The global age distribution has undergone substantial changes in recent years due to a rise in life expectancy. Based on projections, the global population of those aged 60 and beyond is expected to reach 2 billion by 2050, representing almost 25% of the total population. By the year 2050, it is expected that the proportion of adults aged 80 years and older will rise by 1% to 4% of the global population. Because of this trend, economic growth may be hampered. The growing reliance on elderly people results in an increase in taxation, while political pressures may cause public funding to be redirected to adult social care. If this option is made, it could be detrimental to both growth and investment. The present study uses panel data from high-income countries to determine if life expectancy is a favorable predictor of economic growth using Granger causality and panel regression. The Hausman test was used to evaluate pooled, random, and fixed effect models in order to determine which model was the most appropriate. Based on the results, the fixed effect model tends to perform better, as indicated by the p-value being less than 0.05. Furthermore, the findings convey that life expectancy has a negative impact on economic growth.
Published in | Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Volume 12, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12 |
Page(s) | 80-89 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
GDP, Life Expentancy, Economy, Income
[1] | United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). (2010). Health literacy and the Millennium Development Goals: United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) regional meeting background paper (abstracted). Journal of Health Communication, 15(S2), 211-223. |
[2] | Zhang, J. and Zhang, J., 2005. The effect of life expectancy on fertility, saving, schooling and economic growth: theory and evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(1), pp. 45-66. |
[3] | Hazan, M. and Zoabi, H., 2006. Does longevity cause growth? A theoretical critique. Journal of Economic Growth, 11, pp. 363-376. |
[4] | Acemoglu, D. and Johnson, S., 2007. Disease and development: the effect of life expectancy on economic growth. Journal of political Economy, 115(6), pp. 925-985. |
[5] | Bloom, D. E., Canning, D. and Fink, G., 2014. Disease and development revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 122(6), pp. 1355-1366. |
[6] | Hansen, C. W. and Lønstrup, L., 2015. The rise in life expectancy and economic growth in the 20th century. The EconomicJournal, 125(584), pp. 838-852. |
[7] | Preston, S. H., 1975. The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development. Population studies, 29(2), pp. 231-248. |
[8] | Preston, S. H., 2007. The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development. International journal of epidemiology, 36(3), pp. 484-490. |
[9] | Bloom, D. E. and Canning, D., 2007. Commentary: The Preston Curve 30 years on: still sparking fires. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(3), pp. 498-499. |
[10] | Dalgaard, C. J. and Strulik, H., 2014. Optimal aging and death: understanding the Preston curve. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(3), pp. 672-701. |
[11] | Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X., 1992. Convergence. Journal of political Economy, 100(2), pp. 223-251. |
[12] | Madsen, J., 2012. Health, human capital formation and knowledge production: two centuries of international evidence (No. w18461). National Bureau of Economic Research. |
[13] | He, L. and Li, N., 2020. The linkages between life expectancy and economic growth: some new evidence. Empirical Economics, 58, pp. 2381-2402. |
[14] | Li, H., Zhang, J. and Zhang, J., 2007. Effects of longevity and dependency rates on saving and growth: Evidence from a panel of cross countries. Journal of Development Economics, 84(1), pp. 138-154. |
[15] | Echevarría, C. A. and Iza, A., 2006. Life expectancy, human capital, social security and growth. Journal of Public Economics, 90(12), pp. 2323-2349 |
[16] | Yakita, A., 2006. Life expectancy, money, and growth. Journal of Population Economics, 19, pp. 579-592. |
[17] | Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Ryder, H. E. and Weil, D. N., 2000. Mortality decline, human capital investment, and economic growth. Journal of development economics, 62(1), pp. 1-23. |
[18] | Zhang, J., Zhang, J. and Lee, R., 2001. Mortality decline and long-run economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 80(3), pp.485-507. on gambling problems: a comparison of moderate-risk and problem Internet and non-Internet gamblers. J Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. |
[19] | Boucekkine, R., De la Croix, D. and Licandro, O., 2002. Vintage human capital, demographic trends, and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 104(2), pp. 340-375. |
[20] | Echevarría, C. A., 2004. Life expectancy, schooling time, retirement, and growth. Economic Inquiry, 42(4), pp. 602-617. |
[21] | Cervellati, M. and Sunde, U., 2011. Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition. Journal of economic growth, 16, pp. 99-133. |
[22] | Kunze, L., 2014. Life expectancy and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 39, pp. 54-65. |
APA Style
Okunola, K., Okunola, B., Adewuyi, O. (2024). Effect of Life Expectancy on Economy Growth for High-Income Nations. Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 12(5), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12
ACS Style
Okunola, K.; Okunola, B.; Adewuyi, O. Effect of Life Expectancy on Economy Growth for High-Income Nations. Sci. J. Appl. Math. Stat. 2024, 12(5), 80-89. doi: 10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12
@article{10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12, author = {Kayode Okunola and Bolanle Okunola and Oladimeji Adewuyi}, title = {Effect of Life Expectancy on Economy Growth for High-Income Nations }, journal = {Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics}, volume = {12}, number = {5}, pages = {80-89}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjams.20241205.12}, abstract = {The global age distribution has undergone substantial changes in recent years due to a rise in life expectancy. Based on projections, the global population of those aged 60 and beyond is expected to reach 2 billion by 2050, representing almost 25% of the total population. By the year 2050, it is expected that the proportion of adults aged 80 years and older will rise by 1% to 4% of the global population. Because of this trend, economic growth may be hampered. The growing reliance on elderly people results in an increase in taxation, while political pressures may cause public funding to be redirected to adult social care. If this option is made, it could be detrimental to both growth and investment. The present study uses panel data from high-income countries to determine if life expectancy is a favorable predictor of economic growth using Granger causality and panel regression. The Hausman test was used to evaluate pooled, random, and fixed effect models in order to determine which model was the most appropriate. Based on the results, the fixed effect model tends to perform better, as indicated by the p-value being less than 0.05. Furthermore, the findings convey that life expectancy has a negative impact on economic growth. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Life Expectancy on Economy Growth for High-Income Nations AU - Kayode Okunola AU - Bolanle Okunola AU - Oladimeji Adewuyi Y1 - 2024/11/12 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12 T2 - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics JF - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics JO - Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics SP - 80 EP - 89 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-9513 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjams.20241205.12 AB - The global age distribution has undergone substantial changes in recent years due to a rise in life expectancy. Based on projections, the global population of those aged 60 and beyond is expected to reach 2 billion by 2050, representing almost 25% of the total population. By the year 2050, it is expected that the proportion of adults aged 80 years and older will rise by 1% to 4% of the global population. Because of this trend, economic growth may be hampered. The growing reliance on elderly people results in an increase in taxation, while political pressures may cause public funding to be redirected to adult social care. If this option is made, it could be detrimental to both growth and investment. The present study uses panel data from high-income countries to determine if life expectancy is a favorable predictor of economic growth using Granger causality and panel regression. The Hausman test was used to evaluate pooled, random, and fixed effect models in order to determine which model was the most appropriate. Based on the results, the fixed effect model tends to perform better, as indicated by the p-value being less than 0.05. Furthermore, the findings convey that life expectancy has a negative impact on economic growth. VL - 12 IS - 5 ER -