Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Effect of White Noise Combined with Chloral Hydrate Sedation on Improving the Success Rate of MRI Examination in Neonatal

Received: 5 February 2025     Accepted: 18 February 2025     Published: 27 February 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Objective: Observe the sedative effect of white noise combined with hydrolytic aldarin in the newborn MRI examination. Methods: Selected 70 newborns of MRI inspections received by Zhuhai City People's Hospital from November 2021 to November 2023, using random digital tables to divide them into the observation group and control group, each group of 35 cases. The control group used 10% chloral hydrate solution to perform retention enema 30 minutes before MRI examination according to the dosing standard of 0.5 ml/kg. The observation group used laxative drugs for retention enema 15 minutes before chloral hydrate administration, and white noise intervention was given for sleep deprivation on the basis of the control group. Compare the two sets of MRI to check successful power, as well as Brussels sedation score and vital signs at different time points before and after intervention. Observe the occurrence of adverse reactions in the two groups. Results: Brussels sedation score in both groups showed a downward trend with the progress of time, and the change range in the observation group was greater (P<0.05). The blood oxygen saturation in both groups showed an upward trend with the progress of intervention time, while the systolic blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate showed a downward trend (P<0.05). The heart rate and respiratory rate in the observation group decreased significantly compared with those in the control group (P<0.05). There were no adverse reactions such as bradycardia, hypotension and decreased oxygen saturation in both groups. Conclusion: White noise combined with chloral hydrate has obvious sedative and analgesic effects in neonatal MRI examination, which is safe and worth popularizing.

Published in International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine (Volume 13, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13
Page(s) 20-23
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

White Noise, MRI, Chloral Hydrate, Newborns

1. Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to judge the degree of brain development and diagnose various brain injuries in clinical work, which can help doctors guide patients to further treatment and judge the prognosis . However, because MRI examination usually takes a long time and is accompanied by loud noise, it is a special challenge for newborns, because it is difficult for them to stay still during the examination, which usually requires the use of sedatives to ensure the quality of imaging . The use of anesthesia and sedatives in children under 3 years old may have potential neurotoxicity, which has aroused widespread concern about the safety of children using such drugs . White noise refers to the monotonous repetitive noise whose power spectral density is evenly distributed in the whole frequency domain, which can improve the sense of security and comfort of newborns, and has a soothing effect on newborns, and has a significant calming effect . The purpose of this study is to explore the sedation effect of white noise combined with chloral hydrate in neonatal MRI examination, and to provide reference for sedation intervention in neonatal MRI examination.
2. Objects and Methods
2.1. Subjects of the Study
Selected 70 newborns of MRI inspections received by Zhuhai City People's Hospital from November 2021 to November 2023, using random digital tables to divide them into the observation group and control group, each group of 35 cases. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The specific values are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Comparison of baseline data between two groups.

Groups

Case

Gender

Birth gestational age (week)

Age (day)

Weight (g)

Boy

Girl

Observation group

35

22

13

39.60 (38.40, 40.30)

3.00 (2.00, 7.00)

3214.31±558.99

Control group

35

21

14

39.40 (38.90, 40.00)

4.00 (2.00, 11.00)

3238.86±323.75

t/Z/ χ2

-

0.060

612.500

581.500

0.225

P

-

0.806

1.000

0.713

0.823

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: (1) MRI was required; (2) No hearing impairment after hearing screening; (3) Gestational age ≥ 34 weeks, birth weight ≥ 2 000 g. Exclusion criteria: (1) diarrhea, rectal surgery or other patients who are not suitable for retention enema; (2) Those who are allergic to chloral hydrate or accompanied by other congenital malformations; (3) Those who give up the enema or transfer to a higher level hospital halfway.
2.3. Methods
The control group used 10% chloral hydrate solution to perform retention enema 30 minutes before MRI examination according to the dosing standard of 0.5 ml/kg. The observation group used laxative drugs for retention enema 15 minutes before chloral hydrate administration, and white noise intervention was given for sleep deprivation on the basis of the control group.
2.4. Observation Index
Brussels sedation score was performed before intervention, 10 min after intervention and 30 min after MRI examination, with a total score of 1 ~ 5, and the score was inversely proportional to the degree of sedation.
The occurrence of adverse reactions.
2.5. Statistical Methods
SPSS27.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. The measurement data that conform to the normal distribution are expressed by mean standard deviation, and the group t test is used for comparison between groups. The measurement data of skewed distribution are expressed by median, and rank sum test is used for comparison between groups. The analysis of variance of repeated measurement was used to compare the repeated measurement data between groups. Counting data were expressed by the number of cases (%), and χ2 test was used for comparison between groups. P < 0.05 is statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Comparison of Brussels Sedation Score Between the Two Groups at Different Time Points Before and After Intervention
Brussels sedation score in both groups showed a downward trend with the progress of time, and the change range in the observation group was greater (P<0.05). The specific values are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Comparison of Brussels sedation score between the two groups at different time points before and after intervention (x±s).

Groups

Case

Before intervention

10 minutes after intervention

30 minutes after the inspection

Observation group

35

3.57±0.50

2.40±0.55

2.17±0.45

Control group

36

3.46±0.51

2.80±0.80

2.49±0.66

(Compared with the observation group at the same time point,P<0.05)
3.2. Incidence of Adverse Reactions in the Two Groups
There were no adverse reactions such as bradycardia, hypotension and decreased oxygen saturation in the two groups.
4. Discussion
At present, sedation is essential in the process of neonatal diagnosis and treatment. However, different diagnosis and treatment measures have different requirements for sedation depth and duration, and sedation schemes are also different. Generally speaking, the ideal sedation scheme should have a high success rate and the lowest possible incidence of adverse reactions. Chloral hydrate has been used in clinic for more than 100 years, and it is still the most commonly used sedative, but the success rate of sedation by magnetic resonance imaging alone is low.
With the continuous improvement of medical level and the gradual improvement of medical management content, Non-drug intervention programs are gradually applied to newborns undergoing medical examination. Torres shown that infants aged 0-24 months, the non-drug sedation method was used. The application progress of obtaining effective magnetic resonance images in children is systematically reviewed and reviewed comprehensive elaboration shows that non-drug intervention measures can be used in magnetic resonance examination achieve a higher success rate.
Newborns with normal sleep are easily awakened by noise, etc. Compared with newborns with normal sleep, newborns with short sleep deprivation show a deeper sleep state in subsequent compensatory sleep, which is quieter and less likely to be interrupted by external noise . It is beneficial to improve the success rate of examination by short sleep deprivation before examination . White noise is a continuous and monotonous sound, which has a good signal frequency, can shield the interference of the external environment, is conducive to maintaining the stability of neonatal physiological indicators, improving the quality of neonatal sleep and promoting the growth and development of newborns. In this study, brussels sedation score in both groups showed a downward trend with the progress of time, and the change range in the observation group was greater. There were no adverse reactions such as bradycardia, hypotension and decreased oxygen saturation in the two groups.
5. Conclusion
In this study, the Brussels sedation score in the observation group showed a downward trend with time. There were no adverse events in either group. Chloral hydrate combined with white noise intervention can improve the sedative effect of neonatal MRI examination, and the operation method is safe and convenient, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Abbreviations

MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Author Contributions
Hongyan Wei: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Ling Yan: Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft
Xueqing Liu: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Software
Xiaosan Feng: Resources, Supervision
Ying Liu: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Visualization
Funding
2023 Zhuhai City Science and technology plan project of social development.
Project Name: Research on User Portrait Construction and Resource Aggregation Model of Internet Hospital Platform
Project Number: 2320004000200
Project Leader: Zeng Ping
2022 Zhuhai City Science and technology plan project of social development.
Project Name: Correlation between noninvasive gene detection of IL-13, IL-4, ADRB2 and FcER1B in early diagnosis of childhood asthma
Project Number: 2220004000093
Project Leader: Guo Rui
Conflicts of Interest
The author of this article declares no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Wang F H, Zhang J, Xiao M, et al. Study on the effect of midazolam nasal drops on neonatal magnetic resonance sedation-prospective single-blind randomized controlled study [J]. China Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2020, 22(5): 441-445.
[2] Sun X H, Zhou L J, Feng W L. Research progress of non-drug sedation intervention in neonatal magnetic resonance examination [J]. China Maternal and Child Health, 2024, 39(20): 4119-4112.
[3] You M Y, Huang R, Kang S M, et al. Observation on the sedative effect of white noise combined with chloral hydrate in neonatal lumbar puncture [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical New Medicine, 2022, 15(05): 399-403.
[4] Zhu S. Effect of white noise on sleep quality and physiological parameters of premature infants in neonatal intensive care unit [J]. China Maternal and Child Health, 2025, 40(03): 444-447.
[5] Ma J. Effect of touching nursing combined with white noise intervention in neonatal sleep [J]. Medical Theory and Practice, 2024, 37(24): 4275-4278.
[6] Du C Y, Zhou J, Ma J, et al. Effect of white noise therapy intervention on neurobehavioral development and operant pain in preterm infants [J]. Heilongjiang Medicine, 2023, 47(07): 785-787+791.
[7] Zheng H L, Liu G F, Zhang X Z, et al. Application of Quality Control Circle in improving the Success Rate of the First Examination of Color Doppler Echocardiography in Infants with congenital Heart Disease after Sedation with Chloral Hydrate [J]. Clinical Research, 2022, 30(09): 156-159.
[8] Zeng P, Ou Y M, Wei Q F, et al. Study on the application of non-drug intervention program in children with delirium in ICU [J]. Journal of Gannan Medical College, 2023, 43(07): 719-726.
[9] Xu L L. Effect of systematic sedation nursing intervention in neonatal magnetic resonance imaging [J]. General Practice Nursing, 2023, 21(36): 5139-5142.
[10] Li W T, Zou Q F, Gao J W. Effect analysis of chloral hydrate combined with dexmedetomidine in pediatric sedation for hearing diagnosis [J]. Medical Theory & Practice, 2025, 38(01): 103-105.
[11] Chen Z Y. Effect of white noise combined with touch care on neonatal sleep quality and nervous system development [J]. World Journal of Sleep Medicine, 2024, 11(05): 1077-1079.
[12] Ma J. Effect of touch care combined with white noise intervention in neonatal sleep [J]. Medical Theory & Practice, 2024, 37(24): 4275-4278.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Wei, H., Yan, L., Liu, X., Feng, X., Liu, Y. (2025). Effect of White Noise Combined with Chloral Hydrate Sedation on Improving the Success Rate of MRI Examination in Neonatal. International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Wei, H.; Yan, L.; Liu, X.; Feng, X.; Liu, Y. Effect of White Noise Combined with Chloral Hydrate Sedation on Improving the Success Rate of MRI Examination in Neonatal. Int. J. Anesth. Clin. Med. 2025, 13(1), 20-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Wei H, Yan L, Liu X, Feng X, Liu Y. Effect of White Noise Combined with Chloral Hydrate Sedation on Improving the Success Rate of MRI Examination in Neonatal. Int J Anesth Clin Med. 2025;13(1):20-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13,
      author = {Hongyan Wei and Ling Yan and Xueqing Liu and Xiaosan Feng and Ying Liu},
      title = {Effect of White Noise Combined with Chloral Hydrate Sedation on Improving the Success Rate of MRI Examination in Neonatal
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine},
      volume = {13},
      number = {1},
      pages = {20-23},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijacm.20251301.13},
      abstract = {Objective: Observe the sedative effect of white noise combined with hydrolytic aldarin in the newborn MRI examination. Methods: Selected 70 newborns of MRI inspections received by Zhuhai City People's Hospital from November 2021 to November 2023, using random digital tables to divide them into the observation group and control group, each group of 35 cases. The control group used 10% chloral hydrate solution to perform retention enema 30 minutes before MRI examination according to the dosing standard of 0.5 ml/kg. The observation group used laxative drugs for retention enema 15 minutes before chloral hydrate administration, and white noise intervention was given for sleep deprivation on the basis of the control group. Compare the two sets of MRI to check successful power, as well as Brussels sedation score and vital signs at different time points before and after intervention. Observe the occurrence of adverse reactions in the two groups. Results: Brussels sedation score in both groups showed a downward trend with the progress of time, and the change range in the observation group was greater (PPPConclusion: White noise combined with chloral hydrate has obvious sedative and analgesic effects in neonatal MRI examination, which is safe and worth popularizing.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of White Noise Combined with Chloral Hydrate Sedation on Improving the Success Rate of MRI Examination in Neonatal
    
    AU  - Hongyan Wei
    AU  - Ling Yan
    AU  - Xueqing Liu
    AU  - Xiaosan Feng
    AU  - Ying Liu
    Y1  - 2025/02/27
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13
    T2  - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine
    JF  - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine
    JO  - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine
    SP  - 20
    EP  - 23
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2997-2698
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20251301.13
    AB  - Objective: Observe the sedative effect of white noise combined with hydrolytic aldarin in the newborn MRI examination. Methods: Selected 70 newborns of MRI inspections received by Zhuhai City People's Hospital from November 2021 to November 2023, using random digital tables to divide them into the observation group and control group, each group of 35 cases. The control group used 10% chloral hydrate solution to perform retention enema 30 minutes before MRI examination according to the dosing standard of 0.5 ml/kg. The observation group used laxative drugs for retention enema 15 minutes before chloral hydrate administration, and white noise intervention was given for sleep deprivation on the basis of the control group. Compare the two sets of MRI to check successful power, as well as Brussels sedation score and vital signs at different time points before and after intervention. Observe the occurrence of adverse reactions in the two groups. Results: Brussels sedation score in both groups showed a downward trend with the progress of time, and the change range in the observation group was greater (PPPConclusion: White noise combined with chloral hydrate has obvious sedative and analgesic effects in neonatal MRI examination, which is safe and worth popularizing.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Objects and Methods
    3. 3. Results
    4. 4. Discussion
    5. 5. Conclusion
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information