Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review

Kalifa Nasiro

doi:doi:10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12

Review Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review

Kalifa Nasiro^*

Published in Plant (Volume 12, Issue 3)

Received: 26 June 2024 Accepted: 12 July 2024 Published: 29 July 2024

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Agricultural intensification increased crop productivity but simplified production with lower diversity of cropping systems, higher genetic uniformity, and a higher uniformity of agricultural landscapes. Associated detrimental effects on the environment and biodiversity as well as the resilience and adaptability of cropping systems to climate change are of growing concern. Crop diversification may stabilize productivity of cropping systems and reduce negative environmental impacts and loss of biodiversity, but a shared understanding of crop diversification including approaches towards a more systematic research is lacking. The current review highlights the use of Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity. Crop diversification can be considered as an attempt to increase the diversity of crops through, e.g. crop rotation, multiple cropping or intercropping, compared to specialized farming with the aim to improve the productivity, stability and delivery of ecosystem services. It can be one measure to develop more sustainable production systems, develop value-chains for minor crops. Crop diversification practices can include higher crop diversity, more diverse crop, mixed cropping; cultivation of grain legumes in otherwise cereal dominated systems, perennial leys or grassland and regionally adapted varieties or variety mixtures. Crop diversification and/or additional diversification measures like variation of seeding time or changing cropping patterns have the potential to lead to higher and more stable yields, increase profitability and lead to greater resilience of agro-ecosystems in the long term. These practices have the potential to make cropping systems more diverse in space, time and genetics. Through a balanced portfolio approach to agricultural sustainability, cropping system performance can be optimized in multiple dimensions, including food and biomass production, profit, energy use, pest management, and environmental impacts.

Published in	Plant (Volume 12, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12
Page(s)	48-65
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Diversification, Intercropping, Crop Rotation, Productivity, Sustainable Agriculture

References

[1]	Barbieri, P, Pellerin, S. and Nesme T. (2017). Comparing crop rotations between organic and conventional farming. Sci Rep 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14271-6
[2]	Bedoussac, L, Journet, EP, Hauggaard-Nielsen, H, Naudin, C, CorreHellou G, Jensen ES, Prieur L, Justes E (2015) Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35(3): 911–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0277-7
[3]	Bell, LW, Moore, AD, and Kirkegaard, JA. (2014). Evolution in crop– livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia. European Journal of Agronomy, 57, 10-20.
[4]	Bianchi, FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke, T. (2006). Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273(1595): 1715–1727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3530
[5]	Bindi, M, & Olesen, JE. (2011). The responses of agriculture in Europe to climate change. Regional Environmental Change, 11(1), 151-158.
[6]	Bommarco, R, Kleijn, D, Potts, SG. (2013). Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends EcolEvol 28(4): 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012
[7]	Boudreau, M. A. Diseases in intercropping fystems. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 499–519.
[8]	Bowles, TM, Atallah, SS, Campbell, EE, Gaudin, ACM, Wieder, WR, Grandy, AS. (2018). Addressing agricultural nitrogen losses in a changing climate. Nat Sustain 1(8): 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0106-0
[9]	Bradshaw, B, Dolan, H, & Smit, B. (2004). Farm-level adaptation to climatic variability and change: crop diversification in the Canadian prairies. Climatic Change, 67(1), 119-141.
[10]	Buhk, C, Alt, M, Steinbauer, MJ, Beierkuhnlein, C, Warren, SD and Jentsch A (2017). Homogenizing and diversifying effects of intensive agricultural land-use on plant species beta diversity in Central Europe — a call to adapt our conservation measures. Sci Total Environ 576: 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.106
[11]	Bybee-Finley, KA.; Mirsky, SB.; Ryan, MR. (2016). Functional diversity in summer annual grass and legume intercrops in the northeastern United States. Crop Sci., 56, 2775.
[12]	Davis, AS, Hill, JD, Chase, CA, Johanns, AM and Liebman, M. (2012). Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. PLoS One 7(10). https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0047149
[13]	Eigenbrode, S. D.; Birch, A. N. E.; Lindzey, S.; Meadow, R.; Snyder, W. E. Review: A mechanistic framework to improve understanding and applications of push-pull systems in pest management. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 53, 202–212.
[14]	Feliciano, D. (2019). A review on the contribution of crop diversification to sustainable development goal 1 “no poverty” in different world regions. Sustain Dev 27(4): 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1923
[15]	Foley, JA, DeFries, R, Asner, GP, Barford, C, Bonan, G, Carpenter, SR, Chapin, FS, Coe, MT, Daily, GC, Gibbs, HK. et al. (2005). Global Consequences of Land Use. Science, 309, 570–574.
[16]	Gan, Y, Hamel, C, O’Donovan, JT, Cutforth, H, Zentner, RP, Campbell, CA, Poppy, L. (2015). Diversifying crop rotations with pulses enhances system productivity. Scientific Reports: 5, 14625.
[17]	Garbach, K, Milder, JC, DeClerck, FAJ, Montenegro de Wit, M, Driscoll, L, Gemmill-Herren, B. (2017). Examining multi-functionality for crop yield and ecosystem services in five systems of agroecological intensification. Int J Agric Sustain 15(1): 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2016.1174810
[18]	Germer, J, Sauerborn, J, Asch, F, de Boer, J, Schreiber, J, Weber, G, Müller, J. (2011). Skyfarming an ecological innovation to enhance global food security. J. Consum. Prot. Food Safety, 6, 237–251.
[19]	Grigg, DB. (1974). The agricultural systems of the world: An evolutionary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 358 pp 11.
[20]	Haughey, E, Suter, M, Hofer, D, Hoekstra, NJ, McElwain, JC, Lüscher, A, Finn, JA. (2018). Higher species richness enhances yield stability in intensively managed grasslands with experimental disturbance. Sci Rep 8(1): 15047. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33262-9
[21]	Hazell, PBR. (2003). The green revolution. In the Oxford encyclopedia of economic history, ed. J. Mokyr. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[22]	Hossain, Z, Johnson, EN, Wang, L, Blackshaw, RE, & Gan, Y. (2019). Comparative analysis of oil and protein content and seed yield of five Brassicaceae oilseeds on the Canadian prairie. Industrial Crops and Products, 136, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.001
[23]	ICIPE, (2007). How Push-Pull Works: A Platform Technology for Improving Livelihoods of Resource Poor Farmers. Available online: http://www.push-pull.net/how_it_works.shtml
[24]	Kahiluoto, H, Kaseva, J, Balek, J, Olesen, JE, Ruiz-Ramos, M, Gobin, A, Kersebaum, KC, Takáč, J, Ruget, F, Ferrise, R, Bezak, P, Capellades, G, Dibari, C, Mäkinen, H, Nendel, C, Ventrella, D, Rodríguez, A, Bindi, M, Trnka, M. (2019). Decline in climate resilience of European wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(1): 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804387115
[25]	Khan, Z.; Midega, C.; Pittchar, J.; Pickett, J.; Bruce, T. (2011). Push-pull technology: A conservation agriculture approach for integrated management of insect pests, weeds and soil health in Africa. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2011, 9, 162–170.
[26]	Lal, R. (2017). Improving soil health and human protein nutrition by pulses-based cropping systems. Advances in Agronomy, 145, 167–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.05.003
[27]	Langellotto, G. A.; Denno, R. F. Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: A meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 2004, 139, 1–10.
[28]	Lin, BB. (2011). Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: Adaptive management for environmental change. Bioscience, 61, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.4
[29]	Liu, K, Johnson, EN, Blackshaw, RE, Hossain, Z and Gan, Y. (2019). Improving the productivity and stability of oilseed cropping systems through crop diversification. Field Crop Res 237: 65–73. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.fcr.2019.03.020
[30]	Lobell, D. B, Schlenker, W and Costa-Roberts, J. (2011). Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science, 333(6042), 616-620.
[31]	Lobell, DB and Field, CB. (2007). Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters, 2(1), 014002.
[32]	Magdoff, F, Lanyon, L and Liebhardt, B. (1997). Nutrient cycling, transformations, and flows: implications for a more sustainable agriculture. Adv Agron 60: 1–73. 13.
[33]	Martin-Guay, MO, Paquette, A, Dupras, J and Rivest, D. (2018). The new Green Revolution: Sustainable intensification of agriculture by intercropping. Sci. Total Environ. 615, 767–772.
[34]	Meynard, JM, Charrier, F, Fares, M, Le Bail, M, Magrini, MB, Charlier, A and Messéan, A. (2018). Socio-technical lock-in hinders crop diversification in France. Agron Sustain Dev 38(5): 54–13. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13593-018-0535-1
[35]	Naylor, R, Steinfeld, H, Falcon, W, Galloway, J, Smil, V, Bradford, E, Alder, J and Mooney, H. (2005). Losing the links between livestock and land. Science, 310(5754), 1621-1622.
[36]	Phelan P, Moloney, AP, McGeough, EJ, Humphreys, J, Bertilsson, J, O’Riordan, E and O’Kiely, P. (2015). Forage legumes for grazing and conserving in ruminant production systems. Crit Rev Plant Sci 34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.898455
[37]	Raseduzzaman, M. and Jensen, ES. (2017). Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Agron., 91, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.09.009
[38]	Ray, DK, Gerber, JS, MacDonald, GK and West, PC. (2015). Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nature Communications, 6.
[39]	Reckling, M, Hecker, JM, Bergkvist, G, Watson, C, Zander, P, Stoddard, F, Eory, V, Topp, K, Maire, J and Bachinger, J. (2016). A cropping system assessment framework - evaluating effects of introducing legumes into crop rotations. Eur J Agron 76: 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.005
[40]	Renard, D and Tilman, D. (2019). National food production stabilized by crop diversity. Nature 571: 257–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019- 1316-y
[41]	Rosa-Schleich, J, Loos, J, Mußhoff, O and Tscharntke, T. (2019). Ecologicaleconomic trade-offs of diversified farming systems – a review. Ecol Econ 160: 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.002
[42]	Rosenzweig, ST, Stromberger, ME and Schipanski, ME. (2018). Intensified dryland crop rotations support greater grain production with fewer inputs. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 264, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.017
[43]	Rusch, A, Chaplin-Kramer, R, Gardiner, MM, Hawro, V, Holland, J, Landis, D, Thies, C, Tscharntke, T, Weisser, WW, Winqvist, C, Woltz, M and Bommarco, R. (2016). Agricultural landscape simplification reduces natural pest control: a quantitative synthesis. Agric Ecosyst.
[44]	Ryschawy, J, Choisis, N, Choisis, JP and Gibon, A. (2012). Paths to last in mixed crop–livestock farming: lessons from an assessment of farm trajectories of change. Animal, 7(04), 673-681.
[45]	Smith, EG, Zentner, RP, Campbell, CA, Lemke, R and Brandt, K. (2017). Long-term crop rotation effects on production, grain quality, profitability, and risk in the northern great plains. Agronomy Journal, 109, 957–967. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.07.0420
[46]	St. Luce, M, Lemke, R, Gan, Y, et al. (2020). Diversifying cropping systems enhances productivity, stability and nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal.; 112: 1517–1536. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20162
[47]	St. Martin, A, Grant, CA, Zebarth, BJ, Ziadi, N, O’Donovan, JT, Blackshaw, RE and Smith, EG. (2015). Legumes can reduce economic optimum nitrogen rates and increase yields in a wheat-canola cropping sequence in western canada. Field Crops Research, 179, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.003
[48]	St. Martin, A, Grant, CA, Zebarth, BJ, Ziadi, N, O’Donovan, JT, Blackshaw, RE and Malhi, S. S. (2016). Corrigendum to “Legumes can reduce economic optimum nitrogen rates and increase yields in a wheat-canola cropping sequence in western Canada” [Field Crops Res. (2015) 12-25]. Field Crops Research, 188, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.002
[49]	Stein, S, Steinmann, HH. (2018). Identifying crop rotation practice by the typification of crop sequence patterns for arable farming systems – a case study from Central Europe. Eur J Agron 92: 30–40. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.09.010
[50]	St-Martin, A. (2017). Benefits of diverse agriculture on crop yield (Doctoral dissertation).
[51]	Therond, O, Duru, M, Roger-Estrade, J and Richard, G. (2017). A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593- 017-0429-7
[52]	Tilman, D, Cassman, KG, Matson, PA, Naylor, R and Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418: 671–677. 7.
[53]	Urruty N, Tailliez-Lefebvre D, Huyghe C (2016) Stability, robustness, vulnerability and resilience of agricultural systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 36(1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0347-5
[54]	Varvel, GE. (2000). Crop rotation and nitrogen effects on normalized grain yields in a long-term study. Agronomy Journal, 92(5), 938-941.
[55]	Vijaya, BAV, Baresel, JP, Weedon, O and Finckh MR. (2019). Effects of ten years organic and conventional farming on early seedling traits of evolving winter wheat composite cross populations. Sci Rep 9(1): 9053. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45300-1
[56]	Wanasundara, JPD, McIntosh, TC, Perera, SP, Withana-Gamage, TS and Mitra, P. (2016). Canola/rapeseed protein-functionality and nutrition. Ol., Corps Gras, Lipides, 23, D407. https://doi.org/ 10.1051/ocl/2016028
[57]	Watson, C, Reckling, M, Preissel, S, Bachinger, J, Bergkvist, G, Kuhlman, T, Lindström, K, Nemecek, T, Topp, C, Vanhatalo, A, Zander, Z, MurphyBokern, D and Stoddard, F. (2017). Grain legume production and use in European agricultural systems. Adv Agron 144(1): 235–303.
[58]	Weißhuhn, P, Reckling, M, Stachow, U and Wiggering, H. (2017). Supporting agricultural ecosystem services through the integration of perennial polycultures into crop rotations. Sustainability 9(12): 2267.
[59]	Wezel, A, Casagrande, M, Celette, F, Vian, JF, Ferrer, A and Peigné, J. (2014). Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7
[60]	Williamson, J. (2018). Extending the Grazing Season—Preparing for the Summer Slump. Available online: https://extension.psu.edu/extending-the-grazing-season-preparing-for-the-summer-slump
[61]	Yang, LN, Pan, ZC, Zhu, W, Wu, EJ, He, DC, Yuan, X, Qin, YY, Wang, Y, Chen, RS, Thrall, PH, Burdon, JJ, Shang, LP, Sui, QJ and Zhan, J. (2019). Enhanced agricultural sustainability through within-species diversification. Nat Sustain 2(1): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893- 018-0201-2

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nasiro, K. (2024). Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review. Plant, 12(3), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nasiro, K. Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review. Plant. 2024, 12(3), 48-65. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nasiro K. Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review. Plant. 2024;12(3):48-65. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12,
  author = {Kalifa Nasiro},
  title = {Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review
},
  journal = {Plant},
  volume = {12},
  number = {3},
  pages = {48-65},
  doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20241203.12},
  abstract = {Agricultural intensification increased crop productivity but simplified production with lower diversity of cropping systems, higher genetic uniformity, and a higher uniformity of agricultural landscapes. Associated detrimental effects on the environment and biodiversity as well as the resilience and adaptability of cropping systems to climate change are of growing concern. Crop diversification may stabilize productivity of cropping systems and reduce negative environmental impacts and loss of biodiversity, but a shared understanding of crop diversification including approaches towards a more systematic research is lacking. The current review highlights the use of Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity. Crop diversification can be considered as an attempt to increase the diversity of crops through, e.g. crop rotation, multiple cropping or intercropping, compared to specialized farming with the aim to improve the productivity, stability and delivery of ecosystem services. It can be one measure to develop more sustainable production systems, develop value-chains for minor crops. Crop diversification practices can include higher crop diversity, more diverse crop, mixed cropping; cultivation of grain legumes in otherwise cereal dominated systems, perennial leys or grassland and regionally adapted varieties or variety mixtures. Crop diversification and/or additional diversification measures like variation of seeding time or changing cropping patterns have the potential to lead to higher and more stable yields, increase profitability and lead to greater resilience of agro-ecosystems in the long term. These practices have the potential to make cropping systems more diverse in space, time and genetics. Through a balanced portfolio approach to agricultural sustainability, cropping system performance can be optimized in multiple dimensions, including food and biomass production, profit, energy use, pest management, and environmental impacts.
},
 year = {2024}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review

AU  - Kalifa Nasiro
Y1  - 2024/07/29
PY  - 2024
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12
T2  - Plant
JF  - Plant
JO  - Plant
SP  - 48
EP  - 65
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0677
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12
AB  - Agricultural intensification increased crop productivity but simplified production with lower diversity of cropping systems, higher genetic uniformity, and a higher uniformity of agricultural landscapes. Associated detrimental effects on the environment and biodiversity as well as the resilience and adaptability of cropping systems to climate change are of growing concern. Crop diversification may stabilize productivity of cropping systems and reduce negative environmental impacts and loss of biodiversity, but a shared understanding of crop diversification including approaches towards a more systematic research is lacking. The current review highlights the use of Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity. Crop diversification can be considered as an attempt to increase the diversity of crops through, e.g. crop rotation, multiple cropping or intercropping, compared to specialized farming with the aim to improve the productivity, stability and delivery of ecosystem services. It can be one measure to develop more sustainable production systems, develop value-chains for minor crops. Crop diversification practices can include higher crop diversity, more diverse crop, mixed cropping; cultivation of grain legumes in otherwise cereal dominated systems, perennial leys or grassland and regionally adapted varieties or variety mixtures. Crop diversification and/or additional diversification measures like variation of seeding time or changing cropping patterns have the potential to lead to higher and more stable yields, increase profitability and lead to greater resilience of agro-ecosystems in the long term. These practices have the potential to make cropping systems more diverse in space, time and genetics. Through a balanced portfolio approach to agricultural sustainability, cropping system performance can be optimized in multiple dimensions, including food and biomass production, profit, energy use, pest management, and environmental impacts.

VL  - 12
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Kalifa Nasiro

Department of Coffee Agronomy, Institute Ethiopian Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Jimma, Ethiopia

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8308-2712

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nasiro, K. (2024). Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review. Plant, 12(3), 48-65. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nasiro, K. Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review. Plant. 2024, 12(3), 48-65. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nasiro K. Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review. Plant. 2024;12(3):48-65. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12,
  author = {Kalifa Nasiro},
  title = {Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review
},
  journal = {Plant},
  volume = {12},
  number = {3},
  pages = {48-65},
  doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20241203.12},
  abstract = {Agricultural intensification increased crop productivity but simplified production with lower diversity of cropping systems, higher genetic uniformity, and a higher uniformity of agricultural landscapes. Associated detrimental effects on the environment and biodiversity as well as the resilience and adaptability of cropping systems to climate change are of growing concern. Crop diversification may stabilize productivity of cropping systems and reduce negative environmental impacts and loss of biodiversity, but a shared understanding of crop diversification including approaches towards a more systematic research is lacking. The current review highlights the use of Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity. Crop diversification can be considered as an attempt to increase the diversity of crops through, e.g. crop rotation, multiple cropping or intercropping, compared to specialized farming with the aim to improve the productivity, stability and delivery of ecosystem services. It can be one measure to develop more sustainable production systems, develop value-chains for minor crops. Crop diversification practices can include higher crop diversity, more diverse crop, mixed cropping; cultivation of grain legumes in otherwise cereal dominated systems, perennial leys or grassland and regionally adapted varieties or variety mixtures. Crop diversification and/or additional diversification measures like variation of seeding time or changing cropping patterns have the potential to lead to higher and more stable yields, increase profitability and lead to greater resilience of agro-ecosystems in the long term. These practices have the potential to make cropping systems more diverse in space, time and genetics. Through a balanced portfolio approach to agricultural sustainability, cropping system performance can be optimized in multiple dimensions, including food and biomass production, profit, energy use, pest management, and environmental impacts.
},
 year = {2024}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review

AU  - Kalifa Nasiro
Y1  - 2024/07/29
PY  - 2024
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12
T2  - Plant
JF  - Plant
JO  - Plant
SP  - 48
EP  - 65
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0677
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.12
AB  - Agricultural intensification increased crop productivity but simplified production with lower diversity of cropping systems, higher genetic uniformity, and a higher uniformity of agricultural landscapes. Associated detrimental effects on the environment and biodiversity as well as the resilience and adaptability of cropping systems to climate change are of growing concern. Crop diversification may stabilize productivity of cropping systems and reduce negative environmental impacts and loss of biodiversity, but a shared understanding of crop diversification including approaches towards a more systematic research is lacking. The current review highlights the use of Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity. Crop diversification can be considered as an attempt to increase the diversity of crops through, e.g. crop rotation, multiple cropping or intercropping, compared to specialized farming with the aim to improve the productivity, stability and delivery of ecosystem services. It can be one measure to develop more sustainable production systems, develop value-chains for minor crops. Crop diversification practices can include higher crop diversity, more diverse crop, mixed cropping; cultivation of grain legumes in otherwise cereal dominated systems, perennial leys or grassland and regionally adapted varieties or variety mixtures. Crop diversification and/or additional diversification measures like variation of seeding time or changing cropping patterns have the potential to lead to higher and more stable yields, increase profitability and lead to greater resilience of agro-ecosystems in the long term. These practices have the potential to make cropping systems more diverse in space, time and genetics. Through a balanced portfolio approach to agricultural sustainability, cropping system performance can be optimized in multiple dimensions, including food and biomass production, profit, energy use, pest management, and environmental impacts.

VL  - 12
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download