Many studies report sex differences in language processing, but there is still no consensus about differences between men and women in language processing. However, the sex differences in emotional processing are more evident and consistent. In this paper, some studies on sex differences in specific emotional area: emotional processing in language, empathy and pragmatic aspect of language, and humor processing are reviewed. These results demonstrate that women engage more emotion-related brain areas than men and the results are in consistent with sex-related cognitive style strategy hypothesis, that is, men and women favor different cognitive strategies during emotional processing. Based on the findings, sex-related cognitive strategies hypothesis and extreme male brain hypothesis are discussed. Men and women favor different cognitive strategies during emotional processing, and women show more sensitivity to emotion processing in language. Although biology may play a role to affect sex differences, the most important factor might be the different cognitive strategies employed by men and women influenced by sex hormones. The favor of different cognitive styles encourages women to have stronger drive to empathize and play the key role in sex-related differences in emotional processing in language, empathy and pragmatic reasoning, and humor processing. It is concluded that women are more efficient than men in emotional processing.
| Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 9, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11 |
| Page(s) | 275-278 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Sex Differences, Emotional Processing, Empathy, Humor
| [1] | Azim, E., Mobbs, D., Jo, B., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2005). Sex differences in brain activation elicited by humor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (45), 16496–16501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0408456102. |
| [2] | Baron-Cohen, S., 2003. The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain. Penguin, London. |
| [3] | Beaucousin, V., Zago, L., Hervé, P-Y., Strelnikov, K., Crivello, F., Mazoyer, B., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. 2011. Sex-dependent modulation of activity in the neural networks engaged during emotional speech comprehension. Brain Research, 1390, 108-117. |
| [4] | Binder, J. R., Swanson, S. J., Hammeke, T. A., Morris, G. L., Mueller, W. M., Fischer, M., Benbadis, S., Frost, J. A., Rao, S. M., Haughton, V. M., 2003. Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Am. Acad. Neurology. 46, 978–984. |
| [5] | Calero, C., Salles, A., Semelman, M., Sigman, M., 2013. Age and gender dependent development of Theory of Mind in 6- to 8-years old children. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7 (Article 281). http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00281. |
| [6] | Canli, T., Desmond, J. E., Zhao, Z., Gabrieli, J. D., 2002. Sex differences in the neural basis of emotional memories. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 10789–10794. |
| [7] | Chang, Yi-Tzu, Ku, Li-Chuan, Chen HSUEH-Chih, 2018. Sex differences in humor processing: An event-related potential study. Brain and Cognition, 120, 34–42. |
| [8] | Charman, T., Ruffman, T., Clements, W., 2002. Is there a gender difference in false belief development? Soc. Dev. 11, 1–10. |
| [9] | Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Saint-Amour, D., Lepore, F., Lassonde, M., 2010. Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia 48, 220–225. |
| [10] | Dapretto, M., Davies, M. S., Pfeifer, J. H., Scott, A. A., Sigman, M., Bookheimer, S. Y., et al., 2006. Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 28–30. |
| [11] | Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., von Cramon, D. Y., 2008. The extended language network: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 581–593. |
| [12] | Frank, C. K., Baron-Cohen, S., Ganzel, B. L., 2015. Sex differences in neural basis of false-belief and pragmatic language comprehension. NeuroImage, 105, 300-311. |
| [13] | Hagemann, G., Ugur, T., Schleussner, E., Mentzel, H.-J., Fitzek, C., Witte, O. W., Gaser, C., 2011. Changes in brain size during menstrual cycle. PLoS ONE 6 (2), 1–7. |
| [14] | Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., Schmid Mast, M., 2006. Recall of nonverbal cues: exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. J. Nonverbal Behav. 30, 141–155. |
| [15] | Halpern, D., 1992. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum. |
| [16] | Heaton, R., Ryan, L., Grant, I., Matthews, C., 1996. Demographic influences on neuropsychological test performance. In: Igor, G., Adams, K. (Eds.), Neuropsychological Assessment of Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 141–163. |
| [17] | Hellige, J. B., Kosslyn, S. M., 1993. Individual differences. In: Hellige, J. B. (Ed.), Hemispheric Asymmetry: What's Right and What's Left. Harvard University, Cambridge, London, pp. 207–259. |
| [18] | Hitchens, C. (2007). Why women aren’t funny. Vanity Fair, 557, 54–59. |
| [19] | Houde, J. F., Nagarajan, S. S., Sekihara, K., Merzenich, M. M., 2002. Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 14, 1125–1138. |
| [20] | Joel, D., McCarthy, M. M., 2017. Incorporating sex as a biological variable in neuropsychiatric research: where are we now and where should we Be? Neuropsychopharmacology 42 (2), 379–385. |
| [21] | Kimura, D., 1999. Sex differences, brain organization for speech and language, In: Adelman, G., Smith, B. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 2nd ed. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 1849–1851. |
| [22] | Kohn, N., Kellermann, T., Gur, R. C., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2011). Gender differences in the neural correlates of humor processing: Implications for different processing modes. Neuropsychologia, 49 (5), 888–897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.010. |
| [23] | Mar, R. A., 2011. The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 62, 103–134. |
| [24] | Mason, R. A., Williams, D. L., Kana, R. K., Minshaw, N., Just, M. A., 2008. Theory of mind disruption and recruitment of the right hemisphere during narrative comprehension in autism. Neusopsychologia 46, 269–280. |
| [25] | Sato, M., Shiller, D. M., 2018. Auditory prediction during speaking and listening. Brain Lang. 187, 92–103. |
| [26] | Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., Friederici, A. D., 2002. Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 14, 228–233. |
| [27] | Schirmer, A., Zysset, S., Kotz, S. A., von Cramon, Y., 2004. Gender differences in the activation of inferior frontal cortex during emotional speech perception. Neuroimage 21, 1114–1123. |
| [28] | Schultz, R. T. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: The role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23 (2–3), 125–141. |
| [29] | Shlesinger, I. (2017). Girl Logic: The Genius and the Absurdity. New York, NY: Hachette Books. |
| [30] | Singer, T., 2006. The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research. Neurosci. Behav. Rev. 30, 855–863. |
| [31] | Thompson, A. E., & Voyer, D. (2014). Sex differences in the ability to recognize non- verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 28, 1164–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.875889. |
| [32] | Tombaugh, T. N., Kozak, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Normative data stratified by age and A. Scheuringer, et al. Brain and Language 207 (2020) 104814 13 education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14 (2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/14.2.167. |
| [33] | Troyer, A. K. (2000). Normative data for clustering and switching on verbal fluency tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22 (3), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3395(200006)22:3;1-V;FT370. |
| [34] | van Honk, J., Schutter, D. J., Bos, P. A., Kruijt, A. W., Lentjes, E. G., Baron-Cohen, S., 2011. Testosterone administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2, 1–3. |
| [35] | Vingerhoets, G., Van Borsel, J., Tesink, C., van den, N. M., Deblaere, K., Seurinck, R., Vandemaele, P., Achten, E., 2003. Multilingualism: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 20, 2181–2196. |
| [36] | Vrticka, P., Black, J. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2013). The neural basis of humour processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14 (12), 860–868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3566. |
| [37] | Woods, D., 1995. The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 44, 102–109. |
APA Style
Lin Zhu. (2021). Sex Differences in Emotional Processing in Language. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 9(6), 275-278. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11
ACS Style
Lin Zhu. Sex Differences in Emotional Processing in Language. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2021, 9(6), 275-278. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11
AMA Style
Lin Zhu. Sex Differences in Emotional Processing in Language. Int J Lang Linguist. 2021;9(6):275-278. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11,
author = {Lin Zhu},
title = {Sex Differences in Emotional Processing in Language},
journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
pages = {275-278},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20210906.11},
abstract = {Many studies report sex differences in language processing, but there is still no consensus about differences between men and women in language processing. However, the sex differences in emotional processing are more evident and consistent. In this paper, some studies on sex differences in specific emotional area: emotional processing in language, empathy and pragmatic aspect of language, and humor processing are reviewed. These results demonstrate that women engage more emotion-related brain areas than men and the results are in consistent with sex-related cognitive style strategy hypothesis, that is, men and women favor different cognitive strategies during emotional processing. Based on the findings, sex-related cognitive strategies hypothesis and extreme male brain hypothesis are discussed. Men and women favor different cognitive strategies during emotional processing, and women show more sensitivity to emotion processing in language. Although biology may play a role to affect sex differences, the most important factor might be the different cognitive strategies employed by men and women influenced by sex hormones. The favor of different cognitive styles encourages women to have stronger drive to empathize and play the key role in sex-related differences in emotional processing in language, empathy and pragmatic reasoning, and humor processing. It is concluded that women are more efficient than men in emotional processing.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Sex Differences in Emotional Processing in Language AU - Lin Zhu Y1 - 2021/11/05 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 275 EP - 278 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20210906.11 AB - Many studies report sex differences in language processing, but there is still no consensus about differences between men and women in language processing. However, the sex differences in emotional processing are more evident and consistent. In this paper, some studies on sex differences in specific emotional area: emotional processing in language, empathy and pragmatic aspect of language, and humor processing are reviewed. These results demonstrate that women engage more emotion-related brain areas than men and the results are in consistent with sex-related cognitive style strategy hypothesis, that is, men and women favor different cognitive strategies during emotional processing. Based on the findings, sex-related cognitive strategies hypothesis and extreme male brain hypothesis are discussed. Men and women favor different cognitive strategies during emotional processing, and women show more sensitivity to emotion processing in language. Although biology may play a role to affect sex differences, the most important factor might be the different cognitive strategies employed by men and women influenced by sex hormones. The favor of different cognitive styles encourages women to have stronger drive to empathize and play the key role in sex-related differences in emotional processing in language, empathy and pragmatic reasoning, and humor processing. It is concluded that women are more efficient than men in emotional processing. VL - 9 IS - 6 ER -
Information
Email: