In Ethiopia, rice variety development started very recently and is mainly dependent on the introduction breeding materials in which characterization and understanding of the genetic variability of genotypes is the critical step. Knowledge of the extent of genetic variability and interrelationships of yield and yield components is pre-request for designing an effective selection-based rice improvement programs for evolving high yielding rice genotypes. Therefore, this study was carried out with all objectives of assessing genetic variation for yield and yield related traits in lowland rice genotypes. Thirty-six selected lowland rice genotypes were evaluated in simple lattice design with two replications during 2017 cropping season and data on 15 quantitative morphological traits were collected and subjected to various statistical analysis. Combined analysis of variance across location revealed significant location, genotype and genotype × location interaction effects for the traits evaluated at p ≤0.01. The phenotypic coefficient of variation was high for un fertile tiller per plant (88.16 %), followed by infertile grain per panicle (50.66%), and grain yield (21.57%), and the genotypic coefficient of variation was high for un fertile tiller per plant (50.38 %), followed by infertile grain per panicle (27.22%), and culm length (17.7%). The estimate of broad sense heritability ranges from 15.2% for biological yield to 91.5% for plant height. The expected genetic advance as present of mean varied from 5.42% for biological yield to 59.3% for unfertile tiller per plant. Phenotypic and genotypic correlation revealed grain yield had a a significant and positive association with primary branches per panicle (rp=0.4, rg=0.7), fertile grain per panicle (rp=0.5, rg=0.72) and harvest index (rp=0.76, rg=0.73) at both genotypic and phenotypic. Path coefficient analysis of grain yield revealed that harvest index, total tiller per plant and thousand grain weights showed positive phenotypic direct effect. A Positive direct effect was found for total tiller per plant, harvest index and biological yield at genotypic level. The present study indicated sufficient genetic variability for the characters studied in rain fed low land rice genotype, which will create opportunity for future improvement. To have full scale data, further study at various locations and years with the help of molecular techniques should be done.
Published in | International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 12, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19 |
Page(s) | 136-150 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Heritability, Path Coefficient Analysis, Genetic Variability, Trait Association
S/NO | Genotype | Seed Source | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Aromatic | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
2 | Edirne | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
3 | Halilbey | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
4 | Osmancik-97 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
5 | Trakya | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
6 | Tunca | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
7 | SuitouChuukanbohonNou 11 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
8 | Condai | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
9 | Pepita | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
10 | Saegyejinmi | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
11 | Lunyuki | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
12 | Hangamchal | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
13 | Hawaghaelo-2 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
14 | Namcheobyeo | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
15 | Samgangbyeo | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
16 | SCRID091-10-1-3-2-5 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
17 | SCRID091-15-2-2-1-1 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
18 | SCRID091-18-1-5-4-4 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
19 | SCRID091-20-2-2-4-4 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
20 | SCRID091-24-3-2-2-3 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
21 | SCRID091-38-3-1-3-1 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
22 | SCRID090-60-1-1-2-4 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
23 | SCRID090-72-3-1-3-5 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
24 | SCRID090-164-2-1-2-1 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
25 | SCRID090-177-2-4-3-4 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
26 | SCRID090-18-1-2-2-1 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
27 | SCRID091-20-3-1-3-4 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
28 | SCRID122-5-2-1-1-3 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
29 | SCRID122-13-1-1-4-3 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
30 | SCRID186-72-1-1-2 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
31 | SCRID198-73-5-1-3 | 2016/17 PVT | Africa Rice |
32 | GSR IR1-17-Y16-Y3-Y2 | 2016/17NVT | IRRI |
33 | GSR IR1-15-D4-D1-Y1 | 2016/17 NVT | IRRI |
34 | Ediget (Check1) | Breeder Seed | Released |
35 | X-Jigna (Check2) | Breeder Seed | Local |
36 | Hiber | 2016/17 NVT | WARDA |
Traits | Mean | MSL (1) | MSG (35) | MSGL (35) | MSE | CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HD | 91.45 | 2475.06** | 148.70** | 40.20** | 12.11 | 3.8 |
MD | 128.95 | 5.44ns | 283.90** | 140.90* | 59.25 | 5.96 |
PH | 90.39 | 1481.97** | 876.26** | 73.97** | 9.38 | 3.38 |
PL | 17.98 | 196.23** | 7.98** | 2.65* | 1.15 | 5.97 |
CL | 72.96 | 12125.68** | 743.46** | 76.20** | 10.42 | 4.42 |
PBPP | 9.21 | 0.25ns | 2.74** | 0.98* | 0.54 | 8 |
TTPP | 7.62 | 954.86** | 8.96** | 4.52** | 1.13 | 13.96 |
FTPP | 7.25 | 836.17** | 7.15** | 3.73** | 0.92 | 13.23 |
UFTPP | 0.4 | 3.24** | 0.49** | 0.33** | 0.01 | 25 |
FGPP | 80.81 | 326.4** | 501.79** | 385.82** | 5.85 | 2.99 |
IFGP | 5.49 | 23.52** | 30.94** | 22.01** | 1.34 | 21.03 |
TGW | 25.98 | 3018.6** | 41.88** | 32.27** | 2.21 | 5.71 |
HI | 0.4 | 0.32** | 0.01** | 0.01** | 0.00056 | 5.96 |
BY | 5352.46 | 180863497.1** | 3437044.10** | 2914716.80** | 130623 | 6.75 |
GY | 2896.38 | 46189806.9** | 1561350.37** | 1158850.75** | 23019 | 5.23 |
Trait | Range | σ2p | σ2g | GCV | PCV | H2b (%) | GA | GAM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HD | 76-91.25 | 37.18 | 27.13 | 5.7 | 6.67 | 72.97 | 9.16 | 10.02 |
MD | 129.5-148.25 | 70.98 | 35.75 | 4.64 | 6.53 | 50.37 | 8.74 | 6.78 |
PH (cm) | 91.9-140.97 | 219.07 | 200.57 | 15.67 | 16.37 | 91.56 | 27.92 | 30.88 |
PL (cm) | 18.47-22.6 | 2 | 1.33 | 6.42 | 7.86 | 66.79 | 1.94 | 10.81 |
CL | 74.7-119.52 | 185.87 | 166.82 | 17.7 | 18.69 | 89.75 | 25.21 | 34.55 |
PBPP | 9.6-10.9 | 0.69 | 0.44 | 7.21 | 8.99 | 64.38 | 1.1 | 11.92 |
TTPP | 7.9-12.35 | 2.24 | 1.11 | 13.83 | 19.64 | 49.55 | 1.53 | 20.05 |
FTPP | 7.1-11.55 | 1.79 | 0.86 | 12.76 | 18.45 | 47.86 | 1.32 | 18.19 |
UFTPP | 0-1.32 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 50.38 | 88.16 | 32.65 | 0.24 | 59.3 |
FGPP | 55.75-84.55 | 125.45 | 28.99 | 6.66 | 13.86 | 23.11 | 5.33 | 6.6 |
INFGP | 5-14.45 | 7.74 | 2.23 | 27.22 | 50.66 | 28.87 | 1.65 | 30.13 |
TGW | 25.96-34.85 | 10.47 | 2.4 | 5.97 | 12.45 | 22.95 | 1.53 | 5.89 |
HI | 0.255-0.475 | 0.002 | 0.0002 | 6.85 | 14.25 | 23.08 | 0.03 | 6.78 |
BY | 3689-5448.1 | 859261 | 130581.8 | 6.75 | 17.32 | 15.2 | 290.19 | 5.42 |
GY (kg/h) | 1199.5-2980.7 | 390337.6 | 100624.9 | 10.95 | 21.57 | 25.78 | 331.78 | 11.46 |
Traits | HD | MD | PH | PL | CL | PBPP | TTPP | FTPP | UFTPP | FGPP | INFGP | TGW | HI | BY | GY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HD | 0.61** | -0.34** | -0.12 | -0.35** | 0.29** | -0.27** | -0.28** | -0.18 | 0.28** | -0.09 | 0.37** | 0.36** | -0.07 | 0.39** | |
MD | 0.82** | -0.05 | 0.23** | -0.08 | 0.27** | 0.15 | 0.14 | -0.05 | 0.34** | -0.14 | 0.004 | 0.21** | 0.17* | 0.14 | |
PH | -0.18 | -0.15 | 0.70** | 0.99** | 0.21 | 0.27** | 0.29** | -0.04 | 0.28** | -0.19** | -0.29** | -0.14 | 0.43** | -0.1 | |
PL | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.66** | 0.65** | 0.33** | 0.29** | 0.33** | -0.17* | 0.43** | -0.20** | -0.28** | 0.11 | 0.49** | 0.04 | |
CL | -0.2 | -0.18 | 0.99** | 0.61** | 0.18 | 0.27** | 0.28** | -0.01 | 0.255** | -0.18* | -0.28** | -0.17* | 0.42** | -0.11 | |
PBPP | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.45** | 0.23 | -0.09 | -0.08 | -0.19 | 0.63** | -0.23** | -0.001 | 0.32** | 0.26** | 0.41** | |
TTPP | 0.25 | 0.35* | -0.38* | -0.31 | 0.38* | -0.45** | 0.97** | 0.48** | -0.06 | 0.16* | -0.67** | -0.44** | 0.51** | -0.52** | |
FTPP | 0.25 | 0.37* | -0.33* | -0.23 | 0.33* | -0.45** | 0.98** | 0.36** | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.66** | -0.39** | 0.53** | 0.49** | |
UFTPP | -0.01 | 0.06 | -0.38* | 0.59** | 0.35* | -0.36* | 0.63** | 0.49** | -0.28** | 0.25** | -0.38** | -0.48** | 0.1 | -0.45** | |
FGPP | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.51** | 0.26 | 0.82** | -0.40* | - 0.36* | 0.45** | -0.44** | -0.04 | 0.49** | 0.36** | 0.50** | |
INFGP | 0 | -0.01 | -0.38* | -0.35* | 0.36* | -0.29 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.12 | -0.42* | -0.2 | -0.52** | -0.14 | -0.47** | |
TGW | -0.09 | -0.25 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.23 | -0.019 | -0.40* | - 0.38* | -0.28 | -0.06 | -0.03 | 0.42** | -0.38** | 0.50** | |
HI | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.12 | 0.48** | 0.08 | 0.47** | -0.17 | -0.1 | -0.38* | 0.54** | -0.56** | 0.04 | -0.16* | 0.76** | |
BY | 0.519** | 0.42* | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.34* | -0.11 | -0.09 | -0.23 | 0.42* | -0.32 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.04 | |
GY | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.51** | 0.18 | 0.70** | -0.36* | 0.34* | -0.42** | 0.72** | -0.51* | 0.1 | 0.73** | 0.59** |
Traits | FD | PBPP | TTPP | FTPP | UFTPP | FGPP | INFGP | TGW | HI | rp |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HD | 0.014 | 0.035 | -0.081 | 0.120 | 0.012 | 0.046 | 0.007 | 0.072 | 0.166 | 0.39** |
PBPP | 0.004 | 0.120 | -0.027 | 0.039 | 0.013 | 0.103 | 0.018 | 0.0001 | 0.145 | 0.41**. |
TTPP | -0.004 | -0.011 | 0.302 | -0.423 | -0.031 | -0.010 | -0.012 | -0.131 | -0.197 | -0.52** |
FTPP | -0.004 | -0.011 | 0.296 | -0.432 | -0.023 | -0.005 | -0.009 | -0.128 | -0.177 | 0.49** |
UFTPP | -0.003 | -0.024 | 0.146 | -0.158 | -0.063 | -0.045 | -0.019 | -0.074 | -0.215 | -0.45** |
FGPP | 0.004 | 0.076 | -0.019 | 0.013 | 0.018 | 0.163 | 0.033 | -0.009 | 0.223 | 0.5** |
INFGP | -0.001 | -0.028 | 0.048 | -0.052 | -0.016 | -0.072 | -0.075 | -0.040 | -0.232 | -0.47** |
TGW | 0.005 | 0.0001 | -0.203 | 0.284 | 0.024 | -0.008 | 0.015 | 0.195 | 0.188 | 0.5** |
HI | 0.005 | 0.039 | -0.132 | 0.170 | 0.030 | 0.081 | 0.039 | 0.082 | 0.449 | 0.76** |
Traits | PL | PBPP | TTPP | FTPP | UFTPP | FGPP | INFGP | HI | BY | Rg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL | -0.010 | 0.065 | -0.262 | 0.209 | 0.061 | 0.040 | -0.014 | 0.291 | 0.137 | 0.5** |
PBPP | -0.005 | 0.143 | -0.376 | 0.424 | 0.037 | 0.064 | -0.012 | 0.285 | 0.146 | 0.7** |
TTPP | 0.003 | -0.064 | 0.834 | -0.906 | -0.065 | -0.031 | 0.010 | -0.100 | -0.048 | -0.3* |
FTPP | 0.002 | -0.066 | 0.818 | -0.923 | -0.050 | -0.029 | 0.009 | -0.061 | -0.041 | 0.34* |
UFTPP | 0.006 | -0.052 | 0.531 | -0.455 | -0.102 | -0.035 | 0.005 | -0.227 | -0.098 | -0.42** |
FGP | -0.005 | 0.117 | -0.336 | 0.341 | 0.046 | 0.078 | -0.017 | 0.326 | 0.179 | -0.72** |
INFGP | 0.004 | -0.043 | 0.196 | -0.202 | -0.012 | -0.033 | 0.041 | -0.333 | -0.137 | -0.51* |
HI | -0.005 | 0.068 | -0.140 | 0.094 | 0.039 | 0.043 | -0.023 | 0.594 | 0.066 | 0.73** |
BY | -0.003 | 0.050 | -0.096 | 0.091 | 0.024 | 0.033 | -0.013 | 0.093 | 0.418 | 0.59** |
GA | Genetic Advance |
GAM | Genetic Advance at Percent of Mean |
GCV | Genetic Coefficient of Variation |
PCV | Phenotypic Coefficient of Variation |
IRRI | International Rice Research Institute |
σ2p | Phenotypic Variance |
σ2g | Genotypic Variance |
H2b | Broad Sense Heritability |
σe 2 | Environmental Variance |
R | Residual Effect |
[1] | Akinwale, M. G., Gregorio, G., Nwilene, F., Akinyele, B. O., Ogunbayo, S. A. and Odiyi, A. C., 2011. Heritability and correlation coefficient analysis for yield and its components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). African Journal of plant science. 5(3): 207-212. |
[2] | Badri, A., Rassam, G., Dadkhah, A., and Mohaddesi, A., 2016. Path Coefficient Analysis for the yield related traits of rice lines in north Iran. Annalesof the West Universty of Timisoara. Series of Biology. 19(2): 119. |
[3] | Basavaraja, T.; Asif, M. Mallikarjun, S. K. and Gangaprasad, S. 2013. Variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield attributing characters in different local rice (Oryza Sativa L.) cultivars. Asian J. Bio. Sci., 8(1): 60-62. |
[4] | Bhave, S. G Sawant, B., and Krishi, K. 2017. Genetic Variability and Characters Association studies on some exotic Germplasm lines in Kharif Rice (oryza Sativa L.) Dapoli1 (1): 110-113. |
[5] | Burton, G. W., 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceedings of the 6th Grassland Congress 1: 277-285. |
[6] | Chang, T. T., Li, C. C and Tagumpy, O., 1973. Genotypic correlation, heterosis, inbreeding depression and transgressive segregation of agronomic traits in diallel cross of rice (Oryza Sativa L.) cultivars. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica. 14: 83-93. |
[7] | Conover, W. J., Johnson, M. E. and Johnson, M. M., 1981. A comparative study of tests for Development Strategy of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp48. |
[8] | CSA. 2018. Agricultural sample survey 2017/2018. Report on area and production of crops (Private peasant holdings, Meher season) Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[9] | Demewez, F., Getachew, A., Mahesh, S. and Tilahun, T., 2014. Genetic Variability, Heritability and Correlation Coefficient Analysis for Yield and Yield Component Traits in Upland Rice (Oryza sativa L.). East African Journal of Science. 8(2): 147-154. |
[10] | Dewey, D. R., and Lu, K., 1959. A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal. 51(9): 515-518. |
[11] | Dutta, R. K., Baset, M. A., and Khanam, S. 2002. Plant architecture and growth characteristics of fine grain and aromatic rice and their relation with grain yield. Newslett.51: 51–56. |
[12] | Fehr, W. R. (1987). Principles of Cultivar Development: Theory and Technique. Vol.1, McGraw Hill, New York. |
[13] | Fukrei, K. P., Kumar, A., Tyagi, W., Rai, M. and Pattanayak, A., 2011. Genetic variability in yield and its components in upland rice grown in acid soils of North East India. Journal of Rice Research. 4(1): 2. |
[14] | Hailemichael, G. and Tesfaye, K., 2008. The effects of seed rhizome size on the growth, yield and economic return of ginger (ZingiberofficinaleRosc.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 7(2): 213-217. |
[15] | Hartley, H. O., 1950. The maximum F-ratio as a short cut test for heterogeneity of variances. Biometrik. 37(3/4): 308-312. |
[16] | IRRI (International Rice Research Institute), 2001. Rice Research and Production in the 21st Century. |
[17] | Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E., 1955. Estimates of Genetic and Environmental Variability in Soybeans 1. Agronomy journal. 47(7): 314-318. |
[18] | Konate, A. K., Zongo, A., Kam, H., Sanni, A. and Audebert, A., 2016. Genetic variability and correlation analysis of rice (Oryza sativa L.) inbred lines based on agro-morphological traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(35): 3340-3346. |
[19] | Lafarge, T. and Bueno, C. S., 2009. Higher crop performance of rice hybrids than of elite inbreds in the tropics: 2. Does sink regulation, rather than sink size, play a major role. Field crops research. 112(2-3): 238-244. |
[20] | Machunde, Z. A., 2013. Variation and inter relationships among yield and yield components in lowland rice genotypes (Oryza sativa L.) in Mwanza Region (Doctoral dissertation, Sokoine). |
[21] | Mebratu, G. M., Selvaraj, T. and Woldeab, G., 2015. Assessment of disease intensity and isolates characterization of blast disease (Pyriculariaoryzae CAV.) from South West of Ethiopia. International J. of Life Sciences, 3(4): 271-286. |
[22] | Merkebu, G. and Techale, B., 2015. Growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by time and ratio of nitrogen application at Jimma, South-West Ethiopia. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research. 4(1): 175-182. |
[23] | Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MoARD), 2010. National Rice Research and Development Strategy of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 48. |
[24] | Mishu, M. F. K., Rahman, M. W., Azad, M. A. K., Biswas, B. K., Talukder, M. A. I., Kayess, M. O., Islam, M. R. and Alam, M. R., 2016. Study on Genetic Variability and Character Association of Aromatic Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars. |
[25] | Moosavi, M., Ranjbar, G., Zarrini, H. N. and Gilani, A., 2015, January. Correlation between morphological and physiological traits and path analysis of grain yield in rice genotypes under Khuzestan conditions. In Biological Forum. 7(1): 43. |
[26] | Mulugeta, B. J., 2016. Estimation of Genetic parameters, Heritability and genetic advance for yield related traits in upland rice (Oryza sativa L. and OryzaglaberrimaSteud) Genotypes in Northwestern Ethiopia. World Scientific News. 47(2): 340-350. |
[27] | Mulugeta, S., Sentayehu, A. and Kasahun, B., 2012. Genetic variability, heritability, correlation coefficient and path analysis for yield and yield related traits in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of plant sciences. 7(1): 13. |
[28] | Ogunbayo, S. A., Ojo, D. K., Sanni, K. A., Akinwale, M. G., Toulou, B., Shittu, A., Idehen, E. O., Popoola, A. R., Daniel, I. O. and Gregorio, G. B., 2014. Genetic variation and heritability of yield and related traits in promising rice genotypes (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science. 6(11): 153-159. |
[29] | Osekita, O. S., Ajayi, A. T. and Ogundoro, S. F., 2014. Genetic variability and environmental effect on the agronomic performance of upland rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Research Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. 1(1): 1-6. |
[30] | Osman, K. A., Mustafa, A. M., Ali, F., Yonglain, Z. and Fazhan, Q., 2012. Genetic variability for yield and related attributes of upland rice genotypes in semi arid zone (Sudan of A). African Journal gricultural Research. 7(33): 4613-4619. |
[31] | Sabouri, H., Rabiei, B. and Fazlalipour, M., 2008. Use of selection indices based on multivariate analysis for improving grain yield in rice. Rice Science. 15(4): 303-310. |
[32] | SAS Institute. 2002. The SAS system for windows, V.9.0. SAS Institute, Carry, NC, USA. |
[33] | Satheehkumar P. and Saravanan, K., 2012. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in rice (Oryza Sativa L.) International journal of current research. pp. 082-085. |
[34] | Singh SK., Singh, C. M. and Lal, G. M, 2011. Assessment of genetic variability for yield and its component characters in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Research in Plant Biology. 1(4): 73-76. |
[35] | Singh, R. K. and Chaudhary, B. D., 1985. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. pp. 318. |
[36] | Tefera, A., Sentayehu, A. and Leta, T., 2017. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and its related traits in rainfed lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes at Fogera and Pawe, Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Tech. 5(2): 272. |
[37] | Vanisree, S., Swapna, K., DamodraRaju, Ch., SurenderRaju, Ch and Sreedhar, M. 2013. Genetic variability and selection criteria in rice. Journal of Biological & Scientific Opinion. 1(4): 341-346. |
[38] | Venkata Lakshmi, M., Sabetha, Y., Yugandhar, G., and Venkata Lakshmi, N. 2014. Correlation Studies in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) International Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 5: 121-126. |
APA Style
Aklilu, M., Alameraw, S., Dessie, A. (2024). Genetic Variability and Character Association Analysis for Yield and Its Related Traits in Rain Fed Lowland Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes at Teppi and Fogera, Ethiopia. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 12(4), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19
ACS Style
Aklilu, M.; Alameraw, S.; Dessie, A. Genetic Variability and Character Association Analysis for Yield and Its Related Traits in Rain Fed Lowland Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes at Teppi and Fogera, Ethiopia. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2024, 12(4), 136-150. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19
AMA Style
Aklilu M, Alameraw S, Dessie A. Genetic Variability and Character Association Analysis for Yield and Its Related Traits in Rain Fed Lowland Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes at Teppi and Fogera, Ethiopia. Int J Genet Genomics. 2024;12(4):136-150. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19
@article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19, author = {Mequannit Aklilu and Sentayehu Alameraw and Abebaw Dessie}, title = {Genetic Variability and Character Association Analysis for Yield and Its Related Traits in Rain Fed Lowland Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes at Teppi and Fogera, Ethiopia }, journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics}, volume = {12}, number = {4}, pages = {136-150}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20241204.19}, abstract = {In Ethiopia, rice variety development started very recently and is mainly dependent on the introduction breeding materials in which characterization and understanding of the genetic variability of genotypes is the critical step. Knowledge of the extent of genetic variability and interrelationships of yield and yield components is pre-request for designing an effective selection-based rice improvement programs for evolving high yielding rice genotypes. Therefore, this study was carried out with all objectives of assessing genetic variation for yield and yield related traits in lowland rice genotypes. Thirty-six selected lowland rice genotypes were evaluated in simple lattice design with two replications during 2017 cropping season and data on 15 quantitative morphological traits were collected and subjected to various statistical analysis. Combined analysis of variance across location revealed significant location, genotype and genotype × location interaction effects for the traits evaluated at p ≤0.01. The phenotypic coefficient of variation was high for un fertile tiller per plant (88.16 %), followed by infertile grain per panicle (50.66%), and grain yield (21.57%), and the genotypic coefficient of variation was high for un fertile tiller per plant (50.38 %), followed by infertile grain per panicle (27.22%), and culm length (17.7%). The estimate of broad sense heritability ranges from 15.2% for biological yield to 91.5% for plant height. The expected genetic advance as present of mean varied from 5.42% for biological yield to 59.3% for unfertile tiller per plant. Phenotypic and genotypic correlation revealed grain yield had a a significant and positive association with primary branches per panicle (rp=0.4, rg=0.7), fertile grain per panicle (rp=0.5, rg=0.72) and harvest index (rp=0.76, rg=0.73) at both genotypic and phenotypic. Path coefficient analysis of grain yield revealed that harvest index, total tiller per plant and thousand grain weights showed positive phenotypic direct effect. A Positive direct effect was found for total tiller per plant, harvest index and biological yield at genotypic level. The present study indicated sufficient genetic variability for the characters studied in rain fed low land rice genotype, which will create opportunity for future improvement. To have full scale data, further study at various locations and years with the help of molecular techniques should be done. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Genetic Variability and Character Association Analysis for Yield and Its Related Traits in Rain Fed Lowland Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes at Teppi and Fogera, Ethiopia AU - Mequannit Aklilu AU - Sentayehu Alameraw AU - Abebaw Dessie Y1 - 2024/12/10 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19 DO - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19 T2 - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics JF - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics JO - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics SP - 136 EP - 150 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7359 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20241204.19 AB - In Ethiopia, rice variety development started very recently and is mainly dependent on the introduction breeding materials in which characterization and understanding of the genetic variability of genotypes is the critical step. Knowledge of the extent of genetic variability and interrelationships of yield and yield components is pre-request for designing an effective selection-based rice improvement programs for evolving high yielding rice genotypes. Therefore, this study was carried out with all objectives of assessing genetic variation for yield and yield related traits in lowland rice genotypes. Thirty-six selected lowland rice genotypes were evaluated in simple lattice design with two replications during 2017 cropping season and data on 15 quantitative morphological traits were collected and subjected to various statistical analysis. Combined analysis of variance across location revealed significant location, genotype and genotype × location interaction effects for the traits evaluated at p ≤0.01. The phenotypic coefficient of variation was high for un fertile tiller per plant (88.16 %), followed by infertile grain per panicle (50.66%), and grain yield (21.57%), and the genotypic coefficient of variation was high for un fertile tiller per plant (50.38 %), followed by infertile grain per panicle (27.22%), and culm length (17.7%). The estimate of broad sense heritability ranges from 15.2% for biological yield to 91.5% for plant height. The expected genetic advance as present of mean varied from 5.42% for biological yield to 59.3% for unfertile tiller per plant. Phenotypic and genotypic correlation revealed grain yield had a a significant and positive association with primary branches per panicle (rp=0.4, rg=0.7), fertile grain per panicle (rp=0.5, rg=0.72) and harvest index (rp=0.76, rg=0.73) at both genotypic and phenotypic. Path coefficient analysis of grain yield revealed that harvest index, total tiller per plant and thousand grain weights showed positive phenotypic direct effect. A Positive direct effect was found for total tiller per plant, harvest index and biological yield at genotypic level. The present study indicated sufficient genetic variability for the characters studied in rain fed low land rice genotype, which will create opportunity for future improvement. To have full scale data, further study at various locations and years with the help of molecular techniques should be done. VL - 12 IS - 4 ER -