A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development

Fang Zheng

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16

| Peer-Reviewed

A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development

Fang Zheng

Published in International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Received: 1 December 2022 Accepted: 28 December 2022 Published: 13 January 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Throughout the over 2000 years of feudal rule in ancient China, the Confucianism’s distributive justice has played an important role. The principles of Humanity, Differential Distribution and Equal Opportunity had a lasting impact on social development even in modern times. While in ancient Greece, Plato and Aristotle has specifically discussed the view of distributive justice, especially in the content of the distribution principle of “Equality of Values and Proportional Equality” and "Principle of Differential Distribution", whose content was later being developed and enriched continuously by various schools of thought. This paper has systematically introduced the contents and principles of the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s view of distributive justice. Aimed at the historical background and the view of the theory of the comparison of existing value and its limitation, this paper reveals the value of the view of distributive justice. This paper reveals the value of distributive justice in different times, cultures and systems. By studying the view of distributive justice at all times and in all over the world, the paper is intended to seek solution to the increasing social disparities and injustices in modern states in their processes of building harmonious societies, so that the theory of distributive justice will display a new vitality.

Published in	International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16
Page(s)	39-45
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Distributive Justice, Aristotle, Confucianism, Modern Value

References

[1]	[UK] David Hume, An Enquiry CoFieerning the Principles of Morale, Translated by Zeng Xiaoping et al. Beijing Commercial Press, 2004 Edition.
[2]	Zhang Xingjiu, Confucian "Democracy" and Modern Democracy – Modern Significance and Limitation of Confucian Thought, Published on Theoretical discussion, 4th Issue, 2014.
[3]	Bai Tongdong, Sovereignty in the People, Governance in the Virtue: Confucianists as a Mixed Whole and Their Advantages, Published on Literature, history and philosophy, 3th Issue, 2013.
[4]	Liang Tao, The Mid-term Development of Xunzi’s Theory of Human Nature – On False Human Nature as in Rites, Rectification of Name & Evil Human Nature, Published on Academic Monthly, 49th Issue, 2017.
[5]	[Ancient Greek] Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, Translated by Wang Xufeng et al. China Social Sciences Press, 2007 Edition.
[6]	[Ancient Greek] Aristotle, The Politics Of Aristotle, Translated by Wu Shoupeng et al. Beijing Commercial Press, 1965 Edition.
[7]	Wang Yan, A Study of Aristotle’s View of Political Justice, Published on Journal of Political Science, 1st Issue, 2003.
[8]	Yu Keping, Best and Worst Regimes – Another Review of Aristotle’s Political Science & His View of Regime, Published on Journal of Peking University (Philosophy & Social Science), 57th Issue, 2020.
[9]	Wang Shuqin & Cao Yisun, The Differentiation and Analysis of Plato's and Aristotle's View of Justice, Published on Philosophical Trends, 10th Issue, 2008.
[10]	[Germany] Kaufmann, Rechtsphilosophie, Translated by Liu Xingyi et al. Law Press, 2004 Edition.
[11]	[USA] John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Translated by He Huaihong et al. China Social Sciences Press, 1988 Edition.
[12]	Yao Dazhi, The Principle of Distributive Justice: Equality, Need and Deservation – Taking Walzer as an Example, Published on Social Science Research, 2th Issue, 2014.
[13]	Anthology of Important Literatures Over China’s Three Decades of Reform and Opening up (A), People's Publishing House, 2008 Edition.
[14]	Selected and compiled important documents since the 18th National Congress (A), Central Literature Press, 2014 Edition.
[15]	Selected and compiled important documents since the 19th National Congress (A), Central Literature Press, 2019 Edition.3060457

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fang Zheng. (2023). A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development. International Journal of Law and Society, 6(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fang Zheng. A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development. Int. J. Law Soc. 2023, 6(1), 39-45. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fang Zheng. A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development. Int J Law Soc. 2023;6(1):39-45. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16,
  author = {Fang Zheng},
  title = {A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development},
  journal = {International Journal of Law and Society},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {39-45},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20230601.16},
  abstract = {Throughout the over 2000 years of feudal rule in ancient China, the Confucianism’s distributive justice has played an important role. The principles of Humanity, Differential Distribution and Equal Opportunity had a lasting impact on social development even in modern times. While in ancient Greece, Plato and Aristotle has specifically discussed the view of distributive justice, especially in the content of the distribution principle of “Equality of Values and Proportional Equality” and "Principle of Differential Distribution", whose content was later being developed and enriched continuously by various schools of thought. This paper has systematically introduced the contents and principles of the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s view of distributive justice. Aimed at the historical background and the view of the theory of the comparison of existing value and its limitation, this paper reveals the value of the view of distributive justice. This paper reveals the value of distributive justice in different times, cultures and systems. By studying the view of distributive justice at all times and in all over the world, the paper is intended to seek solution to the increasing social disparities and injustices in modern states in their processes of building harmonious societies, so that the theory of distributive justice will display a new vitality.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development
AU  - Fang Zheng
Y1  - 2023/01/13
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16
T2  - International Journal of Law and Society
JF  - International Journal of Law and Society
JO  - International Journal of Law and Society
SP  - 39
EP  - 45
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1908
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16
AB  - Throughout the over 2000 years of feudal rule in ancient China, the Confucianism’s distributive justice has played an important role. The principles of Humanity, Differential Distribution and Equal Opportunity had a lasting impact on social development even in modern times. While in ancient Greece, Plato and Aristotle has specifically discussed the view of distributive justice, especially in the content of the distribution principle of “Equality of Values and Proportional Equality” and "Principle of Differential Distribution", whose content was later being developed and enriched continuously by various schools of thought. This paper has systematically introduced the contents and principles of the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s view of distributive justice. Aimed at the historical background and the view of the theory of the comparison of existing value and its limitation, this paper reveals the value of the view of distributive justice. This paper reveals the value of distributive justice in different times, cultures and systems. By studying the view of distributive justice at all times and in all over the world, the paper is intended to seek solution to the increasing social disparities and injustices in modern states in their processes of building harmonious societies, so that the theory of distributive justice will display a new vitality.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Fang Zheng

The Graduate School of Law, Jiangsu University, Zhen Jiang, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fang Zheng. (2023). A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development. International Journal of Law and Society, 6(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fang Zheng. A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development. Int. J. Law Soc. 2023, 6(1), 39-45. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fang Zheng. A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development. Int J Law Soc. 2023;6(1):39-45. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16,
  author = {Fang Zheng},
  title = {A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development},
  journal = {International Journal of Law and Society},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {39-45},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20230601.16},
  abstract = {Throughout the over 2000 years of feudal rule in ancient China, the Confucianism’s distributive justice has played an important role. The principles of Humanity, Differential Distribution and Equal Opportunity had a lasting impact on social development even in modern times. While in ancient Greece, Plato and Aristotle has specifically discussed the view of distributive justice, especially in the content of the distribution principle of “Equality of Values and Proportional Equality” and "Principle of Differential Distribution", whose content was later being developed and enriched continuously by various schools of thought. This paper has systematically introduced the contents and principles of the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s view of distributive justice. Aimed at the historical background and the view of the theory of the comparison of existing value and its limitation, this paper reveals the value of the view of distributive justice. This paper reveals the value of distributive justice in different times, cultures and systems. By studying the view of distributive justice at all times and in all over the world, the paper is intended to seek solution to the increasing social disparities and injustices in modern states in their processes of building harmonious societies, so that the theory of distributive justice will display a new vitality.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparison Between the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s View of Distributive Justice — The Thoughts Based on Contemporary Development
AU  - Fang Zheng
Y1  - 2023/01/13
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16
T2  - International Journal of Law and Society
JF  - International Journal of Law and Society
JO  - International Journal of Law and Society
SP  - 39
EP  - 45
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-1908
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20230601.16
AB  - Throughout the over 2000 years of feudal rule in ancient China, the Confucianism’s distributive justice has played an important role. The principles of Humanity, Differential Distribution and Equal Opportunity had a lasting impact on social development even in modern times. While in ancient Greece, Plato and Aristotle has specifically discussed the view of distributive justice, especially in the content of the distribution principle of “Equality of Values and Proportional Equality” and "Principle of Differential Distribution", whose content was later being developed and enriched continuously by various schools of thought. This paper has systematically introduced the contents and principles of the Confucianism’s and Aristotle’s view of distributive justice. Aimed at the historical background and the view of the theory of the comparison of existing value and its limitation, this paper reveals the value of the view of distributive justice. This paper reveals the value of distributive justice in different times, cultures and systems. By studying the view of distributive justice at all times and in all over the world, the paper is intended to seek solution to the increasing social disparities and injustices in modern states in their processes of building harmonious societies, so that the theory of distributive justice will display a new vitality.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download