Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments

Massimiliano Kaucic; Giorgio Valentinuz; Rosario Maggistro; Michele Morganti

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17

| Peer-Reviewed

Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments

Massimiliano Kaucic, Giorgio Valentinuz, Rosario Maggistro, Michele Morganti

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 6)

Received: 29 November 2021 Accepted: 16 December 2021 Published: 24 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Since the launch of the first replicating funds in the 1970s, index-linked strategies have captured the interest of equity investors. On the one hand, active investing does not generally lead to higher risk-adjusted returns than a passive approach. On the other hand, passive vehicles cannot optimize the risk exposure to the equity markets without introducing elements of active management. The enhanced index-tracking offers all the advantages of traditional passive investing but aims to generate better returns than the reference benchmark. However, in the last decades, the financial system integration increased, reducing the diversification opportunities across markets, and meanwhile, more and more frequent extreme events affected the world. This amplified systemic instability caused unsatisfactory results even for these investment strategies. To better manage the markets turmoil and reduce losses, we propose alternative portfolio designs to improve the traditional index-tracking techniques. We include the systemic risks directly into the enhanced indexation problem and impose a minimum guaranteed extra-return on the benchmark with turnover control. The analysis builds on country and industry allocation policies in selected European markets from January 2004 to October 2021. Our findings prove that the proposed strategies generate consistent excess returns over the benchmark and outperform other indexing strategies and the equally weighted and risk parity portfolios.

Published in	International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17
Page(s)	260-270
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Enhanced Index Tracking, Downside Risk, Systemic Risks, European Market, Sector VS Country Allocation

References

[1]	Zaher F (2019) Index fund management. Springer Books.
[2]	Affolter K, Hanne T, Schweizer D, Dornberger R (2016) Invasive weed optimization for solving index tracking problems. Soft Computing 20 (9): 3393–3401.
[3]	Beasley JE, Meade N, Chang TJ (2003) An evolutionary heuristic for the index tracking problem. European Journal of Operational Research 148 (3): 621–643.
[4]	Guastaroba G, Speranza MG (2012) Kernel search: an application to the index tracking problem. European Journal of Operational Research 217 (1): 54–68.
[5]	DiBartolomeo D (2000) The enhanced index fund as an alternative to indexed equity management. Northfield Information Services, Boston.
[6]	Canakgoz NA, Beasley JE (2009) Mixed-integer programming approaches for index tracking and enhanced indexation. European Journal of Operational Research 196 (1): 384–399.
[7]	Gnägi M, Strub O (2018) Tracking and outperforming large stock market indices. Omega 90: 101999.
[8]	Kaucic M, Barbini F, Camerota Verdù FJ (2020) Polynomial goal programming and particle swarm optimization for enhanced indexation. Soft Computing 24: 8435–8551.
[9]	Acharya V, Engle R, Richardson M (2012) Capital shortfall: A new approach to ranking and regulating systemic risks. American Economic Review 102 (3): 59–64.
[10]	Patro DK, Qi M, Sun X (2013) A simple indicator of systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability 9 (1): 105–116.
[11]	Brownlees, CT, Engle R (2016) SRISK: A Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk. The Review of Financial Studies 30 (1) 48–79.
[12]	Adrian T, Brunnermeier MK (2016) CoVaR. American Economic Review 106 (7): 1705–41.
[13]	Acharya V, Pedersen LH, Philippon T, Richardson M (2017) Measuring systemic risk. The Review of Financial Studies 30 (1): 2–47.
[14]	Lin W, Olmo J, Taamouti A (2020) Portfolio Selection Under Systemic Risk. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3561153.
[15]	Das SR, Uppal R (2004) Systemic risk and international portfolio choice. The Journal of Finance 59 (6): 2809–2834.
[16]	Kurosaki T, Kim YS (2013b) Mean-CoAVaR optimization for global banking portfolios. Journal of Investment Management and Financial Innovations 10 (2): 15–20.
[17]	Biglova A, Ortobelli S, Fabozzi FJ (2014) Portfolio selection in the presence of systemic risk. Journal of Asset Management 15: 285–299.
[18]	Jian Z, Li X (2021) Skewness-based market integration: A systemic risk measure across international equity markets. International Review of Financial Analysis 74: 101664.
[19]	Ehling P, Ramos SB (2006) Geographic versus industry diversification: constraints matter. Journal of Empirical Finance, 13: 396–416.
[20]	Franks EC (1992) Targeting excess-of-benchmark returns. Journal of Portfolio Management 18 (4): 6–12.
[21]	Takeda A, Niranjan M, Gotoh J, Kawahara Y (2013) Simultaneous pursuit of out-of-sample performance and sparsity in index tracking portfolios. Computational Management Science 10 (1): 21–49.
[22]	Rachev ST, Stoyanov SV, Fabozzi FJ. (2008) Advanced Stochastic Models, Risk Assessment, and Portfolio Optimization. Hoboken: Wiley.
[23]	Shen W, Wang J, Ma S. (2014) Doubly regularized portfolio with risk minimization. In Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[24]	Farinelli S, Ferreira M, Rossello D, Thoeny M, Tibiletti L (2008) Beyond Sharpe ratio: Optimal asset allocation using different performance ratios. Journal of Banking & Finance 32 (10): 2057–2063.
[25]	Barone-Adesi G, Giannopoulos K, Vosper L (1999) VaR without correlations for portfolios of derivative securities. Journal of Futures Markets, 19 (5), 583-602.
[26]	Barone-Adesi G, Giannopoulos K, Vosper L (2002) Backtesting derivative portfolios with filtered historical simulation (FHS). European Financial Management, 8 (1), 31-58.
[27]	Cesarone F, Colucci S (2017) Minimum risk versus capital and risk diversification strategies for portfolio construction. Journal of the operational research society: 1-18.
[28]	Sharpe WF (1966) Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business 39: 119–138.
[29]	Keating C, Shadwick WF (2002) A universal performance measure. Journal of performance measurement 6 (3): 59–84.
[30]	Sharpe WF (1994) The Sharpe ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management 21 (1): 45–58.
[31]	Kaucic M, Valentinuz G (2018) Group risk parity strategies for ETFs portfolios. Chinese Business Review 17 (10): 489–507.
[32]	DeMiguel V, Garlappi L, Uppal, R (2007) Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? The Review of Financial Studies, 22 (5) 1915–1953.
[33]	Asgharian H, Hess W, Liu L. (2013) A spatial analysis of international stock market linkages. Journal of Banking & Finance. 37 (12): 4738–54.
[34]	Bessler W, Taushanov G, Wolff D. (2021) Optimal asset allocation strategies for international equity portfolios: a comparison of country versus industry optimization. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 72: 101343.
[35]	Beraldi P, Violi A, Ferrara M, Ciancio C, Pansera BA (2021) Dealing with complex transaction costs in portfolio management Annals of Operations Research 299: 7–22.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Massimiliano Kaucic, Giorgio Valentinuz, Rosario Maggistro, Michele Morganti. (2021). Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(6), 260-270. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Massimiliano Kaucic; Giorgio Valentinuz; Rosario Maggistro; Michele Morganti. Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2021, 9(6), 260-270. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Massimiliano Kaucic, Giorgio Valentinuz, Rosario Maggistro, Michele Morganti. Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2021;9(6):260-270. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17,
  author = {Massimiliano Kaucic and Giorgio Valentinuz and Rosario Maggistro and Michele Morganti},
  title = {Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments},
  journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {260-270},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20210906.17},
  abstract = {Since the launch of the first replicating funds in the 1970s, index-linked strategies have captured the interest of equity investors. On the one hand, active investing does not generally lead to higher risk-adjusted returns than a passive approach. On the other hand, passive vehicles cannot optimize the risk exposure to the equity markets without introducing elements of active management. The enhanced index-tracking offers all the advantages of traditional passive investing but aims to generate better returns than the reference benchmark. However, in the last decades, the financial system integration increased, reducing the diversification opportunities across markets, and meanwhile, more and more frequent extreme events affected the world. This amplified systemic instability caused unsatisfactory results even for these investment strategies. To better manage the markets turmoil and reduce losses, we propose alternative portfolio designs to improve the traditional index-tracking techniques. We include the systemic risks directly into the enhanced indexation problem and impose a minimum guaranteed extra-return on the benchmark with turnover control. The analysis builds on country and industry allocation policies in selected European markets from January 2004 to October 2021. Our findings prove that the proposed strategies generate consistent excess returns over the benchmark and outperform other indexing strategies and the equally weighted and risk parity portfolios.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments
AU  - Massimiliano Kaucic
AU  - Giorgio Valentinuz
AU  - Rosario Maggistro
AU  - Michele Morganti
Y1  - 2021/12/24
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17
T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
SP  - 260
EP  - 270
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17
AB  - Since the launch of the first replicating funds in the 1970s, index-linked strategies have captured the interest of equity investors. On the one hand, active investing does not generally lead to higher risk-adjusted returns than a passive approach. On the other hand, passive vehicles cannot optimize the risk exposure to the equity markets without introducing elements of active management. The enhanced index-tracking offers all the advantages of traditional passive investing but aims to generate better returns than the reference benchmark. However, in the last decades, the financial system integration increased, reducing the diversification opportunities across markets, and meanwhile, more and more frequent extreme events affected the world. This amplified systemic instability caused unsatisfactory results even for these investment strategies. To better manage the markets turmoil and reduce losses, we propose alternative portfolio designs to improve the traditional index-tracking techniques. We include the systemic risks directly into the enhanced indexation problem and impose a minimum guaranteed extra-return on the benchmark with turnover control. The analysis builds on country and industry allocation policies in selected European markets from January 2004 to October 2021. Our findings prove that the proposed strategies generate consistent excess returns over the benchmark and outperform other indexing strategies and the equally weighted and risk parity portfolios.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Massimiliano Kaucic

Department of Economics, Business, Mathematics and Statistics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
Giorgio Valentinuz

Department of Economics, Business, Mathematics and Statistics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
Rosario Maggistro

Department of Economics, Business, Mathematics and Statistics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
Michele Morganti

Macro & Market Research – Strategy, Generali Insurance Asset Management Società per Azioni, Trieste, Italy

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Massimiliano Kaucic, Giorgio Valentinuz, Rosario Maggistro, Michele Morganti. (2021). Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(6), 260-270. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Massimiliano Kaucic; Giorgio Valentinuz; Rosario Maggistro; Michele Morganti. Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2021, 9(6), 260-270. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Massimiliano Kaucic, Giorgio Valentinuz, Rosario Maggistro, Michele Morganti. Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2021;9(6):260-270. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17,
  author = {Massimiliano Kaucic and Giorgio Valentinuz and Rosario Maggistro and Michele Morganti},
  title = {Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments},
  journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {260-270},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20210906.17},
  abstract = {Since the launch of the first replicating funds in the 1970s, index-linked strategies have captured the interest of equity investors. On the one hand, active investing does not generally lead to higher risk-adjusted returns than a passive approach. On the other hand, passive vehicles cannot optimize the risk exposure to the equity markets without introducing elements of active management. The enhanced index-tracking offers all the advantages of traditional passive investing but aims to generate better returns than the reference benchmark. However, in the last decades, the financial system integration increased, reducing the diversification opportunities across markets, and meanwhile, more and more frequent extreme events affected the world. This amplified systemic instability caused unsatisfactory results even for these investment strategies. To better manage the markets turmoil and reduce losses, we propose alternative portfolio designs to improve the traditional index-tracking techniques. We include the systemic risks directly into the enhanced indexation problem and impose a minimum guaranteed extra-return on the benchmark with turnover control. The analysis builds on country and industry allocation policies in selected European markets from January 2004 to October 2021. Our findings prove that the proposed strategies generate consistent excess returns over the benchmark and outperform other indexing strategies and the equally weighted and risk parity portfolios.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Enhanced Index-Tracking Strategies Based on Systemic Financial Shocks: A Comparison of Countries Versus Sectors Investments
AU  - Massimiliano Kaucic
AU  - Giorgio Valentinuz
AU  - Rosario Maggistro
AU  - Michele Morganti
Y1  - 2021/12/24
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17
T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
SP  - 260
EP  - 270
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-9561
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20210906.17
AB  - Since the launch of the first replicating funds in the 1970s, index-linked strategies have captured the interest of equity investors. On the one hand, active investing does not generally lead to higher risk-adjusted returns than a passive approach. On the other hand, passive vehicles cannot optimize the risk exposure to the equity markets without introducing elements of active management. The enhanced index-tracking offers all the advantages of traditional passive investing but aims to generate better returns than the reference benchmark. However, in the last decades, the financial system integration increased, reducing the diversification opportunities across markets, and meanwhile, more and more frequent extreme events affected the world. This amplified systemic instability caused unsatisfactory results even for these investment strategies. To better manage the markets turmoil and reduce losses, we propose alternative portfolio designs to improve the traditional index-tracking techniques. We include the systemic risks directly into the enhanced indexation problem and impose a minimum guaranteed extra-return on the benchmark with turnover control. The analysis builds on country and industry allocation policies in selected European markets from January 2004 to October 2021. Our findings prove that the proposed strategies generate consistent excess returns over the benchmark and outperform other indexing strategies and the equally weighted and risk parity portfolios.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download