This article aims to analyze the legal framework of freedom of association in post formation of Law No. 2 of 2017 and Law No. 2 of 2017 on the right to assembly in Indonesia. It is claimed that a number of Civil Society Organization (CSOs) threaten the Indonesian government. Those organizations carry out activities which are contrary to the values of the Pancasila and the mandate of the constitution. This article addresses that revocation of Civil Society Organization is not a violation of human rights, especially the freedom of association and assembly. CSOs must comply with the law and state ideology, Pancasila, as Ground Norm and the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. Those CSOs have carried out acts of hostility including words, statements, attitudes or aspirations verbally which create hatred both towards certain groups and against those who fall into the state administration. Those activities potentially cause social conflict between community members leading to chaotic conditions that are difficult to prevent and overcome by law enforcement officials. Therefore, freedom must be limited.
| Published in | International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17 |
| Page(s) | 123-139 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Right to Assembly, Violations, Revocation, Civil Society Organization, Forbidden Organization
| [1] | The 1945 Constitution of Indonesia with the fourth amendment. |
| [2] | Law Number 39 of 1999 of the Republic of Indonesia concerning Human Rights. |
| [3] | Hasani. I, Naipospos, B. T. Religious Radicalism in Jabodetabek & West Java: Implications for Guarantees of Freedom of Religion/Belief. (Jakarta: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara, 2010), p. 5. |
| [4] | Mufid, A. S. Map of Radicalism Movement in Indonesia, Workshop Presentation Paper Building Awareness and Strategies in Facing Religious Radicalization, (Palu, 22 May 2012), p. 8. |
| [5] | Budiyanto, H. et al., Social Organizations, (In the FKIP UMS Surakarta Seminar, 2008), p. 10. |
| [6] | Arinanto, S. Human Rights in Political Transitions in Indonesia, (Jakarta: Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia 2018). p. 21. |
| [7] | Purwaka, T. H. Legal Research Methodology, (Jakarta: Atmajaya University Publisher (PUAJ), 2007), p. 49. |
| [8] | Krabbe, H. et al, The Modern Of The State, (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1922), p. XVIII. |
| [9] | Strong, CF. Modern Political Constitutions "Constitutions of State Politics" Comparative Study of History and Form, translated by Derta Sri Widowatie, (Bandung: Nusa Media, 1966), p. 8. |
| [10] | Salim, H. HS, Theory Development in Law, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, Second Printing, 2012), p. 135. |
| [11] | Affandi, M. Association of State Studies, (Bandung: Alumni, 1971), pp. 166-167. |
| [12] | Hartono, S. What Is The Rule Of Law?, (Bandung: Alumni, 1969), p. 45. |
| [13] | The Writers' Team, Building a Dignified Law State, (Malang: Setara Press, First Printing Edition, 2013), p. 157. |
| [14] | Hadjon, P. M. Legal Protection for the People in Indonesia "a study of its Principles, Their Handling by the Courts in the General Judicial Environment and the establishment of State Administrative Courts, (Surabaya; Bina Ilmu, First Matter, 1987), p. 72. |
| [15] | Yamin, M. Proclamation and Constitution..., quoted by Azhary, Indonesian Law State Normative Yurids Analysis of Its Elements, (Jakarta: UI Press, 1995), p. 31. |
| [16] | Mahfud M. MD, Constitution and Law in the Controversy of Issues, (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2010), p. 384. |
| [17] | Asshiddiqie, J. Principles of Rule of Law, In " Some Aspects of State Administration, Criminal Law, and Islamic Law, Welcoming 73 Years of Prof. Dr. H. Muhammad Tahir Azhary, (n. d), p. 28-29. |
| [18] | Mahfud M. MD, Debate on Constitutional Law Post Constitutional Amendments, (Jakarta: LP3ES, 2007), p. 51. |
| [19] | Utrecht, Introduction to Indonesian State Administrative Law, (Jakarta: Ichtisar, 1962), p. 9. |
| [20] | Friedman, W. Law in a Changing Society, as quoted by Jimly Asshiddiqie, Principles of the Law of Indonesia, in Some Aspects of Constitutional Law..., p. 28. |
| [21] | Arinanto, A. et al., Ed., Human Rights Law, (Yogyakarta: Center for Human Rights Studies at the Islamic University of Indonesia, 2008), p. 14. |
| [22] | Antonius Cahyadi. A., Manulang, E, F, M. Introduction to the philosophy of Law, (Jakarta: Kencana, print 2, 2008), p. 42. |
| [23] | Asshiddiqie, J. Constitutional Law and Pillars of Democracy, Op. Cit., P. 211. |
| [24] | Hisbulloh, H. (n. d) Analysis of Perpu Ormas. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/35218024/ANALISIS_TENTANG_PERPPU_ORMAS. |
| [25] | Utari, S. Freedom of Association and Gathering (A Study of Regulations on Political Parties in Indonesia ), (Jakarta: Postgraduate Program at the Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, 2004), pp. 44-45. |
| [26] | Soekanto. S., Mamuji. S. Legal Research Normative A Brief Overview, Molds to - 11. (Jakarta: King Grafindo Persada, 2009), pp. 13–14. |
| [27] | Prasetyo. T. and Abdul Halim Barkatullah, Philosophy of Theory, and Legal Studies: Thought Towards a Fair and Dignified Society, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012), p. 367. |
| [28] | Flores, I. B. "Legisprudence, The Role and Rationality of Legislators - Vis a Vis Judges - Towards the Realization of Justice ", (Mexican Law Review, New Series Volume 1, Number 2, 2009), p. 107. |
| [29] | Bauman. R. W., Kahana. T. (ed), The Least Examined Branch, The Role Of Legislatures In The Constitutional State, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 17-18. |
| [30] | Justice Forum. No. 19. August 12, 2001. p. 14. |
| [31] | Suny, I. Shift in Executive Power. (Jakarta: New Script. 1986), p. 61. |
| [32] | C. Fatovic. Constitutionalism and Presidential Prerogatives: Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian perspective. (American Journal of Political Science, 48 (3). 2004), p. 429. |
| [33] | Mahfud MD, M. Law and Pillars of Democracy. (Yogjakarta: Gama Media, 2010), p. 256. |
| [34] | Rositier, C. Constitutional Dictatorship. (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1948), p. 9. |
| [35] | Law Number 12 of 2005 concerning Ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Polical Rights (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights). |
| [36] | Kuntowijoyo in Saldi Isra. "Strengthening and Guarding Pancasila in the Legislation Process (Jakarta: National Law Magazine. 2015), p. 61. |
| [37] | Isra. S. "Strengthening and Guarding Pancasila in the Legislation Process ". (Jakarta: National Law Magazine. 2015), page 63. |
| [38] | Assiddiqie, J. Freedom of Association, Dissolution of Political Parties, and the Constitutional Court, (Jakarta: Constitution Press, 2005), p. 9. |
| [39] | Siahaan, M. Freedom of Association and Peaceful Gathering and Its Implications, Institut Leimena, July 2011, https://leimena.org/blog/2011/07/06/keb Freedom- united- and- change-uu-ormas- 3 / Retrieved 2 April 2020. |
| [40] | Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Amendment to Law Number 17 of 2013 concerning Community Organizations. |
| [41] | Basuki, T. Community Organization in Indonesian Democracy, Serial Online July-Aug, http://www.leimena.org/id/page/v/537/organizational-dalam-democracyindonesia, Retrieved 12 April 2020. |
| [42] | Rodhi, M. M. Tsaqofah and the Hizb ut-Tahrir Method in Establishing a Khilaf State (Bogor: Al-Azhar Fresh Zone Publishing, 2012), p. 23. |
| [43] | Hilmy, M. "The Roots of Islamic Transnationalism of Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia ". (In Journal of Islamica, Vol. 6, No. 1, September 2011), pp. 1-2. |
| [44] | Gatra, South Jakarta District Court Freezes JAD 31 July. |
| [45] | Article 22 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. |
| [46] | Asshiddiqie, J. Emergency State Administration Law, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007), p. 13. |
| [47] | Asshidiqie, J. Regarding the Law. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2010, p. 213. |
| [48] | Soeprapto, M. F. I. Science of Basic Law and its Development, Yogyakarta, Kanisius, 199, p. 131. |
| [49] | Manan, B., Magnar, K. Some Indonesian Constitutional Law Issues, Bandung: Alumni, 1993, p. 150-151. |
| [50] | Government Regulation (Perpu) No. 2 of 2017 concerning Amendments of Law Number 17 of 2013 on Community Organization. |
| [51] | Article 12 of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. |
| [52] | Article 59 paragraph (4) of Law No. 17 of 2013. |
| [53] | Amanwinata, R. "Arrangements and limits on the implementation of Freedom of Association and Association in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution" Dissertation, (Bandung: Padjajaran University, 1996), pp. 16-17. |
| [54] | Article 61 paragraph (3) of Law 16 of 2017 concerning Mass Organizations. |
| [55] | Article 23 paragraph (2) of Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. |
APA Style
Manotar Tampubolon, Panti Silaban. (2020). Juridical Analysis of the Enactment of Government Regulation on the Right of Assembly in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Society, 3(3), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17
ACS Style
Manotar Tampubolon; Panti Silaban. Juridical Analysis of the Enactment of Government Regulation on the Right of Assembly in Indonesia. Int. J. Law Soc. 2020, 3(3), 123-139. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17
AMA Style
Manotar Tampubolon, Panti Silaban. Juridical Analysis of the Enactment of Government Regulation on the Right of Assembly in Indonesia. Int J Law Soc. 2020;3(3):123-139. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17,
author = {Manotar Tampubolon and Panti Silaban},
title = {Juridical Analysis of the Enactment of Government Regulation on the Right of Assembly in Indonesia},
journal = {International Journal of Law and Society},
volume = {3},
number = {3},
pages = {123-139},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20200303.17},
abstract = {This article aims to analyze the legal framework of freedom of association in post formation of Law No. 2 of 2017 and Law No. 2 of 2017 on the right to assembly in Indonesia. It is claimed that a number of Civil Society Organization (CSOs) threaten the Indonesian government. Those organizations carry out activities which are contrary to the values of the Pancasila and the mandate of the constitution. This article addresses that revocation of Civil Society Organization is not a violation of human rights, especially the freedom of association and assembly. CSOs must comply with the law and state ideology, Pancasila, as Ground Norm and the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. Those CSOs have carried out acts of hostility including words, statements, attitudes or aspirations verbally which create hatred both towards certain groups and against those who fall into the state administration. Those activities potentially cause social conflict between community members leading to chaotic conditions that are difficult to prevent and overcome by law enforcement officials. Therefore, freedom must be limited.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Juridical Analysis of the Enactment of Government Regulation on the Right of Assembly in Indonesia AU - Manotar Tampubolon AU - Panti Silaban Y1 - 2020/08/25 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17 T2 - International Journal of Law and Society JF - International Journal of Law and Society JO - International Journal of Law and Society SP - 123 EP - 139 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1908 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20200303.17 AB - This article aims to analyze the legal framework of freedom of association in post formation of Law No. 2 of 2017 and Law No. 2 of 2017 on the right to assembly in Indonesia. It is claimed that a number of Civil Society Organization (CSOs) threaten the Indonesian government. Those organizations carry out activities which are contrary to the values of the Pancasila and the mandate of the constitution. This article addresses that revocation of Civil Society Organization is not a violation of human rights, especially the freedom of association and assembly. CSOs must comply with the law and state ideology, Pancasila, as Ground Norm and the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. Those CSOs have carried out acts of hostility including words, statements, attitudes or aspirations verbally which create hatred both towards certain groups and against those who fall into the state administration. Those activities potentially cause social conflict between community members leading to chaotic conditions that are difficult to prevent and overcome by law enforcement officials. Therefore, freedom must be limited. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: