This paper aims at determining if the assumed fundamental structure of the error component (unit mean and constant variance) is maintained after the square root transformation of a Weibull-distributed error component of a multiplicative model and also to investigate what happens to variance of the transformed and untransformed in terms of equality and non-equality. Considering the possibility that the error component of a Multiplicative Error Model (MEM) can be a Weibull distribution (W (σ, n)); σ and n are shape and scale parameters respectively) and the need for data transformation as a popular remedial measure to stabilize the variance of a data set prior to statistical modeling, this paper investigates the impact of the square root transformation on the mean and variance of a Weibull-distributed error component of a MEM. The mean and variance of W (σ, n) and those of the square root transformed distributions are calculated for σ= 6, 7,.., 99, 100 with the corresponding values of n for which the mean of the untransformed distribution is equal to one. The fitted MEM (2,0) under the square root transformation gave a better fit than the original fitted MEM (2,0). The paper concludes that the square-root transformation would yield better results as they reveal constancy in variance when using MEM with a Weibull-distributed error component and where data transformation is deemed necessary to stabilize the variance of the data set.
Published in | Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Volume 9, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11 |
Page(s) | 94-105 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Multiplicative Error Model, Weibull Distribution, Square Transformation, Mean, Variance
[1] | Anderson, D. R. (2008). Model Based Inference in the Life Sciences: A Primer on Evidence. Springer New York. |
[2] | Akpanta, A. C and Iwueze, I. S. (2009). On applying the Barlett transformation methods to time series data. Journal of Math’l Sciences. Vol. 20 No. 3 pp 227 – 243. |
[3] | Bandi, F. M. and Russell, J. R. (2006). Separating microstructure noise from volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 655-692. |
[4] | Brownlees C. T, Cipollini F., and Gallo G. M. (2011). Multiplicative Error Models. Working paper. http:ssrn.com/abstract=1852285. |
[5] | Chatfield, C. (2004). The Analysis of time Series: An introduction 6th ed. Chapman and Hall. CRC Press. Boca Raton. |
[6] | Dike, A. O., Otuonye, E. L and Chikezie, D. C. (2016). The nth Power Transformation of the Error Component of the Multiplicative Time Series Model. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 18 (1), 1-15 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-218. |
[7] | Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487 |
[8] | Engle R. F and Russell J. R (1998). Autoregressive Conditional Duration: A New Model for Irregularly Spaced Transaction Data, Econometrica, Vol. 66, issue 5, 1127-1162. |
[9] | Iwu, H., Iwueze, I. S and Nwogu, E. C. (2009). Trend Analysis of Transformations of the Multiplicative Time Series Model. Journal of Nigerian Statistical Association 21, 40-54. |
[10] | Iwueze I. S (2007). Some Implications of Truncating the N (1,σ2) Distribution to the left at Zero. JASA, Vol 7 (2), 189 – 195. |
[11] | Iwueze, I. S., Akpanta, A. C. and Iwu, H. C (2008). Seasonal Analysis of Transformations of the Multiplicative Time Series Model. Asian J. Math. Statist., 1: 80=89. |
[12] | Manganelli, S. (2005). Duration, Volume and Volatility Impact of Trades". Journal of Financial Markets 8, pp. 377-399. |
[13] | Nwosu C. R, Iwueze I. S, Ohakwe J (2013). Condition for successful inverse transformation of the error component of the multiplicative time series model. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences: 6 (1): 1–15. DOI: 10.3923/ajaps.2013.1-15. |
[14] | Ohakwe J (2013). The Effect of Inverse Transformation on the Unit Mean and Constant Variance Assumptions of a Multiplicative Error Model whose error Component has a Gamma Distribution. Math’l Modeling Vol. 3, No. 3 pp 44-52. |
[15] | Ozdemir O. (2017). Power transformations for families of statistical distributions to satisfy normality. International Journal of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 5, pp. 1 – 4. |
[16] | Ramachandran K. M. And Tsokos C. P (2009). Mathematical Statistics with Applications, pp. 156 – 159. Published by Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier. ISBN: 13: 978-0-12-374848-5. |
[17] | Russell, J. R. and R. F. Engle (2010). Analysis of high-frequency data. In Ait-Sahalia, Y. and L. P. Hansen, (eds) Handbook of Financial Econometrics, Volume 1 Tools and Techniques, 383-427. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing. Society. B. Vol. 26 pp 211 – 243. |
[18] | Tsay, R (2007). Handbook in Econometrics II Palgrave Publishing Company. NY. |
APA Style
Onyemachi Chris Uchechi. (2021). Assessing the Impact of Square Root Transformation on Weibull-Distributed Error Component of a Multiplicative Error Model. Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(4), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11
ACS Style
Onyemachi Chris Uchechi. Assessing the Impact of Square Root Transformation on Weibull-Distributed Error Component of a Multiplicative Error Model. Sci. J. Appl. Math. Stat. 2021, 9(4), 94-105. doi: 10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11
AMA Style
Onyemachi Chris Uchechi. Assessing the Impact of Square Root Transformation on Weibull-Distributed Error Component of a Multiplicative Error Model. Sci J Appl Math Stat. 2021;9(4):94-105. doi: 10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11
@article{10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11, author = {Onyemachi Chris Uchechi}, title = {Assessing the Impact of Square Root Transformation on Weibull-Distributed Error Component of a Multiplicative Error Model}, journal = {Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics}, volume = {9}, number = {4}, pages = {94-105}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjams.20210904.11}, abstract = {This paper aims at determining if the assumed fundamental structure of the error component (unit mean and constant variance) is maintained after the square root transformation of a Weibull-distributed error component of a multiplicative model and also to investigate what happens to variance of the transformed and untransformed in terms of equality and non-equality. Considering the possibility that the error component of a Multiplicative Error Model (MEM) can be a Weibull distribution (W (σ, n)); σ and n are shape and scale parameters respectively) and the need for data transformation as a popular remedial measure to stabilize the variance of a data set prior to statistical modeling, this paper investigates the impact of the square root transformation on the mean and variance of a Weibull-distributed error component of a MEM. The mean and variance of W (σ, n) and those of the square root transformed distributions are calculated for σ= 6, 7,.., 99, 100 with the corresponding values of n for which the mean of the untransformed distribution is equal to one. The fitted MEM (2,0) under the square root transformation gave a better fit than the original fitted MEM (2,0). The paper concludes that the square-root transformation would yield better results as they reveal constancy in variance when using MEM with a Weibull-distributed error component and where data transformation is deemed necessary to stabilize the variance of the data set.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing the Impact of Square Root Transformation on Weibull-Distributed Error Component of a Multiplicative Error Model AU - Onyemachi Chris Uchechi Y1 - 2021/07/27 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11 DO - 10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11 T2 - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics JF - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics JO - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics SP - 94 EP - 105 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-9513 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20210904.11 AB - This paper aims at determining if the assumed fundamental structure of the error component (unit mean and constant variance) is maintained after the square root transformation of a Weibull-distributed error component of a multiplicative model and also to investigate what happens to variance of the transformed and untransformed in terms of equality and non-equality. Considering the possibility that the error component of a Multiplicative Error Model (MEM) can be a Weibull distribution (W (σ, n)); σ and n are shape and scale parameters respectively) and the need for data transformation as a popular remedial measure to stabilize the variance of a data set prior to statistical modeling, this paper investigates the impact of the square root transformation on the mean and variance of a Weibull-distributed error component of a MEM. The mean and variance of W (σ, n) and those of the square root transformed distributions are calculated for σ= 6, 7,.., 99, 100 with the corresponding values of n for which the mean of the untransformed distribution is equal to one. The fitted MEM (2,0) under the square root transformation gave a better fit than the original fitted MEM (2,0). The paper concludes that the square-root transformation would yield better results as they reveal constancy in variance when using MEM with a Weibull-distributed error component and where data transformation is deemed necessary to stabilize the variance of the data set. VL - 9 IS - 4 ER -