Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua; Awosusi Bolade Damilola

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua, Awosusi Bolade Damilola

Published in International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 4, Issue 2)

Received: 1 April 2021 Accepted: 19 April 2021 Published: 8 May 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The rate of insecurity in Nigeria does not only call for concern but raises a loud alarm that no one is safe. The unending occurrence of killing, banditry and kidnapping affect all regions of the country and fear grips the mind of citizens, both the rich and the poor. The government at various levels have tried making security policies, giving security a primary attention in the national budget, purchasing sophisticated ammunitions, reshuffling the rank and file in the army, creating regional security outfits and other proactive steps, yet insecurity in the country prevails by the day and government appears to be handicapped in taking charge of internal sovereignty of the country. The government has however, often times, being excused of liability, especially when the cause of death is not directly connected with any of the government’s agencies despite the primary purpose of government is the security and welfare of the citizens. It is in the light of this that the research aims at examining the sole responsibility of government in protecting citizens in the country, and the government’s corresponding liability in this regard. Relying on both primary and secondary of information, the article revealed the failure of the government to protect lives and properties within her territory makes the country drift into a state of nature. It is therefore concluded that citizens have entered a social contract for the sake of their safety and security, the government should henceforth be held responsible for further acts of killings and insecurity in the country.

Published in	International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 4, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15
Page(s)	89-93
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Insecurity, Human Rights, Government Liability, State of Nature

References

[1]	Scott Clark (2007) Solitary, Poor, Nasty, Brutish, and Short? Heidelblog. Retrieved 30 March 2021, from https://heidelblog.net/2007/12/solitary-poor-nasty-brutish-and-short/
[2]	See John Simmons, (1989) Locke's State of Nature. Political Theory, 17 (3) 449-470.
[3]	Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (As Amended).
[4]	Suit no. ECW/CCJ/APP/03/14
[5]	See Edwin Egede, (2007) Bringing Human Rights Home: An Examination of the Domestication of Human Rights Treaties in Nigeria. Journal of African Law 51 (2), 249-284.
[6]	(1992) AIR 185.
[7]	Series C No 125, [2005] 1 ACHR6.
[8]	50385/99 (delivered on 20 December, 2004).
[9]	(2004-2009 CCJELR 217@242).
[10]	(ECW/CCJ/APP/07/16).
[11]	(ECW/CCJ/APP/07/16 [2018] ECOWASCJ 21.
[12]	(1986) 5 NWLR (PT. 45) 828.
[13]	(2002) 15 NWLR (PT. 791) 539 at 563.
[14]	(CA/C/12/2103) [2016] NGCA 21.
[15]	(2015) LPELR (25581) 1 at 70.
[16]	(2018) LPELR-45778 (CA).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua, Awosusi Bolade Damilola. (2021). Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature. International Journal of Law and Society, 4(2), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua; Awosusi Bolade Damilola. Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature. Int. J. Law Soc. 2021, 4(2), 89-93. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua, Awosusi Bolade Damilola. Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature. Int J Law Soc. 2021;4(2):89-93. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15,
  author = {Omidoyin Taiye Joshua and Awosusi Bolade Damilola},
  title = {Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature},
  journal = {International Journal of Law and Society},
  volume = {4},
  number = {2},
  pages = {89-93},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20210402.15},
  abstract = {The rate of insecurity in Nigeria does not only call for concern but raises a loud alarm that no one is safe. The unending occurrence of killing, banditry and kidnapping affect all regions of the country and fear grips the mind of citizens, both the rich and the poor. The government at various levels have tried making security policies, giving security a primary attention in the national budget, purchasing sophisticated ammunitions, reshuffling the rank and file in the army, creating regional security outfits and other proactive steps, yet insecurity in the country prevails by the day and government appears to be handicapped in taking charge of internal sovereignty of the country. The government has however, often times, being excused of liability, especially when the cause of death is not directly connected with any of the government’s agencies despite the primary purpose of government is the security and welfare of the citizens. It is in the light of this that the research aims at examining the sole responsibility of government in protecting citizens in the country, and the government’s corresponding liability in this regard. Relying on both primary and secondary of information, the article revealed the failure of the government to protect lives and properties within her territory makes the country drift into a state of nature. It is therefore concluded that citizens have entered a social contract for the sake of their safety and security, the government should henceforth be held responsible for further acts of killings and insecurity in the country.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature
AU  - Omidoyin Taiye Joshua
AU  - Awosusi Bolade Damilola
Y1  - 2021/05/08
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15
T2  - International Journal of Law and Society
JF  - International Journal of Law and Society
JO  - International Journal of Law and Society
SP  - 89
EP  - 93
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1908
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15
AB  - The rate of insecurity in Nigeria does not only call for concern but raises a loud alarm that no one is safe. The unending occurrence of killing, banditry and kidnapping affect all regions of the country and fear grips the mind of citizens, both the rich and the poor. The government at various levels have tried making security policies, giving security a primary attention in the national budget, purchasing sophisticated ammunitions, reshuffling the rank and file in the army, creating regional security outfits and other proactive steps, yet insecurity in the country prevails by the day and government appears to be handicapped in taking charge of internal sovereignty of the country. The government has however, often times, being excused of liability, especially when the cause of death is not directly connected with any of the government’s agencies despite the primary purpose of government is the security and welfare of the citizens. It is in the light of this that the research aims at examining the sole responsibility of government in protecting citizens in the country, and the government’s corresponding liability in this regard. Relying on both primary and secondary of information, the article revealed the failure of the government to protect lives and properties within her territory makes the country drift into a state of nature. It is therefore concluded that citizens have entered a social contract for the sake of their safety and security, the government should henceforth be held responsible for further acts of killings and insecurity in the country.
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua

College of Law, Achievers University, Owo, Nigeria
Awosusi Bolade Damilola

Faculty of Law, Federal University, Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua, Awosusi Bolade Damilola. (2021). Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature. International Journal of Law and Society, 4(2), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua; Awosusi Bolade Damilola. Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature. Int. J. Law Soc. 2021, 4(2), 89-93. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Omidoyin Taiye Joshua, Awosusi Bolade Damilola. Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature. Int J Law Soc. 2021;4(2):89-93. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15,
  author = {Omidoyin Taiye Joshua and Awosusi Bolade Damilola},
  title = {Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature},
  journal = {International Journal of Law and Society},
  volume = {4},
  number = {2},
  pages = {89-93},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20210402.15},
  abstract = {The rate of insecurity in Nigeria does not only call for concern but raises a loud alarm that no one is safe. The unending occurrence of killing, banditry and kidnapping affect all regions of the country and fear grips the mind of citizens, both the rich and the poor. The government at various levels have tried making security policies, giving security a primary attention in the national budget, purchasing sophisticated ammunitions, reshuffling the rank and file in the army, creating regional security outfits and other proactive steps, yet insecurity in the country prevails by the day and government appears to be handicapped in taking charge of internal sovereignty of the country. The government has however, often times, being excused of liability, especially when the cause of death is not directly connected with any of the government’s agencies despite the primary purpose of government is the security and welfare of the citizens. It is in the light of this that the research aims at examining the sole responsibility of government in protecting citizens in the country, and the government’s corresponding liability in this regard. Relying on both primary and secondary of information, the article revealed the failure of the government to protect lives and properties within her territory makes the country drift into a state of nature. It is therefore concluded that citizens have entered a social contract for the sake of their safety and security, the government should henceforth be held responsible for further acts of killings and insecurity in the country.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Incessant Insecurity in Nigeria: Has the Country Returned to the State of Nature
AU  - Omidoyin Taiye Joshua
AU  - Awosusi Bolade Damilola
Y1  - 2021/05/08
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15
T2  - International Journal of Law and Society
JF  - International Journal of Law and Society
JO  - International Journal of Law and Society
SP  - 89
EP  - 93
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1908
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20210402.15
AB  - The rate of insecurity in Nigeria does not only call for concern but raises a loud alarm that no one is safe. The unending occurrence of killing, banditry and kidnapping affect all regions of the country and fear grips the mind of citizens, both the rich and the poor. The government at various levels have tried making security policies, giving security a primary attention in the national budget, purchasing sophisticated ammunitions, reshuffling the rank and file in the army, creating regional security outfits and other proactive steps, yet insecurity in the country prevails by the day and government appears to be handicapped in taking charge of internal sovereignty of the country. The government has however, often times, being excused of liability, especially when the cause of death is not directly connected with any of the government’s agencies despite the primary purpose of government is the security and welfare of the citizens. It is in the light of this that the research aims at examining the sole responsibility of government in protecting citizens in the country, and the government’s corresponding liability in this regard. Relying on both primary and secondary of information, the article revealed the failure of the government to protect lives and properties within her territory makes the country drift into a state of nature. It is therefore concluded that citizens have entered a social contract for the sake of their safety and security, the government should henceforth be held responsible for further acts of killings and insecurity in the country.
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download