Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China)

Gang Dong

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China)

Gang Dong

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 4)

Received: 2 August 2016 Published: 3 August 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Over the past few decades, mainland China has reformed restrictions on its port investment in order to meet the huge demand of related infrastructure, especially promulgated the deregulation of foreign investment into container port. Nowadays, port investments have included the state investment, bank loans, self-raised funds, foreign investment and IPO and so on. We focus on investment optimization of container capacity with the basics of the model proposed, putting forth some conclusions and policy recommendations through conducting numerical illustration of the Shanghai case.

Published in	International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16
Page(s)	205-210
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Investment Optimization, Container Capacity, Foreign Investment, Deregulation

References

[1]	K. Cullinane, D. W. Song and R. Gray, “A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures,” Transp. Res. Part A, vol. 8, 2002, pp. 743-762.
[2]	J. Tongzon and W. Heng, “Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals),” Transp. Res. Part A, vol. 39, 2005, pp. 405-424.
[3]	S. X. H. Gong, K. Cullinane and M. Firth, “The impact of airport and seaport privatization on efficiency and performance: A review of the international evidence and implications for developing countries,” Transport Policy, vol. 24, 2012, pp. 37-47.
[4]	P. C. Millán, X. L. Fernández, S. Hidalgo and M. A. Pesquera, “Public regulation and technical efficiency in the Spanish Port Authorities: 1986–2012,”Transport Policy, vol. 47, 2016, pp. 139-148.
[5]	J. I. C. Manzano, M. C. Nuño, X. Fageda and M. G. Aregall, “Evaluating the effects of the latest change in Spanish port legislation: Another “turn of the screw” in port reform,” Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 4, 2016, pp. 170-177.
[6]	M. Allahviranloo and S. Afandizadeh, “Investment optimization on port’s development by fuzzy integer programming,” Eur J Oper Res, vol. 186, 2008, pp. 423-434.
[7]	J. H. Lin, B. H. Gao and C. R. Zhang, “Simulation-based investment planning for Humen Port,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 40, 2014, pp. 161-175.
[8]	N. L. Ioannis, B. R. J. James and B. S. Jason, “Port Investment Strategies under Uncertainty: The Case of a Southeast Asian Multipurpose Port,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 30, 2014, pp. 299-319.
[9]	Y. B. Xiao, X. W. Fu, A. K. Y. Ng and A. M. Zhang, “Port investments on coastal and marine disasters prevention: Economic modeling and implications,” Transp. Res. Part B, vol. 78, 2015, pp. 202-221.
[10]	Y. J. Seo and J. S. Park, “The estimation of minimum efficient scale of the port industry,” Transport Policy, vol. 49, 2016, pp. 168-175.
[11]	W. Y. Yap and J. S. L. Lam, “Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia,” Transp. Res. Part A, vol. 40, 2006, pp. 35-51.
[12]	G. T. Yeo, M. Roe and J. Dinwoodie, “Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China,” Transp. Res. Part A, vol. 42, 2008, pp. 910-921.
[13]	S. Y. Zheng and R. R. Negenborn, “Centralization or decentralization: A comparative analysis of port regulation modes,” Transp. Res. Part E, vol. 69, 2014, pp. 21-40.
[14]	L. Song and M. V. Geenhuizen, “Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces,” Transport Policy, vol. 36, 2014, pp. 173-183.
[15]	J. H. Zhang, “Quasi-landlord port financing in China: Features, practice and a contract theory analysis,” Transp. Res. Part A, vol. 89, 2016, pp. 73-88.
[16]	N. Singh and X. Vives, “Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly,” Rand J. Econ, vol. 15, 1984, pp. 546-554.
[17]	M. Luo, L. Liu and F. Gao, “Post-entry container port capacity expansion,” Transp. Res. Part B, vol. 46, 2012, pp. 120-138.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Gang Dong. (2016). Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China). International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(4), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Gang Dong. Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China). Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2016, 4(4), 205-210. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Gang Dong. Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China). Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2016;4(4):205-210. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16,
  author = {Gang Dong},
  title = {Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China)},
  journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {205-210},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20160404.16},
  abstract = {Over the past few decades, mainland China has reformed restrictions on its port investment in order to meet the huge demand of related infrastructure, especially promulgated the deregulation of foreign investment into container port. Nowadays, port investments have included the state investment, bank loans, self-raised funds, foreign investment and IPO and so on. We focus on investment optimization of container capacity with the basics of the model proposed, putting forth some conclusions and policy recommendations through conducting numerical illustration of the Shanghai case.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China)
AU  - Gang Dong
Y1  - 2016/08/03
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16
T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
SP  - 205
EP  - 210
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16
AB  - Over the past few decades, mainland China has reformed restrictions on its port investment in order to meet the huge demand of related infrastructure, especially promulgated the deregulation of foreign investment into container port. Nowadays, port investments have included the state investment, bank loans, self-raised funds, foreign investment and IPO and so on. We focus on investment optimization of container capacity with the basics of the model proposed, putting forth some conclusions and policy recommendations through conducting numerical illustration of the Shanghai case.
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Gang Dong

School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Gang Dong. (2016). Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China). International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(4), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Gang Dong. Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China). Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2016, 4(4), 205-210. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Gang Dong. Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China). Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2016;4(4):205-210. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16,
  author = {Gang Dong},
  title = {Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China)},
  journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {205-210},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20160404.16},
  abstract = {Over the past few decades, mainland China has reformed restrictions on its port investment in order to meet the huge demand of related infrastructure, especially promulgated the deregulation of foreign investment into container port. Nowadays, port investments have included the state investment, bank loans, self-raised funds, foreign investment and IPO and so on. We focus on investment optimization of container capacity with the basics of the model proposed, putting forth some conclusions and policy recommendations through conducting numerical illustration of the Shanghai case.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Investment Optimization on Container Capacity of Shanghai (China)
AU  - Gang Dong
Y1  - 2016/08/03
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16
T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
SP  - 205
EP  - 210
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20160404.16
AB  - Over the past few decades, mainland China has reformed restrictions on its port investment in order to meet the huge demand of related infrastructure, especially promulgated the deregulation of foreign investment into container port. Nowadays, port investments have included the state investment, bank loans, self-raised funds, foreign investment and IPO and so on. We focus on investment optimization of container capacity with the basics of the model proposed, putting forth some conclusions and policy recommendations through conducting numerical illustration of the Shanghai case.
VL  - 4
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download