Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS

Yusuf Yildiz; Recep Karadag; Irmak Cengiz

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS

Yusuf Yildiz, Recep Karadag, Irmak Cengiz

Published in Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry (Volume 9, Issue 2)

Received: 8 April 2021 Accepted: 28 April 2021 Published: 8 May 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Generally, more sophisticated techniques such as, flame atomic absorption (AAS), inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP-MS), and UV/Visible Spectrophotometer were used to determine trace iron metals in pickling (acid cleaning), and passivating stainless steel solutions. Simple and novel spectrophotometric methods are described for simultaneous determination of iron. While these techniques provide excellent sensitivity and selectivity. The results were found to be in satisfactory agreement (shows no significant difference) with those acquired by the flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS), UV-Vis Spectrometer, and ICP/MS techniques. The results shows that the concentration of iron are very close each other (less than 5.0%) in the pickling and passivating solutions.

Published in	Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11
Page(s)	32-38
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Acid Cleaning (Pickling) Solution, Passivating Solution, Iron Determination, ICP-MS, UV-VIS Spectrophotometer, and FAAS

References

[1]	P. Ugo, L. Moretto, A. De Boni, P. Scopece, and G. Mazzocchin, Anal. Chim, Acta, 474, 147-160 (2002).
[2]	C. A. Sahin, I. Tokgoz, and S. Berktas, J. Hazard. Mater. 181, 359-365 (2010).
[3]	P. M. Harrison, Clin. Toxicol., 4, 529-544 (1971).
[4]	B. K. Adebayo, S. Ayejuyo, H. K. Okoro, and B. Ximba, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10, 16051- 16057 (2013).
[5]	ASM Handbook. ASM International Handbook Committee. (10^th ed.). Materials Park, Ohio. ISBN 9780871703842. OCLC 21034891.
[6]	American Electrorplaters and Surface Finishers Society (2002). Proceedings AESF SUR/FIN 2002: Annual International Technical Conference June 24-27, 2002, Chicago, IL. Orlando, Fl: American Electroplaters and Surface Finishers Society.
[7]	Eagleson, Mary (1994). Concise Encyclopedia Chemistry (revised ed.). Walter de Gruyter. p. 834. ISBN 978-3-11-011451-5.
[8]	Monroe AS9100D&ISO 9001:2015 2990 Technology Dr. Rochester Hills, MI 48309.
[9]	Y. Yildiz, A. Jan, S. Patel. Fluoride Determination in Pickling Solution of Stainless Steel by Ion Selective Electrode World Journal of Applied Chemistry, March 2018.
[10]	Bohler Welding Nordic AB. Pickling Handbook. Surface Treatment of Stainless Steel.
[11]	Avesta Sheffield Corrosion. Handbook for Stainless Steels, 1999.
[12]	ASTM A 380/A380 M-13 Standard Practice for Cleaning, Descaling, and Passivation of Stainless Steel Parts, Equipment, and Systems; ASTM Committee of Standard. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013. www.astm.org
[13]	Standard Operating Procedures. Determination of Metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Methods. (EPA/SW-846 Methods 30115/3050B/6010B
[14]	Y. Yildiz, A. Jan, L. Pendyala, B. Yildiz Determination of Tin in Trityl Candesartan by UV-VIS Spectrophotometer using Phenylfluorone. World Journal of Applied Chemistry, October 20, 2107, 2 (4): 134-13
[15]	Y. Yildiz, M. Kotb, A. Hussein, M. Sayedahmed, M. Rachid, M. Cheema Determination of Palladium (II) in 5% Pd BaSO4 by ICP/MS with Microwave Digestion, and UV-VIS Spectrophotometry. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, volume 10, Number 4, April 2019.
[16]	Michael H. Dunn and B. Hopper. Spectrophotometric Determination of Iron in Acidic Metal-Processing Solutions with 1,10- Phenanthroline Spectroscopy Vol. 2, No: 5.
[17]	Harris, D. C. (2003); “Quantitative Chemical Analysis 6^th ed.”: 18-1, 19-9.
[18]	Y. Yildiz, R. Karadag, M. Cordera, B. Gensinger Determination of Manganese in Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP) by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. American Journal of Chemistry 2020, 11, 301-308.
[19]	Russel, B. J., Shelton, J. P. and Wals, A. (1957) An Atomic-Absorption Spectrophotometer and Its Application to the Analysis of Solutions. Spectrochimica Acta, 8, 317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0371-1951(57)80193-3
[20]	Koirtyohann, S. R. and Pickett, E. E. (1966) Spectral Interferences in Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 38, 585-587. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60236a015
[21]	Z. Marczenco, Separation and Spectrophotometric Determination of Elements (Elis Harwood Limited: Chichester, 1986), 60-66.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yusuf Yildiz, Recep Karadag, Irmak Cengiz. (2021). Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS. Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 9(2), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yusuf Yildiz; Recep Karadag; Irmak Cengiz. Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS. Sci. J. Anal. Chem. 2021, 9(2), 32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yusuf Yildiz, Recep Karadag, Irmak Cengiz. Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS. Sci J Anal Chem. 2021;9(2):32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11,
  author = {Yusuf Yildiz and Recep Karadag and Irmak Cengiz},
  title = {Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS},
  journal = {Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {32-38},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjac.20210902.11},
  abstract = {Generally, more sophisticated techniques such as, flame atomic absorption (AAS), inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP-MS), and UV/Visible Spectrophotometer were used to determine trace iron metals in  pickling (acid cleaning), and passivating stainless steel solutions. Simple and novel spectrophotometric methods are described for simultaneous determination of iron. While these techniques provide excellent sensitivity and selectivity. The results were found to be in satisfactory agreement (shows no significant difference) with those acquired by the flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS), UV-Vis Spectrometer, and ICP/MS techniques. The results shows that the concentration of iron are very close each other (less than 5.0%) in the pickling and passivating solutions.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS
AU  - Yusuf Yildiz
AU  - Recep Karadag
AU  - Irmak Cengiz
Y1  - 2021/05/08
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11
T2  - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry
JF  - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry
JO  - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry
SP  - 32
EP  - 38
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-8053
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11
AB  - Generally, more sophisticated techniques such as, flame atomic absorption (AAS), inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP-MS), and UV/Visible Spectrophotometer were used to determine trace iron metals in  pickling (acid cleaning), and passivating stainless steel solutions. Simple and novel spectrophotometric methods are described for simultaneous determination of iron. While these techniques provide excellent sensitivity and selectivity. The results were found to be in satisfactory agreement (shows no significant difference) with those acquired by the flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS), UV-Vis Spectrometer, and ICP/MS techniques. The results shows that the concentration of iron are very close each other (less than 5.0%) in the pickling and passivating solutions.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Yusuf Yildiz

John F. Kennedy Educational Complex, ACT Academy Science Department, Paterson NJ, USA
Recep Karadag

Istanbul Aydin University, Florya Campus Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
Irmak Cengiz

Chemical Engineering Department, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yusuf Yildiz, Recep Karadag, Irmak Cengiz. (2021). Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS. Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 9(2), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yusuf Yildiz; Recep Karadag; Irmak Cengiz. Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS. Sci. J. Anal. Chem. 2021, 9(2), 32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yusuf Yildiz, Recep Karadag, Irmak Cengiz. Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS. Sci J Anal Chem. 2021;9(2):32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11,
  author = {Yusuf Yildiz and Recep Karadag and Irmak Cengiz},
  title = {Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS},
  journal = {Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {32-38},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjac.20210902.11},
  abstract = {Generally, more sophisticated techniques such as, flame atomic absorption (AAS), inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP-MS), and UV/Visible Spectrophotometer were used to determine trace iron metals in  pickling (acid cleaning), and passivating stainless steel solutions. Simple and novel spectrophotometric methods are described for simultaneous determination of iron. While these techniques provide excellent sensitivity and selectivity. The results were found to be in satisfactory agreement (shows no significant difference) with those acquired by the flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS), UV-Vis Spectrometer, and ICP/MS techniques. The results shows that the concentration of iron are very close each other (less than 5.0%) in the pickling and passivating solutions.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Iron in Acid Cleaning, and Passivating Stainless Steel Solution by UV-VIS, ICP/MS, and FAAS
AU  - Yusuf Yildiz
AU  - Recep Karadag
AU  - Irmak Cengiz
Y1  - 2021/05/08
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11
T2  - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry
JF  - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry
JO  - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry
SP  - 32
EP  - 38
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-8053
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20210902.11
AB  - Generally, more sophisticated techniques such as, flame atomic absorption (AAS), inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP-MS), and UV/Visible Spectrophotometer were used to determine trace iron metals in  pickling (acid cleaning), and passivating stainless steel solutions. Simple and novel spectrophotometric methods are described for simultaneous determination of iron. While these techniques provide excellent sensitivity and selectivity. The results were found to be in satisfactory agreement (shows no significant difference) with those acquired by the flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS), UV-Vis Spectrometer, and ICP/MS techniques. The results shows that the concentration of iron are very close each other (less than 5.0%) in the pickling and passivating solutions.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download