The relationship between standardization and economic growth has received increasing attention. This article first gives different classifications of standards, including classification based on economic purposes. The analysis shows that standards have economic effects in reducing information asymmetry, promoting economies of scale, expanding division of labor, and accelerating technology transfer and diffusion. The research literature of foreign standards on economic growth shows that standards are an important factor in promoting economic growth. Empirical results (mainly based on the Cobb-Douglas production function or VAR model) show that there is a significant positive correlation between standards and economic growth, and standards can effectively promote Economic growth. In addition, the Granger causality test between the standard and economic growth points out that economic growth is the Granger reason for the standard, indicating that the standard is not an exogenous variable independent of the economic system, and the standard level is affected by the economic level of a country. It is an endogenous variable determined by the economic system. At the end of the article, it also gives suggestions on possible future research directions, from the perspectives of the impact of splitting to standard sub-categories, management standards, economic growth quality, and institutional economics.
Published in | International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14 |
Page(s) | 236-241 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Standardization, Technical Standard, Economic Growth, Cobb-Douglas Production Function
[1] | Li Chuntian. Introduction to Standardization (Fourth Edition) [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2005, 25-30. |
[2] | David PA. Economic Policy and Technology Performance [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 330-346. |
[3] | Swann G M P. The Economics of Standardization: Final Report for Standards and Technical Regulations [R]. Manchester: University of Manchester, 2000. |
[4] | Lin Yifu, Pan Shiyuan. Information asymmetry, adverse selection and economic development [J]. World Economy, 2006 (01): 3-11. |
[5] | Harrod, Roy F. An Essay in Dynamic Theory [J]. Economic Journal, 1939 (193): 14-33. |
[6] | Domer, Evsey D. Captical Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment [J]. Econometrica. 1946 (2): 137-147. |
[7] | Solow, Robert M., A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956 (70): 65-94. |
[8] | Swan, Trevor W. Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation [J]. Economic Record, 1956 (32): 334-361. |
[9] | M Solow R M. Technical progress and the aggregate production function [J]. Review of Economics, 1957 (70): 65-94. |
[10] | Romer, Paul M. Increasing Return and Long-Run Growth [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986 (94): 1002-1037. |
[11] | Lucas, Robert E. Jr. On the Mechanism of Economic Development [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988 (22): 3-22. |
[12] | Pan Shiyuan, Shi Jinchuan. Endogenous Economic Growth Theory: A Survey [J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2002 (03): 753-786. |
[13] | DIN. The Economic Benefits to Standardization [EB/OL]. https://www.din.de/blob/89552/68849fab0eeeaafb56c5a3ffee9959c5/economic-benefits-of-standardization-en-data.pdf. |
[14] | AFNOR. The Economic Impact of Standardization: Technological Change, Standards and Growth in France [EB/OL]. https://normalisation.afnor.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Etude-ImpactEcoNorm-GB2009.pdf. |
[15] | Standards Council of Canada. Economic Value of Standardization [EB/OL]. www.scc.ca/asset/iu_files/econ-value-standztion_finalreport_e.pdf. |
[16] | Centre for International Economics (CIE). Standards, Innovation and The Australian Economy [EB/OL]. www.standards.org.au/downloads/11-04-2007-standards_and_innovation.pdf. |
[17] | UK Department of Trade and Industry. The Empirical Economics of Standards [EB/OL]. www.bis.gov.uk/files/file9655.pdf. |
[18] | Blind, K., Ramel, F. & Rochell, C. The Influence of Standards and Patents on Long-term Economic Growth [EB/OL]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09864-3. |
[19] | Xin Chunhua. An Empirical Study on the Contribution of Standards to my country’s Labor Productivity [A]. 2008 International Symposium on Applied Statistics [C]; 2008. |
[20] | Cheng Jianbing. Empirical Study on Governmental Regulation of Technology Standards and Economic Growth [J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2008 (12): 58-69. |
[21] | Wei Fulei. The Empirical Research on the Relationship between Technology Innovation, Technology Standardization and Economic Growth of China [J]. Science & Technology and Economy, 2011 (03): 16-20. |
[22] | Zhang Tianyu. Research on the Impact of Standards on China’s Economic Growth [J]. Statistics and Management, 2017 (10): 33-34. |
[23] | Jungmittag A, Blind K, Grupp H. Innovation Standardization and the Long-term Production Function: A Cointegration Analysis for Germany 1960-1996 [J]. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften (ZWS) 1999 (119): 205-222. |
[24] | Hou Junjun, Cao Yindan. Is the Influence of Technological Standardization on Economic Growth Same——Empirical Study Based on the Provincial Level [J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2019 (01): 47-54. |
[25] | Wang Lijun. Analysis on Contribution Rate of Standards' Stock to Economic Growth: Based on Production Function Method [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40 (12): 173-179. |
[26] | Wang Lijun, Wang Yiyi, Chen Tao. Analysis on the Contribution Rate of Standardization to Economic Growth Based on Interprovincial Panel Data [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41 (01): 86-93. |
[27] | Fan Zhouping. Research on Assessment Model for Standardization Economic Benefit [J]. Standard Science, 2013 (08): 26-29. |
[28] | Zhang Fan, Zeng Zheng. On the Linkages between Technical Standards and Market Factors: Theoretical Hypothesis and Empirical Analysis [J]. Research in Science of Science, 2009, 27 (06): 846-852. |
[29] | Zhao Shukuan, Yu Haiqing, Jiang Hong. Study on the relationship between technology standard, technological innovation and economic growth——theoretical model and empirical analysis [J]. Research in Science of Science, 2012, 30 (09): 1333-1341. |
[30] | Ren Kunxiu. Empirical Research on the Contribution of National Standards and Product to China’s Economic Growth in China [J]. Standards Science, 2013, (07): 25-27. |
[31] | Gao Xiaobo, Chen Huimin, Pang Shuting, Liu Ying. Analysis of the Influence of Standardization on Economic Growth [J]. China Standardization, 2016, (16): 61-64. |
[32] | Wang Lijun. Technological Innovation, Standardization, and Economic Growth——Empirical Analysis based on PVAR Model [J]. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 2020, (04): 54-59. |
[33] | Xin Chunhua, Zhao Jinyu. Effect Mechanism of High-Tech Standards Promoting Economic Growth Based on Endogenous Growth Theory [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2009, 26 (13): 9-12. |
[34] | Feng Xue, Liu Fang. Research on the relationship between technical standardization and China's economic growth [J]. Northern Economy, 2011, (06): 36-37. |
[35] | Paarlburg P, Lee J. Import Restriction in the Presence of a Health risk: An Illustration using FMD [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999, 80 (1): 175-183. |
[36] | Shapiro C. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting [J]. Innovation Policy and Economy, 2000 (1): 119-150. |
APA Style
Zhang Luqing. (2021). Research on the Impact of Standardization on Economic Growth. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(6), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14
ACS Style
Zhang Luqing. Research on the Impact of Standardization on Economic Growth. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2021, 9(6), 236-241. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14
AMA Style
Zhang Luqing. Research on the Impact of Standardization on Economic Growth. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2021;9(6):236-241. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14, author = {Zhang Luqing}, title = {Research on the Impact of Standardization on Economic Growth}, journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences}, volume = {9}, number = {6}, pages = {236-241}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20210906.14}, abstract = {The relationship between standardization and economic growth has received increasing attention. This article first gives different classifications of standards, including classification based on economic purposes. The analysis shows that standards have economic effects in reducing information asymmetry, promoting economies of scale, expanding division of labor, and accelerating technology transfer and diffusion. The research literature of foreign standards on economic growth shows that standards are an important factor in promoting economic growth. Empirical results (mainly based on the Cobb-Douglas production function or VAR model) show that there is a significant positive correlation between standards and economic growth, and standards can effectively promote Economic growth. In addition, the Granger causality test between the standard and economic growth points out that economic growth is the Granger reason for the standard, indicating that the standard is not an exogenous variable independent of the economic system, and the standard level is affected by the economic level of a country. It is an endogenous variable determined by the economic system. At the end of the article, it also gives suggestions on possible future research directions, from the perspectives of the impact of splitting to standard sub-categories, management standards, economic growth quality, and institutional economics.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Research on the Impact of Standardization on Economic Growth AU - Zhang Luqing Y1 - 2021/11/27 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14 T2 - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences JF - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences JO - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences SP - 236 EP - 241 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9561 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.14 AB - The relationship between standardization and economic growth has received increasing attention. This article first gives different classifications of standards, including classification based on economic purposes. The analysis shows that standards have economic effects in reducing information asymmetry, promoting economies of scale, expanding division of labor, and accelerating technology transfer and diffusion. The research literature of foreign standards on economic growth shows that standards are an important factor in promoting economic growth. Empirical results (mainly based on the Cobb-Douglas production function or VAR model) show that there is a significant positive correlation between standards and economic growth, and standards can effectively promote Economic growth. In addition, the Granger causality test between the standard and economic growth points out that economic growth is the Granger reason for the standard, indicating that the standard is not an exogenous variable independent of the economic system, and the standard level is affected by the economic level of a country. It is an endogenous variable determined by the economic system. At the end of the article, it also gives suggestions on possible future research directions, from the perspectives of the impact of splitting to standard sub-categories, management standards, economic growth quality, and institutional economics. VL - 9 IS - 6 ER -