Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPSB Fertilizer Rate and Inter Row Spacing at Buno Bedele Zone

Received: 7 January 2025     Accepted: 17 April 2025     Published: 14 May 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Potato is one of the most important tuber crops grown in Ethiopia as it plays a crucial role in Ethiopian agriculture, contributing to food security and livelihoods of majority of farmers. However, Ethiopia's Potato production and productivity lag behind other countries due to various constraints faced by the farmers of the country, notably among them improper application rate of NPSB fertilizer and inter row spacing for potato production. Thus, study was conducted to determine the effect of NPSB fertilizer rates and inter row spacing on tuber yield and yield components of potato during 2022-2023 cropping season. The experiment consisted of four levels of NPSB (50,100,150 and 200 kg ha-1) fertilizer and three (65, 75 and 85cm) inter row spacing with control treatment. The experiment was laid out in 4x3 factorial plus control arrangements in randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis of variance showed that the main effect of NPSB application rates and inter row spacing were significantly affected all studied parameters. However, interaction effect showed non-significant. Hence, application of 200 kg ha -1 NPSB resulted maximum marketable tuber yield (51.36t ha-1 while lower yield was obtained from control treatment. Furthermore, the highest marketable tuber yield (45.16 t ha -1 were obtained from the inter-row spacing of 85cm whereas the lowest result for these parameters were recorded at 65 cm. Conversely, the highest value of agronomic efficiency 152.4 kg kg-1 was obtained at lowest NPSB rate 50 kg ha -1 while lowest agronomic efficiency 142.65kg kg-1was obtained from highest NPSB 200 kg ha -1. The result of correlation analysis showed that there is positive and significant correlation among tuber yield and yield components, such Marketable tuber yield was strolgly correlated with tuber number (r=0.49**), total tuber yield (r=0.99***), Average tuber weight (r=0.92***), large tuber size (r=0.92***), Medium tuber size (r= 0.46**) and small tuber size (r=0.46**). Besides, the partial budget analysis revealed that the highest net benefit obtained (1231355 birr ha-1) with acceptable marginal rate of return (3823.92%) and (2120240 birr ha-1) with acceptable marginal rate of return (11444.83%) from NPSB kg ha-1 and 85cm inter row spacing respectively. Therefore, the production of potato with 150 kg ha -1NPSB fertilizer rate and 85cm inter row spacing is most productive and economically profitable and can be recommended for the study area for further scaling up.

Published in World Journal of Applied Chemistry (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11
Page(s) 25-41
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Potato, NPSB, Inter Row Spacing

References
[1] Asfaw F (2016) Effect of integrated soil amendment practices on growth and seed tuber yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Jimma Arjo, Western Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 6(15), pp. 38-63.
[2] FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations. Statistics Division (2022).
[3] Hand Book Variety Registration., 2021. Crop Variety Registration for Plant Variety Release. Protection and Quality Control Directorate of Ethiopia, Variety Registration, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[4] IPC (International Potato Center) (2020). Procedures for standard evaluation trials of advanced potato clones. An International Cooperators Guide. www.cipotato.org
[5] Devaux JP, Goffart P, Kromann J, Andrade V, Polar and Hareau G (2021). The potato of the future: opportunities and challenges in sustainable agri-food systems, Potato Res. 681–720,
[6] Degebasa AC (2019). Review of potato research and development in Ethiopia: Achievements and futur prospects. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 9(19), 27–36.
[7] Campos H and Ortiz O (2019). The potato crop: Its agricultural, nutritional and social contribution to humank The potato crop: Its agricultural, nutritional and social contribution to humankind. Springer International Publishing.
[8] Dongyu Q (2022). Role and potential of potato in global food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of th United Nations.
[9] Yenenesh T, Conny JM, Almekinders RS and Paul CS (2017). Understanding farmers’ potato production practices and use of improved varieties in Chencha, Ethiopia, Journal of Crop Improvement, 31: 5, 673-688.
[10] CSA (Central Statistical Agency Ethiopia). 2022. Report on area and production of major crops. Agricultural sample survey. Addis Ababa.
[11] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2023). Faostat.
[12] Alemayehu TG, Nigussie D, and Tamado T (2015). Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield and yield components to nitrogen fertilizer and planting density at Haramaya, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(6): pp. 320-328.
[13] Israel Z, Ali M and Solomon T (2012). Effect of different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on Yield and yield component of potato (SolanumtuberosumL.) at Mashan, Southwestern of Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science. 3(2): 016-024.
[14] Mulatu NT, Hagayo ST (2024) Factors Affecting Improved Potato Production In Central Ethiopia: Evidence From Duna District. Journal of International Trade, Logistics & Law. Dec 1; 10(2).
[15] Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources (MoANR) (2016). Crop Variety Release, Protection and Seed Quality Control Directorate, Issue number 19, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[16] Arega A, Tekalign A, Solomon T and Tekile B (2018). Effect of inter and intra row spacing on tuber yield and yield components of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in guji zone, southern Ethiopia. J Adv plant sci, 1(1), p. 102.
[17] Alemayehu A, Solomon T, Gezahegn B (2023). Periodic Biological, Yield, Nutrient Up Take and Use Efficiency of Bread Wheat as Influenced by NPSB and Urea Fertilize Rates in Gechi District, Southwestern Ethiopia. World Journal of Applied Chemistry, 8(4), 80-92.
[18] EthioSIS (Ethiopia Soil Information System) (2016). Soil Fertility and Fertilizer tentative recommendation Amhara Region. Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 275pp.
[19] Shunka EK, Negash A, Chindi G, Wgiorigis T, Abebe A, Solomon M, Bedasa L, Said and Tesema (2021). Determining the rate of blended fertilizers and urea for potato production under rainfed condition in Jeldu, West Showa, and Ethiopia. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 6(1), 18-25.
[20] EthioSIS (Ethiopian Soil Information System) (2014). Soil analysis report. Agricultural Transformation Agency (Unpublished).
[21] Lung`aho C, Berga L, Nyongesa M, Gildemacher P, Kinyae P, and Demo P (2007). Commercial seed potato production in eastern and central Africa. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute.
[22] Zelalem A, Tekalign T and Nigussie D (2009). Response of potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) to different rates of N and P fertilization on Vertisol at Debre Berhan.
[23] Govinden N (2006). Potato tuber characteristics preferred by growers. Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute Food Crop Agronomy Department. Occasional Report No. 34: 10-18.
[24] Simeret B, Nigussie D, and Tekalign T (2013). Influence of Inorganic Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizers on Seed tuber Yield and Size Distribution of Potato, Proceedings of the National Workshop on Seed Potato Tuber Production and Dissemination: Experiences, Challenges and Prospects. Gebremedhin Woldegiorgis, Steffen Schultz and Baye Berihun (Eds.). 12-14 March 2012, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. PP 130-144.
[25] Dewis J and Freitas F (1984). Physical and chemical methods of soil and water analysis. FAO Soil Bulletin No. 10. FAO, Rome. 275 pp.
[26] Chapman HD (1965). Cation exchange capacity by ammonium saturation. pp. 891- 901. In: Black, CA. (Ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Agronomy part II, No. 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
[27] Walkley A and Black IA (1934). An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29–37.
[28] Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. pp. 183-204. Prentice Hall, Inc., Engle Wood Cliffs. New Jersey.
[29] Bray HR and Kurtz (1945). Determination of organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 9: 39-46.
[30] SAS (Statistical Analysis System Institute) (2014). SAS Version 9.4 © 2002-2012. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
[31] Gomez KA and Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 680.
[32] Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H. and D. A. Dicky. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, Inc. Book Co., New York, 352 358.
[33] CIMMYT (1988). from agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economics training manual.
[34] Tekalign T (1991). Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa.
[35] Landon JR (Ed) (1991). Booker Tropical Soil Manual: A Handbook for Soil Survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in the Tropics and Subtropics. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, New York 474.
[36] Bouyoucos, GJ (1962). Hydrometer Method Improved for Making Particle Size Analyses of Soils. Agronomy Journal, 54(5): 464-465.
[37] Kinde L and Asfaw Z (2016). Effect of spacing and fertilizer dose on growth and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L) Gudenie variety at West Hararghe, Eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Horticulture and Ornamental Plants Vol. 2(1), pp. 011-018.
[38] Tadesse and Mulugeta (2023). Effect of blended fertilizer rates and planting density on yield and yield components of Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Gombora condition, Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia Diriba Sh, Tilaye B (2020). Effects of Different Rates of NPS, NPSB and NPSZn Blended Fertilizers on Growth and Yields of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Discovery Agriculture.; 6(16): 184-92.
[39] Șanli A, Karadoğan T, Erbaș S and Tosun B (2015). The effects of plant density and eye number per seed piece on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber yield.
[40] Abrha H, Belew D and Woldegiorgis G (2013). Effects of Inter-and Intra-Row Spacing on Seed Tuber Yield and Yield Components of Potato in Ofla Woreda. Seed Potato Tuber Production and Dissemination.
[41] Getaneh L and Laekemariam F (2021) Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPS Fertilizer Rates and Inter‐Row Spacing in Kechi District, South Western Ethiopia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2021(1), p. 5582066.
[42] Mekashaw M, Alemayehu M, Shumye G, Haileslassie A (2020). Effects of blended NPS fertilizer rates on yield and yield components of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties at Dessie Zuria district, Northeast Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. Jan 1; 6(1): 1779478.
[43] Mamiru TT and Geleto GM (2022). Effect of Blended Fertilizer Rates and Planting Density on Yield and Yield Components of Irish Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) at Gombora Condition, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia (August 3, 2022).
[44] Ababiya A (2018). Integrated use of NPS blended fertilizer and cattle manure on growth, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under Dabo Ghibe Kebele, Seka Werada of Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Jimma University).
[45] Muluneh S (2018). Effects of Blended NPSB Fertilizer Rates on Growth, Yield and Yield Related Traits of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties under Irrigation in Degem District, Central Highland of Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[46] Bewuketu G and Bekele (2019), “Effect of blended NPSZnB fertilizer and cattle manure rates on growth, yield and quality of potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) at Banja District, Awi Zone, North Western Ethiopia,” International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences (IJRSAS), vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 27–36.
[47] Abrha H, Belew D and Woldegiorgis G (2014). Effect of inter and intra row spacing on seed tuber yield and yield components of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Ofla Woreda, Northern Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science, 8(6), pp. 285-290.
[48] Tsega B, Asrat M and Alemayehu M (2022). The Spacing Effects on Potato Tuber Seed Yield in Farta District, Northwestern Ethiopia. Asian Journal Of Plant And Soil Sciences, Pp. 136-149.
[49] Sharma SP, Sandhu AS, Bhutani RD and Khurana SC (2014). Effects of planting date and fertilizer dose on plant growth attributes and nutrient up take of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Int. J. Agr. Sci. Hisar, India. 4(5): 196-202.
[50] Tesfaye G, Derbew B and Solomon T (2013). Combined effects of plant spacing and time of earthing up on tuber quality parameters of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Degem District, North Showa zone of Oromia regional state. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 5(1): 24-32.
[51] kifle Z, Getu B and Mohammed K (2017). Effects of Intra-Row Spacing on Vegetative Growth Performance of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L) at Wolkite University, Ethiopia. International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology 2(4): 108-11.
[52] Mumia BI, Muthomi JW, Narla RD, Nyongesa M, Olubayo FM (2017). Effect of seed potato tuber storage methods on occurrence of potato diseases. International Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences; 4(4).
[53] Bekele D, Abera G, Gobena A (2020). Effects of chemical fertilizer types and rates on tuber yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Assosa, Western Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science. Apr 30; 14(4): 155-64.
[54] Biruk N, Abdulahi J and Gedamu F (2018). Effects of Rates of Blendd NPSB and Nitrogen Fertilizers on Yield and Yield Components of Potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) in East Badawacho District, Southern Ethiopia (Msc Thesis, Haramaya University).
[55] Amare T, Bazie Z, Alemu E, Alemayehu B, Tenagne A, Kerebh B, Taye Y, Awoke A, Feyisa T and Kidanu S, 2022. Yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) increased by more than two-folds through nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers in the highlands of North-Western Ethiopia. Heliyon, 8(10).
[56] Zabihie M, Jamaati S, Khayatnezhad M and Gholamin R (2010). Quantitative and qualitative yield of potato tuber by used of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, 9(3): 310-318.
[57] Tesfa B (2012). Influence of plant spacing on seed tuber production of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars grown in Eastern Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis submitted to school of plant sciences, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
[58] Girma T, Beyene S, Biazin B (2017). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer application on soil phosphorous balance and phosphorous uptake and use efficiency of potato in Arbegona District, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Fertilizers & Pesticides. 2017; 8(03): 1-6.
[59] Fayera T, Gizaw Y and Megersa M (2015). Assessment on Working Donkey Welfare Issue in Wolaita Soddo Zuria District, Southern Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria, 14(6): 867-875.
[60] Frezgi A (2007). Effect of planting density and nitrogen application on yield and yield components of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Enderta, Southern Tigray, and Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis Haramaya University, Haramaya.
[61] Desalegn R, Wakene T, Dawit M and TolessaT (2016). Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Irish Potato (Solanum tuberosum) at Bule Hora District, Eastern Guji Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Economics 1(3): pp: 71-77.
[62] Anil VS, Manjunatha MH, Yogeesh KJ, Karosiya A, Priyanka S (2024). Overwhelming late blight resistance in Solanum chacoense, Solanum sparsipilum and potato cultivar Kufri Girdhari: Hypersensitive response and a phenomenon of infected leaf shed, pivotal for resistance among the wild potato species. Scientia Horticulturae. Nov 1; 337: 113438.
[63] Tadele F, Derbew B and Solomon T (2013). Combined effect of plant spacing and time of earthing up on tuber quality parameters of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Degeme district, North Shewa Zone of Oromiya regional state. “Aslan J. Crop Sci. 5(1) 24-32.
[64] Minwyelet J, Melkamu A and Yigizaw D (2017). Effects of NPS fertilizer rate and Irrigation frequency determination method on the growth and tuber yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Koga Irrigation Scheme, West Gojjam, and North Western Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis. Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar.
[65] Muhammad N, Hussain Z, Rahmdil and Ahmed N (2015). Effect of Different Doses of NPK Fertilizes on the Growth and Tuber Yield of Potato. Life Science International Journal, 9(1, 2, 3, 4), 3098-3105.
[66] Amasis M (2018). Integrated use of NPS blended fertilizer and cattle manure for growth, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum l.) under daboghibe, kebele, seka werada of jimma zone, southwest Ethiopia.
[67] Bikila A, Derbew B and Adugna D (2014). Yield and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) seed tuber as influenced by inter and intra-row spacing at Bako, Western Ethiopia. Journal of Biological Sciences. 3(5): pp. 11-19.
[68] Nigusie A (2016). “Effect of phosphorus and potassium fertilizer rates on yield and yield component of potato (Solanum tubersum L,) at K/awlaelo, tigray, tigray agricultural research institute, mekelle, Ethiopia,” Food Science and Quality Management, vol. 48, pp. 2016–2060.
[69] Solomon A, Bedasa M, Said I, Tesema L (2021). Determining the rate of blended fertilizers and urea for potato production under rainfed condition in Jeldu, West Showa, Ethiopia. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science.; 6(1): 18-25.
[70] Husna Sh and Kisetu E (2014). Response of Irish Potato to NPK Fertilizer Application and its Economic Return when Grown on an Ultisol of Morogoro, Tanzaina. Journal of Agricultural and crop science. Vol 2(9), pp. 188-196.
[71] Desta B (2018). Evaluation of blended and non-blended fertilizer types and rates on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield and yield components at Assosa, Western Ethiopia. Msc. Thesis, Hawasa University, Hawasa.
[72] Dagne Z, Dechassa N, Mohammed W (2018) Influence of Plant Spacing and Seed Tuber Size on Yield and Quality of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Central Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Tech 6: 406.
[73] Nebiya J (2016). Effect of depth and rate of phosphorus fertilizer application on yield and yield related traits of potato at Haramaya, eastern Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya.
[74] Ayalew B, Dessalegn T, Bidire E, Giziew A, Tilahun G (2021). Improved Potato Production Technology in Productive Safety Net Programme areas of Western Amhara Region. Innovations for Food and Livelihood Security. 2021: 35.
[75] Fageria NK, Baligar, VC and Li Y C (2008). The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. Journal of plant nutrition, 31(6), 1121-1157.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Abdeta, A., Tamiru, T. (2025). Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPSB Fertilizer Rate and Inter Row Spacing at Buno Bedele Zone. World Journal of Applied Chemistry, 10(2), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Abdeta, A.; Tamiru, T. Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPSB Fertilizer Rate and Inter Row Spacing at Buno Bedele Zone. World J. Appl. Chem. 2025, 10(2), 25-41. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Abdeta A, Tamiru T. Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPSB Fertilizer Rate and Inter Row Spacing at Buno Bedele Zone. World J Appl Chem. 2025;10(2):25-41. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11,
      author = {Alemayehu Abdeta and Tolasa Tamiru},
      title = {Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPSB Fertilizer Rate and Inter Row Spacing at Buno Bedele Zone
    },
      journal = {World Journal of Applied Chemistry},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {25-41},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjac.20251002.11},
      abstract = {Potato is one of the most important tuber crops grown in Ethiopia as it plays a crucial role in Ethiopian agriculture, contributing to food security and livelihoods of majority of farmers. However, Ethiopia's Potato production and productivity lag behind other countries due to various constraints faced by the farmers of the country, notably among them improper application rate of NPSB fertilizer and inter row spacing for potato production. Thus, study was conducted to determine the effect of NPSB fertilizer rates and inter row spacing on tuber yield and yield components of potato during 2022-2023 cropping season. The experiment consisted of four levels of NPSB (50,100,150 and 200 kg ha-1) fertilizer and three (65, 75 and 85cm) inter row spacing with control treatment. The experiment was laid out in 4x3 factorial plus control arrangements in randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis of variance showed that the main effect of NPSB application rates and inter row spacing were significantly affected all studied parameters. However, interaction effect showed non-significant. Hence, application of 200 kg ha -1 NPSB resulted maximum marketable tuber yield (51.36t ha-1 while lower yield was obtained from control treatment. Furthermore, the highest marketable tuber yield (45.16 t ha -1 were obtained from the inter-row spacing of 85cm whereas the lowest result for these parameters were recorded at 65 cm. Conversely, the highest value of agronomic efficiency 152.4 kg kg-1 was obtained at lowest NPSB rate 50 kg ha -1 while lowest agronomic efficiency 142.65kg kg-1was obtained from highest NPSB 200 kg ha -1. The result of correlation analysis showed that there is positive and significant correlation among tuber yield and yield components, such Marketable tuber yield was strolgly correlated with tuber number (r=0.49**), total tuber yield (r=0.99***), Average tuber weight (r=0.92***), large tuber size (r=0.92***), Medium tuber size (r= 0.46**) and small tuber size (r=0.46**). Besides, the partial budget analysis revealed that the highest net benefit obtained (1231355 birr ha-1) with acceptable marginal rate of return (3823.92%) and (2120240 birr ha-1) with acceptable marginal rate of return (11444.83%) from NPSB kg ha-1 and 85cm inter row spacing respectively. Therefore, the production of potato with 150 kg ha -1NPSB fertilizer rate and 85cm inter row spacing is most productive and economically profitable and can be recommended for the study area for further scaling up.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to NPSB Fertilizer Rate and Inter Row Spacing at Buno Bedele Zone
    
    AU  - Alemayehu Abdeta
    AU  - Tolasa Tamiru
    Y1  - 2025/05/14
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11
    T2  - World Journal of Applied Chemistry
    JF  - World Journal of Applied Chemistry
    JO  - World Journal of Applied Chemistry
    SP  - 25
    EP  - 41
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-5982
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20251002.11
    AB  - Potato is one of the most important tuber crops grown in Ethiopia as it plays a crucial role in Ethiopian agriculture, contributing to food security and livelihoods of majority of farmers. However, Ethiopia's Potato production and productivity lag behind other countries due to various constraints faced by the farmers of the country, notably among them improper application rate of NPSB fertilizer and inter row spacing for potato production. Thus, study was conducted to determine the effect of NPSB fertilizer rates and inter row spacing on tuber yield and yield components of potato during 2022-2023 cropping season. The experiment consisted of four levels of NPSB (50,100,150 and 200 kg ha-1) fertilizer and three (65, 75 and 85cm) inter row spacing with control treatment. The experiment was laid out in 4x3 factorial plus control arrangements in randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis of variance showed that the main effect of NPSB application rates and inter row spacing were significantly affected all studied parameters. However, interaction effect showed non-significant. Hence, application of 200 kg ha -1 NPSB resulted maximum marketable tuber yield (51.36t ha-1 while lower yield was obtained from control treatment. Furthermore, the highest marketable tuber yield (45.16 t ha -1 were obtained from the inter-row spacing of 85cm whereas the lowest result for these parameters were recorded at 65 cm. Conversely, the highest value of agronomic efficiency 152.4 kg kg-1 was obtained at lowest NPSB rate 50 kg ha -1 while lowest agronomic efficiency 142.65kg kg-1was obtained from highest NPSB 200 kg ha -1. The result of correlation analysis showed that there is positive and significant correlation among tuber yield and yield components, such Marketable tuber yield was strolgly correlated with tuber number (r=0.49**), total tuber yield (r=0.99***), Average tuber weight (r=0.92***), large tuber size (r=0.92***), Medium tuber size (r= 0.46**) and small tuber size (r=0.46**). Besides, the partial budget analysis revealed that the highest net benefit obtained (1231355 birr ha-1) with acceptable marginal rate of return (3823.92%) and (2120240 birr ha-1) with acceptable marginal rate of return (11444.83%) from NPSB kg ha-1 and 85cm inter row spacing respectively. Therefore, the production of potato with 150 kg ha -1NPSB fertilizer rate and 85cm inter row spacing is most productive and economically profitable and can be recommended for the study area for further scaling up.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bedele Agricultural Research Center, Bedele, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bedele Agricultural Research Center, Bedele, Ethiopia

  • Sections