It is manifested to all that sample size varies from unit to unit. It goes without saying that large units contain more apropos information than the smaller units. So if the unit size is larger then there is a greater possibility to choose sample from the large unit than smaller one. It actually means the probability of selecting a unit is positively proportional to its sizes. The selection of unit is done corresponding to choose a number at random from the totality of numbers associated. My main aim is to prefer a method of selecting units on the basis of its size.
| Published in | Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Volume 3, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13 |
| Page(s) | 230-233 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
The Probability Proportional to Size (PPS), Cumulative Method, Lahiri’S Method
| [1] | Amahia GN, Chaubey YP, Rao TJ (1989). Efficiency of a new PPS sampling for multiple characteristics, J. Stat. Plan. Inference, 21, 75-84. |
| [2] | Basu D (1971). An essay on the logical foundation of survey sampling I” Foundation of statistical inference.. Holt, Rinehard and Winston. Edited by Godambe and Sprott |
| [3] | Brewer, K. R. W. and Hanif, M. (1983). Sampling with unequal probabilities, New York: Springer-Verlag. |
| [4] | Chaudhuri A (2010). Essentials of Survey Sampling, PHI Learning Private Limited, New Delhi. |
| [5] | Ekaette, IE, (2008). A class of alternative estimators for Multicharacteristics in PPS sampling Scheme, Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Univeristy of Ibadan, Nigeria. |
| [6] | Godambe VP (1955). A unified theory of sampling from finite population, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B., 17, 269- 278. |
| [7] | Grewal IS, Bansal ML, Singh (1997). An alternative estimator for multiple characteristics using randomized response technique in PPS sampling. Aligarh J. Stat., 19:51-65. |
| [8] | 8 Hansen MH, Hurwitz WN (1943). On the theory of sampling from a finite population, Ann. Math. Stat., 14, 333-362. |
| [9] | Hansen, Morris H., William N. Hurwitz and William G. Madow., (l953b). Sample Survey Methods and Theory, Volume 2- Theory, New York. John Wiley and Sons. |
| [10] | Kendall, M. G., and Smith, B. B., (1938). Randomness and random sampling numbers, Jour. Roy. Stat. Soc., 101, 147-166. |
| [11] | Pathak PK (1966). An estimator in PPS sampling for multiple characteristics. Sankhya, A. 28(1):35-40. Rand Corporation (1955). A Million Random Digits, Free Press, Glencoe, III. |
| [12] | Rao JNK (1966). Alternative estimators in the PPS sampling for multiple characteristics, Sankhya, 28(A), 47-60. |
| [13] | Singh S, Grewal IS, Joarder A (2004). General class of estimators in multi-character surveys. Stat. Papers, 45:571-582. |
APA Style
Maskurul Alam, Sharmin Akter Sumy, Yasin Ali Parh. (2015). Selection of the Samples with Probability Proportional to Size. Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 3(5), 230-233. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13
ACS Style
Maskurul Alam; Sharmin Akter Sumy; Yasin Ali Parh. Selection of the Samples with Probability Proportional to Size. Sci. J. Appl. Math. Stat. 2015, 3(5), 230-233. doi: 10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13
AMA Style
Maskurul Alam, Sharmin Akter Sumy, Yasin Ali Parh. Selection of the Samples with Probability Proportional to Size. Sci J Appl Math Stat. 2015;3(5):230-233. doi: 10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13,
author = {Maskurul Alam and Sharmin Akter Sumy and Yasin Ali Parh},
title = {Selection of the Samples with Probability Proportional to Size},
journal = {Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics},
volume = {3},
number = {5},
pages = {230-233},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjams.20150305.13},
abstract = {It is manifested to all that sample size varies from unit to unit. It goes without saying that large units contain more apropos information than the smaller units. So if the unit size is larger then there is a greater possibility to choose sample from the large unit than smaller one. It actually means the probability of selecting a unit is positively proportional to its sizes. The selection of unit is done corresponding to choose a number at random from the totality of numbers associated. My main aim is to prefer a method of selecting units on the basis of its size.},
year = {2015}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Selection of the Samples with Probability Proportional to Size AU - Maskurul Alam AU - Sharmin Akter Sumy AU - Yasin Ali Parh Y1 - 2015/09/22 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13 DO - 10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13 T2 - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics JF - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics JO - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics SP - 230 EP - 233 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-9513 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20150305.13 AB - It is manifested to all that sample size varies from unit to unit. It goes without saying that large units contain more apropos information than the smaller units. So if the unit size is larger then there is a greater possibility to choose sample from the large unit than smaller one. It actually means the probability of selecting a unit is positively proportional to its sizes. The selection of unit is done corresponding to choose a number at random from the totality of numbers associated. My main aim is to prefer a method of selecting units on the basis of its size. VL - 3 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: