Objective: in order to explore the general quality evaluation model of new medical achievements. New drugs are the most common and main form of medical achievements. Mastering the quality evaluation indicator and quality evaluation model of new drugs will also have important reference value for other medical achievements. Methods: the quality characteristics of new drugs were analyzed by Delphi method or expert consultation method, and the quality evaluation indicator system was obtained. Then the weight coefficient of the indicator was calculated by analytic hierarchy process, and the mathematical model for quantitative analysis was obtained. And develop the technology to identify the quality of many medical achievements by using the percentage exchange algorithm and Bradford's law. Results: using the expert consultation method can get a high reliability of the quality evaluation indicator system, can implement a comprehensive quality evaluation of new medical achievements, and obtain a new quality evaluation model. Conclusion: the new quality evaluation model can fully display the level of medical achievements, and can also be used for the quality acceptance of new products and fair competition between similar products. Fair evaluation makes the evaluation results easily accepted by customers.
| Published in | European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17 |
| Page(s) | 132-137 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
New Medical Achievement, Quality Evaluation Model, Quality Management, Delphi Method, Analytic Hierarchy Process
| [1] | Graul A I, Pina P, Tracy M, Sorbera L (2020). 2019 Global Report on New Drug Development [J]. Advances in Pharmacology, 44 (05): 395-400. |
| [2] | Weijun Dai, Mingru Zhong, Weitong Lin (2020). Overview on the Amendments of Provisions for Drug Registration in China. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 10 (1) 1-8. |
| [3] | Weersink Rianne A (2019). Evaluation of Information in Summaries of Product factors (SmPCs) on the Use of a Medicine in Patients With Hepatic Impairment. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2019, 10. |
| [4] | Mai Wang (2017). Clinical trials and drug approvals continue to accelerate in China. The lancet journals. 18 (7), P: 855. |
| [5] | Chen Yutao (2018). Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Achievements. Beijing: Enterprise Management Publishing House. |
| [6] | Cheng Longsheng (2011). Theory and Method of Service Quality Evaluation. Beijing: China Standards Publishing House. |
| [7] | Kang shanshan (2018). Compilation of guidelines for the current production quality management of FDA pharmaceutical products. Beijing: China pharmaceutical science and technology press. |
| [8] | Evans J R (2020). Total quality management [J]. INFOR, 40 (4): 364. |
| [9] | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction. |
| [10] | Morse, Janice M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2n., pp. 220-35. |
| [11] | Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. |
| [12] | Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55. |
| [13] | Helmer O (1967). Analysis of the future: The Delphi method [R]. Rand Corp Santa Monica CA. |
| [14] | Rovinelli, R. J. and Hambleton, R. K. (1977) On the Use of Content Specialists in the Assessment of Criterion-Referenced Test Item Validity. Tijdschrift Voor Onderwijs Research, 2, 49-60. |
| [15] | Turner, Ronna & Carlson, Laurie (2003). factores of Item-Objective Congruence for Multidimensional Items. International Journal of Testing. 3. 163-171. |
| [16] | Golden B L, Wasil E A, Harker P T (1989). The analytic hierarchy process [J]. Applications and Studies, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
| [17] | Lind Marchal wathen (2015). Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics. U.S.A. Destination, rates & speeds. |
| [18] | Naranan S (1970). Bradford's law of bibliography of science: an interpretation [J]. Nature, 227 (5258): 631-632. |
APA Style
Peng Ruan, Manoch Prompanyo. (2021). Research on Quality Evaluation Method of New Medical Achievements. European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, 7(6), 132-137. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17
ACS Style
Peng Ruan; Manoch Prompanyo. Research on Quality Evaluation Method of New Medical Achievements. Eur. J. Clin. Biomed. Sci. 2021, 7(6), 132-137. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17
AMA Style
Peng Ruan, Manoch Prompanyo. Research on Quality Evaluation Method of New Medical Achievements. Eur J Clin Biomed Sci. 2021;7(6):132-137. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17,
author = {Peng Ruan and Manoch Prompanyo},
title = {Research on Quality Evaluation Method of New Medical Achievements},
journal = {European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences},
volume = {7},
number = {6},
pages = {132-137},
doi = {10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejcbs.20210706.17},
abstract = {Objective: in order to explore the general quality evaluation model of new medical achievements. New drugs are the most common and main form of medical achievements. Mastering the quality evaluation indicator and quality evaluation model of new drugs will also have important reference value for other medical achievements. Methods: the quality characteristics of new drugs were analyzed by Delphi method or expert consultation method, and the quality evaluation indicator system was obtained. Then the weight coefficient of the indicator was calculated by analytic hierarchy process, and the mathematical model for quantitative analysis was obtained. And develop the technology to identify the quality of many medical achievements by using the percentage exchange algorithm and Bradford's law. Results: using the expert consultation method can get a high reliability of the quality evaluation indicator system, can implement a comprehensive quality evaluation of new medical achievements, and obtain a new quality evaluation model. Conclusion: the new quality evaluation model can fully display the level of medical achievements, and can also be used for the quality acceptance of new products and fair competition between similar products. Fair evaluation makes the evaluation results easily accepted by customers.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Research on Quality Evaluation Method of New Medical Achievements AU - Peng Ruan AU - Manoch Prompanyo Y1 - 2021/11/27 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17 T2 - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences JF - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences JO - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences SP - 132 EP - 137 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5005 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20210706.17 AB - Objective: in order to explore the general quality evaluation model of new medical achievements. New drugs are the most common and main form of medical achievements. Mastering the quality evaluation indicator and quality evaluation model of new drugs will also have important reference value for other medical achievements. Methods: the quality characteristics of new drugs were analyzed by Delphi method or expert consultation method, and the quality evaluation indicator system was obtained. Then the weight coefficient of the indicator was calculated by analytic hierarchy process, and the mathematical model for quantitative analysis was obtained. And develop the technology to identify the quality of many medical achievements by using the percentage exchange algorithm and Bradford's law. Results: using the expert consultation method can get a high reliability of the quality evaluation indicator system, can implement a comprehensive quality evaluation of new medical achievements, and obtain a new quality evaluation model. Conclusion: the new quality evaluation model can fully display the level of medical achievements, and can also be used for the quality acceptance of new products and fair competition between similar products. Fair evaluation makes the evaluation results easily accepted by customers. VL - 7 IS - 6 ER -
Information
Email: