| Peer-Reviewed

Predicting Executive Dysfunctions Based on Attachment and Parenting Styles in Students

Received: 19 December 2021    Accepted: 15 January 2022    Published: 21 January 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Executive functions refer to the use of cognitive processes to control thoughts and emotions. Given the importance and impact of executive functions, it seems that understanding the factors that influence executive functions’ development is useful to prevent individuals’ problems and to help their further promotions. The present study is to predict executive dysfunctions based on parenting styles and attachment styles in students. This is a descriptive correlational study. The statistical population of this study included all students of regular elementary schools in Tabriz, Iran in the academic year of 2018-19, among whom, 700 were selected by multistage clustering sampling method. In the next step, their parents were asked to complete Coolidge neuropsychological and personality scale, the Kinship Center Attachment Questionnaire (KCAQ), and Baumrind parenting styles questionnaire. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. The results showed that positive adjustment development, negative behaviors, permissive style, authoritarian style and authoritative style are correlated with the executive dysfunction. Positive adjustment development, attachment style and authoritative parenting style had a negative correlation, and the attachment style of negative behaviors, and permissive and authoritarian parenting styles had a positive correlation with the executive dysfunctions. The findings of the present study show that attachment and parenting styles in childhood correlate significantly with the development of executive functions and may be considered for prediction of executive dysfunctions.

Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12
Page(s) 14-18
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Parenting Styles, Attachment Styles, Executive Functions

References
[1] Alizadeh H, Zahedipour M (2004). Executive Functions in Children with and Without Developmental Coordination Disorder. Advances in Cognitive Science. 6 (3 and 4): 49-56.
[2] Alloway TP, Alloway RG (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 106 (1), 20-29.
[3] Baumrind D (1991). The Influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance Use. Journal of Early Adolescence. 11 (1): 56-95.
[4] Berk L (2009). Child Development. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
[5] Bernard K, Dozier M (2010). Examining infants' cortisol responses to laboratory tasks among children varying in attachment disorganization: Stress reactivity or return to baseline? Developmental Psychology. 46: 1771-1778.
[6] Bernier A, Carlson SM, Deschênes M, Matte-Gagné C (2012). Social factors inthe development of early executive functioning: a closer look at the caregivingenvironment. Developmental Science. 15 (1): 12–24.
[7] Bernier A, Carlson SM, Whipple N (2010). From external regulation to self-regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Development. 81 (1): 326–339.
[8] Bernier, A., Beauchamp, M. H., Carlson, S. M., & Lalonde, G. (2015). A secure base from which to regulate: Attachment security in toddlerhood as a predictor of executive functioning at school entry. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1177–1189.
[9] Berry D, Blair C, Willoughby M, Granger DA (2012). Salivary alpha-amylase and cortisol in infancy and toddlerhood: Direct and indirect relations with executive functioning and academic ability in childhood. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 37 (10): 1700-1711.
[10] Bridgett D­J, Valentino K, Hayden LC (2012). The contribution of children’s temperamental fear and effortful control to restraint and seclusion during inpatient treatment in a psychiatric hospital. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 43 (6): 821-836.
[11] Brydges CR. Reid CL. Fox AM, Anderson M (2012). A unitary executive function predicts intelligence in children. Intelligence. 40 (5): 458-469.
[12] Buri JR. Parental authority questionnaire. J Pers Assess, 1991; 57 (1): 110-119.
[13] Calkins SD (2011). Caregiving as coregulation: Psychobiological processes and child functioning. In A. Booth, S. M. McHale, & N. S. Landale (Eds.), Biosocial Foundations of Family Processes. New York: Springer. 1: 49–59.
[14] Carlson SM, Zelazo P D, & Faja S (2013). Executive function. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.). Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. New York: The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 1: Body and Mind. 1: 706–743.
[15] Diamond A (2013). Executive Functions. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), Annual Review of Psychology. 64: 135-168.
[16] Friedman NP, Miyake A (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex. 86: 186-204.
[17] Grusec JE, Davidov M (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development. 81: 687-709.
[18] Halse KM (2014). Stability and Predictors of Change in Executive Functions from the Age of 6 to 8. Master thesis. Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
[19] Hughes C (2011). Changes and challenges in 20 years of research into the development of executive functions. Infant and Child Development. 20: 251–271.
[20] Kappenberg ES, Halpern DF (2006). Kinship center attachment questionnaire: development of a caregivercompleted attachment measure for children younger than 6 years. Educ psychol meas. 66 (5): 852-73.
[21] Kopp CB (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology. 18: 199–214.
[22] Laughlin L (2013). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Spring 2011. Current population reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
[23] Minaei A, Nikzad S (2017). The Factor Structure and Validity of the Persian Version of the Baumrind Parenting Style Inventory. Journal of Family Research; 13 (1): 91-108.
[24] Müller U, Baker L, Yeung E (2013). A Developmental Systems Approach to Executive Function. Advances in child development and behavior. (45): 39-66.
[25] Murdock KW. Oddi KB, Bridgett DJ (2013). Cognitive Correlates of Personality Links Between Executive Functioning and the Big Five Personality Traits. Journal of Individual Differences. 34 (2), 97-104.
[26] Neuenschwander R. Roethlisberger M. Cimeli P, Roebers CM. How do different aspects of self-regulation predict successful adaptation to school? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2012; 113 (3), 353-371.
[27] Piotrowski JT, Lapierre MA, & Linebarger DL (2013). Investigating Correlates of Self-Regulation in Early Childhood with a Representative Sample of English-Speaking American Families. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 22 (3): 423-436.
[28] Razza RA, Blair C (2009). Associations among false-belief understanding, executive function, and social competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 30 (3): 332-343.
[29] Reichle B, Franiek S (2009). Erziehungsstil aus elternsicht – deutsche erweiterte version des alabama parenting questionnaire für grundschulkinder. Z. Entwicklungspsychol. Pädagogische Psychol. 41: 12–25.
[30] Riggs NR, Blair CB, Greenberg MT (2004). Concurrent and 2-year longitudinal relations between executive function and the behavior of 1st and 2nd grade children. Child Neuropsychology. 9 (4): 267-276.
[31] Roebers CM (2017). Executive function and metacognition: Towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation. Developmental Review. 45 (1): 31-51.
[32] Soleimany H, Bashash L, Latifian M (2014). Psychometric Properties of the Kinship Center Attachment Questionnaire (KCAQ) of Latency-Aged for Children. 4 (16): 41-63.
[33] Sosic-Vasic Z, Kröner J, Schneider S, Vasic N, Spitzer M, & Streb J (2017). The Association between Parenting Behavior and Executive Functioning in Children and Young Adolescents. Front Psychol. 8: 472-481.
[34] Weinstein N, Deci EL, Ryan RM (2011). Motivational determinants of integrating positive and negative past identities. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100: 527–544.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ayyoub Malek, Karim Abdolmohammadi, Farhad Ghadiri Sourman Abadi, Mina Soltani. (2022). Predicting Executive Dysfunctions Based on Attachment and Parenting Styles in Students. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ayyoub Malek; Karim Abdolmohammadi; Farhad Ghadiri Sourman Abadi; Mina Soltani. Predicting Executive Dysfunctions Based on Attachment and Parenting Styles in Students. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2022, 11(1), 14-18. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ayyoub Malek, Karim Abdolmohammadi, Farhad Ghadiri Sourman Abadi, Mina Soltani. Predicting Executive Dysfunctions Based on Attachment and Parenting Styles in Students. Psychol Behav Sci. 2022;11(1):14-18. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12,
      author = {Ayyoub Malek and Karim Abdolmohammadi and Farhad Ghadiri Sourman Abadi and Mina Soltani},
      title = {Predicting Executive Dysfunctions Based on Attachment and Parenting Styles in Students},
      journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
      volume = {11},
      number = {1},
      pages = {14-18},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20221101.12},
      abstract = {Executive functions refer to the use of cognitive processes to control thoughts and emotions. Given the importance and impact of executive functions, it seems that understanding the factors that influence executive functions’ development is useful to prevent individuals’ problems and to help their further promotions. The present study is to predict executive dysfunctions based on parenting styles and attachment styles in students. This is a descriptive correlational study. The statistical population of this study included all students of regular elementary schools in Tabriz, Iran in the academic year of 2018-19, among whom, 700 were selected by multistage clustering sampling method. In the next step, their parents were asked to complete Coolidge neuropsychological and personality scale, the Kinship Center Attachment Questionnaire (KCAQ), and Baumrind parenting styles questionnaire. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. The results showed that positive adjustment development, negative behaviors, permissive style, authoritarian style and authoritative style are correlated with the executive dysfunction. Positive adjustment development, attachment style and authoritative parenting style had a negative correlation, and the attachment style of negative behaviors, and permissive and authoritarian parenting styles had a positive correlation with the executive dysfunctions. The findings of the present study show that attachment and parenting styles in childhood correlate significantly with the development of executive functions and may be considered for prediction of executive dysfunctions.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Predicting Executive Dysfunctions Based on Attachment and Parenting Styles in Students
    AU  - Ayyoub Malek
    AU  - Karim Abdolmohammadi
    AU  - Farhad Ghadiri Sourman Abadi
    AU  - Mina Soltani
    Y1  - 2022/01/21
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12
    T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    SP  - 14
    EP  - 18
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7845
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.12
    AB  - Executive functions refer to the use of cognitive processes to control thoughts and emotions. Given the importance and impact of executive functions, it seems that understanding the factors that influence executive functions’ development is useful to prevent individuals’ problems and to help their further promotions. The present study is to predict executive dysfunctions based on parenting styles and attachment styles in students. This is a descriptive correlational study. The statistical population of this study included all students of regular elementary schools in Tabriz, Iran in the academic year of 2018-19, among whom, 700 were selected by multistage clustering sampling method. In the next step, their parents were asked to complete Coolidge neuropsychological and personality scale, the Kinship Center Attachment Questionnaire (KCAQ), and Baumrind parenting styles questionnaire. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. The results showed that positive adjustment development, negative behaviors, permissive style, authoritarian style and authoritative style are correlated with the executive dysfunction. Positive adjustment development, attachment style and authoritative parenting style had a negative correlation, and the attachment style of negative behaviors, and permissive and authoritarian parenting styles had a positive correlation with the executive dysfunctions. The findings of the present study show that attachment and parenting styles in childhood correlate significantly with the development of executive functions and may be considered for prediction of executive dysfunctions.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychiatry Research Center, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

  • Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Sahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

  • Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

  • Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Tehran Reaearch Science, Tehran, Iran

  • Sections