Thermal comfort in learning environments influences the student’s focus and learning productivity. This study aims to evaluate and compare the adaptive thermal comfort of schoolchildren and their teachers in naturally ventilated primary schools in some selected cities in Imo State Nigeria. To achieve these objectives, the study analyzed the data collected from 330 pupils and 44 teachers in six surveyed classrooms in two types of classroom buildings. The recorded data in the surveyed classrooms consisted of four environmental factors and two personal factors. At the same time, the subjects filled out the questionnaires asking them about thermal sensation and thermal preferences against the classrooms’ thermal requirements. The results of the measurements showed that the indoor mean air temperature, relative humidity, and air velocity were 29.1°C, 71.2%, and 0.19m/s, respectively. The mean thermal sensation votes of the children were +0.16 while that of their teachers was +0.58. The preferred temperatures were 27.4°C and 29.4°C for the schoolchildren and the teachers, respectively. Furthermore, the comfort range of the students was between 25.8°C - 31.6°C, and that of the teachers was between 28.0°C - 29.9°C. Based on the results of this study conducted in primary school buildings located in warm and humid climates, the thermal comfort perception of children and adults differ. This information will serve as a guide to professionals in the built environment, especially architects when designing primary school buildings in the warm and humid climates.
| Published in | Research & Development (Volume 4, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15 |
| Page(s) | 27-39 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Classrooms, Schoolchildren, Teachers, Temperature, Thermal Comfort
| [1] | Jiang, J., Wang, D., Liu, Y., Xu, Y., & Liu, J. (2018). A study on pupils’ learning performance and thermal comfort of primary schools in China. Building and Environment, 134, 102–113. |
| [2] | Humphreys, M. A., & Hancock, M. (2007). Do people like to feel ‘neutral’?: Exploring the variation of the desired thermal sensation on the ASHRAE scale. Energy and Buildings, 39 (7), 867–874. |
| [3] | Korsavi, S. S., & Montazami, A. (2020). Children’s Thermal Comfort and Adaptive Behaviours; UK Primary Schools during Non-heating and Heating Seasons. Energy and Buildings, 10857. |
| [4] | Zomorodian, Z. S., Tahsildoost, M., & Hafezi, M. (2016). Thermal comfort in educational buildings: A review article. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 895–906. |
| [5] | Falk, B., & Dotan, R. (2008). Children’s thermoregulation during exercise in the heat-a revisit. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 33 (2), 420–427. |
| [6] | Haddad, S., Osmond, P., & King, S. (2017). Revisiting thermal comfort models in Iranian classrooms during the warm season. Building Research & Information, 45 (4), 457–473. |
| [7] | Nicol, F., Humphreys, M., & Roaf, S. (2012). Adaptive thermal comfort: principles and practice. Routledge. |
| [8] | Trebilcock, M., Soto-Munoz, J., Yanez, M., & Figueroa-San Martin, R. (2017). The right to comfort: A field study on adaptive thermal comfort in free-running primary schools in Chile. Building and Environment, 114, 455–469. |
| [9] | Nicol, F. (2004). Adaptive thermal comfort standards in the hot–humid tropics. Energy and Buildings, 36 (7), 628–637. |
| [10] | Montazami, A., & Nicol, F. (2013). Overheating in schools: comparing existing and new guidelines. Building Resea rch & Information, 41 (3), 317–329. |
| [11] | Yao, R., Li, B., & Liu, J. (2009). A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort–Adaptive Predicted Mean Vote (aPMV). Building and Environment, 44 (10), 2089–2096. |
| [12] | Indraganti, M. (2010). Using the adaptive model of thermal comfort for obtaining indoor neutral temperature: findings from a field study in Hyderabad, India. Building and Environment, 45 (3), 519–536. |
| [13] | de Dear, R., Kim, J., Candido, C., & Deuble, M. (2015). Adaptive thermal comfort in Australian school classrooms. Building Research & Information, 43 (3), 383–398. |
| [14] | Mishra, A. K., & Ramgopal, M. (2015). A thermal comfort field study of naturally ventilated classrooms in Kharagpur, India. Building and Environment, 92, 396–406. |
| [15] | Trebilock, M., & Figueroa, R. (2014). Thermal comfort in primary schools: a field study in Chile. Counting the Cost of Comfort in a Changing World, 10–13. |
| [16] | ASHRAE, A. (2017). Standard 55-2017. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Journal of Biometeorology, 34 (4), 259–265. |
| [17] | Martinez-Molina, A., Boarin, P., Tort-Ausina, I., & Vivancos, J. L. (2017). Postoccupancy evaluation of a historic primary school in Spain: comparing PMV, TSV and PD for teachers' and pupils' thermal comfort. Building and Environment, 117 (May 2017), 248-259. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.03.01. |
| [18] | Karyono, T. H., & Delyuzir, R. D. (2016). Thermal comfort studies of primary school students in Tangerang, Indonesia. Proceedings of 9th Windsor Conference, Making Comfort Relevant opportunities of female and male high school students. Journal of Building Engineering, 101365. |
| [19] | Teli, D., Jentsch, M. F., & James, P. A. B. (2012). Naturally ventilated classrooms: An assessment of existing comfort models for predicting the thermal sensation and preference of primary school children. Energy and Buildings, 53, 166–182. |
| [20] | Montazami, A., Gaterell, M., Nicol, F., Lumley, M., & Thoua, C. (2017). Developing an algorithm to illustrate the likelihood of the dissatisfaction rate with relation to the indoor temperature in naturally ventilated classrooms. Building and Environment, 111, 61–71. |
| [21] | Korsavi, S. S., & Montazami, A. (2019). Developing a valid method to study adaptive behaviours with regard to IEQ in primary schools. Building and Environment, 153, 1–16.. |
| [22] | Zhang, H., Arens, E., Fard, S. A., Huizenga, C., Paliaga, G., Brager, G., & Zagreus, L. (2007). Air movement preferences observed in office buildings. International Journal of Biometeorology, 51 (5), 349–360. |
| [23] | Wong, N. H., & Khoo, S. S. (2003). Thermal comfort in classrooms in the tropics. Energy and Buildings, 35 (4), 337–351. |
| [24] | Al-Khatri, H., Alwetaishi, M., & Gadi, M. B. (2020). Exploring thermal comfort experience and adaptive opportunities of female and male high school students. Journal of Building Engineering, 101365. |
| [25] | Humphreys, M. A. (1977). A study of the thermal comfort of primary school children in summer. Building and Environment, 12 (4), 231–239. |
| [26] | Mishra, A. K., & Ramgopal, M. (2013). Field studies on human thermal comfort—an overview. Building and Environment, 64, 94–106. |
| [27] | Munonye, C. C & Ji, Y. (2018), Rating the components of indoor environmental quality in student’s classrooms in warm and humid climate, Uli Nigeria, African Journal of Environmental Research 1 (2) pp. 118-129. |
APA Style
Charles Munonye, Michael Ngobili, Chukwunonso Umeora, Ifebi Oluchi, Nkechi Maduka, et al. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Comfort Temperature of School Children and Their Teachers. Research & Development, 4(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15
ACS Style
Charles Munonye; Michael Ngobili; Chukwunonso Umeora; Ifebi Oluchi; Nkechi Maduka, et al. Comparative Analysis of Comfort Temperature of School Children and Their Teachers. Res. Dev. 2023, 4(1), 27-39. doi: 10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15
AMA Style
Charles Munonye, Michael Ngobili, Chukwunonso Umeora, Ifebi Oluchi, Nkechi Maduka, et al. Comparative Analysis of Comfort Temperature of School Children and Their Teachers. Res Dev. 2023;4(1):27-39. doi: 10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15,
author = {Charles Munonye and Michael Ngobili and Chukwunonso Umeora and Ifebi Oluchi and Nkechi Maduka and Chijioke Onwuzuligbo},
title = {Comparative Analysis of Comfort Temperature of School Children and Their Teachers},
journal = {Research & Development},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
pages = {27-39},
doi = {10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rd.20230401.15},
abstract = {Thermal comfort in learning environments influences the student’s focus and learning productivity. This study aims to evaluate and compare the adaptive thermal comfort of schoolchildren and their teachers in naturally ventilated primary schools in some selected cities in Imo State Nigeria. To achieve these objectives, the study analyzed the data collected from 330 pupils and 44 teachers in six surveyed classrooms in two types of classroom buildings. The recorded data in the surveyed classrooms consisted of four environmental factors and two personal factors. At the same time, the subjects filled out the questionnaires asking them about thermal sensation and thermal preferences against the classrooms’ thermal requirements. The results of the measurements showed that the indoor mean air temperature, relative humidity, and air velocity were 29.1°C, 71.2%, and 0.19m/s, respectively. The mean thermal sensation votes of the children were +0.16 while that of their teachers was +0.58. The preferred temperatures were 27.4°C and 29.4°C for the schoolchildren and the teachers, respectively. Furthermore, the comfort range of the students was between 25.8°C - 31.6°C, and that of the teachers was between 28.0°C - 29.9°C. Based on the results of this study conducted in primary school buildings located in warm and humid climates, the thermal comfort perception of children and adults differ. This information will serve as a guide to professionals in the built environment, especially architects when designing primary school buildings in the warm and humid climates.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Analysis of Comfort Temperature of School Children and Their Teachers AU - Charles Munonye AU - Michael Ngobili AU - Chukwunonso Umeora AU - Ifebi Oluchi AU - Nkechi Maduka AU - Chijioke Onwuzuligbo Y1 - 2023/03/15 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15 DO - 10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15 T2 - Research & Development JF - Research & Development JO - Research & Development SP - 27 EP - 39 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7057 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20230401.15 AB - Thermal comfort in learning environments influences the student’s focus and learning productivity. This study aims to evaluate and compare the adaptive thermal comfort of schoolchildren and their teachers in naturally ventilated primary schools in some selected cities in Imo State Nigeria. To achieve these objectives, the study analyzed the data collected from 330 pupils and 44 teachers in six surveyed classrooms in two types of classroom buildings. The recorded data in the surveyed classrooms consisted of four environmental factors and two personal factors. At the same time, the subjects filled out the questionnaires asking them about thermal sensation and thermal preferences against the classrooms’ thermal requirements. The results of the measurements showed that the indoor mean air temperature, relative humidity, and air velocity were 29.1°C, 71.2%, and 0.19m/s, respectively. The mean thermal sensation votes of the children were +0.16 while that of their teachers was +0.58. The preferred temperatures were 27.4°C and 29.4°C for the schoolchildren and the teachers, respectively. Furthermore, the comfort range of the students was between 25.8°C - 31.6°C, and that of the teachers was between 28.0°C - 29.9°C. Based on the results of this study conducted in primary school buildings located in warm and humid climates, the thermal comfort perception of children and adults differ. This information will serve as a guide to professionals in the built environment, especially architects when designing primary school buildings in the warm and humid climates. VL - 4 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: