In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund

Jiang Shiji

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14

| Peer-Reviewed

In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund

Jiang Shiji

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 5)

Received: 26 September 2021 Accepted: 15 October 2021 Published: 21 October 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

As the main policy tool of our government to promote entrepreneurship and innovation and support the development of scientific and technological small and medium-sized enterprises, it has been nearly 15 years since the large-scale implementation in 2008. The introduction and implementation of the guiding fund policy has significantly activated the investment and financing activities of the venture capital industry, expanded the capital supply and investment of the industry, and played a better guiding effect on social capital. However, in recent years, while the new government guidance fund in China has cooled down year by year, there is a problem of insufficient actual investment of a large number of government funds. Behind it reflects many difficulties and contradictions in the actual operation of the guidance fund, which directly leads to the dormancy of some guidance funds and fails to give effective play to the guidance efficiency and support industrial development. In contrast, the Scottish joint investment fund has better solved the above problems in terms of public finance objectives and financial performance objectives, and its operation mode is worthy of our government's guidance fund for reference. By comparing the operation mode of Scottish joint investment fund, this paper puts forward that China should improve the contribution proportion of guidance fund by combining regional industrial advantages; Appropriately relax regional restrictions, broaden fund exit channels and other optimization strategies, and promote the government to guide the healthy operation of funds and the high-quality development of regional economy.

Published in	International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14
Page(s)	193-202
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Government Guided Funds, Follow-up Investment, Investment Exit, Operation Mode

References

[1]	Zhang Han. Analysis on the development status, role and trend of the fund industry guided by the Chinese government [J]. China finance, 2019 (7).
[2]	Yu Yan, Luo Wei, Li Yizong, Zhu Qi. Investment behavior and investment effectiveness of state-owned venture capital [J]. Economic research, 2014, 9 (2): 32-46.
[3]	Bian Sikai, Zhou Yahong. Can the venture capital guidance fund play a guiding role—— Panel data analysis from the perspective of enterprise financing [J]. Financial research, 2020, 46 (6): 155-168.
[4]	Cong Feifei, Li Yao, Gu Wenchen. Research on the guiding effect of state-owned venture capital on private capital [J]. Finance and trade economy, 2019, 40 (10): 95-110. Li Shanmin, Liang Xingyun. Do venture capital institutions respond to policies or cater to policies—— Investment perspective based on government guided fund incentive [J]. Securities market guide, 2020 (9): 14-23.
[5]	Zuo Zhigang, Shi Fangzhi, Tan Guanqin. Has state-owned venture capital played a guiding role—— Empirical test based on assurance mechanism [J]. Financial research, 2017, 43 (12): 17-29.
[6]	Yang Minli, Li Xinfang, Wu Yongheng. Research on the guidance effect of government venture capital guidance fund [J]. Scientific research management, 2014, 35 (11): 8-16.
[7]	Shi Guoping, Dang Xinghua, Dong Jianwei. Can the guidance fund guide venture capital institutions to invest in early-stage and high-tech enterprises—— Empirical evaluation based on double difference model [J]. Scientific research, 2016, 34 (6): 822-832.
[8]	Brander J A, Du Q, Hellmann T. The effects of government-sponsored venture capital: International evidence [J]. Review of Finance, 2015, 19 (2): 571-618.
[9]	Li J. Bridging the equity funding gap in technological entrepreneurship: The case of government-backed venture capital in China [J]. International Research Handbook on Entrepreneurial Finance, 2015, chapter 11: 185-205.
[10]	Li Jianliang. UK chapter of venture capital guidance fund: SCIF's dual objectives of giving consideration to public finance and financial performance [R]. 2018-09-18.
[11]	Yang Zaiping, Bai Ruiming, Zhang Liang, Zhang Chen, et al. Explore a new mode of investment and loan linkage of commercial banks -- Enlightenment and reference from the UK "SME growth fund" [J]. China Banking, 2015, (7): 18-30.
[12]	Song Yuanming. Government guidance fund: development process, operation mechanism and impact on implicit debt [R]. YueKai securities, 2021-06-23.
[13]	Li Junfeng. Thoughts on learning from the experience of UK SME growth fund [J]. Tsinghua financial review, 2020-11-05.
[14]	Xia Xiaoqin. Analysis on the operation dilemma and optimization strategy of government guided Fund [J]. Inner Mongolia coal economy, 2020 (8).
[15]	Yan Hai. Discussion on the legal regulation of government guided funds supporting venture capital [J]. Changbai journal, 2019 (8).
[16]	Jing Yanting, Yang Yingxiong, et al., analysis on the operation dilemma and optimization strategy of government guided funds [J]. Market weekly, 2020 (4).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jiang Shiji. (2021). In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(5), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jiang Shiji. In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2021, 9(5), 193-202. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jiang Shiji. In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2021;9(5):193-202. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14,
  author = {Jiang Shiji},
  title = {In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund},
  journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
  volume = {9},
  number = {5},
  pages = {193-202},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20210905.14},
  abstract = {As the main policy tool of our government to promote entrepreneurship and innovation and support the development of scientific and technological small and medium-sized enterprises, it has been nearly 15 years since the large-scale implementation in 2008. The introduction and implementation of the guiding fund policy has significantly activated the investment and financing activities of the venture capital industry, expanded the capital supply and investment of the industry, and played a better guiding effect on social capital. However, in recent years, while the new government guidance fund in China has cooled down year by year, there is a problem of insufficient actual investment of a large number of government funds. Behind it reflects many difficulties and contradictions in the actual operation of the guidance fund, which directly leads to the dormancy of some guidance funds and fails to give effective play to the guidance efficiency and support industrial development. In contrast, the Scottish joint investment fund has better solved the above problems in terms of public finance objectives and financial performance objectives, and its operation mode is worthy of our government's guidance fund for reference. By comparing the operation mode of Scottish joint investment fund, this paper puts forward that China should improve the contribution proportion of guidance fund by combining regional industrial advantages; Appropriately relax regional restrictions, broaden fund exit channels and other optimization strategies, and promote the government to guide the healthy operation of funds and the high-quality development of regional economy.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund
AU  - Jiang Shiji
Y1  - 2021/10/21
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14
T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
SP  - 193
EP  - 202
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14
AB  - As the main policy tool of our government to promote entrepreneurship and innovation and support the development of scientific and technological small and medium-sized enterprises, it has been nearly 15 years since the large-scale implementation in 2008. The introduction and implementation of the guiding fund policy has significantly activated the investment and financing activities of the venture capital industry, expanded the capital supply and investment of the industry, and played a better guiding effect on social capital. However, in recent years, while the new government guidance fund in China has cooled down year by year, there is a problem of insufficient actual investment of a large number of government funds. Behind it reflects many difficulties and contradictions in the actual operation of the guidance fund, which directly leads to the dormancy of some guidance funds and fails to give effective play to the guidance efficiency and support industrial development. In contrast, the Scottish joint investment fund has better solved the above problems in terms of public finance objectives and financial performance objectives, and its operation mode is worthy of our government's guidance fund for reference. By comparing the operation mode of Scottish joint investment fund, this paper puts forward that China should improve the contribution proportion of guidance fund by combining regional industrial advantages; Appropriately relax regional restrictions, broaden fund exit channels and other optimization strategies, and promote the government to guide the healthy operation of funds and the high-quality development of regional economy.
VL  - 9
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Jiang Shiji

School of Business, Trade and Economic Management, Huzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jiang Shiji. (2021). In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(5), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jiang Shiji. In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2021, 9(5), 193-202. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jiang Shiji. In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2021;9(5):193-202. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14,
  author = {Jiang Shiji},
  title = {In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund},
  journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
  volume = {9},
  number = {5},
  pages = {193-202},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20210905.14},
  abstract = {As the main policy tool of our government to promote entrepreneurship and innovation and support the development of scientific and technological small and medium-sized enterprises, it has been nearly 15 years since the large-scale implementation in 2008. The introduction and implementation of the guiding fund policy has significantly activated the investment and financing activities of the venture capital industry, expanded the capital supply and investment of the industry, and played a better guiding effect on social capital. However, in recent years, while the new government guidance fund in China has cooled down year by year, there is a problem of insufficient actual investment of a large number of government funds. Behind it reflects many difficulties and contradictions in the actual operation of the guidance fund, which directly leads to the dormancy of some guidance funds and fails to give effective play to the guidance efficiency and support industrial development. In contrast, the Scottish joint investment fund has better solved the above problems in terms of public finance objectives and financial performance objectives, and its operation mode is worthy of our government's guidance fund for reference. By comparing the operation mode of Scottish joint investment fund, this paper puts forward that China should improve the contribution proportion of guidance fund by combining regional industrial advantages; Appropriately relax regional restrictions, broaden fund exit channels and other optimization strategies, and promote the government to guide the healthy operation of funds and the high-quality development of regional economy.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - In Depth Analysis of Chinese Government Guided Funds: Based on the Comparison of Scottish Co-investment Fund
AU  - Jiang Shiji
Y1  - 2021/10/21
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14
T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
SP  - 193
EP  - 202
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210905.14
AB  - As the main policy tool of our government to promote entrepreneurship and innovation and support the development of scientific and technological small and medium-sized enterprises, it has been nearly 15 years since the large-scale implementation in 2008. The introduction and implementation of the guiding fund policy has significantly activated the investment and financing activities of the venture capital industry, expanded the capital supply and investment of the industry, and played a better guiding effect on social capital. However, in recent years, while the new government guidance fund in China has cooled down year by year, there is a problem of insufficient actual investment of a large number of government funds. Behind it reflects many difficulties and contradictions in the actual operation of the guidance fund, which directly leads to the dormancy of some guidance funds and fails to give effective play to the guidance efficiency and support industrial development. In contrast, the Scottish joint investment fund has better solved the above problems in terms of public finance objectives and financial performance objectives, and its operation mode is worthy of our government's guidance fund for reference. By comparing the operation mode of Scottish joint investment fund, this paper puts forward that China should improve the contribution proportion of guidance fund by combining regional industrial advantages; Appropriately relax regional restrictions, broaden fund exit channels and other optimization strategies, and promote the government to guide the healthy operation of funds and the high-quality development of regional economy.
VL  - 9
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download