| Peer-Reviewed

On the Monetary Causes of Inequality: A Review of the Literature and an Alternate Way Forward

Received: 27 July 2020     Accepted: 10 August 2020     Published: 19 August 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This research re-examines the relations between production, money and income and arrives at a need for reform, through a contemporary money theory, with the same foundations that endow the system of the numerical entity that measures the economy. The analysis undertaken began from the “Econophysics” observation that wealth is unequally distributed among agents in an economic system. The literature has consolidated the concept of ‘systemic entropy’ as the degree of endogenous ‘disorder’ that occurs with the succession of interactions/transactions among its elements, leading to a stabilization in equilibrium that is no longer modifiable by spontaneous perturbations, even though there is clear evidence of profound inequality in individual wealth. The contribution offered here is an in-depth investigation into the causes that have led and continue to lead to the genesis and exacerbation of these socio-economic differences, which also convey an exclusion of the less wealthy sectors of the population from the most significant transactions. This ordains the impossibility, at the current state of the art, of achieving a neg-entropic practice, which is fundamental to the evolution of organisms. The point of arrival is in the negation of the monetary structure as currently perceived and organized.

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14
Page(s) 156-167
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Econophysics, Quantum Macroeconomics, Monetary Structure, Economic Systems, Inequalities, Production, Money and Income

References
[1] Amoroso, L. (1925). Ricerche intorno alla curva dei redditi. Annali di Matematica Pura e Applicata, Serie IV Tomo XXI, 123-159.
[2] Arrhenius, S. (1915). Quantitative laws in biological chemistry. London: G. Bell and sons.
[3] Bailly, J. (2017). Rethinking exchange and prices. In Rochon L. P. and Rossi S. (eds), A Modern Guide to Rethinking Economics, pp. 90-113. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
[4] Bergson, H. (1946). The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics. New York: Kensington Publishing Corp.
[5] Berman, Y., Ben-Jacob, E. and Shapira, Y. (2016). The Dynamics of Wealth Inequality and the Effect of Income Distribution. PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, no. 4.
[6] Bloch, H. (2020). Price Theory, Historically Considered: Smith, Ricardo, Marshall and Beyond. History of Economics Review, Vol. 75, no. 1, 50-73.
[7] Boltzmann, L. (1872/1995). Weitere Studien über das Wärmegleichgewicht unter Gasmolekülen. Sitzungsberichte der keiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 66, 275-370. Translation: Brush, S. G. (2003), Further studies on the thermal equilibrium of gas molecules. In Kinetic Theory of Gases: An Anthology of Classic Papers With Historical Comment, pp. 362-368. London: Imperial College Press.
[8] Bradley, X. (2017). Inflation and Unemployment. In Bailly J., Cencini A., and Rossi S. (eds.), Quantum Macroeconomics, pp. 50-63. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
[9] Cencini, A. (1984). Time and the Macroeconomic Analysis of Income, London and New York: Pinter.
[10] Cencini, A. (1985). L'analyse de la production et production circulaire, échange et théorie quantique. In Schmitt B. (ed), Production et Monnaie, Cahier de la Revue d'économie politique. Paris: Sirey.
[11] Cencini, A. (1988). Money, Income and Time, with a Preface by Meghnad Desai. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
[12] Cencini, A. (1995/1997). Monetary Theory. National and International. London and New York: Routledge.
[13] Cencini, A. (2001). Monetary Macroeconomics. A New Approach. London and New York: Routledge.
[14] Cencini, A. (2005). Macroeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomics. London and New York: Routledge.
[15] Cencini, A. (2008). Elementi di Macroeconomia monetaria. Padova: Cedam.
[16] Chatterjee, A., Chakrabarti, B. K. and Manna, S. S. (2004). Pareto law in a kinetic model of market with random saving propensity. Physica A, Vol. 335, 155-163.
[17] Clower, R. W. (1969). Monetary Theory: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
[18] Cordier, S., Pareschi, L. and Toscani, G. (2005). On a kinetic model for a simple market economy. Journal of Statistical Physics, Vol. 120, 253–277.
[19] D’addario, R. (1949). Ricerche sulla curva dei redditi. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia Nuova Serie, Anno 8, 1/2, 91-114.
[20] de Medeiros C.A. and Amico F. (2019). Financialization and Capital Accumulation, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 53, no. 2, 587-594.
[21] de Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale, Losanna-Parigi: Payot.
[22] Deleplace, G. and Nell, E. J. (1996), Money in Motion: The Post Keynesian and Circulation Approaches, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.
[23] Desogus, M. and Casu, E. (2018). Essays in innovative risk management methods based on deterministic, stochastic and quantum approaches. Quanah, TX: Anaphora Literary Press.
[24] Duncan, D., Sabirianova Peter, K. (2016). Unequal inequalities: Do progressive taxes reduce income inequality?. International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 23, 762–783.
[25] Fântână, R. S. (2016). The exchange activity and quantic economics. Revista Economica, vol. 68, no. 2.
[26] Gibbs, W. (1914). Elementary principles in statistical mechanics, developed with special reference to the rational foundations of thermodynamics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[27] Gini, C. (1921). Measurement of Inequality and Incomes, The Economic Journal, Vol. 31, 124-126.
[28] Goodhart, C. A. E. (1989). Money, Information and Uncertainty. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
[29] Graziani, A. (1989). The Theory of the Monetary Circuit. Thames Papers in Political Economy, Spring, 1-26.
[30] Harck, S. (2017). Real-wage versus wage-share targets in an open-economy model of the wage and price dynamics, Review of Keynesian Economics, Vol. 5, no. 2, 276-299.
[31] Hoffmann, A. and Schnabl, G. (2016). Adverse Effects of Ultra-Loose Monetary Policies on Investment, Growth and Income Distribution. CESifo Working Paper Series, no. 5754.
[32] Ivanova, M. N. (2020). Marx’s Theory of Money: A Reappraisal in the Light of Unconventional Monetary Policy. Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 52, no. 1, 137–151.
[33] Keynes, J. M. (1930/1971). A Treatise on Money: Vol. 1 - The Pure Theory of Money; Vol. 2 - The Applied Theory of Money. London: Macmillan.
[34] Keynes, J. M. (1933/1973). A Monetary Theory of Production. London: Macmillan.
[35] Keynes, J. M. (1936/1973). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.
[36] Keynes, J. M. (1937). Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest. Economic Journal 47, 241-252.
[37] Lawson, T. (2018). The Constitution and Nature of Money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 42, no. 3, 851–873.
[38] Marx, K. (1857/1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin.
[39] Marx, K. (1867/1976). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1, London: Penguin.
[40] Marx, K. (1885/1986). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 2, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
[41] Marx, K. (1894/1984). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 3, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
[42] Matthes, D. and Toscani, G. (2008). On steady distributions of kinetic models of conservative economies. Journal of Statistical Physics Vol. 130, 1087-1117.
[43] Orrell, D. (2016) ‘A Quantum Theory of Money and Value.’ Economic Thought, Vol. 5, no. 2, 19-28.
[44] Pareto, V. (1897). Cours d’èconomie politique, Lausanne and Paris: Rouge.
[45] Ricardo, D. (1817/1951). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[46] Rossi, S. (1998). Endogenous Money and Banking Activity: Some Notes on the Workings of Modern Payment Systems. Studi Economici 53, 23-56.
[47] Rossi, S. (2001). Money and Inflation: A New Macroeconomic Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
[48] Rossi, S. (2006). The theory of money emissions. In Arestis P., Sawyer M. (eds.), A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
[49] Rossi, S. (2007). Money and Payments in Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
[50] Say, J. B. (1852). Cours complet d'économie politique pratique. Paris: Guillaumin.
[51] Schmitt, B. (1960). La formation Du Pouvoir D’Achat. Paris: Sirey.
[52] Schmitt, B. (1966). Monnaie, Salaires et Profits. Presses Universitaires de France, Albeuve: Castella.
[53] Schmitt, B. (1972). Macroeconomic Theory. A Fundamental Revision, Albeuve: Castella.
[54] Schmitt, B. (1975), Théorie Unitaire de la Monnaie, Nationale et International, Albeuve: Castella.
[55] Schmitt, B. (1984). Inflation, Chômage et Malformations du Capital, Paris and Albeuve: Economica Et Castella.
[56] Schmitt, B. (1996). A New Paradigm for the Determination of Money Prices. In Deleplace, G. and Nell, E. J. (eds), Money in Motion, pp. 84-118. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan And St. Martin's Press.
[57] Schumpeter, J. A. (1954/1994). History of Economic Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
[58] Smith, A. (1776/1976). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
[59] Starr, R. M. (1989). General Equilibrium Models of Monetary Economies: Studies in the Static Foundations of Monetary Theory (Economic Theory, Econometrics, and Mathematical Economics). Boston: Academic Press (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).
[60] Thébault, K., Bradley, S. and Reutlinger, A. (2018). Modelling Inequality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 69, no. 3, 691–718.
[61] Toscani, G. (2016). Sulle code di potenza di Pareto. Matematica, Cultura e Società. Rivista dell'Unione Matematica Italiana - Serie 1, Vol. 1, 21-30.
[62] Villani, C. (2003). Cercignani’s conjecture is sometimes true and always almost true. Commun. Math. Phys. 234, 455-490.
[63] Vivian, R., & Spearman, N. (2016). Banks and Money Creation ‘Out of Nothing’, Working Paper, December 2016. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series.
[64] Walras, L. (1952). Eléments d'économie politique pure, ou la théorie de la richessesociale. Paris: Librairiegenerale De Droit Et De Jurisprudence.
[65] Yakovenko, V. M. (2016). Monetary economics from econophysics perspective. European Physical Journal Special Topics, Vol. 225, 3313–3335.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Marco Desogus, Elisa Casu. (2020). On the Monetary Causes of Inequality: A Review of the Literature and an Alternate Way Forward. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 8(4), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Marco Desogus; Elisa Casu. On the Monetary Causes of Inequality: A Review of the Literature and an Alternate Way Forward. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2020, 8(4), 156-167. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Marco Desogus, Elisa Casu. On the Monetary Causes of Inequality: A Review of the Literature and an Alternate Way Forward. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2020;8(4):156-167. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14,
      author = {Marco Desogus and Elisa Casu},
      title = {On the Monetary Causes of Inequality: A Review of the Literature and an Alternate Way Forward},
      journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
      volume = {8},
      number = {4},
      pages = {156-167},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20200804.14},
      abstract = {This research re-examines the relations between production, money and income and arrives at a need for reform, through a contemporary money theory, with the same foundations that endow the system of the numerical entity that measures the economy. The analysis undertaken began from the “Econophysics” observation that wealth is unequally distributed among agents in an economic system. The literature has consolidated the concept of ‘systemic entropy’ as the degree of endogenous ‘disorder’ that occurs with the succession of interactions/transactions among its elements, leading to a stabilization in equilibrium that is no longer modifiable by spontaneous perturbations, even though there is clear evidence of profound inequality in individual wealth. The contribution offered here is an in-depth investigation into the causes that have led and continue to lead to the genesis and exacerbation of these socio-economic differences, which also convey an exclusion of the less wealthy sectors of the population from the most significant transactions. This ordains the impossibility, at the current state of the art, of achieving a neg-entropic practice, which is fundamental to the evolution of organisms. The point of arrival is in the negation of the monetary structure as currently perceived and organized.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - On the Monetary Causes of Inequality: A Review of the Literature and an Alternate Way Forward
    AU  - Marco Desogus
    AU  - Elisa Casu
    Y1  - 2020/08/19
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14
    T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    SP  - 156
    EP  - 167
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9561
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20200804.14
    AB  - This research re-examines the relations between production, money and income and arrives at a need for reform, through a contemporary money theory, with the same foundations that endow the system of the numerical entity that measures the economy. The analysis undertaken began from the “Econophysics” observation that wealth is unequally distributed among agents in an economic system. The literature has consolidated the concept of ‘systemic entropy’ as the degree of endogenous ‘disorder’ that occurs with the succession of interactions/transactions among its elements, leading to a stabilization in equilibrium that is no longer modifiable by spontaneous perturbations, even though there is clear evidence of profound inequality in individual wealth. The contribution offered here is an in-depth investigation into the causes that have led and continue to lead to the genesis and exacerbation of these socio-economic differences, which also convey an exclusion of the less wealthy sectors of the population from the most significant transactions. This ordains the impossibility, at the current state of the art, of achieving a neg-entropic practice, which is fundamental to the evolution of organisms. The point of arrival is in the negation of the monetary structure as currently perceived and organized.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Economics and Business Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

  • Unifidi Sardegna, Cagliari, Italy

  • Sections