Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (<i>Eragrostis tef </i>(Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia

Sisay Gurmu; Muhidin Biya; Eshetu Yadete

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia

Sisay Gurmu, Muhidin Biya, Eshetu Yadete

Published in European Journal of Biophysics (Volume 9, Issue 2)

Received: 4 August 2021 Accepted: 18 August 2021 Published: 24 August 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted for four consecutive years (2013-2016) under rain-fed conditions in South Western part of Ethiopia, to evaluate the time of transplanting and direct planting of different seed rates either in row or broadcast for improving growth and yield of tef. The experiment had two time of transplanting tef seedling (at 10 and 20 ahead of planting); five tef seed rates (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 kg ha^-1) planted in rows and two tef seed rates (5 and 25 kg ha^-1) planted in broadcasting. The experiment was designed in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Over year and locations mean results revealed that all parameters (number of tiller per plant, plant height, Panicle length, lodging percent, grain yield, aboveground biomass, straw yield and harvest index) were significantly affected by different planting methods (transplanting, row planting and broadcasting) and seed rates. Seedlings raised in nursery for 10 days ahead of planting then transplanted to plots at sowing time gave the highest number of tillers per plant, plant height, panicle length, grain yield, straw yield and above ground biomass. Whereas, the lowest seed rate 5 kg ha^-1 with both broadcasting and row planting gave the lowest grain yield, straw yield, above ground biomass and also lodging percent. Broadcast seeds at the rate of 25 kg ha^-1 gave the lowest number of tillers per plant, plant height and panicle length and gave the highest lodging percent. These results indicated as the seed rate increases the problem of lodging of tef increases. The Partial budget analysis revealed that the higher net benefit and higher marginal rate of return were obtained from drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha^-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha^-1 with values of 4004% and 3351%, respectively. This is, therefore, drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha^-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha^-1 can be used to high and economic yield of tef at South Western parts of Ethiopia.

Published in	European Journal of Biophysics (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13
Page(s)	61-71
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Transplanting, Row Spacing, Seed Rate, Tef, Yield

References

[1]	Minten, B., S. Tamru, E. Engida, and T. Kuma. (2013). Ethiopia’s Value Chains on the Move: The Case of Teff. ESSP II Working Paper 52. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[2]	Teklay Tesfay and Girmay Gebresamuel (2016): Agronomic and economic evaluations of compound fertilizer applications under different planting methods and seed rates of tef [Eragrostistef (Zucc.) Trotter] in Northern Ethiopia. Journal of the Dry lands, 6 (1): 409-422.
[3]	Central Statistical Agency (2019). Agricultural sample survey 2018/2019: volume i report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season). In Statistical Bulletin. Addis Ababa.
[4]	Fufa, B., Behute, B., Rupert, S., & Berhe, T. (2011). Strengthing the teff value chain in Ethiopia, Agricultural Transformation Agency.
[5]	Tesfahun, W. (2018). Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing in East Shewa, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13 (2): 162-173.
[6]	Central Statistical Agency (2015). Agricultural Sample Survey 2014/2015: Volume I, Report on area and production of major crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season). Statistical Bulletin, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[7]	Tareke Berehe (2010) “Report of new and innovative research approaches to increasing productivity of tef. Sasakawa African Association Adis Abeba, Ethiopia. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15406/apar.2015.02.00045
[8]	Hailu T., Seyfu K. (2001). Production and Importance of Tef in Ethiopia Agriculture. In: Hailu T, Getachew B, Mark S (eds) Tef Research and Development. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Tef Genetics and Improvement, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia, pp: 3-7.
[9]	Wubante Negash and Menzir Mulatu (2017). Effect of Row Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Teff [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] Varieties in Gonji Kolela District, North Western Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, Vol. 7, No. 23.
[10]	Melaku (2008). Effects of seeding and nitrogen rates on yield and yield components of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) at Adet, Northern western Ethiopia, M.Sc. thesis, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
[11]	Norman Uphoff (2003) Higher Yields with Fewer External Inputs? The System of Rice Intensification and Potential Contributions to Agricultural Sustainability, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 1: 1, 38-50, DOI: 10.3763/ijas.2003.0105.
[12]	Patel and Charugamba (1981). Potential for improving rice production in Tabo Region, Tanzania and its implications for village planning. Overseas Development of Natural Resources Institute, Arusha, Tanzania.
[13]	Abeysiriwardena DS, SN Jayanwardena, KDS Kiriwaththuuduwage, and SW Beysekara (2005). Potential of broadcasting seedlings for making savings in seed water and labour in irrigated rice production systems in Sri Lanka.
[14]	Morris M. (1980). Rice production. Peace Crops Information collection and exchange. Freetwon, Sierralione. 79 p.
[15]	Batjes NH. (1995). Aglobal data set of soil pH properties. Technical Paper 27, International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC), Wageningen.
[16]	Brady N, Weil RR. (2008). Nature and Properties of Soils (14th edn.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 992 p.
[17]	Berhanu D. (1980). A survey of studies conducted about soil resources appraisal and evaluation for rural development in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. 70 p.
[18]	Tekalign M., and Haque I. (1991). Phosphorus status of some Ethiopian soils, II. Forms and distribution of inorganic phosphates and their relation to available phosphorus. Tropical Agriculture 68: 2-8.
[19]	Donald CM. (1962). In search of yield. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 28 (1): 171-178.
[20]	CIMMYT (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Completely revised edition. Mexico, D. F. 79 p.
[21]	Shah STH., Zamir MSI., Waseem M., Ali A, Tahir M., Khalid WB. (2009). Growth and yield response of maize to organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen. Pakistan Journal of life science 7 (2): 108-111.
[22]	Sate Sahle and Tafese Altaye (2016). Effects of sowing methods and seed rates on yield components and yield of tef in Soro Woreda, Hadya zone, southern Ethiopia. Facultyof Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Science, Wachemo University J. Nat. Sci. Res. 6 (9), 113.
[23]	Farooq, M., Shahzad, M. A., Basra, A. S., Basharat, A. S., (2006). Direct seeding method popular among rice farmers, DAWN Group of News letter. Sri Lanka For. 89 (2), 11–28.
[24]	Abraham Reda (2014). Evaluation of seed rates and sowing methods on growth, Yield and yield attributes of tef [Eragrostis Tef (Zucc.) Trotter] in Ada district, East shewa, Ethiopia. J. Biol. 4, 171–172.
[25]	ATA (Agricultural Transformation Agency) (2012). Innovations to help our country grow. (http://www.ata.gov.et/programs/value-chain-programs/tef/) (Accessed on March 2013).
[26]	Awan, T. H., Ahmad, M., Ashraf, M. M., and Ali, I. (2011). “Effect of Different Transplanting Methods on Paddy Yield and Its Components at Farmers' field in Rice zone of Punjab”. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 498-502.
[27]	Tareke Berhe, Zewdie Gebresadik, Sue E. and Hailu Areya (2013). Boosting tef productivity using improved agronomic practices and appropriate fertilizer. In: Kebebew Assefa, Solomon Chanyalew and Zerihun Tadele (eds.) proceeding of the second international workshop, 7-9 November 2011, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia, pp 133-140. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119130765.ch9
[28]	Maqsood, M. (1998). Growth and yield of rice and wheat as influenced by different planting methods and nitrogen levels in rice-wheat cropping’ system. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Agri., Faisalabad. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/brj.v19i2.28164
[29]	Alemu Assefa, Tamado Tana, Jemal Abdulahi (2016). Effects of Compost and Inorganic NP Rates on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of tef (Eragrotis Tef (Zucc.) Trotter) in Girar Jarso District, Central Highland of Ethiopia. Journal of Fertilizer and Pesticide 7: 174. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2471-2728.1000174
[30]	Wakjira Tesfahun (2018). Tef Yield Response to NPS Fertilizer and Methods of Sowing in East Shewa, Ethiopia. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13 (2). Pp 162-173.
[31]	Getachew A., Taye B. (2005). On-farm integrated soil fertility management in wheat on nitisols of central Ethiopian highlands. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources 7: 141-155.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sisay Gurmu, Muhidin Biya, Eshetu Yadete. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia. European Journal of Biophysics, 9(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sisay Gurmu; Muhidin Biya; Eshetu Yadete. Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia. Eur. J. Biophys. 2021, 9(2), 61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sisay Gurmu, Muhidin Biya, Eshetu Yadete. Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia. Eur J Biophys. 2021;9(2):61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13,
  author = {Sisay Gurmu and Muhidin Biya and Eshetu Yadete},
  title = {Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia},
  journal = {European Journal of Biophysics},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {61-71},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejb.20210902.13},
  abstract = {Field experiments were conducted for four consecutive years (2013-2016) under rain-fed conditions in South Western part of Ethiopia, to evaluate the time of transplanting and direct planting of different seed rates either in row or broadcast for improving growth and yield of tef. The experiment had two time of transplanting tef seedling (at 10 and 20 ahead of planting); five tef seed rates (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 kg ha-1) planted in rows and two tef seed rates (5 and 25 kg ha-1) planted in broadcasting. The experiment was designed in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Over year and locations mean results revealed that all parameters (number of tiller per plant, plant height, Panicle length, lodging percent, grain yield, aboveground biomass, straw yield and harvest index) were significantly affected by different planting methods (transplanting, row planting and broadcasting) and seed rates. Seedlings raised in nursery for 10 days ahead of planting then transplanted to plots at sowing time gave the highest number of tillers per plant, plant height, panicle length, grain yield, straw yield and above ground biomass. Whereas, the lowest seed rate 5 kg ha-1 with both broadcasting and row planting gave the lowest grain yield, straw yield, above ground biomass and also lodging percent. Broadcast seeds at the rate of 25 kg ha-1 gave the lowest number of tillers per plant, plant height and panicle length and gave the highest lodging percent. These results indicated as the seed rate increases the problem of lodging of tef increases. The Partial budget analysis revealed that the higher net benefit and higher marginal rate of return were obtained from drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha-1 with values of 4004% and 3351%, respectively. This is, therefore, drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha-1 can be used to high and economic yield of tef at South Western parts of Ethiopia.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia
AU  - Sisay Gurmu
AU  - Muhidin Biya
AU  - Eshetu Yadete
Y1  - 2021/08/24
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13
T2  - European Journal of Biophysics
JF  - European Journal of Biophysics
JO  - European Journal of Biophysics
SP  - 61
EP  - 71
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-1737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13
AB  - Field experiments were conducted for four consecutive years (2013-2016) under rain-fed conditions in South Western part of Ethiopia, to evaluate the time of transplanting and direct planting of different seed rates either in row or broadcast for improving growth and yield of tef. The experiment had two time of transplanting tef seedling (at 10 and 20 ahead of planting); five tef seed rates (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 kg ha-1) planted in rows and two tef seed rates (5 and 25 kg ha-1) planted in broadcasting. The experiment was designed in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Over year and locations mean results revealed that all parameters (number of tiller per plant, plant height, Panicle length, lodging percent, grain yield, aboveground biomass, straw yield and harvest index) were significantly affected by different planting methods (transplanting, row planting and broadcasting) and seed rates. Seedlings raised in nursery for 10 days ahead of planting then transplanted to plots at sowing time gave the highest number of tillers per plant, plant height, panicle length, grain yield, straw yield and above ground biomass. Whereas, the lowest seed rate 5 kg ha-1 with both broadcasting and row planting gave the lowest grain yield, straw yield, above ground biomass and also lodging percent. Broadcast seeds at the rate of 25 kg ha-1 gave the lowest number of tillers per plant, plant height and panicle length and gave the highest lodging percent. These results indicated as the seed rate increases the problem of lodging of tef increases. The Partial budget analysis revealed that the higher net benefit and higher marginal rate of return were obtained from drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha-1 with values of 4004% and 3351%, respectively. This is, therefore, drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha-1 can be used to high and economic yield of tef at South Western parts of Ethiopia.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Sisay Gurmu

Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia
Muhidin Biya

Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia
Eshetu Yadete

Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sisay Gurmu, Muhidin Biya, Eshetu Yadete. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia. European Journal of Biophysics, 9(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sisay Gurmu; Muhidin Biya; Eshetu Yadete. Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia. Eur. J. Biophys. 2021, 9(2), 61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sisay Gurmu, Muhidin Biya, Eshetu Yadete. Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia. Eur J Biophys. 2021;9(2):61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13,
  author = {Sisay Gurmu and Muhidin Biya and Eshetu Yadete},
  title = {Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia},
  journal = {European Journal of Biophysics},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {61-71},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejb.20210902.13},
  abstract = {Field experiments were conducted for four consecutive years (2013-2016) under rain-fed conditions in South Western part of Ethiopia, to evaluate the time of transplanting and direct planting of different seed rates either in row or broadcast for improving growth and yield of tef. The experiment had two time of transplanting tef seedling (at 10 and 20 ahead of planting); five tef seed rates (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 kg ha-1) planted in rows and two tef seed rates (5 and 25 kg ha-1) planted in broadcasting. The experiment was designed in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Over year and locations mean results revealed that all parameters (number of tiller per plant, plant height, Panicle length, lodging percent, grain yield, aboveground biomass, straw yield and harvest index) were significantly affected by different planting methods (transplanting, row planting and broadcasting) and seed rates. Seedlings raised in nursery for 10 days ahead of planting then transplanted to plots at sowing time gave the highest number of tillers per plant, plant height, panicle length, grain yield, straw yield and above ground biomass. Whereas, the lowest seed rate 5 kg ha-1 with both broadcasting and row planting gave the lowest grain yield, straw yield, above ground biomass and also lodging percent. Broadcast seeds at the rate of 25 kg ha-1 gave the lowest number of tillers per plant, plant height and panicle length and gave the highest lodging percent. These results indicated as the seed rate increases the problem of lodging of tef increases. The Partial budget analysis revealed that the higher net benefit and higher marginal rate of return were obtained from drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha-1 with values of 4004% and 3351%, respectively. This is, therefore, drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha-1 can be used to high and economic yield of tef at South Western parts of Ethiopia.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparative Evaluation of Transplanting and Sowing on Growth and Yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)) at Jimma and Buno Bedele South Western Ethiopia
AU  - Sisay Gurmu
AU  - Muhidin Biya
AU  - Eshetu Yadete
Y1  - 2021/08/24
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13
T2  - European Journal of Biophysics
JF  - European Journal of Biophysics
JO  - European Journal of Biophysics
SP  - 61
EP  - 71
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-1737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20210902.13
AB  - Field experiments were conducted for four consecutive years (2013-2016) under rain-fed conditions in South Western part of Ethiopia, to evaluate the time of transplanting and direct planting of different seed rates either in row or broadcast for improving growth and yield of tef. The experiment had two time of transplanting tef seedling (at 10 and 20 ahead of planting); five tef seed rates (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 kg ha-1) planted in rows and two tef seed rates (5 and 25 kg ha-1) planted in broadcasting. The experiment was designed in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Over year and locations mean results revealed that all parameters (number of tiller per plant, plant height, Panicle length, lodging percent, grain yield, aboveground biomass, straw yield and harvest index) were significantly affected by different planting methods (transplanting, row planting and broadcasting) and seed rates. Seedlings raised in nursery for 10 days ahead of planting then transplanted to plots at sowing time gave the highest number of tillers per plant, plant height, panicle length, grain yield, straw yield and above ground biomass. Whereas, the lowest seed rate 5 kg ha-1 with both broadcasting and row planting gave the lowest grain yield, straw yield, above ground biomass and also lodging percent. Broadcast seeds at the rate of 25 kg ha-1 gave the lowest number of tillers per plant, plant height and panicle length and gave the highest lodging percent. These results indicated as the seed rate increases the problem of lodging of tef increases. The Partial budget analysis revealed that the higher net benefit and higher marginal rate of return were obtained from drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha-1 with values of 4004% and 3351%, respectively. This is, therefore, drill seeds in rows of 20 cm apart at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 and broadcast seed at rate of 25 kg ha-1 can be used to high and economic yield of tef at South Western parts of Ethiopia.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download