainslie, A., Tenywa, M. M., Majaliwa, J., Saronga, N. J. & Amoako, E. E. (2017). Analysis of Farmer’s Choices for Climate Change Adaptation Practices in South-Western Uganda, 1980–2009. Climate, 5(4), 1-15.
[20] Antwi-Agyei, P., Wiafe, E. A., Amanor, K., Baffour-Ata, F. & Codjoe, S. N. A (2021). Determinants of choice of climate change adaptation practices by smallholder pineapple farmers in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 12, 1-11.
[21] Cochran, W. (1977). Sampling techniques, 3rd Ed., New York: John Wiley Sons, Inc.
[22] McFadden, D. (1974). The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 303-328.
[23] Hausman, J. A. & McFadden, D. (1984). Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model. Econometrica, 52, 1219-1240.
[24] Issahaku, A.-M., Akurugu, E. & Aliou, A.-S. (2018). Statistical Modeling of Modes of Waste Disposal Practices by Inhabitants of Bolgatanga Municipality, Ghana: An Application of Polytomous Logistic Regression. American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 8(3), 70-78.
[25] Marie, M., Yirga, F., Haile, M. & Tquabo, F. (2020). Farmers’ Choice and Factors affecting adoption of Climate Change adaptation strategies: Evidence from Northwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 6, 1-9.
[26] Danso-Abbeam, G., Bosiako, J. A., Ehiakpor, D. S. & Mabe, F. N. (2017). Adoption of improved maize variety among farm households in the northern region of Ghana. Cogent Economics and Finance, 5(1), 1-14.
[27] Alhassan, A., Salifu, H. & Adebanji, A. O. (2016). Discriminant Analysis of Farmers Adoption of Improved Maize Varieties in Wa Municipatility, Upper West Region of Ghana. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1-12.
[28] Ojo, S. O. & Ogunyemi, A. I. (2014). Analysis of factors influencing the adoption of improved cassava production technology in Ekiti State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 1(3), 40–44.
[29] Tanti, P. C., Jena, P. R., Aryal, J. P. & Rahut, D. B. (2022). Role of institutional factors in climate-smart technology adoption in agriculture: Evidence from an Eastern Indian state. Environmental Challenges, 7, 1-11.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Hashim, I., Alhassan, A., Puurbalanta, R., Akurugu, E., Iddrisu, Y., et al. (2023). Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Technology Practices in Ghana: Application of Multinomial Logistic Regression. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 12(6), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Hashim, I.; Alhassan, A.; Puurbalanta, R.; Akurugu, E.; Iddrisu, Y., et al. Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Technology Practices in Ghana: Application of Multinomial Logistic Regression. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2023, 12(6), 187-194. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Hashim I, Alhassan A, Puurbalanta R, Akurugu E, Iddrisu Y, et al. Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Technology Practices in Ghana: Application of Multinomial Logistic Regression. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2023;12(6):187-194. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15,
      author = {Ibrahim Hashim and Abukari Alhassan and Richard Puurbalanta and Edward Akurugu and Yahaya Iddrisu and Salifu Hussein},
      title = {Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Technology Practices in Ghana: Application of Multinomial Logistic Regression},
      journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics},
      volume = {12},
      number = {6},
      pages = {187-194},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtas.20231206.15},
      abstract = {The study primarily examined the determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture technology practices on maize production. Data on socio-demographic and farming characteristics were obtained from the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Partnership for Up Scaling the project’s targeted communities (Bompari, Dazuuri and Toto) in the Lawra municipality of the Upper West Region of Ghana. A total of 300 peasant farmers completed the questionnaire. Results from the model building confirmed models 1 and 2 to have strong explanatory power. Notwithstanding that, further evaluation with the adoption of Likelihood Ratio and log-likelihood favoured model 1 Furthermore, the post estimation results (Average Marginal Effects) from model 1 revealed that farming experience and household head status have no significant impact on predicting Climate Smart Agriculture technology practices. The results also confirmed that farmers who have practiced Climate Smart Agriculture technology for 6 to 10 years were found to be accompanied by a low probability (15.47%) of using improved variety/treated seeds as compared to those farmers who have practiced the technology for a period of 1–5 years. Also, tied ridges as Climate Smart Agriculture technology practiced by farmers resulted in a high probability of 11.44% for high yields relative to low yields. We recommend the need for further study to investigate the underlying reasons, if any, based on the non-significant relationship established at the 5% level between the determinants of mineral chemical fertiliser and monoculture respectively.
    },
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture Technology Practices in Ghana: Application of Multinomial Logistic Regression
    AU  - Ibrahim Hashim
    AU  - Abukari Alhassan
    AU  - Richard Puurbalanta
    AU  - Edward Akurugu
    AU  - Yahaya Iddrisu
    AU  - Salifu Hussein
    Y1  - 2023/12/22
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15
    T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics
    SP  - 187
    EP  - 194
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9006
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20231206.15
    AB  - The study primarily examined the determinants of Climate Smart Agriculture technology practices on maize production. Data on socio-demographic and farming characteristics were obtained from the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Partnership for Up Scaling the project’s targeted communities (Bompari, Dazuuri and Toto) in the Lawra municipality of the Upper West Region of Ghana. A total of 300 peasant farmers completed the questionnaire. Results from the model building confirmed models 1 and 2 to have strong explanatory power. Notwithstanding that, further evaluation with the adoption of Likelihood Ratio and log-likelihood favoured model 1 Furthermore, the post estimation results (Average Marginal Effects) from model 1 revealed that farming experience and household head status have no significant impact on predicting Climate Smart Agriculture technology practices. The results also confirmed that farmers who have practiced Climate Smart Agriculture technology for 6 to 10 years were found to be accompanied by a low probability (15.47%) of using improved variety/treated seeds as compared to those farmers who have practiced the technology for a period of 1–5 years. Also, tied ridges as Climate Smart Agriculture technology practiced by farmers resulted in a high probability of 11.44% for high yields relative to low yields. We recommend the need for further study to investigate the underlying reasons, if any, based on the non-significant relationship established at the 5% level between the determinants of mineral chemical fertiliser and monoculture respectively.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • CSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (CSIR-SARI), Wa, Ghana

  • Department of Statistics, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana

  • Department of Statistics, C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Ghana

  • Department of Statistics, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana

  • CSIR-Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (CSIR-SARI), Wa, Ghana

  • Department of Statistical Sciences, Tamale Technical University, Tamale, Ghana

  • Sections