This study examines the mobility challenges tourists face in Ziro Valley, Arunachal Pradesh, India. The research was conducted in September 2022 during the Ziro Festival of Music and surveyed a diverse group of international, national, and domestic tourists. The primary goal was to identify the most significant factors that impede tourist mobility to and within their destinations. The study employed a field survey methodology, gathering data from a cross-section of tourists to understand their experiences. To analyse the collected data, researchers used Garrett's ranking technique, a statistical method for ranking items based on their perceived importance. This technique was specifically applied to determine the key challenges affecting overall tourist mobility and to investigate the specific inconveniences faced by international tourists in Arunachal Pradesh and all tourists during their stay in Ziro Valley. The findings of this research indicate that the condition of road communications is the most significant factor hindering tourist mobility. This poor road infrastructure poses a considerable barrier, making it difficult for tourists to reach their desired destinations and navigate the region effectively. The study’s results highlight the urgent need for improvements in the transportation network to enhance the tourist experience and promote tourism in the Ziro Valley. In conclusion, this paper successfully identifies and ranks the key mobility challenges encountered by tourists in the Ziro Valley. By using Garrett's ranking technique, the study provides a clear and data-driven understanding of the most pressing issues. The findings strongly suggest that improving road infrastructure is essential to overcoming these obstacles and facilitating smoother travel for visitors. This research serves as a valuable resource for policymakers and tourism developers aiming to enhance the region's accessibility and appeal.
Published in | International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13 |
Page(s) | 99-112 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Tourist, Ziro Valley, Mobility Challenges, Ziro Festival of Music, Arunachal Pradesh and Garrett Ranking
Factors of mobility challenges | Rank given by the International Respondents | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | 11th | |
F1 | 4 | 22 | 12 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F2 | 12 | 46 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 50 |
F4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
F5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 28 |
F6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
F7 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 30 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
F8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 41 | 10 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
F9 | 64 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 52 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
F11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 50 | 20 | 2 | 2 |
Sl. No | 100 (Rij - 0.5)/Nj | Calculated Value | Garret Value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 100 (1-0.5)/11 | 4.54 | 82 |
2 | 100 (2-0.5)/11 | 13.6 | 71 |
3 | 100 (3-0.5)/11 | 22.72 | 64 |
4 | 100 (4-0.5)/11 | 31.81 | 59 |
5 | 100 (5-0.5)/11 | 40.9 | 54 |
6 | 100 (6-0.5)/11 | 50 | 50 |
7 | 100 (7-0.5)/11 | 59.09 | 45 |
8 | 100 (8-0.5)/11 | 68.18 | 41 |
9 | 100 (9-0.5)/11 | 77.27 | 35 |
10 | 100 (10-0.5)/11 | 86.36 | 28 |
11 | 100 (11-0.5)/11 | 95.45 | 17 |
Factors of mobility challenges | Rank given by the International Respondents | Total | % | Rank | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | 11th | ||||
F1 | 328 | 1562 | 768 | 2360 | 54 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5122 | 64.03 | 4th |
F2 | 984 | 3266 | 1491 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5791 | 72.39 | 2nd |
F3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 140 | 672 | 850 | 1752 | 21.9 | 11th |
F4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 236 | 540 | 1050 | 0 | 41 | 1505 | 0 | 0 | 3373 | 42.16 | 8th |
F5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1456 | 476 | 1932 | 24.15 | 10th |
F6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 177 | 1242 | 2000 | 0 | 41 | 350 | 56 | 0 | 3867 | 48.34 | 6th |
F7 | 0 | 0 | 2982 | 1770 | 108 | 150 | 45 | 41 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5131 | 64.14 | 3rd |
F8 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 2214 | 500 | 1035 | 164 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 4019 | 50.24 | 5th |
F9 | 5248 | 852 | 71 | 59 | 54 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6334 | 79.18 | 1st |
F10 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 59 | 54 | 50 | 3240 | 943 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3552 | 44.4 | 7th |
F11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 54 | 100 | 90 | 2050 | 700 | 56 | 34 | 3143 | 39.29 | 9th |
Factors of mobility challenges | Rank given by the National Respondents | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | 11th | |
F1 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 50 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F2 | 56 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 55 |
F4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 70 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
F5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 72 | 3 |
F6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
F7 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 73 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
F9 | 20 | 50 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
F10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 72 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
F11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 55 | 0 | 23 |
Factors of mobility challenges | Rank given by the National Respondents | Total | % | Rank | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | 11th | ||||
F1 | 164 | 426 | 1280 | 2950 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4915 | 61.44 | 4th |
F2 | 4592 | 1633 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6289 | 78.61 | 1st |
F3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 90 | 41 | 700 | 28 | 935 | 1848 | 23.1 | 11th |
F4 | 0 | 71 | 128 | 0 | 3780 | 200 | 45 | 0 | 35 | 28 | 0 | 4287 | 53.59 | 5th |
F5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 82 | 35 | 2016 | 51 | 2288 | 28.6 | 10th |
F6 | 0 | 0 | 192 | 236 | 0 | 3550 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 28 | 0 | 4041 | 50.51 | 6th |
F7 | 0 | 71 | 3200 | 1357 | 324 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4952 | 61.9 | 3rd |
F8 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 135 | 2993 | 0 | 84 | 0 | 3276 | 40.95 | 8th |
F9 | 1640 | 3550 | 128 | 59 | 54 | 100 | 45 | 0 | 35 | 28 | 17 | 5656 | 70.7 | 2nd |
F10 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 0 | 54 | 50 | 3240 | 82 | 70 | 28 | 0 | 3588 | 44.85 | 7th |
F11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 41 | 1925 | 0 | 391 | 2407 | 30.09 | 9th |
Factors of mobility challenges | Rank given by the Domestic Respondents | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | 11th | |
F1 | 2 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F2 | 77 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 43 |
F4 | 0 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 41 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
F5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 35 |
F6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 41 | 2 | 30 | 2 |
F7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
F9 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
F10 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 1 | 41 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
F11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 71 | 4 | 0 |
Factors of mobility challenges | Rank given by the Domestic Respondents | Total | % | Rank | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | 11th | ||||
F1 | 164 | 3124 | 64 | 59 | 0 | 1550 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5002 | 62.53 | 2nd |
F2 | 6314 | 213 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6527 | 81.59 | 1st |
F3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 54 | 50 | 45 | 1230 | 35 | 56 | 731 | 2260 | 28.25 | 10th |
F4 | 0 | 2201 | 128 | 118 | 2214 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 4831 | 60.39 | 4th |
F5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1204 | 595 | 1903 | 23.79 | 11th |
F6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108 | 100 | 45 | 1681 | 70 | 840 | 34 | 2878 | 35.98 | 8th |
F7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2478 | 1890 | 50 | 45 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4504 | 56.3 | 5th |
F8 | 0 | 71 | 128 | 236 | 0 | 0 | 3240 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3710 | 46.38 | 7th |
F9 | 0 | 71 | 2752 | 1770 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 82 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 4853 | 60.66 | 3rd |
F10 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 59 | 54 | 2050 | 135 | 82 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 4399 | 54.99 | 6th |
F11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 164 | 2485 | 112 | 0 | 2815 | 35.19 | 9th |
Factors of mobility challenges | Rank given by the All Respondents | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | 11th | |
F1 | 8 | 72 | 33 | 91 | 2 | 32 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F2 | 145 | 72 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
F3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 31 | 25 | 27 | 148 |
F4 | 0 | 32 | 5 | 6 | 121 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 46 | 1 | 0 |
F5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 167 | 66 |
F6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 25 | 113 | 1 | 42 | 13 | 33 | 2 |
F7 | 0 | 1 | 92 | 95 | 43 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
F8 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 41 | 10 | 98 | 77 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
F9 | 84 | 63 | 46 | 32 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
F10 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 1 | 3 | 43 | 127 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
F11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 55 | 146 | 6 | 25 |
Factors of mobility challenges | Rank given by the All Respondents | Total | % | Rank | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 10th | 11th | ||||
F1 | 656 | 5112 | 2112 | 5369 | 108 | 1600 | 0 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15039 | 62.66 | 3rd |
F2 | 11890 | 5112 | 1408 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18460 | 76.92 | 1st |
F3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 108 | 50 | 225 | 1271 | 875 | 756 | 2516 | 5860 | 24.42 | 11th |
F4 | 0 | 2272 | 320 | 354 | 6534 | 1350 | 45 | 41 | 1610 | 28 | 0 | 12554 | 52.31 | 5th |
F5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 54 | 50 | 45 | 82 | 35 | 4676 | 1122 | 6123 | 25.51 | 10th |
F6 | 0 | 0 | 256 | 413 | 1350 | 5650 | 45 | 1722 | 455 | 924 | 34 | 10849 | 45.20 | 8th |
F7 | 0 | 71 | 5888 | 5605 | 2322 | 200 | 90 | 82 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 14292 | 59.55 | 4th |
F8 | 0 | 71 | 256 | 236 | 2214 | 500 | 4410 | 3157 | 70 | 84 | 0 | 10998 | 45.83 | 7th |
F9 | 6888 | 4473 | 2944 | 1888 | 216 | 150 | 45 | 82 | 105 | 28 | 17 | 16836 | 70.15 | 2nd |
F10 | 0 | 0 | 2112 | 59 | 162 | 2150 | 5715 | 1107 | 175 | 28 | 0 | 11508 | 47.95 | 6th |
F11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 108 | 150 | 90 | 2255 | 5110 | 168 | 425 | 8365 | 34.85 | 9th |
ZFM | Ziro Festival of Music |
ILP | Inner Line Permit |
PAP | Protected Area Pass |
RAP | Restricted Area Permit |
FRRO | Foreigners Regional Registration Officers |
MaaS | Mobility as a Service |
[1] |
Tour My India Pvt. (2020). Ziro Valley Travel Guide. Retrieved October 28, 2022, from Tourmyindia.com:
https://www.tourmyindia.com/states/arunachalpradesh/ziro.html |
[2] | Haimendorf, C. F. (1962). The Apa Tanis and Thier Neighbours: A Primitive Civilisation of the Eastern Himalayas. London & New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. |
[3] | Lora, A. V., Domenech, A., & Gutierrez, A. (2021, December 20). COVID-19 and Tourist Mobility at Destinations: A Literature Review and Emerging Research Agenda. JOURNAL OF TOURISM FUTURES, 1-14. |
[4] | Cole, T. S., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Dimensions of lodging guest satisfaction among guests with mobility challenges: A mixed-method analysis of web-based texts. Tourism Management, 53, 13-27. |
[5] | Szymanska, E. (2022, September 5). Problems of Tourist Mobility in Remote Areas of Natural Value - The Case of the Hajnowka Poviat in Poland and the Zaonesshye Region in Russia. (W. Strielkowski, Ed.) MDPI Journals - Economies, 10(9), p. 212. |
[6] | Dimanche, Frederic, and David Jolly (2009). Tourism, Mobility, and Technology: Perspective and Challenges. Tourism Analysis, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 421-423. |
[7] | Vovk, Iryna, et al (2024). Mobility as a Service for Tourism: Challenges and Opportunities for Meeting the Needs of Tourists in Urban Environments. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137-149. |
[8] | De Cantis, Stefano, Mauro Ferrante, and Patrizia Calo (2015). Analysing Tourist Mobility: Current Issues and Future Challenges.” Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 125-140. University of Palermo, Department of Economics, Business and Statistics. |
[9] | Szymanska, Elzbieta (2022). Problems of Tourist Mobility in Remote Areas of Natural Value—The Case of the Hajnowka Poviat in Poland and the Zaoneshye Region in Russia. Economies, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 212. MDPI, |
[10] | Den Hoed, Wilbert, and Antonio Paolo Russo (2024). Aging, Everyday Active Mobility and the Challenge of the Tourist City: An Illustration from Barcelona. Urban Geography, 5 Dec. 2024, |
[11] | Lyons, Kevin (2005). Room to Move? The Challenges of Career Mobility for Tourism Education. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 51-55. |
[12] | Viana-Lora, Alba, Antoni Domenech, and Aaron Gutierrez (2023). COVID-19 and Tourist Mobility at Destinations: A Literature Review and Emerging Research Agenda. Journal of Tourism Futures, vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, pp. 21-34. Emerald Publishing, |
[13] | Graburn, Nelson (2017). Key Figure of Mobility: The Tourist. Social Anthropology, vol. 25, pp. 183-96. European Association of Social Anthropologists. |
[14] | Department of Information, Public Relation & Printing. (2022). Inner Line Permit. Retrieved October 28, 2022, from arunachalipr.gov.in: |
[15] | Ministry of Home Affairs. (2022, August 25). Protected Area Permit (PAP)/ Restricted Area Permit (RAP). Retrieved October 28, 2022, from: |
APA Style
Lampung, C., Mema, T., Camder, Y. R. (2025). Challenges in the Mobility of the Tourist in Arunachal Pradesh: An Empirical Case Study of Ziro Valley with Special Reference to Ziro Festival of Music - 2022. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management, 9(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13
ACS Style
Lampung, C.; Mema, T.; Camder, Y. R. Challenges in the Mobility of the Tourist in Arunachal Pradesh: An Empirical Case Study of Ziro Valley with Special Reference to Ziro Festival of Music - 2022. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2025, 9(2), 99-112. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13, author = {Chiging Lampung and Takam Mema and Yab Rajiv Camder}, title = {Challenges in the Mobility of the Tourist in Arunachal Pradesh: An Empirical Case Study of Ziro Valley with Special Reference to Ziro Festival of Music - 2022 }, journal = {International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {99-112}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijhtm.20250902.13}, abstract = {This study examines the mobility challenges tourists face in Ziro Valley, Arunachal Pradesh, India. The research was conducted in September 2022 during the Ziro Festival of Music and surveyed a diverse group of international, national, and domestic tourists. The primary goal was to identify the most significant factors that impede tourist mobility to and within their destinations. The study employed a field survey methodology, gathering data from a cross-section of tourists to understand their experiences. To analyse the collected data, researchers used Garrett's ranking technique, a statistical method for ranking items based on their perceived importance. This technique was specifically applied to determine the key challenges affecting overall tourist mobility and to investigate the specific inconveniences faced by international tourists in Arunachal Pradesh and all tourists during their stay in Ziro Valley. The findings of this research indicate that the condition of road communications is the most significant factor hindering tourist mobility. This poor road infrastructure poses a considerable barrier, making it difficult for tourists to reach their desired destinations and navigate the region effectively. The study’s results highlight the urgent need for improvements in the transportation network to enhance the tourist experience and promote tourism in the Ziro Valley. In conclusion, this paper successfully identifies and ranks the key mobility challenges encountered by tourists in the Ziro Valley. By using Garrett's ranking technique, the study provides a clear and data-driven understanding of the most pressing issues. The findings strongly suggest that improving road infrastructure is essential to overcoming these obstacles and facilitating smoother travel for visitors. This research serves as a valuable resource for policymakers and tourism developers aiming to enhance the region's accessibility and appeal. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Challenges in the Mobility of the Tourist in Arunachal Pradesh: An Empirical Case Study of Ziro Valley with Special Reference to Ziro Festival of Music - 2022 AU - Chiging Lampung AU - Takam Mema AU - Yab Rajiv Camder Y1 - 2025/09/03 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13 T2 - International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management JF - International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management JO - International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management SP - 99 EP - 112 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1800 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20250902.13 AB - This study examines the mobility challenges tourists face in Ziro Valley, Arunachal Pradesh, India. The research was conducted in September 2022 during the Ziro Festival of Music and surveyed a diverse group of international, national, and domestic tourists. The primary goal was to identify the most significant factors that impede tourist mobility to and within their destinations. The study employed a field survey methodology, gathering data from a cross-section of tourists to understand their experiences. To analyse the collected data, researchers used Garrett's ranking technique, a statistical method for ranking items based on their perceived importance. This technique was specifically applied to determine the key challenges affecting overall tourist mobility and to investigate the specific inconveniences faced by international tourists in Arunachal Pradesh and all tourists during their stay in Ziro Valley. The findings of this research indicate that the condition of road communications is the most significant factor hindering tourist mobility. This poor road infrastructure poses a considerable barrier, making it difficult for tourists to reach their desired destinations and navigate the region effectively. The study’s results highlight the urgent need for improvements in the transportation network to enhance the tourist experience and promote tourism in the Ziro Valley. In conclusion, this paper successfully identifies and ranks the key mobility challenges encountered by tourists in the Ziro Valley. By using Garrett's ranking technique, the study provides a clear and data-driven understanding of the most pressing issues. The findings strongly suggest that improving road infrastructure is essential to overcoming these obstacles and facilitating smoother travel for visitors. This research serves as a valuable resource for policymakers and tourism developers aiming to enhance the region's accessibility and appeal. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -