Non-uniform production and injection profiles in extended reach horizontal wells invite several production and recovery issues. Downhole flow control devices, along with dynamic reservoir modeling, have been beneficial in regulating flow, improving productivity from the toe section, delaying water breakthrough, reducing water coning, and improving overall reservoir sweep. However, such measures add to substantial completion costs and may not be economical for marginal reservoirs. Using simple slotted liners is a cheaper option but may not be effective in regulating injection/production profiles in the longer term. This research focused on applying “coupled static and dynamic modeling” to examine and compare five different types of completion designs, using data from a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir. Results show that inflow control device (ICD) integrated completions can achieve better recovery than the slotted, pre-perforated, or engineered liners. Engineered-slotted liners perform better than the pre-perforated-slotted liners. The pre-perforated-slotted liners do not show much improvement over open-hole completions. Finally, a hybrid completion design is optimized by combining ICD with engineered-slotted liners, which showed higher well productivity, lower water cut production, and reduced completion cost.
Published in | Petroleum Science and Engineering (Volume 4, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11 |
Page(s) | 1-15 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Horizontal Well Completion, Inflow Control Devices, Limited Entry Liners, Production Optimization, Water Control
[1] | Allen, F., Tooms, P., Conran, G. and Lesso, B. “Extended reach drilling: Breaking the 10-km barrier.” Oilfield Review. Winter 1997. Pp 32-47. |
[2] | Satter, A. and Iqbal, G. M. (2016). “Reservoir Engineering: The Fundamentals, Simulation, and Management of Conventional and Unconventional Recoveries”. ISBN-978-0-12-800219-3. |
[3] | Verma, C. et al. (2017). Drilling Optimization of Extended Reach Multilateral Wells to Maximize Reservoir Contact in Carbonate. SPE-186982. Presented at the Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia Oct 2017. |
[4] | Yang, M. Li, H., Wang, Y. and Jiang, R. (2019). “Numerical Modelling for the Optimum Design of Horizontal Well. Completions with PSCs in Water Drive Reservoirs.” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. Vol- 44. Pp. 5215–32. |
[5] | Chammout O. J., Ghosh, B and Alkhi M. Y. (2017). “Downhole flow controllers in mitigating challenges of long reach horizontal wells: A practical outlook with case studies”. Journal of Petroleum and Gas Engineering. Vol. 8 (9), pp. 90-103. |
[6] | Jha, P., Smith, C. and Metcalfe R. W. (2016). “Insight Into the Heel–Toe Effect of a Long Horizontal Wellbore Based on a Hybrid Numerical Method”. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. Vol. 138 (1): Pp 12905-13. |
[7] | Minulina, P., Al-Sharif, S., Zeito, G. A. and Bouchard, M. J. (2012). “The Design, Implementation and Use of Inflow Control Devices for Improving the Production Performance of Horizontal Wells”. SPE-157453. Presented at SPE International Production and Operations Conference and Exhibition, Doha, Qatar. May 2012. |
[8] | Daneshy, A., Guo, B., Krasnov, V. and Ziminet, S. (2010). “ICD Design: Revisiting Objectives and Techniques. SPE-133234. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, Oct 2010. |
[9] | Garcia, L., Coronado, M. P., Russell, R. D., Garcia, G. A. and Peterson, E. R. (2009). “The First Passive Inflow Control Device That Maximizes Productivity during Every Phase of a Well’s Life”. IPTC-13863. Presented at International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, Dec 2009. |
[10] | . Ouyang, L. (2009). “Practical Consideration of an Inflow-Control Device Application for Reducing Water Production”. SPE-124154. “Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Oct 2009. |
[11] | Aadnoy, B. and Hareland, G. (2009). “Analysis of Inflow Control Devices”. SPE-122824. Presented at Offshore Europe, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, Sept 2009. |
[12] | Gao, C., Rajeswaran, R. T. and Nakagawa, E. Y. (2007). “A literature review on smart well Technology”. SPE-106011. Presented at SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma, USA, March- April 2007. |
[13] | Burtsev, A., Ascanio, F. A., Mollinger, A. M., Kuvshinov, B. and De Rouffignac, E. P. (2006). “Limited Entry Perforations in HVO Recovery: Injection and Production in Horizontal Wells”. SPE-102656. Presented at SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, Russia, 3-6 Oct 2006. |
[14] | Chow, H., Blount, C. G. and Hilleary, N. (2009). “Annular Isolation of Horizontal Slotted Liners with Chemical External-Casing Packers”. SPE-121643. Presented at SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing & Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Woodlands, Texas, March- April 2009. |
[15] | Wang, J., Dale, B. A., Ellison, T. K., Benish, T. G. and Grubert, M. (2008). “Coupled Well and Reservoir Simulation Models to Optimize Completion Design and Operations for Subsurface Control”. SPE-113635. Presented at Europec/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Rome, Italy. June 2008. |
[16] | Thornton, K., Soliman, M. Y. and Jorquera, R. A. (2010). “Optimization of Inflow Control Device Placement and Mechanical Conformance Decisions Using a New Coupled Well-Intervention Simulator”. SPE-139435. Presented at SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Lima, Peru. Dec 2010. |
[17] | Carvajal, G. A., Saldierna, N., Querales, M., Thornton, K. and Loaiza, J. (2013). “Coupling Reservoir and Well Completion Simulators for Intelligent Multi-Lateral Wells: Part-1”. SPE-164815. Presented at EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE Europec, London, UK, June 2013. |
[18] | Grubert, M. A. et al. (2009). “Coupled Completion and Reservoir Simulation Technology for Well Performance Optimization”. SPE-12552. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, USA. Oct 2009. |
APA Style
Bisweswar Ghosh, Omar Jamal Chammout, Mohamad Yousef Alklih, Samuel Osisanya. (2020). Development of Hybridized Completions for Extended Reach Horizontal Wells. Petroleum Science and Engineering, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11
ACS Style
Bisweswar Ghosh; Omar Jamal Chammout; Mohamad Yousef Alklih; Samuel Osisanya. Development of Hybridized Completions for Extended Reach Horizontal Wells. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 4(1), 1-15. doi: 10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11
AMA Style
Bisweswar Ghosh, Omar Jamal Chammout, Mohamad Yousef Alklih, Samuel Osisanya. Development of Hybridized Completions for Extended Reach Horizontal Wells. Pet Sci Eng. 2020;4(1):1-15. doi: 10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11
@article{10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11, author = {Bisweswar Ghosh and Omar Jamal Chammout and Mohamad Yousef Alklih and Samuel Osisanya}, title = {Development of Hybridized Completions for Extended Reach Horizontal Wells}, journal = {Petroleum Science and Engineering}, volume = {4}, number = {1}, pages = {1-15}, doi = {10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pse.20200401.11}, abstract = {Non-uniform production and injection profiles in extended reach horizontal wells invite several production and recovery issues. Downhole flow control devices, along with dynamic reservoir modeling, have been beneficial in regulating flow, improving productivity from the toe section, delaying water breakthrough, reducing water coning, and improving overall reservoir sweep. However, such measures add to substantial completion costs and may not be economical for marginal reservoirs. Using simple slotted liners is a cheaper option but may not be effective in regulating injection/production profiles in the longer term. This research focused on applying “coupled static and dynamic modeling” to examine and compare five different types of completion designs, using data from a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir. Results show that inflow control device (ICD) integrated completions can achieve better recovery than the slotted, pre-perforated, or engineered liners. Engineered-slotted liners perform better than the pre-perforated-slotted liners. The pre-perforated-slotted liners do not show much improvement over open-hole completions. Finally, a hybrid completion design is optimized by combining ICD with engineered-slotted liners, which showed higher well productivity, lower water cut production, and reduced completion cost.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Development of Hybridized Completions for Extended Reach Horizontal Wells AU - Bisweswar Ghosh AU - Omar Jamal Chammout AU - Mohamad Yousef Alklih AU - Samuel Osisanya Y1 - 2020/02/10 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11 DO - 10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11 T2 - Petroleum Science and Engineering JF - Petroleum Science and Engineering JO - Petroleum Science and Engineering SP - 1 EP - 15 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4516 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20200401.11 AB - Non-uniform production and injection profiles in extended reach horizontal wells invite several production and recovery issues. Downhole flow control devices, along with dynamic reservoir modeling, have been beneficial in regulating flow, improving productivity from the toe section, delaying water breakthrough, reducing water coning, and improving overall reservoir sweep. However, such measures add to substantial completion costs and may not be economical for marginal reservoirs. Using simple slotted liners is a cheaper option but may not be effective in regulating injection/production profiles in the longer term. This research focused on applying “coupled static and dynamic modeling” to examine and compare five different types of completion designs, using data from a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir. Results show that inflow control device (ICD) integrated completions can achieve better recovery than the slotted, pre-perforated, or engineered liners. Engineered-slotted liners perform better than the pre-perforated-slotted liners. The pre-perforated-slotted liners do not show much improvement over open-hole completions. Finally, a hybrid completion design is optimized by combining ICD with engineered-slotted liners, which showed higher well productivity, lower water cut production, and reduced completion cost. VL - 4 IS - 1 ER -