Nowadays, e-learning systems are widely used for education and training in universities and companies because of their electronic course content access and virtual classroom participation. But not all learners learn in the same way and at the same rate, some prefer the traditional text-based or oral presentation of content, while others learn more easily in a visual or kinetic instruction style. The real value of e-Learning lies not in its ability to train just anyone, anytime, anywhere, but in our ability to deploy this attribute to train the right people to gain the right skills or knowledge at the right time. Learning objects and courses databases are syntactically structured text archives with powerful search engines. But, there is no semantic relationship between information needs of the user and the information content of documents. Because of many limitations using web 2.0 for creating E-learning management system, now-a-days we use Web 3.0 which is known as Semantic web. It is a platform to represent E-learning management system that recovers the limitations of Web 2.0. However, with the rapid increase of learning content on the Web, it is time-consuming for learners to find contents they really want to and need to study. “Making content machine-understandable” is a popular paraphrase of the fundamental prerequisite for the Semantic Web. This paper focuses on e-Learning, benefits and requirements of e-Learning and potential uses of semantic web technology in e-Learning.
Published in | International Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (Volume 4, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11 |
Page(s) | 84-94 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
E-Learning, Semantic Web, RDF, Ontology
[1] | T. Govindasamy, "Successful implementation of e-Learning Pedagogical considerations," Internet and Higher Education, vol. 4, p. 287–299, 2002. |
[2] | K. S. Neepa, "E-Learning and Semantic Web," International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, vol. 2, no. 2, April 2012. |
[3] | J. Hendler, "Agents and the Semantic Web," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 30-37, 2001. |
[4] | G. Fayed, D. Sameh, H. Ahmad, M. A. Jihad, A. E.-S. Samir and E.-S. Hosam, "E-Learning Model Based On Semantic Web Technology," International Journal of Computing & Information Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 63 -71, 2006. |
[5] | B. Dutta, "Semantic Web Based E-learning," [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242691487_Semantic_Web_Based_E-learning. |
[6] | N. Kontodimopoulos, A. BOUKOUVALAS1, K. Savidakis and A. Gasparinatou, "Distance-Learning Educational Material in the Biomedical Engineering Degree Program," in WSEAS Int. Conf. on ENGINEERING EDUCATION, Venice, Italy, 2004. |
[7] | Hoppe, G.; Breitner, M. H, "Business Models for E-Learning," in E-learning,models,istrument,experiences,of the Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Essen-Germany, 2004. |
[8] | G. Jorge, M. Ruiz and J. Michael, "The Impact of E-Learning in Medical Education," in Academic Medicine, 2006. |
[9] | "e-Learning- Introductions," [Online]. Available: http://agelesslearner.com/intros/elearning.html. |
[10] | P. Drucker, "Need to Know Integrating e-Learning with High Velocity Value Chains," A Delphi Group White, 2000. |
[11] | L. Stojanovic, S. Steffen and S. Rudi, "eLearning based on the Semantic Web," in WebNet'2001 World Conference of the WWW and Internet. AACE (2001), 2001. |
[12] | Y. Zhiwen, N. Yuichi, J. Seiie and K. Shoji, "Ontology-Based Semantic Recommendation for Context-Aware E-Learning," in Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. pp 898-907. |
[13] | T. Dietinger, "ASPECTS OF E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS," Graz University of Technology, 2003. |
[14] | A. Rossett, THE ASTD E-LEARNING HANDBOOK BEST PRACTICES, STRATEGIES, AND CASE STUDIES FOR AN EMERGING FIELD, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002. |
[15] | M. R. Charles and A. C.-C. Alison, Instructional-Design Theories and Models, New York: Taylor & Francis publishing, 2009. |
[16] | M. Elazony, "master's thesis"Presentation Techniques for Distance Learning"," cairo, 2011. |
[17] | J. Hofmann, "Blended Learning Case Study," 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.astd.org/LC/2001/0401_hofmann.htm. [Accessed 13 January 2009]. |
[18] | B. Karin, C. M. Antonio and T. Walt, Semantic Web: Concepts, Technologies and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007. |
[19] | T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler and O. Lassila, "The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that ismeaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities.," Scientific American., 2001. |
[20] | "Semantic_Web," 2013. [Online]. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web. [Accessed 2013]. |
[21] | B. Ö. Czerkawski, "THE SEMANTIC WEB IN TEACHER EDUCATION," TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 13, no. 4, October 2014. |
[22] | V. Devedžić, "Web Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence in Education," Web Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence in Education. Educational Technology & Society, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 29-39, 2004. |
[23] | T. Berners-Lee, "What the Semantic Web can represent," 17 09 1998. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDFnot.html. [Accessed 31 03 2013]. |
[24] | T. Berners-Lee, "Semantic Web Road map," 1998. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html.. |
[25] | M.-B. T, Everything Integrated: A Framework for Associative Writing in the Web, University of Southampton, 2004. |
[26] | L. O. K. T. S. Michael Daconta, The Semantic web: the guide to future of XML,web services and knowledge management. |
[27] | A. B. A. J. v. d. M. A. Gerber, "Functional Semantic Web Architecture,”," Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vols. Volume 5021/2008, ISBN:978-3-540-68233-2, pp. pages: 273-287, 2008. |
[28] | A. B. A. J. v. d. M. A. Gerber, "Towards a Semantic Web Layered Architecture," in Software Engineering Proceedings of the 25th conference on IASTED International Multi-Conference, Innsbruck, Austria,, 2007. |
[29] | M. A. a. H. S. H. Al-Feel, "Toward an Agreement on Semantic Web Architecture," in World Academy of Science,Engineering and Technology, 2009. |
[30] | H. Pascal and J. Krzysztof, "Semantic Web Tools and Systems," Semantic Web, vol. 2, no. 1 / 2011, 2011. |
[31] | B. P. P. P.-S. J. I. Horrocks, "Semantic Web Architecture: Stack or Two Towers?” "Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vols. Volume 3703/2005,, no. ISBN: 978-3-540-, pp. Pages: 37-41,, 2005. |
[32] | A. Swartz, "The Semantic Web in Breadth," 2002. [Online]. Available: http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long.. |
[33] | R. Pandey and S. Dwivedi, "Interoperability between Semantic Web Layers: A Communicating Agent Approach," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 0975 – 8887, November 2010. |
[34] | "XML_schema," [Online]. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_schema. |
[35] | T. Bray, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition)," 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#sec-origin-goals. |
[36] | "REC-xml-names," [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names. |
[37] | D. Beckett, "RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)," 2004. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/. [Accessed 2013]. |
[38] | E. Miller, "An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework," D-Lib Magazine, 1998. |
[39] | "Resource Description Framework," [Online]. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework. |
[40] | "rdf-schema," [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema. |
[41] | M. Obitko., "Introduction to Ontologies and Semantic Web," 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.obitko.com/tutorials/ontologies-semantic-web/. |
[42] | S. S. A. Maedche, "Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 16, no. ISSN:1541-1672, pp. 72- 9, 2001. |
[43] | "owl-features," [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features. |
[44] | "Logic layer," [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2002/Talks/04-sweb/slide20-0.html. |
[45] | S. K. Patel and B. H. B, "AUTOMATIC DISCOVERY AND PRESENTATION OF HIGHLY PERSONALIZED E-LEARNING RESOURCES: A SURVEY," International Journal of Advanced Technology & Engineering Research (IJATER), vol. 3, p. 25–29, 2013. |
[46] | L. T and R. S, "Information Portal of E-Learning System in Semantic Web Environment," in The 6th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications, 2011. |
[47] | L. Stojanovic, S. Staab and R. Studer, "eLearning based on the Semantic Web," in WebNet'2001 World Conference of the WWW and Internet. AACE (2001), 2001. |
[48] | M. Frank and E. Miller, "RDF Primer:W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004," W3C, 10 February 2004. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/. [Accessed 10 8 2015]. |
[49] | M. Frank, M. Eric and M. Brian, "RDF 1.1 Primer:W3C Working Group Note 24 June 2014," W3C, 24 June 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-rdf11-primer-20140624/. [Accessed 10 8 2015]. |
APA Style
Ahmed Rashad Khalifa. (2015). E-Learning and Semantic Web. International Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 4(5), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11
ACS Style
Ahmed Rashad Khalifa. E-Learning and Semantic Web. Int. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 2015, 4(5), 84-94. doi: 10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11
AMA Style
Ahmed Rashad Khalifa. E-Learning and Semantic Web. Int J Intell Inf Syst. 2015;4(5):84-94. doi: 10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11, author = {Ahmed Rashad Khalifa}, title = {E-Learning and Semantic Web}, journal = {International Journal of Intelligent Information Systems}, volume = {4}, number = {5}, pages = {84-94}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijiis.20150405.11}, abstract = {Nowadays, e-learning systems are widely used for education and training in universities and companies because of their electronic course content access and virtual classroom participation. But not all learners learn in the same way and at the same rate, some prefer the traditional text-based or oral presentation of content, while others learn more easily in a visual or kinetic instruction style. The real value of e-Learning lies not in its ability to train just anyone, anytime, anywhere, but in our ability to deploy this attribute to train the right people to gain the right skills or knowledge at the right time. Learning objects and courses databases are syntactically structured text archives with powerful search engines. But, there is no semantic relationship between information needs of the user and the information content of documents. Because of many limitations using web 2.0 for creating E-learning management system, now-a-days we use Web 3.0 which is known as Semantic web. It is a platform to represent E-learning management system that recovers the limitations of Web 2.0. However, with the rapid increase of learning content on the Web, it is time-consuming for learners to find contents they really want to and need to study. “Making content machine-understandable” is a popular paraphrase of the fundamental prerequisite for the Semantic Web. This paper focuses on e-Learning, benefits and requirements of e-Learning and potential uses of semantic web technology in e-Learning.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - E-Learning and Semantic Web AU - Ahmed Rashad Khalifa Y1 - 2015/09/26 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11 T2 - International Journal of Intelligent Information Systems JF - International Journal of Intelligent Information Systems JO - International Journal of Intelligent Information Systems SP - 84 EP - 94 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7683 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijiis.20150405.11 AB - Nowadays, e-learning systems are widely used for education and training in universities and companies because of their electronic course content access and virtual classroom participation. But not all learners learn in the same way and at the same rate, some prefer the traditional text-based or oral presentation of content, while others learn more easily in a visual or kinetic instruction style. The real value of e-Learning lies not in its ability to train just anyone, anytime, anywhere, but in our ability to deploy this attribute to train the right people to gain the right skills or knowledge at the right time. Learning objects and courses databases are syntactically structured text archives with powerful search engines. But, there is no semantic relationship between information needs of the user and the information content of documents. Because of many limitations using web 2.0 for creating E-learning management system, now-a-days we use Web 3.0 which is known as Semantic web. It is a platform to represent E-learning management system that recovers the limitations of Web 2.0. However, with the rapid increase of learning content on the Web, it is time-consuming for learners to find contents they really want to and need to study. “Making content machine-understandable” is a popular paraphrase of the fundamental prerequisite for the Semantic Web. This paper focuses on e-Learning, benefits and requirements of e-Learning and potential uses of semantic web technology in e-Learning. VL - 4 IS - 5 ER -