Considering a dual channel closed-loop supply chain composed of a manufacturer and a retailer, and the retailer establishes online direct channels, four Stackelberg game models are constructed to study the impact of carbon tax and different fairness concerns of supply chain members on the optimal strategies, such as carbon emission reduction level, recycling and pricing decisions etc. The results show that the fairness concerns of supply chain members does not affect the recycling decision of manufacturer, but increasing carbon tax will promote the manufacturer to recycle more used products to reduce carbon emissions through remanufacturing. When the retailer has fairness concern but the manufacturer ignores it, with the increase of the retailers' fairness concern, the online selling price, the retail price and the retailers' utility increase while the manufacturers' profit decreases. When the manufacturer considers retailers' fairness concern, there will be more carbon emissions in the supply chain. Manufacturer should pay attention to this fairness concern and take certain measures to prevent this behavior. Compared with fairness neutrality, whether one or both of supply chain members have fairness concerns, it will inhibit manufacturers' enthusiasm for carbon reduction investment. When both of them have fairness concerns, the higher the manufacturers' fairness concern, the lower the carbon emission reduction level is.
Published in | International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13 |
Page(s) | 102-113 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Carbon Tax, Dual Channel Closed Loop Supply Chain, Fairness Concern, Carbon Reduction Investment
[1] | Luo R L, Zhou L, Song Y, Fan T J. Evaluating the impact of carbon tax policy on manufacturing and remanufacturing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 245, 108408. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108408. |
[2] | Chen W, Wang Y, Zhang P & Chen X. Effects of an Inaccurate Sorting Procedure on Optimal Procurement and Production Decisions in a Remanufacturing System. Engineering Management Journal, 2018, 30 (2): 117-127. |
[3] | Yang L, Zhang Q, Zhang Z Y. Supply chain channel selection and emission reduction strategy under carbon trading mechanism. Journal of Management Science, 2017, 20 (11): 75-87. |
[4] | Liu B, Holmbom M, Segerstedt A, et al. Effects of carbon emission regulations on remanufacturing decisions with limited information of demand distribution. International Journal of Production Research, 2015, 53 (2): 532-548. |
[5] | Shu T, Liu Q, Chen S, Wang S, & Lai, K. Pricing Decisions of CSR Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Carbon Emission Constraints. Sustainability, 2018, 10 (4430): 1-25. |
[6] | Wang Y, Chen W. Effects of emissions constraint on manufacturing/remanufacturing decisions considering capital constraint and financing. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2017, 8 (3): 455-464. |
[7] | Bazan E, Jaber M Y, Zanoni S. Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer- retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183: 394-408. |
[8] | Mohammed F, Selim S Z, Hassan A, et al. Multi-period planning of closed-loop supply chain with carbon policies under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 51: 146-172. |
[9] | Mohajeri A, Fallah M. A carbon footprint-based closed-loop supply chain model under uncertainty with risk analysis: A case study]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2016, 48: 425-450. |
[10] | Wang W L, Wang F L, Zhang S X. Research on coordination contract of dual-channel supply chain considering low-carbon efforts. Management World, 2020, 32 (8): 43-54. |
[11] | He R Y, Yu X, Lin Z B. Carbon emissions in a dual channel closed loop supply chain: the impact of consumer free riding behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 134: 384-394. |
[12] | Wang C X, Li H. Dual-channel Closed-loop Supply Chain Decision Based on Carbon Emission Limits under Government Subsidities. Journal of Fudan University (Natural Science), 2018, 57 (02): 131-142. |
[13] | Chen Z Y, Cheng Y, Gong X W. Research on Decision Model of Dual-channel Closed-loop Supply Chain under Carbon Trading Policy [J]. Journal of Chongqing Second Normal University, 201, 34 (01): 13-16+21+127. |
[14] | Li Q, Xiao T, Qiu Y. Price and carbon emission reduction decisions and revenue-sharing contract considering fairness concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 190: 303-314. |
[15] | Jian J, Zhang Y, Jiang L, et al. Coordination of Supply Chains with Competing Manufacturers considering Fairness Concerns. Complexity, 2020, 2020 (5): 1-15. |
[16] | Cao X G, Huang M, Wen H. Differential pricing decision and coordination strategy of closed-loop supply chain considering equity concerns. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2019, 39 (09): 2300-2314. |
[17] | Wang Y Y, Su M, Shen L. Decision-making of closed-loop supply chain under Corporate Social Responsibility and fairness concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 284: 125373. |
[18] | Shi S, Yan B, Shi P. Decision-making research on autonomous emission reduction and low carbon supply chain considering equity concerns. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2016, 36 (12): 3079-3091. |
[19] | Zhou Y T, Liu L. Decision making and coordination of dual-channel closed-loop supply chain considering retailer's fairness concern. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematics, 2017, 37 (9): 1930-1948. |
[20] | Li B, Zhu M Y, Jiang Y S, Li Z H. Pricing policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112: 2029-2042. |
[21] | Ghosh D, Shah J. A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 135 (2): 568-583. |
[22] | Xu X, He P, Xu H, & Zhang Q. Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183: 433-442. |
[23] | Yang L, Zhang Q, & Ji J. Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 191, 286-297. |
[24] | Bakal I S, Akcali E. Effect of random yield in remanufacturing with price sensitive supply and demand. Production And Operation Management, 2006, 15 (3): 407-420. |
[25] | Yao F M, Liu S, Hu X W, Teng C X. Pricing strategy of retailer leading closed-loop supply chain under fairness concern. Operations Research and Management, 2020, 29 (8): 120-127. |
APA Style
Ruiling Luo, Haojuan Chang, Difan Zhang. (2022). Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Decisions of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Under Carbon Tax Policy. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 10(3), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13
ACS Style
Ruiling Luo; Haojuan Chang; Difan Zhang. Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Decisions of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Under Carbon Tax Policy. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2022, 10(3), 102-113. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13
AMA Style
Ruiling Luo, Haojuan Chang, Difan Zhang. Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Decisions of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Under Carbon Tax Policy. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2022;10(3):102-113. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13, author = {Ruiling Luo and Haojuan Chang and Difan Zhang}, title = {Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Decisions of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Under Carbon Tax Policy}, journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {102-113}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20221003.13}, abstract = {Considering a dual channel closed-loop supply chain composed of a manufacturer and a retailer, and the retailer establishes online direct channels, four Stackelberg game models are constructed to study the impact of carbon tax and different fairness concerns of supply chain members on the optimal strategies, such as carbon emission reduction level, recycling and pricing decisions etc. The results show that the fairness concerns of supply chain members does not affect the recycling decision of manufacturer, but increasing carbon tax will promote the manufacturer to recycle more used products to reduce carbon emissions through remanufacturing. When the retailer has fairness concern but the manufacturer ignores it, with the increase of the retailers' fairness concern, the online selling price, the retail price and the retailers' utility increase while the manufacturers' profit decreases. When the manufacturer considers retailers' fairness concern, there will be more carbon emissions in the supply chain. Manufacturer should pay attention to this fairness concern and take certain measures to prevent this behavior. Compared with fairness neutrality, whether one or both of supply chain members have fairness concerns, it will inhibit manufacturers' enthusiasm for carbon reduction investment. When both of them have fairness concerns, the higher the manufacturers' fairness concern, the lower the carbon emission reduction level is.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Decisions of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Under Carbon Tax Policy AU - Ruiling Luo AU - Haojuan Chang AU - Difan Zhang Y1 - 2022/06/01 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13 T2 - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences JF - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences JO - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences SP - 102 EP - 113 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9561 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221003.13 AB - Considering a dual channel closed-loop supply chain composed of a manufacturer and a retailer, and the retailer establishes online direct channels, four Stackelberg game models are constructed to study the impact of carbon tax and different fairness concerns of supply chain members on the optimal strategies, such as carbon emission reduction level, recycling and pricing decisions etc. The results show that the fairness concerns of supply chain members does not affect the recycling decision of manufacturer, but increasing carbon tax will promote the manufacturer to recycle more used products to reduce carbon emissions through remanufacturing. When the retailer has fairness concern but the manufacturer ignores it, with the increase of the retailers' fairness concern, the online selling price, the retail price and the retailers' utility increase while the manufacturers' profit decreases. When the manufacturer considers retailers' fairness concern, there will be more carbon emissions in the supply chain. Manufacturer should pay attention to this fairness concern and take certain measures to prevent this behavior. Compared with fairness neutrality, whether one or both of supply chain members have fairness concerns, it will inhibit manufacturers' enthusiasm for carbon reduction investment. When both of them have fairness concerns, the higher the manufacturers' fairness concern, the lower the carbon emission reduction level is. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -