Indigenous breeds provide the necessary Genetic diversity needed by modern agriculture as a Means to ensure stability and are vital building blocks for future livestock breeding programmers. Farm Animal Genetic Resources (FAnGR) conservation, Collection and processing procedures which different widely depending upon the type of germplasm being collected and the donor species. Due to indigenous FAnGR carry genes that enable them to tolerate harsh environments, cope with thorny vegetation in drought-prone areas, walk long distance and repel attacks by diseases and pests. However, these animal resources are constantly being eroded and are nearing extinction. Conservation is an action to ensure that the diversity of farm animal genetic material is being maintained for contribution to food production, Two methods for the conservation of animal genetic resources In-situ conservation refers to conservation of livestock through continued use by livestock keepers in the production system in which the livestock evolved or are now normally found and Ex-situ (in vivo conservation): Effective conservation of genetic resources is possible only if the breeds are identified and documented adequately. Therefore conservation of FAnGR is useful for the sustainable utilization of genetic resources under different production environment and production system. In this regard, valuation of local breeds should consider their major contribution to risk management under the prevailing hard and fluctuating environmental conditions.
Published in | World Journal of Food Science and Technology (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13 |
Page(s) | 15-21 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Farm Animal, Indigenous Breeds, Collection, Germplasm, Conservation
[1] | Agricultural Information Service, 2007 Conservation of farm Animal Genetic Resource Department of Agriculture South Africa. |
[2] | National Research Council. 1993. Managing global genetic resources: Agricultural crop issues and policies. National Academies Press. |
[3] | Mulualem, T., Molla, M., & Getachew, M. 2015. Assessment of livestock genetic resource diversity in Ethiopia: An implication for conservation. Journal of Gene c and Environmental Resources Conserva on, 3 (2), 150-163. |
[4] | Baldassarre, H. & Karatzas, C. N. 2004. Advanced assisted reproduction technologies (ART) in goats. Animal Reproduction Science, 82-83: 255–266. |
[5] | Jacquard, A. 2012. The genetic structure of populations (Vol. 5). Springer Science & Business Media. |
[6] | Falconer, I. R., Runnegar, M. T., Buckley, T., Huyn, V. L., & Bradshaw, P. 1989. Using activated carbon to remove toxicity from drinking water containing cyanobacterial blooms. Journal (American Water Works Association), 102-105. |
[7] | Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetics Research, 66 (2), 95-107. |
[8] | Chagunda, M. H. G., &Wollny, C. B. 2003. Conserving and managing the biodiversity of Malawian farm animal genetic resources: A case of Malawi zebu cattle. University of Malawi. |
[9] | Alrøe, H. F., Vaarst, M., &Kristensen, E. S. 2001. Does organic farming face distinctive livestock welfare issues?–A conceptual analysis. Journal of Agricultural and environmental Ethics, 14 (3), 275-299. |
[10] | Kosgey, I. S., Baker, R. L., Udo, H. M. J., & Van Arendonk, J. A. M. 2006. Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programmes in the tropics: a review. Small Ruminant Research, 61 (1), 13-28. |
[11] | Chagunda, M. H. G., & Wollny, C. B. 2003. Conserving and managing the biodiversity of Malawian farm animal genetic resources: A case of Malawi zebucattle. University of Malawi. |
[12] | Gjedrem, T., &Baranski, M. 2010. Selective breeding in aquaculture: an introduction (Vol. 10). Springer Science & Business Media. |
[13] | Purdom, C. E. 1992. Genetics and fish breeding (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media. |
[14] | Wollny, C. B. 2003. The need to conserve farm animal genetic resources in Africa: should policy makers be concerned?. Ecological Economics, 45 (3), 341-351. |
[15] | Chagunda, M. H. G., and Clemens BA Wollny. "Conserving and managing the biodiversity of Malawian farm animal genetic resources: A case of Malawi zebu cattle." University of Malawi, 2003. |
[16] | Clay, A. M. 2007. The causation of reproductive synchrony in the wildebeest (Connochaetestaurinus). George Mason University. |
[17] | Kubbinga, B., Hoffmann, I., &Scherf, B. 2007. Passing on the fire-To further inspire people to contribute to the management of animal genetic resources. Animal Genetic Resources Information, 41, 1-7. |
[18] | Coleman, W. D. (1988). Business and politics: A study of collective action. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP. |
[19] | FAO, 2007 Guide lines for the In Vivo Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources (Draft). |
[20] | Noss, R. F., O'Connell, M., & Murphy, D. D. 1997. The science of conservation planning: habitat conservation under the Endangered Species Act. Island Press. |
[21] | Pimm, Stuart L., H. Lee Jones, and Jared Diamond. "On the risk of extinction." The American Naturalist 132.6 (1988): 757-785. |
[22] | FAO., 2012. Guidelines Cryoconservation of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 12. Rome. |
[23] | FAO. 1991a. Training manual for embryo transfer in cattle, by G. E. Seidel, Jr. & S. Moore Seidel. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 77. Rome (available at http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/T0117E/T0117E00.htm). |
[24] | Watson, P. F. 1978. A review of techniques of sperm collection in mammals. Symposium of theZoology Society of London, 43: 97–126. |
[25] | Colembrander, B., Gadella, B., Feitsma, H. & Woelders, H. 2000. Semen quality assessment, present and future. Boar Semen Preservation IV, pp. 35–42. Lawrence, USA, Allen Press Inc. |
[26] | Burrows, W. H. & Quinn, J. P. 1935. A method of obtaining spermatozoa from the domesticfowl. Poultry Science, 14: 251–254. |
[27] | Guerrero, C. A., Gentry, G. T., Saenz, J., & Godke, R. A. 2009. Birth of calves after artificialinsemination with cryopreserved bovine caudal epididymal spermatozoa harvested from apostmortem bull. Reproduction Fertility Development, 21: 105–106. |
[28] | Hasler, John F. 2014 "Forty years of embryo transfer in cattle: A review focusing on the journal Theriogenology, the growth of the industry in North America, and personal reminisces." Theriogenology 81.1 152-169. |
[29] | FAO. 1993. Manuel de formation pratiquepour la transplantation embryonnaire chez la brebiset la chevre, by G. Baril, P. Brebion& P. Chesne. FAO Animal Production and Health PaperNo. 115. Rome. |
[30] | Baldassarre, H., &Karatzas, C. N. 2004. Advanced assisted reproduction technologies (ART) in goats. Animal Reproduction Science, 82, 255-266. |
[31] | Akingboye, A. A. 2012. Elucidating the Biological Role of Autologous Derived Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel in the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers (Doctoral dissertation, Queen Mary University of London). |
[32] | FAO. 1991a. Training manual for embryo transfer in cattle, by G. E. Seidel, Jr. & S. Moore Seidel. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 77. Rome (available at http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/T0117E/T0117E00.htm). |
[33] | Kwong, P. J. 2012. Development of intra-and interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer protocols using ear fibroblast cells as donor karyoplasts for production of cloned caprine embryos/KwongPhekJin (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya). |
[34] | FAO. 1993. Manuel de formation pratiquepour la transplantation embryonnaire chez la brebiset la chevre, by G. Baril, P. Brebion& P. Chesne. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 115. Rome. |
[35] | FAO. 1999. The management of global animal genetic resources. Proceedings of an FAO Expert Consultation, Roma. |
[36] | Koehler-Rollefson, I., & Meyer, H. 2014. Access and Benefit-sharing of Animal Genetic Resources Using the Nagoya Protocol as a Framework for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Locally Adapted Livestock Breeds. ABS Capacity Development Initiative-implemented by the Deutsche Gesells chaftfür International eZusammenarbeit. |
[37] | FAO. 2007. Introduction. Utilisation and conservation of farm animal genetic resources, 13-27. |
[38] | Watson, P., & Holt, W. V. (Eds.). 2001. Cryobanking the genetic resource: Wildlife conservation for the future?. CRC Press. |
[39] | ChagundaM. H. G., &Wollny, C. B. 2003. Conserving and managing the biodiversity of Malawian farm animal genetic resources: A case of Malawi zebu cattle. University of Malawi. |
APA Style
Habtamu Alebachew, Diba Dedecha, Yosef Tadesse. (2017). Utilization, Collection and Conservation of Animal Genetics Resources in Relation to Indigenous Breeds. World Journal of Food Science and Technology, 1(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13
ACS Style
Habtamu Alebachew; Diba Dedecha; Yosef Tadesse. Utilization, Collection and Conservation of Animal Genetics Resources in Relation to Indigenous Breeds. World J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 1(1), 15-21. doi: 10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13
@article{10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13, author = {Habtamu Alebachew and Diba Dedecha and Yosef Tadesse}, title = {Utilization, Collection and Conservation of Animal Genetics Resources in Relation to Indigenous Breeds}, journal = {World Journal of Food Science and Technology}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {15-21}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjfst.20170101.13}, abstract = {Indigenous breeds provide the necessary Genetic diversity needed by modern agriculture as a Means to ensure stability and are vital building blocks for future livestock breeding programmers. Farm Animal Genetic Resources (FAnGR) conservation, Collection and processing procedures which different widely depending upon the type of germplasm being collected and the donor species. Due to indigenous FAnGR carry genes that enable them to tolerate harsh environments, cope with thorny vegetation in drought-prone areas, walk long distance and repel attacks by diseases and pests. However, these animal resources are constantly being eroded and are nearing extinction. Conservation is an action to ensure that the diversity of farm animal genetic material is being maintained for contribution to food production, Two methods for the conservation of animal genetic resources In-situ conservation refers to conservation of livestock through continued use by livestock keepers in the production system in which the livestock evolved or are now normally found and Ex-situ (in vivo conservation): Effective conservation of genetic resources is possible only if the breeds are identified and documented adequately. Therefore conservation of FAnGR is useful for the sustainable utilization of genetic resources under different production environment and production system. In this regard, valuation of local breeds should consider their major contribution to risk management under the prevailing hard and fluctuating environmental conditions.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Utilization, Collection and Conservation of Animal Genetics Resources in Relation to Indigenous Breeds AU - Habtamu Alebachew AU - Diba Dedecha AU - Yosef Tadesse Y1 - 2017/06/22 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13 T2 - World Journal of Food Science and Technology JF - World Journal of Food Science and Technology JO - World Journal of Food Science and Technology SP - 15 EP - 21 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-6024 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20170101.13 AB - Indigenous breeds provide the necessary Genetic diversity needed by modern agriculture as a Means to ensure stability and are vital building blocks for future livestock breeding programmers. Farm Animal Genetic Resources (FAnGR) conservation, Collection and processing procedures which different widely depending upon the type of germplasm being collected and the donor species. Due to indigenous FAnGR carry genes that enable them to tolerate harsh environments, cope with thorny vegetation in drought-prone areas, walk long distance and repel attacks by diseases and pests. However, these animal resources are constantly being eroded and are nearing extinction. Conservation is an action to ensure that the diversity of farm animal genetic material is being maintained for contribution to food production, Two methods for the conservation of animal genetic resources In-situ conservation refers to conservation of livestock through continued use by livestock keepers in the production system in which the livestock evolved or are now normally found and Ex-situ (in vivo conservation): Effective conservation of genetic resources is possible only if the breeds are identified and documented adequately. Therefore conservation of FAnGR is useful for the sustainable utilization of genetic resources under different production environment and production system. In this regard, valuation of local breeds should consider their major contribution to risk management under the prevailing hard and fluctuating environmental conditions. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -