Objective: Traditional fungal detection methods, such as fungal microscopy and cultivation, often have drawbacks such as high false negative rates and time-consuming cultivation. Using molecular biology methods for diagnosis can not only be used for identifying fungal strains in cultured colonies, but also for diagnosing diseased tissues, which can shorten the diagnosis time. There is a lack of systematic research on the clinical characteristics, susceptibility factors, and the composition and distribution of pathogenic fungi of superficial mycosis in Shiyan area. In order to understand the relevant situation of superficial mycosis and pathogenic fungi in this area, this study conducted a molecular epidemiological investigation on 146 patients with superficial mycosis who visited our outpatient department. Methods: From January 2022 to December 2022, the typical clinical manifestations of outpatient visits in our department were collected. 146 cases of superficial fungal patients with positive fungal microscopy were cultured and DNA was extracted. PCR technology was applied to compare the products in GeneBank after the amplification of ITS region. Results: A total of 23 pathogenic strains were obtained, including 112 strains of Trichophyton rubrum (76.71%), 5 strains of other dermatophytes (3.42%), 6 strains of Candida species (4.11%), 4 strains of Aspergillus species (2.74%), 8 strains of Cladosporium species (5.48%), and 11 strains of other fungi (7.53%). Conclusions: DNA sequencing combined with traditional fungal microscopic culture is helpful for more accurate diagnosis of superficial mycosis.
Published in | International Journal of Infectious Diseases and Therapy (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11 |
Page(s) | 40-44 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Superficial Mycosis, Trichophyton rubrum, DNA Sequencing
Clinical diagnosis | n | Gender | Age (years) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
male | female | χ2 | P | 0~10 | 11~20 | 21~30 | 31~40 | 41~50 | 51~60 | 61~ | ||
Tinea cruris | 62 | 46 | 16 | 2.907 | 0.088 | 0 | 11 | 21 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 2 |
Onychomycosis | 25 | 14 | 11 | 1.474 | 2.225 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Tinea corporis | 21 | 17 | 4 | 2.317 | 0.128 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Tinea manuum | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0.000 | 0.984 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Tinea pedis | 11 | 5 | 6 | 1.442 | 0.230 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Tinea facial | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0.122 | 0.727 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Tinea capitis | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3.403 | 0.065 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 146 | 97 | 49 | 9 | 20 | 44 | 30 | 21 | 14 | 8 |
Stains | Tinea capitis (%) | Tinea facial (%) | Tinea corporis (%) | Tinea cruris (%) | Tinea manuum (%) | Tinea pedis (%) | Onychomycosis (%) | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trichophyton rubrum | 1 (33.33) | 4 (44.44) | 19 (90.48) | 53 (85.48) | 13 (86.67) | 9 (81.81) | 13 (52.00) | 112 (76.71) |
Other dermatophytes | 2 (66.67) | 1 (11.11) | 1 (9.09) | 1 (4.00) | 5 (3.42) | |||
Candida species | 2 (3.23) | 4 (16.00) | 6 (4.11) | |||||
Aspergillus species | 1 (1.61) | 1 (6.67) | 2 (8.00) | 4 (2.74) | ||||
Cladosporium species | 1 (11.11) | 1 (4.76) | 4 (6.45) | 1 (6.67) | 1 (4.00) | 8 (5.48) | ||
Other pathogenic fungi | 3 (33.33) | 1 (4.76) | 2 (3.23) | 1 (9.09) | 4 (16.00) | 11 (7.53) | ||
Total | 3 (2.05) | 9 (6.16) | 21 (14.38) | 62 (42.47) | 15 (10.27) | 11 (7.53) | 25 (17.12) | 146 |
SDA | Sabourg Glucose Agar |
DNA | Deoxyribonucleic Acid |
PCR | Polymerase Chain Reaction |
ITS | Internal Transcribed Spacers |
NCBI | The National Center for Biotechnology Information |
SPSS | Statistical Package for the Social Sciences |
[1] | Otašević S, Momčilović S, Golubović M, et al. Species distribution and epidemiological characteristicsof superficial fungal infections in Southeastern Serbia [J]. Mycoses, 2019, 62(5): 458-465. |
[2] | Wu T, Wu SD, Zhang LY, Ye HH, Mao YH, Lian X, Tao J, Huang CZ, Zeng JS. Pathogen Analysis of Superficial Mucocutaneous Mycosis in a Tertiary A-level Hospital from 2007 to 2018. Curr Med Sci. 2022, 42(2): 434-438. |
[3] | Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M. Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide [J]. Mycoses, 2008, 4: 2-15. |
[4] | Sharma B, Nonzom S. Superficial mycoses, a matter of concern: Global and Indian scenario-an updated analysis. Mycoses. 2021 Aug; 64(8): 890-908. |
[5] | Khodadadi H, Zomorodian K, Nouraei H, Zareshahrabadi Z, Barzegar S, Zare MR, Pakshir K. Prevalence of superficial-cutaneous fungal infections in Shiraz, Iran: A five-year retrospective study (2015-2019). J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Jul; 35(7): e23850. |
[6] | Silva-Rocha WP, de Azevedo MF, Chaves GM. Epidemiology and fungal species distribution of superficial mycoses in Northeast Brazil. J Mycol Med. 2017 Mar; 27(1): 57-64. |
[7] | Yu J, Liu WD, Tong ZS, Yu N, Cao CW, Zhou X, Li YZ, Zhang Y, Li FQ, Zhang JM, Zhu M, Yang LJ, Abliz P, Wang AP, Ran YP, Li RY. Aetiology of superficial fungal infections of the foot in urban outpatients in mainland China: A multicentre, prospective case study. Mycoses. 2020 Nov; 63(11): 1235-1243. |
[8] | Cai W, Lu C, Li X, et al. Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Guangdong, Southern China: A Retrospective Study from 2004 to 2014. Mycopathologia. 2016 Jun; 181(5-6): 387-395. |
[9] | Simonnet C, Berger F, Gantier JC. Epidemiology of superficial fungal diseases in French Guiana: a three-year retrospective analysis. Med Mycol. 2011 Aug; 49(6): 608-611. |
[10] | Nasr A, Vyzantiadis TA, Patsatsi A, Louka A, Ioakimidou A, Zachrou E, Chavale A, Kalabalikis D, Malissiovas N, Sotiriadis D. Epidemiology of superficial mycoses in Northern Greece: a 4-year study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 May; 30(5): 837-839. |
[11] | Sacheli R, Cuypers L, Seidel L, Darfouf R, Adjetey C, Lagrou K, Hayette MP. Epidemiology of Dermatophytes in Belgium: A 5 Years' Survey. Mycopathologia. 2021 Jun; 186(3): 399-409. |
[12] | Bontems O, Fratti M, Salamin K, Guenova E, Monod M. Epidemiology of Dermatophytoses in Switzerland According to a Survey of Dermatophytes Isolated in Lausanne between 2001 and 2018. J Fungi (Basel). 2020 Jun 26; 6(2): 95. |
[13] | Surjushe A, Kamath R, Oberai C, Saple D, Thakre M, Dharmshale S, Gohil A. A clinical and mycological study of onychomycosis in HIV infection. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007 Nov-Dec; 73(6): 397-401. https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.37057 |
[14] | Martínez-Herrera EO, Arroyo-Camarena S, Tejada-García DL, Porras-López CF, Arenas R. Onychomycosis due to opportunistic molds. An Bras Dermatol. 2015, 90(3): 334-337. |
[15] | Das S, Bandyopadhyay S, Sawant S, Chaudhuri S. The epidemiological and mycological profile of superficial mycoses in india from 2015 to 2021: A systematic review. Indian J Public Health. 2023 Jan-Mar; 67(1): 123-135. |
[16] | Gamage H, Sivanesan P, Hipler UC, Elsner P, Wiegand C. Superficial fungal infections in the department of dermatology, University Hospital Jena: A 7-year retrospective study on 4556 samples from 2007 to 2013. Mycoses. 2020 Jun; 63(6): 558-565. |
[17] | de Albuquerque Maranhão FC, Oliveira-Júnior JB, Dos Santos Araújo MA, Silva DMW. Mycoses in northeastern Brazil: epidemiology and prevalence of fungal species in 8 years of retrospective analysis in Alagoas. Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Oct; 50(4): 969-978. |
[18] | Wang X, Ding C, Xu Y, Yu H, Zhang S, Yang C. Analysis on the pathogenic fungi in patients with superficial mycosis in the Northeastern China during 10 years. Exp Ther Med. 2020 Dec; 20(6): 281. |
[19] | Correia NS, Balbinot RTS, Bonacorsi C, Donofrio FC. Epidemiology of dermatomycoses in children in Northern Mato Grosso 2015-2020. Mycoses. 2022 May; 65(5): 560-566. |
[20] | Antuori A, Fernández G, Fernández A, Alcaide M, Boada A, Bielsa MI, Romaní N, Matas L. Epidemiology of dermatophytic infections between 2008 and 2017 in Barcelona, Spain. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019, 37(10): 642-647. |
[21] | Piorunek M, Kubisiak-Rzepczyk H, Dańczak-Pazdrowska A, Trafas T, Walkowiak J. Superficial Zoonotic Mycoses in Humans Associated with Cats. J Fungi (Basel). 2024, 10(4): 244. |
[22] | Yuan HW, Zhao L, Liu YL, et al. A survey on skin superficial fungal infection of the elderly in nursing home (in Chinese). J Pract Dermatol. 2013, 6(2): 88-90. |
APA Style
Wang, R., Chen, T., Yang, Y., Wang, L., Wu, Y., et al. (2024). DNA Sequencing Accurately Diagnosed 146 Cases of Superficial Mycosis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 9(3), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11
ACS Style
Wang, R.; Chen, T.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wu, Y., et al. DNA Sequencing Accurately Diagnosed 146 Cases of Superficial Mycosis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2024, 9(3), 40-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11
AMA Style
Wang R, Chen T, Yang Y, Wang L, Wu Y, et al. DNA Sequencing Accurately Diagnosed 146 Cases of Superficial Mycosis. Int J Infect Dis Ther. 2024;9(3):40-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11, author = {Runchao Wang and Tingting Chen and Yao Yang and Lingling Wang and Yaqiong Wu and Yanqing He and Haixia Jing}, title = {DNA Sequencing Accurately Diagnosed 146 Cases of Superficial Mycosis }, journal = {International Journal of Infectious Diseases and Therapy}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {40-44}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijidt.20240903.11}, abstract = {Objective: Traditional fungal detection methods, such as fungal microscopy and cultivation, often have drawbacks such as high false negative rates and time-consuming cultivation. Using molecular biology methods for diagnosis can not only be used for identifying fungal strains in cultured colonies, but also for diagnosing diseased tissues, which can shorten the diagnosis time. There is a lack of systematic research on the clinical characteristics, susceptibility factors, and the composition and distribution of pathogenic fungi of superficial mycosis in Shiyan area. In order to understand the relevant situation of superficial mycosis and pathogenic fungi in this area, this study conducted a molecular epidemiological investigation on 146 patients with superficial mycosis who visited our outpatient department. Methods: From January 2022 to December 2022, the typical clinical manifestations of outpatient visits in our department were collected. 146 cases of superficial fungal patients with positive fungal microscopy were cultured and DNA was extracted. PCR technology was applied to compare the products in GeneBank after the amplification of ITS region. Results: A total of 23 pathogenic strains were obtained, including 112 strains of Trichophyton rubrum (76.71%), 5 strains of other dermatophytes (3.42%), 6 strains of Candida species (4.11%), 4 strains of Aspergillus species (2.74%), 8 strains of Cladosporium species (5.48%), and 11 strains of other fungi (7.53%). Conclusions: DNA sequencing combined with traditional fungal microscopic culture is helpful for more accurate diagnosis of superficial mycosis. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - DNA Sequencing Accurately Diagnosed 146 Cases of Superficial Mycosis AU - Runchao Wang AU - Tingting Chen AU - Yao Yang AU - Lingling Wang AU - Yaqiong Wu AU - Yanqing He AU - Haixia Jing Y1 - 2024/08/15 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11 T2 - International Journal of Infectious Diseases and Therapy JF - International Journal of Infectious Diseases and Therapy JO - International Journal of Infectious Diseases and Therapy SP - 40 EP - 44 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-966X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijidt.20240903.11 AB - Objective: Traditional fungal detection methods, such as fungal microscopy and cultivation, often have drawbacks such as high false negative rates and time-consuming cultivation. Using molecular biology methods for diagnosis can not only be used for identifying fungal strains in cultured colonies, but also for diagnosing diseased tissues, which can shorten the diagnosis time. There is a lack of systematic research on the clinical characteristics, susceptibility factors, and the composition and distribution of pathogenic fungi of superficial mycosis in Shiyan area. In order to understand the relevant situation of superficial mycosis and pathogenic fungi in this area, this study conducted a molecular epidemiological investigation on 146 patients with superficial mycosis who visited our outpatient department. Methods: From January 2022 to December 2022, the typical clinical manifestations of outpatient visits in our department were collected. 146 cases of superficial fungal patients with positive fungal microscopy were cultured and DNA was extracted. PCR technology was applied to compare the products in GeneBank after the amplification of ITS region. Results: A total of 23 pathogenic strains were obtained, including 112 strains of Trichophyton rubrum (76.71%), 5 strains of other dermatophytes (3.42%), 6 strains of Candida species (4.11%), 4 strains of Aspergillus species (2.74%), 8 strains of Cladosporium species (5.48%), and 11 strains of other fungi (7.53%). Conclusions: DNA sequencing combined with traditional fungal microscopic culture is helpful for more accurate diagnosis of superficial mycosis. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -