To tackle the feed shortage, fodder oat is one of improved fodder crops highly recognized mainly in the highland areas. However, the performance of fodder oat sown in different time vary in yield and quality parameters and hence identifying the proper time of sowing date is critical for production of high biomass and quality fodder oat. Thus, the study was conducted to determine the appropriate sowing time of oat. Accordingly five sowing times (mid-June, late June to early July, mid-July, late July to early August and mid-August) were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The results indicated that sowing time had a significant (p < 0.05) effect on plant height and number of tillers per plant. Leaf to stem ratio was significantly (p < 0.05) affected due to sowing time only at Kofele site. Dry matter (DM) and seed yield were also significantly (p < 0.05) different among sowing time at both sites with the maximum yield recorded at early sowing time. The maximum DM yield (7.5 t/ha to 13.9 t/ha) was recorded from oat sown in mid-June followed by oat sown in late June to early July (8.0 t/ha to 10.8 t/ha) at both sites, while the lowest DM yield (1.13 to 3.3 t/ha) were obtained from oat sown in mid-August. Likewise, the highest seed yield (20.1 to 22.8 qt/ha) were recorded from oat sown in mid-June followed by (18.9 qt/ha to 21.8 qt/ha) in late June to early July while the least seed yield (4.1 qt/ha to 4.8 qt/ha) produced from oat sown in mid-August. The higher yield in earlier sowing time may be due to the good weather conditions that prevailed during the earlier sowing period which favors for plant height and number of tillers per plants. On the other hands, ADF and CP contents of oat were significantly (p<0.05) influenced by sowing times. Therefore, it can be concluded that sowing oat from mid-June to early July is recommended to maximize both the yield and nutritive value of oats in the study areas. To minimize the risks of lodging while sustaining high yield performance, further study is required on agronomic management and to select lodging tolerant oat varieties.
Published in | Reports (Volume 5, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11 |
Page(s) | 33-42 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Dry Matter Yield, Seed Yield, Sowing Time, Oat, Lodging
Source of Variation | DF | PH | DDS | Tillers Per Plant | LSR | DM Yield | Seed Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sowing time | 4 | 5301.8** | 6.69*** | 59.5* | 0.94** | 13.38** | 680.1*** |
Year | 1 | 1874.2* | 150.4*** | 62.6* | 15.8** | 3.7NS | 31.1* |
Location | 1 | 358.5NS | 1782.1*** | 8.1NS | 0.6NS | 3.8NS | 8.6NS |
Sowing time *Year | 4 | 57.3NS | 6.8NS | 35.8** | 0.4NS | 4.13NS | 16.9* |
Sowing time *location | 4 | 466.5NS | 7.25** | 1.73NS | 2.3* | 2.77NS | 9.29NS |
Sowing time *location* Year | 5 | 218.3NS | 53.2NS | 2.78NS | 0.21NS | 14.56** | 4.56NS |
Error | 192.9 | 0.66 | 1.62 | 0.54 | 1.99 | 3.57 |
Sowing times | Plant height (cm) | Tillers per plant |
---|---|---|
Mid-June | 140.7a | 17.7a |
Late June to early July | 139.6a | 16.8a |
Mid-July | 126.5b | 16.5a |
Late July to early August | 112.3c | 13.7b |
Mid-August | 90.5d | 12.5b |
Mean | 121.9 | 15.46 |
CV (%) | 12.7 | 15.1 |
LSD (0.05) | 12.64 | 1.91 |
Sowing times | Days to dough stage | Leaf to stem ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dodola | Kofele | Dodola | Kofele | |
Mid-June | 101.2 | 113.3 | 0.91 | 0.90ab |
Late June to early July | 100.0 | 111.0 | 0.87 | 0.89b |
Mid-July | 102.8 | 111.0 | 0.83 | 0.93a |
Late July to early August | 100.0 | 111.7 | 0.85 | 0.89b |
Mid-August | 101.0 | 112.5 | 0.84 | 0.88b |
Mean | 101.0 | 111.9 | 0.86 | 0.89 |
CV (%) | 4.0 | 2.6 | 9.16 | 2.4 |
LSD (0.05) | NS | NS | NS | 0.04 |
Sowing time | Dodola | Kofele | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
2021/22 | 2022/23 | 2021/22 | 2022/23 | |
Mid-June | 13.9a | 7.5ab | 8.5a | 11.2a |
Late June to early July | 10.8a | 8.0a | 9.2a | 9.5ab |
Mid-July | 7.3b | 6.2b | 7.4ab | 8.3b |
Late July to early August | 3.9bc | 3.3c | 5.3b | 4.9c |
Mid-August | 1.13c | 2.6c | 2.4c | 3.3c |
Mean | 7.42 | 5.54 | 6.55 | 7.4 |
CV (%) | 25.4 | 17.3 | 22.9 | 14.8 |
LSD (0.05) | 3.43 | 1.74 | 2.73 | 2.0 |
Sowing time | 2021/22 | 2022/23 |
---|---|---|
Mid-June | 22.8a | 20.1a |
Late June to early July | 21.8a | 18.9a |
Mid-July | 16.6b | 12.8b |
Late July to early August | 7.0c | 8.6c |
Mid-August | 4.1d | 4.8d |
Mean | 14.5 | 13.0 |
CV (%) | 15.2 | 14.5 |
LSD (0.05) | 2.62 | 2.25 |
Sowing times | Lodging (%) | Actual yield (t/ha) | Yield loss due to lodging (t/ha) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dodola | Kofele | Mean | DM yield | Seed yield | DM yield | Seed yield | |
Mid-June | 16.8 | 19.2 | 18 | 10.31 | 21.46 | 1.86 | 3.86 |
Late June to early July | 7.2 | 10.3 | 8.75 | 9.37 | 20.38 | 0.82 | 1.78 |
Mid-July | 1.3 | 2.2 | 1.75 | 7.29 | 14.72 | 0.13 | 0.26 |
Late July to early August | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.34 | 7.8 | ||
Mid-August | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.35 | 4.43 |
Sowing time | DM (%) | ASH (%) | NDF (%) | ADF (%) | CP (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mid-June | 93.4 | 12.0 | 47.4 | 19.4c | 10.8a |
Late June to early July | 93.2 | 12.5 | 46.8 | 22.3ab | 10.9a |
Mid-July | 93.5 | 12.3 | 46.7 | 21.1abc | 10.0ab |
Late July to early August | 93.6 | 12.5 | 47.4 | 20.3bc | 9.8b |
Mid-August | 93.0 | 11.8 | 47.2 | 22.8a | 10.1ab |
Mean | 93.4 | 12.2 | 47.1 | 21.2 | 10.4 |
CV (%) | 3.2 | 16.1 | 6.2 | 8.7 | 9.0 |
LSD (0.05) | NS | NS | NS | 2.2 | 0.96 |
ADF | Acid Detergent Fiber |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
DM | Dry Matter |
CP | Crude Protein |
CV | Coefficient Variation |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
NDF | Neutral Detergent Fiber |
[1] | Abebe, M., Tafese, B. and Adane, H. (2014). Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars isolated from food of bovine origin in selected Woredas of Tigray, Ethiopia. World Journal of Medical Sciences. 11(3): 342-347. |
[2] | Dereje Fekadu, Seyoum Bediye, Aemiro Kehaliw, Tadesse Daba, Getu Kitaw and Getnet Assefa (2010). Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) for determination of chemical entities of natural pasture from Ethiopia, Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. |
[3] | Irfan M., Ansar M., Sher A., Wasaya A., Sattar A., (2016). Improving Forage Yield and Morphology of Oat Varieties through Various Row Spacing and Nitrogen Application. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 26(6,): 2016, 1718-1724. |
[4] | Niazi, I. A. K., Akhtar, S., Kohli, S., Naveed, A., Rauf, S., & Shehzad, M. (2020). Oat (Avena sativa L.) advanced lines outperform existing cultivars for forage yield and its components under terminal heat stress. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 57(2). |
[5] | Shaker, A. M., Shaimaa Ibrahem, M. and Salih Mizel, M. (2016). Determined the Oat (Avena sativa L.) genotype sresponding to different planting times in southern Iraq. Int. Net. of Nat. Sci. 9(6): 33-43. |
[6] | Singh M., Chauhan A., Kumar R., Joshi D., Soni D. and Meena V. (2017). Dual purpose barley as affected by time of sowing, varieties and stage of harvesting. Agricultural Research CommunicationCentrewww.arccjo |
[7] | Marion Studhalter J., Jinwook K., Holly B., Nathan M., and Joshua N. (2023). Row spacing, seeding depth, seeding rate, and trinexapac-ethyl effects on oat yield and lodging. Journal of Crop Science |
[8] | Wu, W. and Ma, B. L. (2016). A new method for assessing plant lodging and the impact of management options on lodging in canola crop production. Sci. Rep. 6, 31890. |
[9] | James K., Daniel M. and Mugendi N. (2008). Combining Napier grass with leguminous shrubs in counter hedgerows controls soil erosion without competing with crops. |
[10] | Van Soest, P. J. and Robertson, J. B. (1985) Analysis of Forages and Fibrous Foods a Laboratory Manual for Animal Science. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. |
[11] | AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Methods 925.10, 65.17, 974.24, 992.16. |
[12] | Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. (1984). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd McGraw Hill Book Co., Singapore. |
[13] | Naveena B., Shekara B., Vishwanath A., Kalyana M., and Chikkarugi N. (2021). Effect of times of sowing and nitrogen levels on growth and seed yield of fodder oats (Avena sativa L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal 10(12): 2752-2756. |
[14] | Dar N. A., Singh K. N., Latief Ahmad, Sofi J. A., Elyass Bhat M. and Kotru R. (2014). Influence of times of sowing, cultivars and different fertility levels on fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) under temperate conditions of Kashmir valley, Range Mgmt. & Agroforestry 35(1). |
[15] | Rashid, R. M., Ranjha, A. M., Waqas, M., Hannan, A., Bilal, A., Saeed, A., and Zafar, M. (2010). Effect of P fertilizers on yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.) fodder on two different textured calcareous soils. Soils & Environment 26(1): 3 3-45. |
[16] | Sharma, S. K. and Bhunia, S. R. (2001). Response of oat (Avena sativa L.) to cutting management, method of sowing and nitrogen. Indian Journal of Agronomy 46(3): 563-567. |
[17] | Shou-Chen M., Tong-Chao W., Xiao-Kang G., and Xia Z. (2018). Effect of sowing time and seeding rate on yield components and water use efficiency of winter wheat by regulating the growth redundancy and physiological traits of root and shoot. Journal of ScienceDirect Volume 221, 15 May 2018, Pages 166-174. |
[18] | Dawit Abate and Mulusew Fikere (2017). Performance of Fodder Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Yield and Yield Attributes in the Highland of Bale. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare Vol. 7, No. 19, 2017. |
[19] | Intikhab A., Khan U., Khan M., Ur-Rasool F., Bhat R., Mubarak T., Bhat M. and Rasool S. (2013). Effect of sowing times, fertility levels and cutting managements on growth, yield and quality of oats (Avena sativa L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 8(7), pp. 648-651, 28. |
[20] | Pathan, S. H., Bhilare, R. L., Nawales, K. S. and Jadhav, V. T. (2007). Responce of multicut oat varieties to nitrogen levels. Forage Research 32(4) 269-70. |
[21] | Sharma, N. K. (2003). Effect of sowing time and cutting management on fodder yield of oat cultivars. Current Agriculture 27(1-2) 61-63. |
[22] | Zaman S. A., Al-dulaimi, Maher H. S., Al-Asady and Husham S. Al. (2021). Effect of sowing time and planting distance on growth and yield of Oat, Journal of Ecology Environment & Conservation 27(1): pp. (410-415). |
[23] | Al-dulaimi ZSA, Al-Asady MHS, and Ali HS. (2021). Effect of sowing time and planting distance on growth and yield of Oat. Ecology, environment and conservation 2021; 27(1): 410-415. |
[24] | Murali B., Susheela R., Shanti M., and Shashikala T. (2021). Effect of time of sowing, seed rate, and variety on seed yield of oat. The Pharma Innovation Journal 2021; 10(11): 1263-1266. |
[25] | Carolyn King (2020). Limiting lodging in oat. Top Crop Manager Newsletter |
[26] | Khakwani A., Baloch M., Nadim M., Zubair M., Shah I., and Khan A. (2010). Lodging: A determining factor in reducing yield and yield structure of wheat. Sarhad J. Agric. 26(2): 235-239. |
[27] | Waheed A, Waqas A, Shehzad MA, Shahid M. (2012). Nitrogen and phosphorus: impact on forage oat (Avena sativa L.) growth, yield and its quality attributes. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 49(4): 473-479. |
[28] | Bhilare RL, Joshi YP. (2008). Response of oats (Avena sativa L.) to nitrogen levels under different cutting management. J Maharashtra agric Univ; 33(3): 312-314. |
[29] | Sumanth Kumar GV, Sukanya TS, Jayaramaiah R, Somashekar KS and Pratima Ningaraddi Morab (2021). Green fodder yield and quality of fodder oats (Avena sativa) as influenced by dates of sowing and nitrogen levels in Southern transition zone of Karnataka. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 10(1): 1475-1479. |
[30] | Harpreet Singh Dhillon and Kamaljeet Kaur Sidhu (2020). Effect of Cutting Schedule on Fodder Yield and Quality of Staggered Sown Oats. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 9(9): 2935-2941. |
[31] | Longyu Hou, Wenming Bai, Qiangqiang Zhang, Yahong Liu, Hailian Sun, Yingluo Luo, Shihuan Song, Wen-Hao Zhang (2021). A new model of two-sown regime for oat forage production in an alpine region of northern China. |
[32] | Reddya B. V., Sanjana Reddya, F. Bidingera, M. Blu¨mmel (2003). Crop management factors influencing yield and quality of crop residues. International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. |
[33] | El-Hattab, A. H., Harb, M. Y., (1991). Effect of planting dates and nitrogen levels on forage yield and quality in sorghum sudangrass hybrid in the Central Jordan Valley. Dirasat Series B, Pure Appl. Sci. 18, 7-25. |
APA Style
Wana, D., Abate, D., Tilahun, M., Husen, N. (2025). Effects of Sowing Time on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Nutritive Quality of Fodder Oat at Dodola and Kofele Districts of West Arsi Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia. Reports, 5(3), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11
ACS Style
Wana, D.; Abate, D.; Tilahun, M.; Husen, N. Effects of Sowing Time on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Nutritive Quality of Fodder Oat at Dodola and Kofele Districts of West Arsi Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia. Reports. 2025, 5(3), 33-42. doi: 10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11
@article{10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11, author = {Daniel Wana and Dawit Abate and Meseret Tilahun and Nebi Husen}, title = {Effects of Sowing Time on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Nutritive Quality of Fodder Oat at Dodola and Kofele Districts of West Arsi Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia }, journal = {Reports}, volume = {5}, number = {3}, pages = {33-42}, doi = {10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.reports.20250503.11}, abstract = {To tackle the feed shortage, fodder oat is one of improved fodder crops highly recognized mainly in the highland areas. However, the performance of fodder oat sown in different time vary in yield and quality parameters and hence identifying the proper time of sowing date is critical for production of high biomass and quality fodder oat. Thus, the study was conducted to determine the appropriate sowing time of oat. Accordingly five sowing times (mid-June, late June to early July, mid-July, late July to early August and mid-August) were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The results indicated that sowing time had a significant (p < 0.05) effect on plant height and number of tillers per plant. Leaf to stem ratio was significantly (p < 0.05) affected due to sowing time only at Kofele site. Dry matter (DM) and seed yield were also significantly (p < 0.05) different among sowing time at both sites with the maximum yield recorded at early sowing time. The maximum DM yield (7.5 t/ha to 13.9 t/ha) was recorded from oat sown in mid-June followed by oat sown in late June to early July (8.0 t/ha to 10.8 t/ha) at both sites, while the lowest DM yield (1.13 to 3.3 t/ha) were obtained from oat sown in mid-August. Likewise, the highest seed yield (20.1 to 22.8 qt/ha) were recorded from oat sown in mid-June followed by (18.9 qt/ha to 21.8 qt/ha) in late June to early July while the least seed yield (4.1 qt/ha to 4.8 qt/ha) produced from oat sown in mid-August. The higher yield in earlier sowing time may be due to the good weather conditions that prevailed during the earlier sowing period which favors for plant height and number of tillers per plants. On the other hands, ADF and CP contents of oat were significantly (p<0.05) influenced by sowing times. Therefore, it can be concluded that sowing oat from mid-June to early July is recommended to maximize both the yield and nutritive value of oats in the study areas. To minimize the risks of lodging while sustaining high yield performance, further study is required on agronomic management and to select lodging tolerant oat varieties.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of Sowing Time on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Nutritive Quality of Fodder Oat at Dodola and Kofele Districts of West Arsi Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Daniel Wana AU - Dawit Abate AU - Meseret Tilahun AU - Nebi Husen Y1 - 2025/07/21 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11 DO - 10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11 T2 - Reports JF - Reports JO - Reports SP - 33 EP - 42 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7146 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20250503.11 AB - To tackle the feed shortage, fodder oat is one of improved fodder crops highly recognized mainly in the highland areas. However, the performance of fodder oat sown in different time vary in yield and quality parameters and hence identifying the proper time of sowing date is critical for production of high biomass and quality fodder oat. Thus, the study was conducted to determine the appropriate sowing time of oat. Accordingly five sowing times (mid-June, late June to early July, mid-July, late July to early August and mid-August) were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The results indicated that sowing time had a significant (p < 0.05) effect on plant height and number of tillers per plant. Leaf to stem ratio was significantly (p < 0.05) affected due to sowing time only at Kofele site. Dry matter (DM) and seed yield were also significantly (p < 0.05) different among sowing time at both sites with the maximum yield recorded at early sowing time. The maximum DM yield (7.5 t/ha to 13.9 t/ha) was recorded from oat sown in mid-June followed by oat sown in late June to early July (8.0 t/ha to 10.8 t/ha) at both sites, while the lowest DM yield (1.13 to 3.3 t/ha) were obtained from oat sown in mid-August. Likewise, the highest seed yield (20.1 to 22.8 qt/ha) were recorded from oat sown in mid-June followed by (18.9 qt/ha to 21.8 qt/ha) in late June to early July while the least seed yield (4.1 qt/ha to 4.8 qt/ha) produced from oat sown in mid-August. The higher yield in earlier sowing time may be due to the good weather conditions that prevailed during the earlier sowing period which favors for plant height and number of tillers per plants. On the other hands, ADF and CP contents of oat were significantly (p<0.05) influenced by sowing times. Therefore, it can be concluded that sowing oat from mid-June to early July is recommended to maximize both the yield and nutritive value of oats in the study areas. To minimize the risks of lodging while sustaining high yield performance, further study is required on agronomic management and to select lodging tolerant oat varieties. VL - 5 IS - 3 ER -